Characteristics of wall pressure generated by bubble jets in an underwater explosion

CUI Xiongwei; CHEN Yingyu; SU Biao; MA Chunlong

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2020-0106

Volume 40 Issue 11

Nov. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2020 > 40(11): 111404

MA Huayuan, LONG Yuan, XIE Quanmin, SONG Ge, ZHOU You, YIN Qin. Prototypical experiment and numerical simulation of ground vibrationresulting from explosion in shallowly buried gas pipelines[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(10): 102201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0303

Citation:

CUI Xiongwei, CHEN Yingyu, SU Biao, MA Chunlong. Characteristics of wall pressure generated by bubble jets in an underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(11): 111404. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0106

Citation:

PDF( 5255 KB)

Characteristics of wall pressure generated by bubble jets in an underwater explosion

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0106

CUI Xiongwei^1
,,
CHEN Yingyu^{1
,
,},
SU Biao¹,
MA Chunlong^{2, 3}

1.
College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China
2.
College of Mechanical and Electrical, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China
3.
Automobile College, Harbin Vocational & Technical College, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China

Received Date: 2020-04-08
Rev Recd Date: 2020-09-16
Publish Date: 2020-11-05

Abstract

Abstract

The loading of bubble jet is an important part of the whole loading induced by the middle-field and near-field underwater explosion. Due to the fact that the period of the bubble jet is extremely short and the jet occurs inside the complicated underwater explosion bubble, it is hard to investigate the bubble jet through the direct underwater explosion bubble. Therefore, simplifying underwater explosion bubble jet into a high-speed water column has been widely adopted by many researchers to investigate the bubble jet. Based on the in-cavity explosion, a new high-speed water jet experimental methodology was proposed, and the experimental device design, method and system were presented as well. The details about how to carry out the pertinent experiments were also illustrated. Based on the proposed experimental system, the experimental research on high-speed water jet under different conditions were carried out. It is found that the shapes of the generated high-speed water jet vary with the outlet position and the depth of the cavity. Three experiments with three different cavity depths but same outlet position, and other two experiments with same cavity depth but different outlet positions were carried out. According to the results, the shape of the water jet generated in the experiments with short cavity depth and surface-above outlet position cannot meet the requirements of the investigation. The influence of outlet position and depth of the cavity on the shape of the water jet was investigated and the mechanism of the water jet shape was analyzed. According to the requirements of the investigation of the bubble jet wall pressure, the adoptable outlet position and cavity depth were got. In the experiments, the piezoelectric wall pressure sensor was used to measure the wall pressure of the water jet. The whole water jet wall pressure can be divided into two phases: the initial impact pressure period and the later hydrodynamical pressure period. According to the results, the outlet position and the depth of the cavity are the two main factors affecting on the shape of the water jet. The initial impact pressure of the water jet meets the water hammer theory. The proposed water jet experimental methodology based on the in-cavity explosion can be used to investigate the shape of the high-speed water jet and wall pressure characteristics including the underwater explosion bubble jet.
- underwater explosion,
- bubble jet,
- high-speed water jet,
- wall pressure measurement,
- water hammer theory

