Design and evaluation of new honeycomb configurations with high in-plane /out-of-plane loading-carrying capacity under impact

LIAO Jiu; LI Zhigang; LIANG Fangzheng; WANG Jiaming; LIU Wanting; LI Meng; FENG Jianwen

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2020-0262

Volume 41 Issue 8

Aug. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2021 > 41(8): 083103

LIAO Jiu, LI Zhigang, LIANG Fangzheng, WANG Jiaming, LIU Wanting, LI Meng, FENG Jianwen. Design and evaluation of new honeycomb configurations with high in-plane /out-of-plane loading-carrying capacity under impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 083103. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0262

Citation:

LIAO Jiu, LI Zhigang, LIANG Fangzheng, WANG Jiaming, LIU Wanting, LI Meng, FENG Jianwen. Design and evaluation of new honeycomb configurations with high in-plane /out-of-plane loading-carrying capacity under impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 083103. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0262

Citation:

LIAO Jiu, LI Zhigang, LIANG Fangzheng, WANG Jiaming, LIU Wanting, LI Meng, FENG Jianwen. Design and evaluation of new honeycomb configurations with high in-plane /out-of-plane loading-carrying capacity under impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 083103. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0262

PDF( 13163 KB)

Design and evaluation of new honeycomb configurations with high in-plane /out-of-plane loading-carrying capacity under impact

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0262

1.
School of Mechanical, Electronic and Control Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
2.
Qian Xuesen Laboratory of Space Technology, China Academy of Space Technology, Beijing 100094, China
3.
Airworthiness Certification Center, Civil Aviation Administration of China, Beijing 100102, China

Received Date: 2020-08-03
Rev Recd Date: 2020-11-30

Available Online: 2021-07-20

Publish Date: 2021-08-05

Abstract

Abstract

An aluminum honeycomb is widely used in the field of impact cushioning because of its excellent performance. In order to solve the problem of large difference between the in-plane and out-of-plane load-carrying capacities of traditional honeycombs, three new configurations of honeycombs were proposed as follows: bow-shaped, staggered and folded configurations. The finite element models for these new honeycombs were established, and their deformation modes and load-carrying capacities were analyzed. The results show that under the same relative density, compared with the traditional hexagonal honeycombs, the three new configurations can reduce the difference of load-carrying capacity in in-plane and out-of-plane directions. The average in-plane/out-of-plane (I/O) ratio of loading-carrying capacity of the bow-shaped honeycombs in two coplanar directions increased by 21.3 times. For the staggered honeycomb, the load-carrying capacity of each in-plane direction is of great difference, in which the I/O ratio of the excellent direction is increased by 42 times due to its special structure. For the folded honeycomb, the I/O ratio is increased by 21.3 times on average. The research results can provide a new idea and reference for the design of honeycomb structure under multi-directional impact load.
- honeycomb,
- cell configuration,
- energy absorption,
- in-plane,
- out-of-plane

FullText(HTML)

References(21)

