Simulation on magnetically-driven one-sided flyer plate experiments

KAN Mingxian; WANG Ganghua; XIAO Bo; DUAN Shuchao; ZHANG Zhaohui

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2019-0103

Volume 40 Issue 3

Mar. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2020 > 40(3): 033304

KAN Mingxian, WANG Ganghua, XIAO Bo, DUAN Shuchao, ZHANG Zhaohui. Simulation on magnetically-driven one-sided flyer plate experiments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(3): 033304. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0103

Citation:

KAN Mingxian, WANG Ganghua, XIAO Bo, DUAN Shuchao, ZHANG Zhaohui. Simulation on magnetically-driven one-sided flyer plate experiments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(3): 033304. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0103

Citation:

PDF( 1285 KB)

Simulation on magnetically-driven one-sided flyer plate experiments

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0103

Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621999, Sichuan, China

Received Date: 2019-04-01
Rev Recd Date: 2019-11-18

Available Online: 2020-02-25

Publish Date: 2020-03-01

Abstract

Abstract

The numerical simulation of magnetically driven one-sided flyer plate experiment usually does not take into account the influences of cathode motion and ablation width in the thickness direction on the boundary magnetic field. Hence, one-sided computational model was usually applied to simulate magnetically driven one-sided flyer plate experiment. In order to understand the reason why magnetically driven one-sided flyer plate experiment can be simulated by one-sided computational model, magnetically driven one-sided flyer plate experiment (experiment PTS-061 with a 0.972-mm-thick aluminum flyer plate and experiment PTS-064 with a 1.041-mm-thick aluminum flyer plate) were simulated by two-sided computational model. In the experiments with experiment PTS-061 and PTS-064, displacement of thin flyer plate current-loading surface increases with time; displacement of thick cathode current-loading surface does not increases with time, and remains basically unchanged with small displacement in the middle and late stage of experiments. At the end of experiment PTS-061, displacement of thin flyer plate current-loading surface is 4.9 mm, and displacement of thick cathode current-loading surface is only 1.7 mm. At the end of experiment PTS-064, displacement of thin flyer plate current-loading surface is 4.1 mm, and displacement of thick cathode current-loading surface is only 0.9 mm. The reason of one-sided computational model can be adopted in magnetically driven one-sided flyer plate experiment is not that cathode plate position remains unchanged, but instead that cathode current-loading surface has smaller displacement remaining basically unchanged in the middle and later stage of experiments, and the displacement of thin flyer plate current-loading surface has a greater influence on the boundary magnetic field that of thick cathode current-loading surface in the late stage of experiments.
- magnetically driven one-sided flyer plate experiment,
- magneto-hydrodynamics,
- one-sided computational model,
- free-surface velocity

FullText(HTML)

References(19)

