An improved diffuse interface model for the numerical simulation of interaction between solid explosive detonation and inert media

YU Ming

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2019-0435

Volume 40 Issue 10

Oct. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2020 > 40(10): 104202

YU Ming. An improved diffuse interface model for the numerical simulation of interaction between solid explosive detonation and inert media[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(10): 104202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0435

Citation:

YU Ming. An improved diffuse interface model for the numerical simulation of interaction between solid explosive detonation and inert media[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(10): 104202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0435

Citation:

PDF( 8692 KB)

An improved diffuse interface model for the numerical simulation of interaction between solid explosive detonation and inert media

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0435

YU Ming^{1, 2
,}

1.
Center for Applied Physics and Technology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
2.
Key Laboratory for Computational Physics, Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2019-11-18
Rev Recd Date: 2020-06-12

Available Online: 2020-09-25

Publish Date: 2020-10-05

Abstract

Abstract

In the article a thermodynamically consistent diffuse interface model is proposed in order to numerically simulate the interaction between solid explosive detonation and compressible inert media. The chemical reaction of detonation course in solid explosive is simplified as the solid-phase reactant changing into the gas-phase product, thus the mixture within a control volume is regarded to be composed by three kinds of components: solid-phase reactant, gas-phase product and inert media, and all components are thought to be in mechanical equilibrium and thermal nonequilibrium because of their having distinct thermodynamic properties or equations of state. The starting point based on the energy conservation of the mixture and pressure equivalence among components within the control volume is adopted to derive the evolution equation for volume fraction of every component, in which the equation for energy conservation of the mixture is decomposed into a family of equations for energy conservation of the all components with the heat exchange resulting from thermal nonequilibrium. Thus, the governing equations of proposed diffuse interface model include: the conservation equation for mass of every component and the conservation equations for momentum and total energy of the mixture, and the evolution equations for volume fraction of every component and for pressure of the mixture. The important character of the present model is that the mass transfer due to chemical reaction and the heat exchange due to thermal nonequilibrium are involved. In this model, pressure is solved directly from the governing equations instead of computed next from the obtained conservative variables. The present model may apply to arbitrary expression of equation of state and allow for any number of inert media. The partially differential governing equations of the diffuse interface model are numerically solved by a temporal-spatial second-order Godunov-type finite volume scheme with wave propagation algorithm. From numerical examples, the proposed diffuse interface model can eliminate the unphysical oscillations near the material interfaces, and obtain the agreeable results with the physical mechanism.
- diffuse interface model,
- solid explosive detonation,
- multimaterial flow,
- thermal nonequilibrium,
- multiphase flow model

FullText(HTML)

References(34)

