Fluid-solid coupling model of micro-jet impact from acoustic cavitation bubble collapses near a wall and pit inversion analysis

YE Linzheng; ZHU Xijing; WANG Jianqing

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2018-0118

Volume 39 Issue 6

Jun. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2019 > 39(6): 062201

YE Linzheng, ZHU Xijing, WANG Jianqing. Fluid-solid coupling model of micro-jet impact from acoustic cavitation bubble collapses near a wall and pit inversion analysis[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(6): 062201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0118

Citation:

YE Linzheng, ZHU Xijing, WANG Jianqing. Fluid-solid coupling model of micro-jet impact from acoustic cavitation bubble collapses near a wall and pit inversion analysis[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(6): 062201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0118

Citation:

PDF( 1242 KB)

Fluid-solid coupling model of micro-jet impact from acoustic cavitation bubble collapses near a wall and pit inversion analysis

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0118

School of Mechanical Engineering, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, Shanxi, China

Received Date: 2018-04-10
Rev Recd Date: 2018-05-03
Publish Date: 2019-06-01

Abstract

Abstract

Bubble collapse near a wall will generate strong micro-jet in a liquid environment under ultrasonic field. To explore the fluid-solid coupling effect of micro-jet impinging on a wall, hydrodynamics and impact dynamics were employed, and the J-C rate correlation material constitutive model was applied, then a three-dimensional fluid-solid coupling model of micro-jet impact on a wall was established and analyzed numerically based on the Euler-Lagrange coupling method. Finally, an ultrasonic cavitation test and inversion analysis based on the theory of the spherical indentation test were conducted for validation. Pit depth is decided jointly by micro-jet velocity and micro-jet diameter, and increases with their increases, while the ratio of diameter to depth of a pit is negatively correlated with the micro-jet velocity. Wall pressure distribution is mostly symmetric and the maximum pressure appears on the edge of micro-jet impinging. The maximum wall pressure clearly increases with the micro-jet velocity. The increase of the pressure can lead to the increase of the shock wave intensity and velocity in liquid, which can reach 682 MPa and 2 435 m/s, respectively, when the micro-jet velocity is 479 m/s. Micropits appearing on the material surface impacted by micro-jet were demonstrated by ultrasonic cavitation test, and the pits’ ratio of diameter to depth vary from 16 to 68. Inversion analysis results indicate that equivalent stress, equivalent strain of the pit and impact strength, velocity of the micro-jet are closely related with the ratio of diameter to depth of the pit. When it is 16−68, the micro-jet impingement strength is 420−500 MPa, and the corresponding micro-jet velocity is 310−370 m/s. Test and inversion analysis results are consistent with the theoretical analysis, which verifies the rationality and accuracy of a fluid-solid coupling model considering the J-C rate correlation material constitutive model and inversion analysis method. This work provides a theoretical reference for the control of cavitation intensity and micro-jet velocity in the following engineering applications.
- ultrasonic cavitation,
- micro-jet impact,
- fluid-solid coupling,
- inversion analysis

