Numerical simulation on characteristics of impinging air flow propagationand CO formation in lignite explosion

LIU Tianqi

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2018-0297

Volume 39 Issue 10

Oct. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2019 > 39(10): 105401

LIU Tianqi. Numerical simulation on characteristics of impinging air flow propagationand CO formation in lignite explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(10): 105401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0297

Citation:

LIU Tianqi. Numerical simulation on characteristics of impinging air flow propagationand CO formation in lignite explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(10): 105401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0297

Citation:

PDF( 3930 KB)

Numerical simulation on characteristics of impinging air flow propagationand CO formation in lignite explosion

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0297

LIU Tianqi

College of Safety Engineering, Shenyang Aerospace University, Shenyang 110136, Liaoning, China

Received Date: 2018-08-13
Rev Recd Date: 2018-11-02
Publish Date: 2019-10-01

Abstract

Abstract

In this paper we established a horizontal pipeline geometric model based on the horizontal pipeline coal dust explosion experimental device to study the characteristics of impinging airflow and CO gas generation during lignite explosion, and constructed the mathematical model of the coal-dust explosion dynamic propagation according to the 1∶1 ratio, with the characteristics of the airflow propagation and CO generation simulated. The results verified the reliability of the simulation by comparing the simulated and measured values of the lignite explosion flame propagation distance at different times. The spatial region is divided by the simulated velocity of the impinging airflow: z=0−0.10 m is the initial dusting zone, z=0.10−0.42 m is the impact airflow velocity jump zone, and z=0.42−0.98 m is the high velocity propagation zone of the impinging airflow. z=0.98−1.40 m is the impinging airflow buffer. The farther away from the centers of the z=0.20 m and z=0.40 m cross-sections, the greater the velocity of the impinging airflow, resulting from the " wall effect” of the fluid flow. The void ratio near the wall is larger than that in the inside of the fluid, and the resistance is weak when flowing. Therefore, the impinging airflow exhibits a relatively greater flow velocity near the wall. The simulation of the formation of CO gas products shows that z=0.30−0.60 m in the tube is the spatial range with the highest CO mass fraction, and the local maximum is 0.024%−0.026%. At z＞0.70 m, the particles were subjected to the gravity, and the high-temperature gas generated by the explosion was subjected to the buoyancy, resulting in a tendency of the CO gas product to sink.
- explosion of coal dust,
- impinging airflow,
- CO toxic gas product,
- lignite

FullText(HTML)

References(17)

References

[1]	金龙哲.矿井粉尘防治理论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 33−35.
[2]	景国勋, 杨书召. 煤尘爆炸传播特性的实验研究 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2010, 35(4): 605–608. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2010. 04.023. JING Guoxun, YANG Shuzhao. Experimental study on flame propagation characteristic of coal dust explosion [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2010, 35(4): 605–608. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2010. 04.023.
[3]	毕明树.气体和粉尘爆炸防治工程学[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2012: 20−26.
[4]	ABBASI T, ABBASI S A. Dust explosion: cases, causes, consequences, and control [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 140(1): 7–44.
[5]	ECKHOFF R K. Current status and expected future trends in dust explosion research [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2005, 18(4): 225–237.
[6]	司荣军.矿井瓦斯煤尘爆炸传播规律研究[D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2007: 25−37; 1−25.
[7]	ECKHOFF R K. Understanding dust explosions: the role of powder science and technology [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(1): 105–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2008.07.006.
[8]	ELAINE O. Structure and flame speed of dilute and dense layered coal-dust explosions [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2015, 36(4): 214–222.
[9]	PAWEL K, ALEX H. An investigation of the consequences of primary dust explosions in interconnected vessels [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, 137(2): 752–761. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.04.029.
[10]	蔡周全, 罗振敏, 程方明. 瓦斯煤尘爆炸传播特性的实验研究 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2009, 34(7): 938–941. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2009.07.015. CAI Zhouquan, LUO Zhenmin, CHENG Fangming. Experimental study on propagation characteristic of gas and coal dust explosion [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2009, 34(7): 938–941. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9993.2009.07.015.
[11]	刘贞堂.瓦斯煤尘爆炸物证特性参数实验研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学, 2010: 12-28.
[12]	刘义, 孙金华, 陈东梁. 甲烷-煤尘复合体系中煤尘爆炸下限的实验研究 [J]. 安全与环境学报, 2007, 7(4): 129–131. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2007.04.033. LIU Yi, SUN Jinhua, CHEN Dongliang. Experimental study on the lower limit of coal dust explosion in methane-coal dust composite system [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2007, 7(4): 129–131. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2007.04.033.
[13]	曹卫国, 徐森, 梁济元. 煤粉爆炸过程中火焰的传播特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2014, 34(5): 586–593. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)05-0586-08. CAO Weiguo, XU Sen, LIANG Jiyuan. Flame propagation characteristic of coal dust explosion [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2014, 34(5): 586–593. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)05-0586-08.
[14]	程磊. 受限空间煤尘爆炸冲击波传播衰减规律研究[D]. 焦作: 河南理工大学, 2011: 41−49.
[15]	周力行. 湍流两相流动与燃烧的数值模拟[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 1991: 19−38.
[16]	FAUNDEZ J, ARENILLAS A, RUBIERA F. Ignition behavior of different rank coals in an entrained flow reactor [J]. Fuel, 2005, 84(17): 2172–2177. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.03.028.
[17]	刘建, 姚海飞, 金龙哲. 基于罗森-拉姆勒分布函数的粉尘分散度分析 [J]. 北京科技大学学报, 2010, 32(9): 1101–1106. DOI: 10.13374/j.issn1001-053x.2010.09.001. LIU Jian, YAO Haifei, JIN Longzhe. Dust dispersion analysis based on Rosen-Rammler distribution function [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Science and Technology, 2010, 32(9): 1101–1106. DOI: 10.13374/j.issn1001-053x.2010.09.001.

