Experimental study on the mitigation effects of confined-blast loading

KONG Xiangshao; WANG Zitang; KUANG Zheng; ZHOU Hu; ZHENG Cheng; WU Weiguo

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2020-0193

Volume 41 Issue 6

Jun. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2021 > 41(6): 062901

KONG Xiangshao, WANG Zitang, KUANG Zheng, ZHOU Hu, ZHENG Cheng, WU Weiguo. Experimental study on the mitigation effects of confined-blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(6): 062901. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0193

Citation:

KONG Xiangshao, WANG Zitang, KUANG Zheng, ZHOU Hu, ZHENG Cheng, WU Weiguo. Experimental study on the mitigation effects of confined-blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(6): 062901. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0193

Citation:

PDF( 3856 KB)

Experimental study on the mitigation effects of confined-blast loading

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0193

1.
Green & Smart River-Sea-Going Ship, Cruise and Yacht Research Center, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China
2.
Department of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Structural Engineering, School of Transportation, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, China

Received Date: 2020-06-11
Rev Recd Date: 2020-08-31

Available Online: 2021-05-13

Publish Date: 2021-06-05

Abstract

Abstract

The blast loading from an explosion in a confined space is quite different from that in an open environment. The detonation products of TNT can be fully mixed with the surrounding air, and release additional energy through combustion effect, resulting in a significantly increase of the reflected shockwaves and quasi-static pressure in the confined space.In order to investigate the mitigation effect of different atmosphere on explosion load in confined space, the experimental tests of TNT with three different charge masses were performed in a fully confined chamber filled with air, water mist and nitrogen, respectively. The explosive load pressure, temperature and the response characteristics of blast-loaded steel plates in the confined space were analyzed by theoretical calculation and experiment. The results show that both the water mist and the nitrogen can effectively reduce the reflected shock wave, the quasi-static pressure and the temperature in the confined chamber. The average reduction rate of quasi-static pressure is 36.0% and 51.7%, and the average reduction rate of temperature is 42.6% and 40.3%, respectively. The ideal gas state equation was used to calculate the theoretical value of quasi-static pressure in the confined space filled with nitrogen. It is found that the theoretical value is slightly larger than the experimental value, which is due to the insufficient combustion of detonation products in the test. The dynamic response of blast-loaded steel plates in water mist and nitrogen atmosphere is significantly lower than that in the air condition, and the residual deformation of the steel plate at 160 g TNT in water mist and air conditions, the attenuating effect of nitrogen is better than that of water mist. It is revealed that the mechanism of the water mist and nitrogen in mitigating the confined blast load and the subsequent dynamic response of structure is restraining the energy release from the combustion of the detonation products. The conclusions can provide references for the design of anti-blast structure.
- confined-blast loading,
- water mist,
- nitrogen,
- quasi-static pressure,
- dynamic response of steel plates

FullText(HTML)

References(24)

