A multi-component Duan-Zhang-Kim mesoscopic reaction rate model for shock initiation of multi-component PBX explosives

BAI Zhiling; DUAN Zhuoping; WEN Lijing; ZHANG Zhenyu; OU Zhuocheng; HUANG Fenglei

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2018-0410

Volume 39 Issue 11

Nov. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2019 > 39(11): 112101

Xiao Dawu, Qiu Zhicong, Wu Xiangchao, He Lifeng. Compressive deformation behaviors of beryllium[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(2): 285-288. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)02-0285-04

Citation:

BAI Zhiling, DUAN Zhuoping, WEN Lijing, ZHANG Zhenyu, OU Zhuocheng, HUANG Fenglei. A multi-component Duan-Zhang-Kim mesoscopic reaction rate model for shock initiation of multi-component PBX explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(11): 112101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0410

Xiao Dawu, Qiu Zhicong, Wu Xiangchao, He Lifeng. Compressive deformation behaviors of beryllium[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(2): 285-288. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)02-0285-04

Citation:

PDF( 2303 KB)

A multi-component Duan-Zhang-Kim mesoscopic reaction rate model for shock initiation of multi-component PBX explosives

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0410

1.
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2.
Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Beijing 100082, China
3.
Institute of Technical Physics, College of Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, Hunan, China

Received Date: 2018-10-26
Rev Recd Date: 2019-01-10

Available Online: 2019-09-25

Publish Date: 2019-11-01

Abstract

Abstract

This paper offers a new method for calculating the reaction rate of the pore collapse hot-spot ignition in multi-component PBX explosives, and proposes a new mesoscopic reaction rate model capable of describing and predicting the shock initiation and detonation behavior of multi-component PBX explosives with any explosive components proportion as well as any explosive particle size. The pressure-time histories in the explosive samples calculated using this mesoscopic reaction rate model are in good agreement with the experimental data. The shock initiation and detonation process of PBX explosives is mainly controlled by both the hot-spot ignition processes and the combustion reaction processes. The PBXC03 explosive with the dominant component of HMX is mainly controlled by the hot-spot ignition and shows the accelerated reaction characteristics. With the dominant component of insensitive TATB, the critical initiation pressure of PBXC10 is high and the shock initiation behavior is controlled by the combustion reaction process, which shows a stable reaction characteristics.
- shock initiation,
- multi-component PBX explosives,
- mesoscopic reaction rate model,
- reaction rate-time histories

