Burn rate-pressure characteristic for PBX-1 explosive at high pressures

YAO Kuiguang; ZHAO Xuefeng; FAN Xing; XUE Pengyi; DAI Xiaogan

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2019-0347

Volume 40 Issue 1

Jan. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2020 > 40(1): 011404

LIU Ye, WANG Rui, LI Zhigang. Finite element analysis of CFRP-concrete-steel composite structure under low velocity lateral impact loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 759-767. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0349

Citation:

YAO Kuiguang, ZHAO Xuefeng, FAN Xing, XUE Pengyi, DAI Xiaogan. Burn rate-pressure characteristic for PBX-1 explosive at high pressures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(1): 011404. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0347

Citation:

PDF( 10057 KB)

Burn rate-pressure characteristic for PBX-1 explosive at high pressures

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0347

Institute of Chemical Materials, CAEP, Mianyang 621999, Sichuan, China

Received Date: 2019-09-06
Rev Recd Date: 2019-11-19
Publish Date: 2020-01-01

Abstract

Abstract

The burn rate-pressure characteristic of explosive is the intrinsic factor of ammunition safety, which reflects the potential tendency of the development of reaction violence. We conducted the experiment to understand the deflagration behavior of PBX-1 explosive by using the method of burn pressure-burn consumption in a closed bomb. The temporal pressure data and burn front time-of-arrival data were respectively recorded by pressure transducer and microthermocouple, allowing direct calculation of burn rate as a function of pressure. The result shows that the burn rate equation of PBX-1 explosive can be expressed as r = (2.16±0.55) p^1.08±0.06 with the pressure exponent n＞1, indicating that the burn rate is sensitive to pressure. Over the pressure range 10−100 MPa the burn rate displays exponent dependence on the pressure. In contrast, PBX-1 exhibits erratic burn behaviors with pressures grater than 100 MPa and burn rate rises sharply. The analysis demonstrates that the physical deconsolidation of PBX-1 explosive at high pressure is the main factor, which physically disrupts the sample and results in burn specific surface area increasing over 100 times. PBX-1 explosive has potential tendency of enhancing the reaction violence by convective burning mechanism.
- explosive,
- burn rate,
- pressure,
- specific surface area