References

[1]	胡宏伟, 宋浦, 赵省向, 等. 有限空间内部爆炸研究进展 [J]. 含能材料, 2013, 21(4): 539–546. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2013.04.026. HU H W, SONG P, ZHAO S X, et al. Progressinexplosioninconfinedspace [J]. ChineseJournalofEnergeticMaterials, 2013, 21(4): 539–546. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9941.2013.04.026.
[2]	WU C Q, LUKASZEWICZ M, SCHEBELLA K, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of confined explosion in a blast chamber [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(4): 737–750. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2013.02.001.
[3]	ZHENG C, KONG X S, WU W G, et al. The elastic-plastic dynamic response of stiffened plates under confined blast load [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 95: 141–153. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.05.008.
[4]	CAÇOILO A, TEIXEIRA-DIAS F, MOURÃO R, et al. Blast wave propagation in survival shelters: experimental analysis and numerical modelling [J]. Shock Waves, 2018, 28(6): 1169–1183. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-018-0858-5.
[5]	DONAHUE L, ZHANG F, RIPLEY R C. Numerical models for afterburning of TNT detonation products in air [J]. Shock Waves, 2013, 23(6): 559–573. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-013-0467-2.
[6]	KONG X S, ZHOU H, ZHENG C, et al. An experimental study on the mitigation effects of fine water mist on confined-blast loading and dynamic response of steel plates [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 134: 103370. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103370.
[7]	ANANTH R, WILLAUER H D, FARLEY J P, et al. Effects of fine water mist on a confined blast [J]. Fire Technology, 2012, 48(3): 641–675. DOI: 10.1007/s10694-010-0156-y.
[8]	WILLAUER H D, ANANTH R, FARLEY J P, et al. Mitigation of TNT and Destex explosion effects using water mist [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 165(1/2/3): 1068–1073. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.130.
[9]	MATARADZE E, CHIKHRADZE N, BOCHORISHVILI N, et al. Experimental study of the effect of water mist location on blast overpressure attenuation in a shock tube [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2017, 95(4): 042031. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/95/4/042031.
[10]	SCHWER D A, KAILASANATH K. Numerical simulations of the mitigation of unconfined explosions using water-mist [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(2): 2361–2369. DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.145.
[11]	ADIGA K C, WILLAUER H D, ANANTH R, et al. Implications of droplet breakup and formation of ultra fine mist in blast mitigation [J]. Fire Safety Journal, 2009, 44(3): 363–369. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.08.003.
[12]	JONES A, NOLAN P F. Discussions on the use of fine water sprays or mists for fire suppression [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1995, 8(1): 17–22. DOI: 10.1016/0950-4230(95)90057-V.
[13]	胡翔. 细水雾对冲击波的削弱作用研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2018. HU X. Research on the mitigation of shock wave using fine water mist [D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2018.
[14]	陈鹏宇, 侯海量, 刘贵兵, 等. 水雾对舱内装药爆炸载荷的耗散效能试验研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(5): 927–933. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.05.012. CHEN P Y, HOU H L, LIU G B, et al. Experimental investigation on mitigatingeffect of water mist on theexplosive shock wave inside cabin [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(5): 927–933. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.05.012.
[15]	孔祥韶, 况正, 郑成, 等. 舱室密闭空间中爆炸载荷燃烧增强效应试验研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2020, 41(1): 75–85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.01.009. KONG X S, KUANG Z, ZHENG C, et al. Experimental study of after burning enhancement effect for blast load in confined compartment space [J]. ActaArmamentarii, 2020, 41(1): 75–85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2020.01.009.
[16]	金朋刚, 郭炜, 任松涛, 等. TNT密闭环境中能量释放特性研究 [J]. 爆破器材, 2014, 43(2): 10–14. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2014.02.003. JIN P G, GUO W, REN S T, et al. ResearchonTNTenergyrelease characteristicsinenclosedcondition [J]. ExplosiveMaterials, 2014, 43(2): 10–14. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2014.02.003.
[17]	金朋刚, 郭炜, 王建灵, 等. 密闭条件下TNT的爆炸压力特性 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2013, 36(3): 39–41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2013.03.009. JIN P G, GUO W, WANG J L, et al. Explosion pressure characteristics of TNT under closed condition [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2013, 36(3): 39–41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2013.03.009.
[18]	张玉磊, 苏健军, 李芝绒, 等. TNT内爆炸准静态压力特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(6): 1429–1434. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0170. ZHANG Y L, SU J J, LI Z R, et al. Quasi-static pressure characteristic of TNT’s internal explosion [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(6): 1429–1434. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0170.
[19]	李芝绒, 王胜强, 蒋海燕, 等. 圆筒装置内爆炸压力载荷特性实验研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(10): 102202. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0327. LI Z R, WANG S Q, JIANG H Y, et al. Experimental studies on characteristics of explosion pressure load in cylinder apparatus [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(10): 102202. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0327.
[20]	FELDGUN V R, KARINSKI Y S, EDRI I, et al. Prediction of the quasi-static pressure in confined and partially confined explosions and its application to blast response simulation of flexible structures [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 90: 46–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.12.001.
[21]	王等旺, 张德志, 李焰, 等. 爆炸容器内准静态气压实验研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2012, 33(12): 1493–1497. WANG D W, ZHANG D Z, LI Y, et al. Experiment investigation on quasi-static pressure in explosion containment vessels [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2012, 33(12): 1493–1497.
[22]	NURICK G N, MARTIN J B. Deformation of thin plates subjected to impulsive loading—a review part II: Experimental studies [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1989, 8(2): 171–186. DOI: 10.1016/0734-743X(89)90015-8.
[23]	YUEN S C K, NURICK G N, LANGDON G S, et al. Deformation of thin plates subjected to impulsive load: part III–an update 25 years on [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 107: 108–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.06.010.
[24]	孔祥韶, 周沪, 郑成, 等. 基于饱和响应时间的封闭空间内爆炸载荷等效方法研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(9): 092102. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0183. KONG X S, ZHOU H, ZHENG C, et al. An equivalent calculation method for confined-blast load based on saturated response time [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 092102. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0183.