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

[1]	向文英, 李晓红, 卢义玉, 等. 空化射流效应的实验研究 [J]. 中国机械工程, 2006, 17(13): 1388–1391. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-132X.2006.13.016. XIANG Wenying, LI Xiaohong, LU Yiyu, et al. Experimental study of domino effect on cavitating water jet [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2006, 17(13): 1388–1391. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-132X.2006.13.016.
[2]	张阿漫, 姚熊亮. 近边界三维水下爆炸气泡动态特性研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2008, 28(2): 124–130. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)02-0124-07. ZHANG Aman, YAO Xiongliang. On dynamics of an underwater explosion bubble near a boundary [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2008, 28(2): 124–130. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)02-0124-07.
[3]	张阿漫, 姚熊亮. 近自由面水下爆炸气泡的运动规律研究 [J]. 物理学报, 2008, 57(1): 339–353. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3290.2008.01.054. ZHANG Aman, YAO Xiongliang. Law of the underwater explosion bubble motion near free surface [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2008, 57(1): 339–353. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3290.2008.01.054.
[4]	李健, 黄红生, 林贤坤, 等. 基于VOF法的近自由面水下爆炸气泡运动数值模拟 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2016, 36(2): 122–127. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2016.02.003. LI Jian, HUANG Hongsheng, LIN Xiankun, et al. Numerical study on bubble motion by underwater explosion near free surface based on VOF [J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2016, 36(2): 122–127. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2016.02.003.
[5]	郭娅, 唐文勇, 郑绍文, 等. 水下近场爆炸冲击波与射流载荷联合作用分析方法 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(20): 26–30. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.20.006. GUO Ya, TANG Wenyong, ZHENG Shaowen, et al. Simulation method for the combined effect of underwater near-field shock wave and jet load [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(20): 26–30. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.20.006.
[6]	沈壮志, 林书玉. 声场中水力空化泡的动力学特性 [J]. 物理学报, 2011, 60(08): 385–394. DOI: 10.7498/aps.60.084302. SHEN Zhuangzhi, LIN Shuyu. Dynamical behaviors of hydrodynamic cavitation bubble under ultrasound field [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2011, 60(08): 385–394. DOI: 10.7498/aps.60.084302.
[7]	郭策, 祝锡晶, 王建青, 等. 超声场下刚性界面附近溃灭空化气泡的速度分析 [J]. 物理学报, 2016, 65(4): 180–187. DOI: 10.7498/aps.65.044304. GUO Ce, ZHU Xijing, WANG Jianqing, et al. Velocity analysis for collapsing cavitation bubble near a rigid wall under an ultrasound field [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2016, 65(4): 180–187. DOI: 10.7498/aps.65.044304.
[8]	TAKAKUWA O, NISHIKAWA M, SOYAMA H. Estimation of the depth of surface modification layer induced by cavitation peening [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2012, 212(8): 1716–1722. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.03.010.
[9]	FRANC J P, RIONDET M, KARIMI A, et al. Material and velocity effects on cavitation erosion pitting [J]. Wear, 2012, 274: 248–259. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2011.09.006.
[10]	KORNFELD M, SUVOROV L. On the destructive action of cavitation [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1944, 15(6): 495–506. DOI: 10.1063/1.1707461.
[11]	GREGORČIČ P, PETKOVŠEK R, MOŽINA J. Investigation of a cavitation bubble between a rigid boundary and a free surface [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2007, 102(9): 21–23. DOI: 10.1063/1.2805645.
[12]	PLESSET M S, CHAPMAN R B. Collapse of an initially spherical vapour cavity in the neighbourhood of a solid boundary [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1971, 47(2): 283–290. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112071001058.