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	BOLTON O, SIMKE L R, PAGORIA P F, et al. High power explosive with good sensitivity: a 2:1 cocrystal of CL-20: HMX [J]. Crystal Growth and Design, 2012, 12(9): 4311–4314. DOI: 10.1021/cg3010882.
[2]	TARVER C M, TRAN T D. Thermal decomposition models for HMX-based plastic bonded explosives [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2004, 137(1/2): 50–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.01.002.
[3]	URTIEW P A, FORBES J W, GARCIA F, et al. Shock Initiation of UF-TATB at 250 ℃ [C] // FURNISH M D, HORIE Y, THADHANI N N. Shock Compression of Condensed Matter-2001. United States: American Institute of Physics, 2002: 1039−1042. DOI: 10.1063/1.1483716.
[4]	AN Chongwei, LI Hequn, YE Baoyun, et al. Preparation and characterization of ultrafine HMX/TATB explosive co-crystals [J]. Central European Journal of Energetic Materials, 2017, 14(4): 876–887. DOI: 10.22211/cejem/77125.
[5]	WANG Z, GUO X, WU F, et al. Preparation of HMX/TATB composite particles using a mechanochemical approach [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2016, 41(2): 327–333. DOI: 10.1002/prep.201500136.
[6]	GREBENKIN K F. Comparative analysis of physical mechanisms of detonation initiation in HMX and in a low-sensitive explosive (TATB) [J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2009, 45(1): 78–87. DOI: 10.1007/s10573-009-0011-y.
[7]	AUSTIN R, BARTON N, HOWARD W, et al. Modeling pore collapse and chemical reactions in shock-loaded HMX crystals [J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2014, 500(5): 052002–052007. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/500/5/052002.
[8]	KAPAHI A. Dynamics of void collapse in shocked energetic materials: physics of void-void interactions [J]. Shock Waves, 2013, 23(6): 537–558. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-013-0439-6.
[9]	OZLEM M, SCHWENDEMAN D W, KAPILA A K, et al. A numerical study of shock-induced cavity collapse [J]. Shock Waves, 2012, 22(2): 89–117. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-011-0352-9.
[10]	TRAN L, UDAYKUMAR H S. Simulation of void collapse in an energetic material: Part 1: inert case [J]. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 2006, 22(5): 947–958. DOI: 10.2514/1.13146.
[11]	ZHOU Tingting, LOU Jianfeng, ZHANG Yangeng, et al. Hot spot formation and chemical reaction initiation in shocked HMX crystals with nanovoids: a large-scale reactive molecular dynamics study [J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2016, 18(26): 17627–17645. DOI: 10.1039/C6CP02015A.
[12]	MASSONI J, SAUREL R, BAUDIN G, et al. A mechanistic model for shock initiation of solid explosives [J]. Physics of Fluids, 1999, 11(3): 710–736. DOI: 10.1063/1.869941.
[13]	SOUERS P C, GARZA R, VITELLO P. Ignition & growth and JWL++ detonation models in coarse zones [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2002, 27(2): 62–71. DOI: 10.1002/1521-4087(200204)27:23.0.CO;2-5.
[14]	STARKENBERG J. Modeling detonation propagation and failure using explosive initiation models in a conventional hydrocode [C] // SHOR J M, MAIENSCHEIN J L. The 12th Symposium (International) on Detonation. USA: Office of Naval Research, 2002: 1001−1007.
[15]	SHAW M S, MENIKOFF R. A reactive burn model for shock initiation in a PBX: scaling and separability based on the hot spot concept [C] // PEIRIS C B S, ASAY B. The 14th Symposium (International) on Detonation. USA: Office of Naval Research, 2010.
[16]	DUAN Zhuoping, WEN Lijing, LIU Yan, et al. A pore collapse model for hot-spot ignition in shocked multi-component explosives [J]. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 2010, 11(S): 19–24. DOI: 10.1515/IJNSNS.2010.11.S1.19.
[17]	KIM K. Development of a model of reaction rates in shocked multicomponent explosives [C] // LEE E L, SHORT J M. The 9th Symposium (International) on Detonation. USA: Office of the Chief of Naval Researche, 1989: 593−603.
[18]	WEN Lijing, DUAN Zhuoping, ZHANG Liansheng, et al. Effects of HMX particle size on the shock initiation of PBXC03 explosive [J]. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 2012, 13(2): 189–194. DOI: 10.1515/ijnsns.2011.129.
[19]	温丽晶. PBX炸药冲击起爆细观反应速率模型研究[D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2011. WEN Lijing. Research on mesoscopic reaction rate model of shock initiation of PBX [D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2011.
[20]	LIU Y R, DUAN Z P, ZHANG Z Y, et al. A mesoscopic reaction rate model for shock initiation of multi-component PBX explosives [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 317: 44–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.052.
[21]	URTIEW P A, TARVER C M. Shock initiation of energetic materials at different initial temperatures: review [J]. Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves, 2005, 41(6): 766–776. DOI: 10.1007/s10573-005-0085-0.
[22]	URTIEW P A, VANDERSALL K S, TARVER C M, et al. Initiation of heated PBX-9501 explosive when exposed to dynamic loading: UCRL-CONF-214667 [R]. United States: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2005.