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	TARVER C M, MCGUIRE R R, WRENN E W, et al. Thermal decomposition of explosives with full containment in one-dimensional geometries [C] // Paper presented at 17th International Symposium on Combustion. England, 1978.
[2]	WILLIAMS M R, MATEI M V. The decomposition of some RDX and HMX based materials in the one-dimensional time to explosion apparatus. part 1. time to explosion and apparent activation energy [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2006, 31(6): 435–441. DOI: 10.1002/prep.200600058.
[3]	JAN H E. Slow heating, munitions test procedures: NATO STANAG 4382 [S]. Brussels: NATO Standardization Agency, 2003: 1−6.
[4]	代晓淦, 黄毅民, 吕子剑, 等. 不同升温速率热作用下PBX-2炸药的响应规律 [J]. 含能材料, 2010, 18(3): 282–285. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2010.03.010. DAI X G, HUANG Y M, LYU Z J, et al. Reaction behavior for PBX-2 explosive at different Heating rate [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2010, 18(3): 282–285. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2010.03.010.
[5]	NAOS J T, KNET L A, GILL W, et al. Fast cook-off testing in enclosed facilities with reduced emissions: SAND-91-0470C [R]. USA: Sandia National Labs, 1991.
[6]	胡海波, 郭应文, 傅华, 等. 炸药事故反应烈度转化的主控机制 [J]. 含能材料, 2016, 24(7): 622–624. DOI: 10.11943/j.issn.1006-9941.2016.07.00X. HU H B, GUO Y W, FU H, et al. Dominant mechanism affecting reaction violence transition of explosive in accidents [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2016, 24(7): 622–624. DOI: 10.11943/j.issn.1006-9941.2016.07.00X.
[7]	杨荣杰, 李玉平, 刘云飞, 等. 固体推进剂燃烧过程实时监测与燃速测定系统 [J]. 推进技术, 2000, 21(1): 86–88. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4055.2000.01.025. YANG R J, LI Y P, LIU Y F, et al. Advanced system of monitor and measurement for the combustion process and rate of solid propellants [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2000, 21(1): 86–88. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-4055.2000.01.025.
[8]	温刚, 堵平, 廖昕. 用密闭爆发器法测定发射药实际燃速的原理和方法 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2011, 34(3): 57–60. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2011.03.015. WEN G, DU P, LIAO X. Principle and method of measuring actual burning rate of propellant by closed bomb [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2011, 34(3): 57–60. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2011.03.015.
[9]	胡松启, 邓哲, 刘迎吉. 复合推进剂应变条件下燃速变化的实验研究 [J]. 固体火箭技术, 2013, 36(2): 230–233. HU S Q, DENG Z, LIU Y J. Experimental research on burning rate change of composite propellant under strain [J]. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 2013, 36(2): 230–233.
[10]	COOPER M A, OLIVER M S. The burning regimes and conductive burn rates of titanium subhydride potassium perchlorate (TiH_1.65/KClO₄) in hybrid closed bomb-strand burner experiments [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160: 2619–2630. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.05.015.
[11]	MAIENSCHEIN J L, WARDELL J F, DEHAVEN M R, et al. Deflagration of HMX based explosives at high temperatures and pressures [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2004, 29: 287–295. DOI: 10.1002/prep.200400061.
[12]	GLASCOE E A, SPRINGER H K, TRINGE J, et al. A comparison of deflagration rates at elevated pressures and temperatures with thermal explosion results [C] // Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, American Institute Physics, 2011.
[13]	MAIENSCHEIN J L, WARDELL J F. Deflagration behavior of HMX-based explosives at high temperatures and pressures [C] // JANNAF 21st Propulsion Systems Hazards Subcommittee Meeting. Colorado Springs, CO, United States, 2003.
[14]	GLASCOE E A, MAIENSCHEIN J L, BURNHAM A K, et al. PBXN-9 ignition kinetics and deflagration rates [C] // 55th JANNAF Propulsion Meeting. Newton, MA, United States, 2008.
[15]	KOERNER J, MAIENSCHEIN J L, BLACK K, et al. LX-17 deflagration at high pressures and temperatures [C] // 23rd Propulsion Systems Hazards Joint Subcommittee Meeting. San Diego, CA, United States, 2006.
[16]	ASAY B. Shock wave science and technology reference library, Vo. 5: non-shock initiation of explosives [M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.