[13]	DULAR M. Hydrodynamic cavitation damage in water at elevated temperatures [J]. Wear, 2016, s346–347: 78–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2015.11.007.
[14]	TZANAKIS I, ESKIN D G, GEORGOULAS A, et al. Incubation pit analysis and calculation of the hydrodynamic impact pressure from the implosion of an acoustic cavitation bubble [J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2014, 21(2): 866–878. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.10.003.
[15]	REUTER F, METTIN R. Mechanisms of single bubble cleaning [J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2015, 29: 550–562. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.06.017.
[16]	SOYAMA H, TAKEO F. Comparison between cavitation peening and shot peening for extending the fatigue life of a duralumin plate with a hole [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2016, 227: 80–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.08.012.
[17]	DULAR M, STOFFEL B, ŠIROK B. Development of a cavitation erosion model [J]. Wear, 2006, 261(5–6): 642–655. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2006.01.020.
[18]	LI R, NINOKATA H, MORI M. A numerical study of impact force caused by liquid droplet impingement onto a rigid wall [J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2011, 53(7): 881–885. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2011.03.002.
[19]	LI N, ZHOU Q, CHEN X, et al. Liquid drop impact on solid surface with application to water drop erosion on turbine blades, Part I: Nonlinear wave model and solution of one-dimensional impact [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2008, 50(10): 1526–1542. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.08.001.
[20]	CARNELLI D, KARIMI A, FRANC J P. Evaluation of the hydrodynamic pressure of cavitation impacts from stress–strain analysis and geometry of individual pits [J]. Wear, 2012, 289(5): 104–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.04.009.
[21]	王艳辉. 1060铝搅拌摩擦焊温度场数值模拟 [D]. 苏州: 江苏科技大学, 2012: 24−25.
[22]	CARNELLI D, KARIMI A, FRANC J P. Application of spherical nanoindentation to determine the pressure of cavitation impacts from pitting tests [J]. Journal of Materials Research, 2012, 27(1): 91–99. DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2011.259.
[23]	ROY S C, FRANC J P, PELLONE C, et al. Determination of cavitation load spectra – Part 1: Static finite element approach [J]. Wear, 2015, s 344–345: 110–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2015.09.006.
[24]	FRANCIS H A. Phenomenological analysis of plastic spherical indentation [J]. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology Transactions of the Asme, 1976, 98(3): 272–281. DOI: 10.1115/1.3443378.
[25]	GRANT M M, LUSH P A. Liquid impact on a bilinear elastic-plastic solid and its role in cavitation erosion [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 176: 237–252. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112087000648.
[26]	CHEN H, LI J, CHEN D, et al. Damages on steel surface at the incubation stage of the vibration cavitation erosion in water [J]. Wear, 2008, 265(5–6): 692–698. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2007.12.011.
[27]	PETKOVSEK R, GREGORCIC P. A laser probe measurement of cavitation bubble dynamics improved by shock wave detection and compared to shadow photography [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2007, 102(4): 044909–044909. DOI: 10.1063/1.2774000.
[28]	ROBERTO G A S, SONG C, CLAUS-DIETER O. Fast transient microjets induced by hemispherical cavitation bubbles [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2015, 767: 31–51. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2015.33.
[29]	FUTAKAWA M, NAOE T, KOGAWA H, et al. Micro-impact damage caused by mercury bubble collapse [J]. JSME International Journal, 2005, 48(4): 234–239. DOI: 10.1299/jsmea.48.234.

