Experimental study on explosion pressure variation law of coal dust with different degrees of metamorphism

LIU Tianqi; LI Yucheng; LUO Hongbo

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2018-0265

Volume 39 Issue 9

Sep. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2019 > 39(9): 095403

LIU Tianqi, LI Yucheng, LUO Hongbo. Experimental study on explosion pressure variation law of coal dust with different degrees of metamorphism[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 095403. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0265

Citation:

LIU Tianqi, LI Yucheng, LUO Hongbo. Experimental study on explosion pressure variation law of coal dust with different degrees of metamorphism[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 095403. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0265

Citation:

PDF( 3041 KB)

Experimental study on explosion pressure variation law of coal dust with different degrees of metamorphism

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0265

1.
College of Safety Engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang 110136, Liaoning, China
2.
College of Safety Science and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, Liaoning, China

Received Date: 2018-07-18
Rev Recd Date: 2018-09-18
Publish Date: 2019-09-01

Abstract

Abstract

In order to study the variation law of coal dust explosion pressure with different metamorphic degrees, the maximum pressure p_max and maximum pressure rise rate (dp/dt)_max are characterized. The variation of explosion pressure characteristics of lignite, long flame coal, non-coking coal and gas coal is investigated by using a near-spherical coal dust explosion device. It is found that, among the selected coal dust samples, lignite has the largest p_max and (dp/dt)_max, up to 0.71 MPa and 65.69 MPa/s, respectively. With the increase of metamorphism, the p_max and (dp/dt)_max of long-flame coal, non-coking coal and gas coal are significantly reduced. Characterizing the explosion intensity by the explosion pressure characteristics, the four coal dust explosion strengths are then ranked from lignite, long flame coal, non-coking coal to gas coal. By comparing the volatile matter content of coal dust before and after the explosion, it is concluded that the proportion of volatile matter involved in the explosion is 46.28%−68.19%. At dispersion pressure p₀=2.0 MPa and ignition delay time t₀=100 ms, the p_max values of the four types of coal dust reach the maximum 0.71, 0.60, 0.55 and 0.47 MPa, respectively. However, lignite, non-viscous coal and gas coal have the highest (dp/dt)_max at p₀=2.0 MPa and t₀=80 ms, while long-flame coal reaches the maximum (dp/dt)_max at p₀=2.0 MPa and t₀=100 ms. The results are of significance for mastering explosion pressure characteristics under different test conditions.
- explosion of coal dust,
- pressure characteristic,
- pressure of dust injection,
- ignition delay time

FullText(HTML)

References(14)

References

[1]	金龙哲. 矿井粉尘防治理论 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 17−28.
[2]	毕明树. 气体和粉尘爆炸防治工程学 [M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2012: 19−32.
[3]	景国勋, 杨书召. 煤尘爆炸传播特性的实验研究 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2010, 35(4): 605–608. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2010.04.023. JING Guoxun, YANG Shuzhao. Experimental study on flame propagation characteristic of coal dust explosion [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2010, 35(4): 605–608. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2010.04.023.
[4]	程卫民. 矿井粉尘防治理论与技术 [M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 2016: 9−21.
[5]	宁建国, 王成, 马天宝. 爆炸与冲击动力学 [M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 2010: 31−37.
[6]	司荣军. 矿井瓦斯煤尘爆炸传播规律研究 [D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2007: 8−21.
[7]	ECKHOFF R K. Understanding dust explosions: the role of powder science and technology [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(1): 105–116. DOI: 10.2514/6.1993-427.
[8]	蔡周全, 罗振敏, 程方明. 瓦斯煤尘爆炸传播特性的实验研究 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2009, 34(7): 938–941. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2009.07.020. CAI Zhouquan, LUO Zhenmin, CHENG Fangming. Experimental study on propagation characteristic of gas and coal dust explosion [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2009, 34(7): 938–941. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2009.07.020.
[9]	刘贞堂. 瓦斯煤尘爆炸物证特性参数实验研究 [D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2010: 12−31.
[10]	司荣军. 矿井瓦斯煤尘爆炸传播规律研究 [D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2007: 19−25.
[11]	刘义, 孙金华, 陈东梁. 甲烷-煤尘复合体系中煤尘爆炸下限的实验研究 [J]. 安全与环境学报, 2007, 7(4): 129–131. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2007.04.033. LIU Yi, SUN Jinhua, CHEN Dongliang. Experimental study on the lower limit of coal dust explosion in methane-coal dust composite system [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2007, 7(4): 129–131. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2007.04.033.
[12]	曹卫国, 徐森, 梁济元. 煤粉爆炸过程中火焰的传播特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2014, 34(5): 586–593. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)05-0586-08. CAO Weiguo, XU Sen, LIANG Jiyuan. Flame propagation characteristic of coal dust explosion [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2014, 34(5): 586–593. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)05-0586-08.
[13]	程磊. 受限空间煤尘爆炸冲击波传播衰减规律研究 [D]. 焦作: 河南理工大学, 2011: 41−56.
[14]	煤炭工业部煤炭科学研究总院. 粉尘云最大爆炸压力和最大压力上升速率测定方法: GBTT 16426-1996 [S]. 北京: 中国煤炭工业部, 1996.