References

[1]	KNUDSON M D, LEMKE R W, HAYES D B, et al. Near-absolute Hugoniot measurements in aluminum to 500 GPa using a magnetically accelerated flyer plate technique [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2003, 94(7): 4420–4431. DOI: 10.1063/1.1604967.
[2]	LEMKE R W, KNUDSON M D, BLISS D E, et al. Magnetically accelerated, ultrahigh velocity flyer plates for shock wave experiments [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2005, 98: 073530. DOI: 10.1063/1.2084316.
[3]	KNUDSON M D, HANSON D L, BAILEY J E, et al. Equation of state measurements in liquid Deuterium to 70 GPa [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2001, 87: 225501. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.225501.
[4]	KNUDSON M D, HANSON D L, BAILEY J E, et al. Use of a wave reverberation technique to infer the density compression of shocked liquid deuterium to 75 GPa [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2003, 90: 035505. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.035505.
[5]	KNUDSON M D, HANSON D L, BAILEY J E, et al. Principal Hugoniot, reverberating wave, and mechanical reshock measurements of liquid deuterium to 400 GPa using plate impact techniques [J]. Physical Review B, 2004, 69: 144209. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.144209.
[6]	LEMKE R W, KNUDSON M D, HALL C A, et al. Characterization of magnetically accelerated flyer plates [J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2003, 10(4): 1092–1099. DOI: 10.1063/1.1554740.
[7]	LEMKE R W, KNUDSON M D, DAVIS J P. Magnetically driven hyper-velocity launch capability at the Sandia Z accelerator [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2011, 38(6): 480–485. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.019.
[8]	DAVIS J P, BROWN J L, KNUDSON M D, et al. Analysis of shockless dynamic compression data on solids to multi-megabar pressures: application to tantalum [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2014, 116: 204903. DOI: 10.1063/1.4902863.
[9]	KAN M X, ZHANG Z H, XIAO B, et al. Simulation of magnetically driven flyer plate experiments with an improved magnetic field boundary formula [J]. High Energy Density Physics, 2018, 26: 38–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.hedp.2017.12.002.
[10]	DENG J J, XIE W P, FENG S P, et al. Initial performance of the Primary Test Stand [J]. IEEE TPS, 2013, 41(10): 2580–2583.
[11]	但加坤, 任晓东, 黄显宾, 等. Z箍缩内爆产生的电磁脉冲辐射 [J]. 物理学报, 2013, 62(24): 245201. DOI: 10.7498/aps.62.245201. DAN J K, REN X D, HUANG X B, et al. Electromagnetic pulse emission produced by Z pinch implosions [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2013, 62(24): 245201. DOI: 10.7498/aps.62.245201.
[12]	郭帅, 王贵林, 张朝辉, 等. 聚龙一号装置准等熵压缩实验负载优化研究 [J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2016, 28(1): 015015. DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.015015. GUO S, WANG G L, ZHANG Z H, et al. Optimization of load configurations for isentropic compression experiments on PTS [J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28(1): 015015. DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.015015.
[13]	王贵林, 张朝辉, 郭帅, 等. 聚龙一号装置上铜的准等熵压缩线测量实验研究 [J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2016, 28(5): 055010. DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.055010. WANG G L, ZHANG Z H, GUO S, et al. Experimental measurement of quasi-isentrope for copper on PTS [J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2016, 28(5): 055010. DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB201628.055010.
[14]	阚明先, 蒋吉昊, 王刚华, 等. 套筒内爆ALE方法二维MHD数值模拟 [J]. 四川大学学报, 2007, 44(1): 91–96. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0490-6756.2007.01.020. KAN M X, JIANG J H, WANG G H, et al. ALE simulation 2D MHD for liner [J]. Journal of Sichuan University, 2007, 44(1): 91–96. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0490-6756.2007.01.020.
[15]	阚明先, 王刚华, 赵海龙, 等. 磁驱动飞片二维磁流体力学数值模拟 [J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2013, 25(8): 2137–2141. DOI: 10.3788/HPLPB20132508.2137. KAN M X, WANG G H, ZHAO H L, et al. Two dimensional magneto-hydrodynamic simulations of magnetically accelerated flyer plates [J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2013, 25(8): 2137–2141. DOI: 10.3788/HPLPB20132508.2137.
[16]	杨龙, 王刚华, 阚明先, 等. 基于MDSC程序的Z箍缩内爆单温和三温模拟分析 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2016, 30(1): 64–70. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2016.01.010. YANG L, WANG G H, KAN M X, et al. A numerical simulation analysis of mono-temperature and tri-temperature models by MDSC program Z-pinch implosion [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2016, 30(1): 64–70. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2016.01.010.
[17]	阚明先, 张朝辉, 段书超, 等. “聚龙一号”装置上磁驱动铝飞片实验的数值模拟 [J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2015, 27(12): 125001. DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.125001. KAN M X, ZHANG Z H, DUAN S C, et al. Numerical simulation of magnetically driven aluminum flyer plate on PTS accelerator [J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2015, 27(12): 125001. DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB201527.125001.
[18]	阚明先, 段书超, 王刚华, 等. 自由面被烧蚀磁驱动飞片的数值模拟 [J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2017, 29(4): 045003. DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160482. KAN M X, DUAN S C, WANG G H, et al. Numerical simulation of magnetically driven flyer plate of ablated free surface [J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2017, 29(4): 045003. DOI: 10.11884/HPLPB201729.160482.
[19]	阚明先, 王刚华, 赵海龙, 等. 金属电阻率模型 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2013, 33(3): 282–286. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1145(2013)03-0282-05. KAN M X, WANG G H, ZHAO H L, et al. Electrical resistivity model for metals [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2013, 33(3): 282–286. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1145(2013)03-0282-05.