Relative Articles

[1]	Study on the influence of afterburning effect on implosion characteristics in different energy release rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0442
[2]	ZHANG Xuerui, ZHOU Tao. Energy release characteristics of composite charge in confined space[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(6): 062302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0381
[3]	HU Lishuang, LIU Yang, YANG Yajun, ZHU He, LIANG Kaili, HU Shuangqi. Inhibition effect of water mist on RDX dust explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 055401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0346
[4]	ZHU Jianlei, HAN Lei, FANG Zhanxiang, XU Yuxin. Calculation method for quasi-static pressure of annular composite implosion of active materials and explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0218
[5]	WANG Jian, YU Jingyu, FAN Ziyao, ZHENG Ligang, LIU Guilong, ZHAO Yongxian. Experimental study on the synergistic suppression of gas explosion by combined porous media and nitrogen curtain[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(10): 105402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0562
[6]	ZHAO Jiaxing, LI Qi, ZHANG Liang, LIU Songhan, JIANG Lin. Experimental study on mitigation effects of water mist on blast wave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(10): 105401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0108
[7]	ZHANG Kai, DU Saifeng, CHEN Hao, GUO Jin, WANG Jingui, HONG Yidu. Experiments on the effects of venting and nitrogen inerting on hydrogen-air explosions[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(12): 125402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0459
[8]	ZHANG Pengfei, LIU Zhifang, LI Shiqiang. Dynamic response of sandwich tubes with graded foam aluminum cores under internal blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(7): 071402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0418
[9]	JIA Hailin, ZHAI Rupeng, LI Dihui, XIANG Haijun, YANG Yongqin. Differences of premixed methane-air explosion in pipelines suppressed by three ultrafine water mists containing different salts[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(8): 082201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0456
[10]	JIA Hailin, XIANG Haijun, LI Dihui, ZHAI Rupeng. Suppression of explosion in pipelines with different blocking ratios by ultrafine water mist containing sodium chloride[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(4): 042201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0268
[11]	LU Chang, ZHANG Yunpeng, ZHU Han, WANG Hongbo, LU Haoxin, PAN Rongkun. The spurted nitrogen preventing the gas explosion in pipe[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(4): 042101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0106
[12]	LIU Wenxiang, ZHANG Dezhi, ZHONG Fangping, CHENG Shuai, ZHANG Qingming. Quasi-static gas pressure generated by explosive charge blasting in a spherical explosion containment vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1045-1050. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0056
[13]	ZHANG Yulei, SU Jianjun, LI Zhirong, JIANG Haiyan, ZHONG Kai, WANG Shengqiang. Quasi-static pressure characteristic of TNT's internal explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(6): 1429-1434. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0170
[14]	Yu Chenglong, Wang Zhongqi. Quasi-static model for predicting explosion cavity with spherical charges[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 249-254. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0249-06
[15]	Li Ying, Ren Guangwei, Zhang Wei, Zhao Pengduo, Zhang Lei, Du Zhipeng. Water mitigation effect under internal blast[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(6): 1080-1086. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)06-1080-07
[16]	Yu Minggao, Yang Yong, Pei Bei, Niu Pan, Zhu Xinna. Experimental study of methane explosion suppression by nitrogen twin-fluid water mist[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 194-200. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0194-07
[17]	Zhong Wei, Tian Zhou. Calculation of quasi-static pressures for confined explosions considering chemical reactions under isobaric assumption[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(4): 375-380. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)04-0375-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

1.	赵家兴，刘凇含，姜林. 水雾对爆炸冲击波的衰减机理研究. 计算力学学报. 2025(01): 8-18 .
2.	李营，杜志鹏，陈赶超，王诗平，侯海量，李晓彬，张攀，张伦平，孔祥韶，李海涛，郭君，姚术健，王志凯，殷彩玉. 舰艇爆炸毁伤与防护若干关键问题研究进展. 中国舰船研究. 2024(03): 3-60 .
3.	习修义，李俊，张娅，王志平，陈威，李营，李晓彬. 水雾环境下密闭舱室内爆准静态压力特性试验研究. 中国舰船研究. 2024(03): 174-181 .
4.	胡俊华，董奇，胡八一，任逸飞，黄广炎. 抗爆容器的内部爆炸效应和动态力学行为研究进展. 含能材料. 2024(09): 986-1008 .
5.	赵家兴，李奇，张亮，刘凇含，姜林. 水雾对爆炸冲击波衰减效应的实验研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2023(10): 174-184 . 本站查看
6.	解江，潘汉源，李漩，王立轩，蒋逸伦，冯振宇. 内爆载荷作用下泄压容器准静态压力特性. 应用数学和力学. 2023(10): 1236-1249 .
7.	周沪，岳学森，孔祥韶，郑成，吴卫国. 战斗部舱内爆炸下舰船耦合毁伤数值计算. 中国舰船研究. 2022(05): 241-249+267 .