References

[1]	NEUMANN J V, RICHTMYER R D. A method for the numerical calculations of hydrodynamical shocks [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1950, 21: 232–238. DOI: 10.1063/1.1699639.
[2]	WILKINS M L. Calculation of elastic-plastic flow, methods in computational physics: Vol.3 [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1964: 211−263.
[3]	BENSON D J. Computational methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian hydrocodes [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1992, 99(2−3): 235–394. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(92)90042-I.
[4]	BENSON D J. A multi-material Eulerian formulation for the efficient solution of impact and penetration problems [J]. Computational Mechanics, 1995, 15(6): 558–571. DOI: 10.1007/BF00350268.
[5]	GLIMM J, ISAACSON E, MARCHESIN D, et al. Front tracking for hyperbolic systems [J]. Advances in Applied Mathematics, 1981, 2(1): 91–119. DOI: 10.1016/0196-8858(81)90040-3.
[6]	TRYGGVASON G, BUNNER B, ESMAEELI A, et al. A front-tracking method for the computations of multiphase flow [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2001, 169: 708–759. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2001.6726.
[7]	HIRT C, NICHOLS B. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 39: 201–225. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90145-5.
[8]	SAUREL R, ABGRALL R. A multiphase Godunov method for compressible multifluid and multiphase flows [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1999, 150: 425–467. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6187.
[9]	OSHER S, SMEREKA P. A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1994, 114: 146–159. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1994.1155.
[10]	ASLAM T, BDZIL J, STEWART D. Level set method applied to modeling detonation shock dynamics [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 126: 390–409. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1996.0145.
[11]	ANDERSON D M, MCFADDEN G B, WHEELER A A. Diffuse-interface methods in fluid mechanics [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1998, 30: 139–165. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.139.
[12]	YUE P, FENG J J, LIU C, et al. , A diffuse-interface method for simulating two-phase flows of complex fluids [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2004, 515: 293–317. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112004000370.
[13]	PETITPAS F, SAUREL R, FRANQUET E, et al. Modelling detonation waves in condensed energetic materials: multiphase CJ conditions and multidimensional computations [J]. Shock Wave, 2009, 19: 377–401. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-009-0217-7.
[14]	FAVRIS N, GAVRILYUK S, RAUREL R. , Solid-fluid diffuse interface model in cases of extreme deformations [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2009, 228: 6037–6077. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.05.015.
[15]	SCHOCH S, NIKIFORAKIS N, LEE B, et al. Multi-phase simulation of ammonium nitrate emulsion detonation [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160: 1883–1899. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.03.033.
[16]	NDANOU S, FAVTIE N, GAVRILYUK S. Multi-solid and multi-fluid diffuse interface model: applications to dynamics fracture and fragmentation [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2015, 295: 523–555. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.04.024.
[17]	SAUREL R, PANTANO C. Diffuse-interface capturing methods for compressible two-phase flows [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2018, 50: 105–130. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-122316-050109.
[18]	MICHAEL L, NIKIFORAKIS N. A hybrid formulation for the numerical simulation of condensed phase explosives [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2016, 316: 193–217. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.04.017.
[19]	TON V T. Improved shock-capturing methods for multicomponent and reactive flows [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 128: 237–253. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1996.0206.
[20]	SHYUE K. An efficient shock-capturing algorithm for compressible multicomponent problems [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1998, 142(1): 208–242. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1998.5930.
[21]	BANKS J, SCHWENDEMAN D, KAPILA A. A high-resolution Godunov method for compressible multi-material flow on overlapping grids [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2007, 223(1): 262–297. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.09.014.
[22]	LEE B J, TORO E F, CASTRO C E, et al. Adaptive Osher-type scheme for the Euler equations with highly nonlinear equations of state [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2013, 246: 165–183. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.03.046.
[23]	BAER M R, NUNZIATO J W. A two-phase mixture theory for the deflagration to detonation transition (DDT) in reactive granular materials [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1986, 12: 861–889. DOI: 10.1016/0301-9322(86)90033-9.
[24]	KAPILA A K, MENIKOFF R, BDZIL J B, et al. Two-phase modeling of deflagration-to-detonation transition in granular materials: reduced equations [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2001, 13(10): 3002–3024. DOI: 10.1063/1.1398042.
[25]	ALLAIRE G, CLERC S, KOKH S. A five-equation model for the simulation of interfaces between compressible fluids [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2002, 181: 577–616. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2002.7143.
[26]	MASSONI J, SAUREL R, NKONGA B. Some models and Eulerian methods for interfaces between compressible fluids with heat transfer [J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2002, 45(6): 1287–1307. DOI: 10.1016/S0017-9310(01)00238-1.
[27]	MURRONE A, GUILLARD H. A five equation reduced model for compressible two phase flow problems [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2005, 202(2): 664–698. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.07.019.
[28]	GROVE J W. Pressure-velocity equilibrium hydrodynamics models [J]. Acta Mathematica Scientia, 2010, 30B(2): 563–594.
[29]	ZHANG F. Shock wave science and technology reference library: Vol.6 [M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.
[30]	STRANG G. On the construction and comparison of difference schemes [J]. SIAM Journal of Numerical and Analysis, 1968, 5: 506–517. DOI: 10.1137/0705041.
[31]	LEVEQUE R J. Wave propagation algorithms for multi-dimensional hyperbolic systems [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1997, 131(1): 327–353.
[32]	ZHONG X L. Additive semi-implicit Runge-Kutta schemes for computing high-speed nonequilibrium reactive flows [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1996, 128: 19–31. DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1996.0193.
[33]	FICKETT W, DAVIS W C. Detonation: theory and experiment [M]. New York: Dover, 1979.
[34]	TARVER C M, MCGUIRE E M. Reactive flow modeling of the interaction of TATB detonation waves with inert materials [C] // The 12th International Symposium on Detonation. San Diego, California, 2002: 641−649.