Relative Articles

[1]	YUAN Shuai, TAI Feng, QIAN Xinming, CHENG Donghao. Prediction methods for lower explosion limit of thermal runaway products of lithium-iron phosphate batteries[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2025, 45(2): 021434. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0452
[2]	JIAO Junjie, SHAN Feng, WANG Hancheng, QI Yanjie, PAN Xuchao, FANG Zhong, CHENG Yubo, HE Xiaolan, CI Shengjie, HE Yong. Determination of JWL equation of state based on the detonation product from underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0203
[3]	ZHONG Feixiang, ZHENG Ligang, MA Hongyan, DU Depeng, WANG Xi, PAN Rongkun. A study of explosion dynamics of a CH₄/O₂/CO₂ premixed system[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(1): 012101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0191
[4]	CHENG Fangming, NAN Fan, XIAO Yang, LUO Zhenmin, NIU Qiaoxia. Experimental study on the suppression of methane-air explosion by CF₃I and CO₂[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(6): 065402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0386
[5]	GUO Jiaqi, PEI Bei, XU Mengjiao, LI Shiliang, WEI Shuangming, HU Ziwei. Coupling effect of fuel property parameters on gas/coal dust composite explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(11): 115402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0300
[6]	ZHANG Wenchao, WANG Shu, LIANG Zengyou, QIN Bin, LU Haitao, CHEN Xinyuan, LU Wenjie. A study of blast wave protection efficiency of helmet based on air flow field pressure analysis[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(11): 113201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0411
[7]	ZHOU Yonghao, GAN Bo, JIANG Haipeng, HUANG Lei, GAO Wei. Investigations on the flame propagation characteristics in methane and coal dust hybrid explosions[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(1): 015402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0064
[8]	YANG Chenchen, LI Xiaojie, YAN Honghao, WANG Xiaohong, WANG Yuxin. An inverse method for the equation of state of detonation products from underwater explosion tests[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 092201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0210
[9]	PEI Bei, WEI Shuangming, CHEN Liwei, PAN Rongkun, WANG Yan, YU Minggao, LI Jie. Effect of CO₂-ultrafine water mist on initial explosion characteristics of CH₄/Air[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(2): 025402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0147
[10]	LIU Tianqi, LI Yucheng, LUO Hongbo. Experimental study on explosion pressure variation law of coal dust with different degrees of metamorphism[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 095403. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0265
[11]	LI Runzhi. Minimum explosive concentration of coal dust cloud in the coexistence of gas and coal dust[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 913-917. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0331
[12]	Yi Xiangyu, Zhu Yujian, Yang Jiming. Early-stage deformation of liquid drop in shock induced high-speed flow[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(5): 853-862. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)05-0853-10
[13]	Zhang Yingxin, Wu Qiang, Liu Chuanhai, Jiang Bingyou, Zhang Baoyong. Experimental study on coal mine gas explosion suppression with inert gas N₂/CO₂[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(5): 906-912. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)05-0906-07
[14]	Liu Zhentang, Lin Song, Zhao Enlai, Zhang Songshan, Guo Rulin. Characteristics of space-time variations of coal dust residues from explosion in a horizontal pipe[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 237-242. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0237-06
[15]	Li Yucheng, Liu Tianqi, Zhou Xihua. An energy prediction model for coal dust explosion based on dimensional analysis[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 566-570. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0566-05
[16]	Gao Wei, Abe Shuntaro, Rong Jian-zhong, Dobashi Ritsu. Effect of airflow characteristics on flame structure for following lycopodium dust-air mixtures in a long horizontal tube[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(3): 372-379. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455-(2015)03-0372-08
[17]	QIAN Hai-lin, WANG Zhi-rong, JIANG Jun-cheng. InfluenceofN2/CO2 mixtureonmethaneexplosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4): 445-448. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)04-0445-04
[18]	LI Run-zhi. Numericalsimulationofcoaldustexplosioninducedbygasexplosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(5): 529-534. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)05-0529-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

1.	聂百胜，张豪，宫婕，彭超，杨龙龙，颜宏伟，何学秋. 煤粉爆炸宏细观四阶段反应机理. 中国矿业大学学报. 2023(06): 1129-1145 .
2.	孙睿成，刘天奇，孙溢阳. 微米级煤尘云最低着火温度特性试验研究. 科技与创新. 2022(17): 7-9 .
3.	刘天奇，田伟业，贾瑞衡，孙睿成. 微米级褐煤粉尘爆炸压力试验研究. 消防科学与技术. 2022(12): 1629-1632 .
4.	陈鹏，安亚军，黄伟岗，孙黎君，何超，刘繁旭，王英俊. 某塔式锅炉异常振动现象及原因分析. 上海电力大学学报. 2021(S1): 17-21 .
5.	刘天奇. 微米级玉米粉尘爆炸能量传播数学模型研究. 数学的实践与认识. 2020(10): 144-149 .
6.	刘天奇，蔡之馨，曲芳，王潇，王宁. 角联空间煤尘爆炸传播特性数值模拟. 消防科学与技术. 2020(12): 1697-1700 .