Relative Articles

[1]	FANG Houlin, LU Qiang, GUO Quanshi, LI Guoliang, LIU Cunxu, TAO Sihao, ZHANG Dezhi. Experimental research on the free surface effect of shock wave and bubble behavior of small yield underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(8): 081444. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0003
[2]	ZHANG Fengguo, WANG Pei, WANG Yanjin, HU Jianbo. Improvement of void growth model and its application in simulating spallation experiments under different impact loading wave forms[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 051201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0218
[3]	SUN Chengwei, LU Yu, ZHAO Jibo, LUO Binqiang, GU Zhuowei, WANG Guiji, ZHANG Xuping, CHEN Xuemiao, ZHOU Zhongyu, LI Mu, YUAN Hong, ZHANG Hongping, WANG Ganghua, SUN Qizhi, WEN Shanggang, TAN Fuli, ZHAO Jianheng, MO Jianjun, CAI Jintao, JIN Yunsheng, HE Jia, CHONG Tao, ZHAO Xiaoming, LIU Cangli. SSS-MHD: a one-dimensional magneto-hydrodynamics multi-physics simulation platform for magnetically-driven high-energy-density dynamics experiments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(10): 104201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0127
[4]	LU Yu, GU Zhuowei, ZHOU Zhongyu, SUN Chengwei. Analysis and experimental verification of quasi-isentropic loading process in explosive-driven magnetic flux compression[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(7): 074101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0453
[5]	WANG Yuntian, ZENG Xiangguo, CHEN Huayan, YANG Xin, WANG Fang, QI Zhongpeng. Multi-scale simulation study on characteristics of free surface velocity curve in ductile metal spallation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 084202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0467
[6]	JIN Yunsheng, SUN Chengwei, ZHAO Jianheng, LUO Binqiang, WANG Guiji, TAN Fuli. Direct calculation method for free surface data processing of step target in ICE[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(4): 044201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0294
[7]	Liu Na, Chen Yibing. High order spectral volume method for multi-component flows[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(1): 114-119. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)01-0114-06
[8]	Kan Mingxian, Yang Long, Duan Shuchao, Wang Ganghua, Xiao Bo, Zhang Zhaohui, Wang Guilin. Numerical analysis and redesign of magnetically driven aluminum flyer plateon PTS accelerator[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(5): 793-798. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)05-0793-06
[9]	Zhao Jibo, Sun Chengwei, Gu Zhuowei, Wang Guiji, Cai Jintao. Magnetic hydrodynamic calculation on planar and cylindrical configurations[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(1): 9-16. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)01-0009-08
[10]	Yuan Shuai, Wen Shang-gang, Li Ping, Dong Yu-bin. Simulation of free surface particle velocity of flyer under the strong detonation drive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(2): 197-202. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)02-0197-06
[11]	Zhang Xu-ping, Zhao Jian-heng, Tan Fu-li, Wang Gui-ji, Luo Bin-qiang, Mo Jian-jun, Zhong Tao, Sun Cheng-wei, Liu Cang-li. A method for magnetically driven flyer simulation coupled with electrical circuit of generator[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(3): 257-263. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)03-0257-07
[12]	WANG Gang-hua, KAN Ming-xian, WANG Gui-ji, ZHANG Chao-hui, . Loaddesignformagneticallydrivenflyerexperiment[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(5): 547-550. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)05-0547-04
[13]	WANG Gang-hua, SUN Cheng-wei, ZHAO Jian-heng, HU Xi-jing, JIANG Ji-hao. One-dimensional, magnetohydrodynamic simulations of magnetically driven flyer plates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(3): 261-264. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)03-0261-04
[14]	TANG Xiao-jun, HU Hai-bo, LI Qing-zhong, ZHANG Xing-hua, TANG Zhi-ping, HU Ba-yi, TANG Tie-gang. Experimental studies on shock-induced phase transition in HR2 and other Fe-based materials[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(2): 115-120. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)02-0115-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(2)

1.	阚明先，王刚华，刘利新，南小龙，计策，何勇，段书超. 带窗口磁驱动准等熵压缩实验模拟. 强激光与粒子束. 2021(05): 121-125 .
2.	阚明先，段书超，王刚华，肖波，赵海龙. 磁驱动飞片发射实验结构系数初步研究. 强激光与粒子束. 2020(08): 117-122 .