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	CARLUCHO I, DE PAULA M, WANG S, et al. Adaptive low-level control of autonomous underwater vehicles using deep reinforcement learning [J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2018, 107: 71–86. DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2018.05.016.
[2]	EL-FAKDI A, CARRERAS M. Two-step gradient-based reinforcement learning for underwater robotics behavior learning [J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2013, 61(3): 271–282. DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2012.11.009.
[3]	WANG X M, JIA J, YIN J W, et al. Underwater sonar image classification using adaptive weights convolutional neural network [J]. Applied Acoustics, 2019, 146: 145–154. DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.11.003.
[4]	崔杰. 近场水下爆炸气泡载荷及对结构毁伤试验研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2013: 1−10. CUI J. Experimental study on underwater explosion bubble loads and damage on the structure nearby [D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2013: 1−10.
[5]	张阿漫. 水下爆炸气泡三维动态特性研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2007: 156−196. ZHANG A M. 3D dynamic behavior of underwater explosion bubble [D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2007: 156−196.
[6]	WANG Q X. Non-spherical bubble dynamics of underwater explosions in a compressible fluid [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2013, 25(7): 072104. DOI: 10.1063/1.4812659.
[7]	LIU L T, YAO X L, ZHANG A M, et al. Numerical analysis of the jet stage of bubble near a solid wall using a front tracking method [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2017, 29(1): 012105. DOI: 10.1063/1.4974073.
[8]	明付仁. 水下近场爆炸对舰船结构瞬态流固耦合毁伤特性研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2014: 6−12. MING F R. Damage characteristics of transient fluid-structure interaction of warship structures subjected to near-field underwater explosion [D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2014: 6−12.
[9]	HUANG Y C, HAMMITT F G, YANG W J. Hydrodynamic phenomena during high-speed collision between liquid droplet and rigid plane [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 1973, 95(2): 276–292. DOI: 10.1115/1.3447017.
[10]	HSU C Y, LIANG C C, NGUYEN A T, et al. A numerical study on the underwater explosion bubble pulsation and the collapse process [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2014, 81: 29–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.02.018.
[11]	PLESSET M S, CHAPMAN R B. Collapse of an initially spherical vapour cavity in the neighbourhood of a solid boundary [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1971, 47(2): 283–290. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112071001058.
[12]	BLAKE J R, GIBSON D C. Cavitation bubbles near boundaries [J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1987, 19: 99–123. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fl.19.010187.000531.
[13]	HUANG C F, HWANGFU J J. Experimental study of the behavior of mini-charge underwater explosion bubbles near different boundaries [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 651: 55–80. DOI: 10.1017/s0022112009993776.
[14]	LAUTERBORN W, BOLLE H. Experimental investigations of cavitation-bubble collapse in the neighbourhood of a solid boundary [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1975, 72: 391–399. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112075003448.
[15]	牟金磊, 朱锡, 黄晓明, 等. 水下爆炸气泡射流现象的试验研究 [J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2010, 31(2): 154–158. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.2010.02.004. MU J L, ZHU X, HUANG X M, et al. Experimental study of jets formed by bubbles from underwater explosions [J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2010, 31(2): 154–158. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.2010.02.004.
[16]	崔杰, 张阿漫, 郭君, 等. 舱段结构在气泡射流作用下的毁伤效果 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2012, 32(4): 355–361. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)04-0355-07. CUI J, ZHANG A M, GUO J, et al. Damage effect of cabin structure subjected to bubble jet [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4): 355–361. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)04-0355-07.
[17]	黄超, 汪斌, 张远平, 等. 柱形装药自由场水中爆炸气泡的射流特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2011, 31(3): 263–267. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)03-0263-05. HUANG C, WANG B, ZHANG Y P, et al. Behaviors of bubble jets induced by underwater explosion of cylindrical charges under free-field conditions [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2011, 31(3): 263–267. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)03-0263-05.
[18]	KOROBKIN A. Global characteristics of jet impact [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1996, 307: 63–84. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112096000043.
[19]	KOROBKIN A, KHABAKHPASHEVA T I, WU G X. Coupled hydrodynamic and structural analysis of compressible jet impact onto elastic panels [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2008, 24(7): 1021–1041. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2008.03.002.
[20]	HSU C Y, LIANG C C, TENG T L, et al. A numerical study on high-speed water jet impact [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2013, 72: 98–106. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.06.012.
[21]	孙士丽, 胡健, 胡竞中. 可压缩性水柱冲击弹性平板的砰击问题研究 [J]. 船舶力学, 2013, 17(9): 1031–1037. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2013.09.007. SUN S L, HU J, HU J Z. Impact of a compressible water column on an elastic plate [J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2013, 17(9): 1031–1037. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2013.09.007.