References

[1]	KHAN M K, BAIG T, MIRZA S. Experimental investigation of in-plane and out-of-plane crushing of aluminum honeycomb [J]. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2012, 539: 135–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2012.01.070.
[2]	荣吉利, 朱宇博, 宋乾强, 等. 异面压缩下六边形铝蜂窝平均塑性坍塌应力研究 [J]. 宇航学报, 2018, 39(3): 257–263. DOI: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2018.03.003. RONG J L, ZHU Y B, SONG Q Q, et al. Research on the mean plastic crushing stress of hexagonal aluminum honeycombs under out-of-plane compression [J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2018, 39(3): 257–263. DOI: 10.3873/j.issn.1000-1328.2018.03.003.
[3]	罗昌杰, 周安亮, 刘荣强, 等. 金属蜂窝异面压缩下平均压缩应力的理论模型 [J]. 机械工程学报, 2010, 46(18): 52–59. DOI: 10.3901/JME.2010.18.052. LUO C J, ZHOU A L, LIU R Q, et al. Average compressive stress constitutive equation of honeycomb metal under out-of-plane compression [J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2010, 46(18): 52–59. DOI: 10.3901/JME.2010.18.052.
[4]	赵国伟, 白俊青, 祁玉峰, 等. 异面冲击下金属蜂窝结构平均塑性坍塌应力模型 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2016, 35(12): 50–54. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2016.12.008. ZHAO G W, BAI J Q, QI Y F, et al. Average plastic collapse stress model of metallic honeycomb structure under out-of-plan impact load [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35(12): 50–54. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2016.12.008.
[5]	何彬, 李响. 一种新型组合蜂窝的抗冲击性能研究 [J]. 机械设计与制造, 2015(6): 49–51, 54. DOI: 10.19356/j.cnki.1001-3997.2015.06.013. HE B, LI X. Research on the impact resistance of a new type of honeycomb structure [J]. Machinery Design and Manufacture, 2015(6): 49–51, 54. DOI: 10.19356/j.cnki.1001-3997.2015.06.013.
[6]	杜义贤, 李涵钊, 谢黄海, 等. 具有创新拓扑构型的周期性点阵结构抗剪切性能分析 [J]. 机械设计与研究, 2016, 32(5): 83–87. DOI: 10.13952/j.cnki.jofmdr.2016.0192. DU Y X, LI H Z, XIE H H, et al. Shear resistance of periodic lattice structure with innovative topology configuration [J]. Machine Design and Research, 2016, 32(5): 83–87. DOI: 10.13952/j.cnki.jofmdr.2016.0192.
[7]	YANG X F, SUN Y X, YANG J L, et al. Out-of-plane crashworthiness analysis of bio-inspired aluminum honeycomb patterned with horseshoe mesostructure [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2018, 125: 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2018.01.014.
[8]	王中钢, 姚松. 加筋正六角铝蜂窝异面力学特性与筋胞厚度匹配优化 [J]. 航空材料学报, 2013, 33(3): 86–91. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5053.2013.3.016. WANG Z G, YAO S. Out-of-plane mechanical properties and thickness matching optimization between rib and cell thin-wall of reinforced regular hexagon aluminum honeycomb [J]. Journal of Aeronautical Materials, 2013, 33(3): 86–91. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5053.2013.3.016.
[9]	WANG Z G, SHI C, DING S S, et al. Crashworthiness of innovative hexagonal honeycomb-like structures subjected to out-of-plane compression [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2020, 27(2): 621–628. DOI: 10.1007/s11771-020-4321-2.
[10]	胡玲玲, 蒋玲. 胞孔构型对金属蜂窝动态力学性能的影响机理 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2014, 34(1): 41–46. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)01-0041-06. HU L L, JIANG L. Mechanism of cell configuration affecting dynamic mechanical properties of metal honeycombs [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2014, 34(1): 41–46. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)01-0041-06.
[11]	胡玲玲, 陈依骊. 三角形蜂窝在面内冲击荷载下的力学性能 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2011, 30(5): 226–229, 235. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2011.05.047. HU L L, CHEN Y L. Mechanical properties of triangular honeycombs under in-plane impact loading [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(5): 226–229, 235. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2011.05.047.
[12]	LIU Y, ZHANG X C. The influence of cell micro-topology on the in-plane dynamic crushing of honeycombs [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(1): 98–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.03.001.
[13]	何强, 马大为, 张震东. 分层屈服强度梯度蜂窝材料的动力学性能研究 [J]. 工程力学, 2015, 32(4): 191–196. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.10.0986. HE Q, MA D W, ZHANG Z D. Research on dynamic crushing of layered yielding stress-gradient circular honeycombs [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 32(4): 191–196. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2013.10.0986.
[14]	HEDAYATI R, SADIGHI M, MOHAMMADI-AGHDAM M, et al. Mechanical properties of additively manufactured octagonal honeycombs [J]. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 2016, 69: 1307–1317. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.020.
[15]	THOMAS T, TIWARI G. Energy absorption and in-plane crushing behavior of aluminium reinforced honeycomb [J]. Vacuum, 2019, 166: 364–369. DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.10.057.
[16]	卢子兴, 李康. 负泊松比蜂窝动态压溃行为的有限元模拟 [J]. 机械强度, 2016, 38(6): 1237–1242. DOI: 10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2016.06.018. LU Z X, LI K. Dynamic crushing of honeycombs with a negative Poisson’s ratio-a finite element study [J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2016, 38(6): 1237–1242. DOI: 10.16579/j.issn.1001.9669.2016.06.018.
[17]	HU L L, ZHOU M Z, DENG H. Dynamic indentation of auxetic and non-auxetic honeycombs under large deformation [J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 207: 323–330. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.066.
[18]	马瑞君, 王玉涛, 李萌, 等. 基于Miura折纸的蜂窝材料共面缓冲性能研究 [J]. 载人航天, 2020, 26(1): 48–55. DOI: 10.16329/j.cnki.zrht.2020.01.007. MA R J, WANG Y T, LI M, et al. Research on in-plane buffer performance of honeycomb material based on Miura pattern [J]. Manned Spaceflight, 2020, 26(1): 48–55. DOI: 10.16329/j.cnki.zrht.2020.01.007.
[19]	ZHAI J Y, LIU Y F, GENG X Y, et al. Energy absorption of pre-folded honeycomb under in-plane dynamic loading [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2019, 145: 106356. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.106356.
[20]	谭思博, 侯兵, 李玉龙, 等. 基体材料对铝蜂窝动态强化特性的影响 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2015, 35(1): 16–21. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)01-0016-06. TAN S B, HOU B, LI Y L, et al. Effect of base materials on the dynamic enhancement of aluminium honeycombs [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2015, 35(1): 16–21. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)01-0016-06.
[21]	李萌, 刘荣强, 郭宏伟, 等. 腿式着陆器用不同拓扑结构金属蜂窝吸能特性优化设计 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2013, 32(21): 7–14. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2013.21.002. LI M, LIU R Q, GUO H W, et al. Crashworthiness optimization of different topological structures of metal honeycomb used in a legged-typed lander [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(21): 7–14. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2013.21.002.