Relative Articles

[1]	GU Zhuowei, ZHOU Zhongyu, ZHAO Xincai, LU Yu, ZHANG Xuping, CHENG Cheng, ZHAO Juan, CHEN Guanghua, WU Gang, TAN Fuli, ZHAO Jianheng, SUN Chengwei. Experiment study of cascades explosive implosion magnetic flux generator[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(2): 021201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0183
[2]	SUN Chengwei, LU Yu, ZHAO Jibo, LUO Binqiang, GU Zhuowei, WANG Guiji, ZHANG Xuping, CHEN Xuemiao, ZHOU Zhongyu, LI Mu, YUAN Hong, ZHANG Hongping, WANG Ganghua, SUN Qizhi, WEN Shanggang, TAN Fuli, ZHAO Jianheng, MO Jianjun, CAI Jintao, JIN Yunsheng, HE Jia, CHONG Tao, ZHAO Xiaoming, LIU Cangli. SSS-MHD: a one-dimensional magneto-hydrodynamics multi-physics simulation platform for magnetically-driven high-energy-density dynamics experiments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(10): 104201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0127
[3]	PAN Xintong, LUO Binqiang, ZHANG Xuping, PENG Hui, CHEN Xuemiao, WANG Guiji, TAN Fuli, ZHAO Jianheng, SUN Chengwei. Uncertainty quantification of magnetically driven quasi-isentropic compression experiments based on the Monte Carlo method[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(3): 031101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0408
[4]	WANG Guiji, LUO Binqiang, CHEN Xuemiao, ZHANG Xuping, CHONG Tao, CAI Jintao, TAN Fuli, SUN Chengwei. Recent progress on the experimental facilities, techniques and applications of magnetically driven quasi-isentropic compression[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(12): 121403. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0119
[5]	KAN Mingxian, WANG Ganghua, XIAO Bo, DUAN Shuchao, ZHANG Zhaohui. Simulation on magnetically-driven one-sided flyer plate experiments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(3): 033304. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0103
[6]	LIU Xuezhe, LIN Zhong, WANG Ruili, YU Yunlong. A constructed method of manufactured solutions and code verification for 2D Lagrangian radiation hydrodynamic equations[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(1): 014201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0199
[7]	CHEN Zibo, XIE Puchu, LIU Dongsheng, CHEN Wei, WANG Yonggang. Quasi-isentropic compression technique based on generalized wave impedance gradient flyer[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(4): 041406. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0407
[8]	Liu Na, Chen Yibing. High order spectral volume method for multi-component flows[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(1): 114-119. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)01-0114-06
[9]	Zhao Jibo, Sun Chengwei, Gu Zhuowei, Wang Guiji, Cai Jintao. Magnetic hydrodynamic calculation on planar and cylindrical configurations[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(1): 9-16. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)01-0009-08
[10]	WangGang-hua, ZhongMin, ZhaoJian-heng, ZhangHong-ping, FanRui-feng. Quasi-isentropiccompressiontechniquesdrivenbydetonationproducts withacavityanddataprocessing[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(6): 620-624. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)06-0620-05
[11]	WANG Gang-hua, KAN Ming-xian, WANG Gui-ji, ZHANG Chao-hui, . Loaddesignformagneticallydrivenflyerexperiment[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(5): 547-550. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)05-0547-04
[12]	ZHANG Hong-ping, LI Mu, ZHAO Jian-heng, SUN Cheng-wei, ZHU Wen-jun. Numericalanalysisofquasi-isentropiccompressionofRDX(210)crystal[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(3): 274-278. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)03-0274-05
[13]	WANG Gang-hua, SUN Cheng-wei, WANG Gui-ji, ZHAO Jian-heng, TAN Fu-li, HU Xi-jing. Backward analysis for isentropic compression experiments with windows backed on samples[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(1): 101-104. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)01-0101-04
[14]	WANG Gang-hua, SUN Cheng-wei, ZHAO Jian-heng, HU Xi-jing, JIANG Ji-hao. One-dimensional, magnetohydrodynamic simulations of magnetically driven flyer plates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(3): 261-264. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)03-0261-04