Relative Articles

[1]	YANG Tengteng, GONG Li, DONG Zhouquan, DU Yunfei, CUI Yue. Dynamic response of flowing ice colliding with a sluice pier under hydrodynamic action[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(12): 123901. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0113
[2]	ZHANG Wenhao, YU Yonggang. Analysis of gas-eroding barrel characteristics based on fluid-solid interaction[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(3): 034201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0390
[3]	ZHOU Lang, XU Chunguang. An algorithm for building structural damage under the effect of shock wave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(10): 104201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0415
[4]	SI Peng, QIU Ming, LIAO Zhenqiang, SONG Jie, MA Longxu. Numerical simulation of two-phase flow in a side spray gun considering piston reset motion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 084201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0252
[5]	ZHANG Hetao, NING Jianguo, XU Xiangzhao, MA Tianbao. A strong coupling prediction-correction immersed boundary method[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(9): 094201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0129
[6]	GAO Yingjie, SUN Tiezhi, ZHANG Guiyong, YOU Tianqing, YIN Zhihong, ZONG Zhi. Flow characteristics and structure response of high-speed oblique water-entry for a revolution body[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(12): 123301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0014
[7]	MIAO Fuxing, WANG Hui, WANG Lili, HE Wenming, CHEN Xiabo, GONG Wenbo, DING Yuanyuan, HUAN Shi, XU Chong, XIE Yanqing, LU Yicheng, SHEN Lijun. Relationship between the blood-vessel coupling characteristics and the propagation of pulse waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(4): 041101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0082
[8]	LI Zhijie, YOU Xiaochuan, LIU Zhanli, DU Zhibo, ZHANG Yi, YANG Ce, ZHUANG Zhuo. Numerical simulation of the mechanism of traumatic brain injury induced by blast shock waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(1): 015901. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0348
[9]	HUANG Zhigang, SUN Tiezhi, YANG Biye, ZHANG Guiyong, ZONG Zhi. Numerical analysis on structural strength of a cone-shaped flatted revolution body during high-speed water-entry[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(4): 043201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0330
[10]	CHEN Xiaokun, LI Haitao, WANG Qiuhong, JIN Yongfei, DENG Jun, ZHANG Yanni. Antiknock analysis and structure optimization for coal mine cylindrical shell refuge capsule under gas explosion load[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(1): 124-132. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0248
[11]	CHEN Yang, WU Liang, ZENG Guowei, ZHOU Junru. Numerical analysis of the water entry process of a projectile with a circular airbag[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1155-1164. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0387
[12]	Jian Guozuo, Zeng Qingxuan, Guo Junfeng, Li Bing, Li Mingyu. Simulation of flyers driven by detonation of copper azide[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(2): 248-252. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)02-0248-05
[13]	Liu Yun-long, Wang Yu, Zhang A-man. Whipping responses of double cylindrical shell structures to underwater explosion based on DAA₂[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(6): 691-700. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)06-0691-10
[14]	Guo Pan, Wu Wen-hua, Liu Jun, Wu Zhi-gang. Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction in defect-contained charge of solid rocket motor subjected to shock waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(1): 93-98.
[15]	ZhouJie, TaoGang, PanBao-qing, ZhangHong-we. Mechanismofblasttraumatohumanthorax:Afiniteelementstudy[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(3): 315-321. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)03-0315-06
[16]	ZHOU Jie, TAO Gang, WANG Jian. Numericalsimulationoflunginjuryinducedbyshockwave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4): 418-422. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)04-0418-05
[17]	GUO Jun, YANG Wen-shan, YAO Xiong-liang, ZAHNG A-man, REN Shao-fei. Underwaterexplosioncalculationwithafieldseparationtechnique[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(3): 295-299. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)03-0295-05
[18]	CAO Yuan, JIN Xian-long, LI Zheng. Dynamicanalysisofflexiblecontainersunderimpact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(5): 469-474. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)05-0469-06
[19]	WANG Jian, ZHAO Qing-bin, TAO Gang, WU Jun-ji. Numericalsimulationonrocketsledwater-brake high-speedwater-entryimpact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(6): 628-632. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)06-0628-05
[20]	LIAO Hua-lin, LI Gen-sheng. Influences of the pore-fluid coupling effect on impact stress in rocks impacted by water jets[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(1): 84-90. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)01-0084-07

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

1.	杜先荣，尹建勇，张永学，田磊，马明凯. 基于OpenFOAM的缺陷壁面附近空化泡动力学过程模拟. 水利水电科技进展. 2025(01): 39-46 .
2.	王宁，祁杰，张子轩，王飞龙，孙荣伟，邵志豪，陆文卿. 基于空化水射流的有机污水净化循环系统研究——以第十八届“挑战杯”全国大学生课外学术科技作品竞赛参赛作品“水净有方”为例. 创新创业理论研究与实践. 2024(07): 172-178 .
3.	许磊，张翼，徐春龙，宋猛，庞浩宇，张宇，唐诗泽，雷丽军. 某柴油喷油嘴新冲蚀寿命预测模型及瞬态特性数值模拟. 表面技术. 2023(01): 121-131+177 .
4.	王明环，吕明，何凯磊，郑劲松，许雪峰. 超声辅助微细电解加工间隙空化微射流对材料蚀除的影响. 兵工学报. 2023(08): 2368-2380 .
5.	刘送永，商港，李洪盛. 水下跨介质射流破岩性能试验研究. 煤炭学报. 2022(04): 1723-1733 .
6.	黄志超，涂林鹏，刘举平，黄薇，韩志利. 超声波清洗技术及设备研究进展. 华东交通大学学报. 2020(03): 1-9 .