Relative Articles

[1]	JIANG Zhoushun, XU Fengxiang, ZOU Zhen, ZHOU Qianmou. Dynamic response and energy absorption properties of sinusoidally curved three-dimensional negative Poissonʼs ratio sandwich panels subjected to blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(2): 021001. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0214
[2]	Gao Hui-hui, Zhang Bo, Qiao Jian-jiang, Yang Shao-peng, Chen Ting, Chen Xiao. Explosion characteristics of dimethyl ether/air/argon mixtures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(5): 753-757. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)05-0753-05
[3]	Xue Bing, Ma Hong-hao, Shen Zhao-wu, Yu Yong. Dynamic calibration of pressure sensors by small-scale explosive experiments in an explosion containment vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(3): 437-441. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)03-0437-05
[4]	Yao Cheng-bao, Li Ruo, Tian Zhou, Guo Yong-hui. Two dimensional simulation for shock wave produced by strong explosion in free air[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 585-590. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0585-06
[5]	Wang Yu-Xin, Li Xiao-Jie, Wang Xiao-Hong, Yan Hong-hao, Sun Ming. Numerical simulation on interfacial wave formation in explosive welding using material point method[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(6): 716-722. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)06-0716-07
[6]	YAO Zhe-fang, REN Hui-qi, SHEN Zhao-wu. Internalblastflowfieldanddynamicresponsesofthick-walledcylinder subjectedtocylindricalchargeexplosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(5): 449-456. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)05-0449-08
[7]	MINGFu-ren, ZHANGA-man, YANG Wen-shan. Three-dimensionalsimulationsonexplosiveloadcharacteristicsof underwaterexplosionnearfreesurface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(5): 508-514. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)05-0508-07
[8]	JIA Hu, SHEN Zhao-wu. Underwatersoundcharacteristicsofmetal-claddetonatingcords[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(4): 428-432. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)04-0428-05
[9]	JIANG Tao, YOU Wen-li, ZHANG Ke-yu, DING Hao. Studyonthetheoryofbulkcavitationfromunderwaterexplosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(1): 19-24. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)01-0019-06
[10]	ZONG Si-guang, WANG Jiang-an, LIU Tao, GUO Guang-li. Characteristicsofexplosionbubblesgenerated bylaser-inducedbreakdowninliquids[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(6): 641-646. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)06-0641-06
[11]	WANG Bin, ZHANG Yuan-ping, WANG Yan-ping. Waterjetphenomenainducedbytheinteractionbetween underwaterexplosionbubblesandwaterbottomboundaries[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(3): 250-255. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)03-0250-06
[12]	HUANG Chao, WANG Bin, ZHANG Yuan-ping, . Behaviorsofbubblejetsinducedbyunderwaterexplosion ofcylindricalchargesunderfree-fieldconditions[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(3): 263-267. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)03-0263-05
[13]	LIANG Yun-tao, ZENG Wen. Kineticcharacteristicsandinfluencingfactorsof gasexplosioninducedbyshockwave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(4): 370-376. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)04-0370-07
[14]	GAO Cong, LI Hua, SU Dan, HUANG Wei-Xing. Explosion characteristics of coal dust in a sealed vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(2): 164-168. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)02-0164-05
[15]	LI Jian, RONG Ji-li, XIANG Da-lin. Effectsofchargemassandwaterdepthondynamicbehaviorsof anunderwaterexplosionbubble[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(4): 342-348. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)04-0342-07
[16]	SHI Hua-qiang, ZONG Zhi, JIA Jing-bei. Short-range characters of underwater blast waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 125-130. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0125-06
[17]	JIN Ri-ya, HU Shuang-qi, BO Tao, ZHANG Ying-hao, YUAN Hong-su. Relation between explosion pressure and volume fraction of ClO2 gas[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(3): 333-336. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)03-0333-04
[18]	ZHANG A-man, YAO Xiong-liang, WEN Xue-you. Physical behaviors of an underwater explosion bubble in a free field[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(5): 391-400. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)05-0391-10
[19]	FANG Bin, ZHU Xi, CHEN Xi-di, ZHANG Zhen-hua. Pulsation dynamics of an underwater explosion bubble vertical migrating to a horizontal rigid plane[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(4): 345-350. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)04-0345-06
[20]	GUI Yu-lin, YU Chuan, LIU Cang-li, SUN Cheng-wei. 3D simulation of over-turned explosively formed projectile (EFP) with star-shaped fins[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(4): 313-318. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)04-0313-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(5)

1.	林靖涛，于洋，杨春霞，饶天华，闫飞宇. 抽水蓄能电站回水排气管道能量特性及流动特性研究. 水电与抽水蓄能. 2024(03): 28-35 .
2.	吕海成，黄孝龙，李宁，翁春生. 气相爆轰波冲击气固界面的透反射特性. 爆炸与冲击. 2022(11): 29-38 . 本站查看
3.	梁瑞，包娟，周文海，王树江. 地铁隧道掘进爆破对既有埋地管道的动力影响. 爆破. 2021(01): 41-50 .
4.	武泽. 果子沟隧道爆破对临近管道影响的数值模拟. 油气储运. 2021(10): 1167-1173 .
5.	姚安林，田晓建，徐涛龙，高山，蒋宏业，李又绿. 管道爆炸对同沟邻管的冲击效应及防爆墙抗爆性能. 石油学报. 2020(06): 753-761 .