Relative Articles

[1]	QIAN Haimin, PAN Yahao, ZONG Zhouhong, GAN Lu, WU Xi, SUN Miaomiao. Experimental study on dynamic response of underground utility tunnel under ground explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(7): 075102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0400
[2]	LI Zhiyang, LEI Jianyin, LIU Zhifang. Dynamic response of nacre-like structure under explosion load[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(8): 083101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0145
[3]	CHEN Xiaokun, LI Haitao, WANG Qiuhong, JIN Yongfei, DENG Jun, ZHANG Yanni. Antiknock analysis and structure optimization for coal mine cylindrical shell refuge capsule under gas explosion load[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(1): 124-132. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0248
[4]	ZHOU Zhongxin, JIN Fengnian, YUAN Xiaojun, CHEN Hailong, ZHOU Jiannan, XU Ying, KONG Xinli. Dynamic response of underground arch structure under lateral point blast loads[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 639-646. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0295
[5]	Sun Hui-xiang, Xu Jin-yu, Zhu Guo-fu, Wen Ke-xu. Dynamic interaction between surrounding rock and underground structure subjected to blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(5): 519-524. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)05-0519-06
[6]	ZHANG Xiao-peng, GE Fei, XING Huai-nian, JIN Li-qiang. Dynamicstressmeasurementofalargeexplosion-containmentvessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(1): 101-104. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0101-04
[7]	LI Xu-dong, LIU Kai-xin, YAN Hong-hao, LI Xiao-jie, WANG Shuai. Dynamicdamageprocessofanundergroundprotectivestructure subjectedtoimpactloading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(5): 541-545. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)05-0541-05
[8]	HOU Hai-liang, ZHU Xi, GU Mei-bang. Study on failure mode of stiffened plate and optimized design of structure subjected to blast load[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(1): 26-33. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)01-0026-08
[9]	DU Xiu-li, LIAO Wei-zhang, TIAN Zhi-min, LI Liang. Dynamic response analysis of underground structures under explosion-induced loads[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(5): 474-480. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)05-0474-07