Relative Articles

[1]	NIU Leilei, WANG Cong, ZHU Wancheng, LUO Ke, TONG Wenhui. Test method of dynamic mechanical properties of filling body based on pendulum-loaded rock bar SHPB device[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(9): 091444. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0433
[2]	ZHANG Mingtao, WANG Wei, WANG Qizhi, ZHANG Siyi. Dynamic failure process and strain-damage evolution law of sandstone based on SHPB experiments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(9): 093102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0288
[3]	LI Shangkun, FENG Xiaowei, XIE Ruoze, ZHANG Fangju, HU Wenjun, XU Weifang, HUANG Xicheng. Dynamic compression property of distill-water ice and impurity-water ice at high strain rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 093103. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0270
[4]	HU Liangliang, HUANG Ruiyuan, GAO Guangfa, JIANG Dong, LI Yongchi. A novel method for determining strain rate of concrete-like materials in SHPB experiment[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(6): 063102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0142
[5]	Li Xianglong, Wang Jianguo, Zhang Zhiyu, Huang Yonghui. Experimental study for effects of strain rates and joint angles on dynamic responses of simulated rock materials[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(4): 483-490. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)04-0483-08
[6]	Lai Fu-wen, Zhang Zhi-jie, Zhang Jian-yu, Li Dong. Processing method of shock wave test data based on dynamic characteristic compensation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 871-875. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0871-05
[7]	ZhaoGuang-ming, XieLi-xiang, MengXiang-rui. Aconstitutivemodelforsoftrockunderimpactload[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(2): 126-132. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)02-0126-07
[8]	Tang Zhi-ping, Zhang Hui-jie. Radial impact responses of cylindrical shells with phase transformation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(1): 47-53. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)01-0047-07
[9]	TAO Jun-lin, QIN Li-bo, LI Kui, LIU Dan, JIA Bin, CHEN Xiao-wei, CHEN Gang. Experimentalinvestigationondynamiccompressionmechanical performanceofconcreteathightemperature[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(1): 101-106. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)01-0101-06
[10]	WANG Yang, LI Yu-long, LIU Chuan-xiong. Dynamicmechanicalbehaviorsoficeathighstrainrates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(2): 215-219. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)02-0215-05
[11]	LI Ji-Cheng, CHEN Xiao-Wei, CHEN Gang. Dynamic deformations of 921A steel pure shear hat-shaped specimen in SHPB tests[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(3): 239-246. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)03-0239-08
[12]	SHANG Bing, HU Shi-sheng, JIANG Xi-quang. Athree-wavecouplingmethodfordatatreatment inSHPBexperimentswithmetalsamples[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(4): 429-432. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)04-0429-04
[13]	TANG Tie-gang, GUI Yu-lin, LI Qing-zhong, CHEN Yong-tao, TONG Hui-feng, LIU Cang-li. Adiscussionofdataprocessingtechniquesforexpandingringtest[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(5): 505-510. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)05-0505-06
[14]	ZHANG Zu-gen, LI Ying-lei, LI Ying-hua, CHEN Xi-meng. Influences of bar/specimen contact surfaces indentation on strain measurement in SHPB experiments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(6): 573-578. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)06-0573-06
[15]	SHANG Bing, SHENG Jing, WANG Bao-zhen, HU Shi-sheng. Dynamic mechanical behavior and constitutive model of stainless steel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(6): 527-531. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)06-0527-05
[16]	WANG Zhi-hua, CAO Xiao-qing, MA Hong-wei, ZHAO Long-mao, YANG Gui-tong. Experimental studies on the dynamic compressive properties of open-celled aluminum alloy foams[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(1): 46-52. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)01-0046-07
[17]	TAO Jun-lin, CHEN Yu-ze, TIAN Chang-jin, CHEN Gang, LI Si-zhong, HUANG Xi-cheng, ZHANG Fang-jü. Investigation of the effect of strain rate history on the stress-strain curves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(1): 80-84. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)01-0080-05
[18]	WANG Li-li, WANG Yong-gang. The important role of stress waves in the study on dynamic constitutive behavior of materials by SHPB[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(1): 17-25. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455（2005）01-0017-09
[19]	SONG Li, HU Shi-sheng. Stress uniformity and constant strain rate in SHPB test[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(3): 207-216. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)03-0207-10
[20]	SONG Li, HU Shi-sheng. Two-wave and three-wave method in SHPB data processing[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(4): 368-373. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)04-0368-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

1.	宋殿义，蒙朝美，谭清华. 基于数值模拟的蜂窝钢管约束混凝土靶抗侵彻机理. 弹道学报. 2024(03): 82-90 .
2.	李萌，武海军，董恒，任光，张鹏，黄风雷. 基于机器学习的混凝土侵彻深度预测模型. 兵工学报. 2023(12): 3771-3782 .