Relative Articles

[1]	MENG Xianzhong, ZHOU Chuanbo, JIANG Nan, ZHANG Yuqi, ZHANG Zhen, WU Di. Generation mechanism and propagation characteristics of blasting seismic waves on tunnel surface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(2): 025201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0217
[2]	CHAO Hongxiao, HU Hao, LEI Qiang, GAO Rui, YAO Guoqing. Experimental study on shock wave from dynamic explosion of a warhead based on seismic wave triggering[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 083201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0196
[3]	LU Qiang, DING Yang, LIU Yunzhe, TANG Shiying, GUO Zhiyun, WANG Zhanjiang. Evolution of the radiated seismic wave energy of underground explosion in visco-elastic solids[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(9): 093201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0058
[4]	GAO Qidong, LU Wenbo, YANG Zhaowei, YAN Peng, CHEN Ming. Components and attenuation of seismic wavesinduced by horizontal smooth blasting[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(8): 085201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0280
[5]	Zhong Mingshou, Zhou Hui, Liu Ying, Long Yuan, Guo Tao. Time-frequency analysis of explosion seismic signal based on improved matching pursuit[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(6): 931-938. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)06-0931-08
[6]	Hu Xuelong, Qu Shijie, Jiang Wenli, Li Hua, Yang Wei, Huang Hanbo, Hu Guangqiu. Attenuation law of blasting induced ground vibrations based on equivalent path[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(6): 966-975. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)06-0966-10
[7]	Lu Liang, Long Yuan, Guo Tao, Xie Quan-min, Zhao Chang-xiao, Gao Fu-yin. Dynamic response sensitivity of urban tunnel structures under blasting seismic waves to parameters[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(6): 701-708. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)06-0701-08
[8]	Hao Chun-yue, Zheng Zhong. Main characteristics for three explosion events based on explosion waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(6): 730-735. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)06-0730-06
[9]	WEI Hai-xia, CHEN Shi-ha. Effectsofthreemainfactorsofblastingseismicwaves onelastic-plasticseismicresponseofmultistorymasonrybuildings[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(1): 55-61. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)01-0055-07
[10]	ZHONG Ming-shou, LONG Yuan, XIE Quan-min, JI Chong, LIU Hao-quan. Effectsofnon-couplingchargecoefficientsonexplosionseismic waveenergyincarbonaterocks[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(6): 612-618. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)06-0612-07
[11]	ZHENG Yu, LI Wen-bin, WANG Xiao-ming, FANG Shi-xin, WANG Ke-bo. Hydrocodeanalysisofdynamitesourceexplosion inRVSPprospectingofpetroleum[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(5): 472-478. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)05-0472-07
[12]	ZHU Hao-feng, JIN Ping, XIAO Wei-guo. Numerical modeling of seismic source function for underground explosion in hard rock[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(6): 648-653. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)06-0648-06
[13]	ZHOU Zhong, WANG Xiao-jun, XIAO Wei-guo, ZHAO Kai. Study on the main characteristics of underground explosion seismic source function in granite[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(1): 18-25. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)01-0018-08
[14]	ZHONG Fang-qing, LI Shan-lin, SUN Heng-zhong, ZHOU Jian-qing, ZOU Zu-jun, WANG Wen-xue. Seismic source function for an underground explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(2): 176-179. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)02-0176-04
[15]	GUO Sheng-bing, PAN Yue-feng, GAO Pei-zheng, WANG Ming-yang, QIAN Qi-hu. Numerical simulation of explosion seismic waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(4): 335-340. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)04-0335-06