Relative Articles

[1]	GUO Wencan, ZHANG Zhiqiang, DENG Shunyi, HUANG Wenbin, PEI Hongbo. Influence of longitudinal air gaps within charge structure on the detonation performance of explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0165
[2]	HU Lishuang, LIU Yang, YANG Yajun, ZHU He, LIANG Kaili, HU Shuangqi. Inhibition effect of water mist on RDX dust explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 055401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0346
[3]	GUO Lu, ZHI Xiaoqi, QU Kepeng, LIU Xinghe, JIA Jie, LI Jin. Calculation of pressure parameters at ignition moment of HMX-based aluminized pressed explosives during slow cook-off[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(6): 062303. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0353
[4]	ZHOU Ning, ZHANG Guowen, WANG Wenxiu, ZHAO Huijun, YUAN Xiongjun, HUANG Weiqiu. Effect of ignition energy on the explosion process and the dynamic response of propane-air premixed gas[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1031-1038. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0049
[5]	CHANG Lihua, HE Hui, WEN Weifeng, LI Jinhe, WANG Xu, RAN Maojie. Study of underwater-explosion shock wave using ultrahigh-speed simultaneous framing and streak photography technology[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 437-442. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0241
[6]	Li Yangchao, Du Yang, Qi Sheng, Li Guoqing, Wang Shimao. Gasoline vapor/air premixed flame's unstretched laminar burning velocity[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(5): 863-870. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)05-0863-08
[7]	Zhou Ning, Zhang Bingbing, Feng Lei, Geng Ying, Jiang Shuai, Zhang Lu. Effects of reflected wave on premixed-gas explosion and dynamic response of tube shells[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(4): 541-547. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)04-0541-07
[8]	Sun Guilei, Yan Honghao, Li Xiaojie. Preparation of grapheme by detonation using liquid explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(5): 715-720. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)05-0715-06
[9]	Zhang Zhu, Jin Yan -juan. Shock wave loading of reverse detonation model[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(2): 223-228. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)02-0223-06
[10]	TAO Wei-jun, HUAN Shi, HUANG Feng-lei, JIANG Guo-ping. Lateralrarefactionwaveeffectsonshockinitiation ofheterogeneouscondensedexplosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(4): 397-401. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)04-0397-05
[11]	CHEN Jun, ZENG Dai-peng, SUN Cheng-wei, ZHANG Zhen-yu, TAND uo-wang. Equationsofstateforoverdriven-detonationproducts ofJB-9014explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(6): 583-587. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)06-0583-05
[12]	LONG Xin-ping, HAN Yong, JIANG Zhi-hai, HUANG Hui, HUANG Yi-min, HONG Tao. Measurementandnumericalsimulationofinitialstage aboutdetonationproductsdrivingwater[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(1): 12-16. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0012-05
[13]	WANG Hui-jun, CHEN Wang-hua, HE Zhong-qi, HU Yi-ting, XU Hai-ou, PENG Jin-hua, LIU Rong-hai. Shock sensitivity measurement of explosives by an underwater card gap test method[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(5): 481-485. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)05-0481-05
[14]	FENG Xiao-jun, WANG Xiao-feng. Influences of charge porosity on cook-off response of explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(1): 109-112. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)01-0109-04
[15]	LI Jin-he, ZHAO Ji-bo, TAN Duo-wang, WANG Yan-ping, ZHANG Yuan-ping. Underwater shock wave performances of explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 172-176. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0172-05
[16]	ZHANG A-man, YAO Xiong-liang, WEN Xue-you. Physical behaviors of an underwater explosion bubble in a free field[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(5): 391-400. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)05-0391-10
[17]	LI Zhi-peng, LONG Xin-ping, HUANG Yi-min, HE Bi, WANG Rong, HE Song-wei. Electromagnetic gauge measurements of shock initiating JOB-9003 explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(3): 269-272. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)03-0269-04
[18]	PENG Qi-xian, LIU Jun, LI Ze-ren, DENG Xiang-yang, KONG Fan-long. An experimental study of increasing the driving power of explosive with restricted charge[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(5): 448-451. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)05-0448-04
[19]	JIA Guang-hui, HUANG Hai, HU Zhen-dong. Simulation analyse of hypervelocity impact perforation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(1): 47-53. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)01-0047-07
[20]	FENG Xiao-jun, WANG Xiao-feng, HAN Zhu-long. The study of charging size influence on the response of explosives in slow cook-off test[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(3): 285-288. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)03-0285-04

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(8)

1.	张海霞，陈欢，鞠士龙. 含钢率对GFRP管-钢骨混凝土组合构件抗冲击性能的影响. 爆炸与冲击. 2024(04): 83-96 . 本站查看
2.	游俊，李峰. 单丝20 mm碳纤维含量对CFRC梁抗弯性能的影响试验. 混凝土. 2023(05): 124-127+133 .
3.	苏亚森. 坑槽腐蚀对圆钢管混凝土柱轴压性能的影响分析. 福建建设科技. 2023(06): 37-40 .
4.	陈光明，陆奕辰，谢攀，滕锦光，余涛，向宇，成彤，李召兵，胡福南，刘伟楠. FRP-混凝土-钢双壁空心桥墩分析及设计方法研究. 中国公路学报. 2022(02): 12-38 .
5.	赵伟，李峰. 不同量16mm碳纤维增强混凝土梁落锤冲击试验. 高科技纤维与应用. 2022(02): 17-21 .
6.	王善章，张冰，张千标，郑寰泽，高宇航. 纤维增强材料-混凝土-钢组合矩形空心柱的低周往复荷载试验研究. 工业建筑. 2022(12): 136-141+178 .
7.	孙国帅，顾威，冯娇. 碳纤维增强聚合物-钢管混凝土柱轴压稳定性灰熵关联度分析. 科学技术与工程. 2019(24): 313-317 .
8.	丁颖楠，许维炳，沈铂坦，陈彦江，李世安. 隧道开挖台车中心抗冲击参数优化与性能验证. 振动.测试与诊断. 2022(04): 718-725+826 .