Shock initiation characteristics of four-component HTPB solid propellant containing RDX

WU Junying; LI Yaojiang; YANG Lijun; LIU Jiaxi; WU Jiaojiao; ZHANG Xiaozhou; CHEN Lang

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2020-0350

Volume 41 Issue 8

Aug. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2021 > 41(8): 082301

YANG Nana, ZHAO Tianyou, CHEN Zhipeng, WU Guoxun, YAO Xiongliang. Peridynamic simulation of damage of ship composite structure under fragments impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(2): 023302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0019

Citation:

WU Junying, LI Yaojiang, YANG Lijun, LIU Jiaxi, WU Jiaojiao, ZHANG Xiaozhou, CHEN Lang. Shock initiation characteristics of four-component HTPB solid propellant containing RDX[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 082301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0350

Citation:

PDF( 16386 KB)

Shock initiation characteristics of four-component HTPB solid propellant containing RDX

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0350

State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Received Date: 2020-09-22
Rev Recd Date: 2021-01-05

Available Online: 2021-07-27

Publish Date: 2021-08-05

Abstract

Abstract

In order to investigate the characters of the four-component HTPB solid propellant containing RDX initiated by shock waves and evaluate its adaptability to low temperature, Lagrange analytical experiments were carried out in normal and low temperature conditions. In the Lagrange analytical experiments, sensors were embedded in different locations of the material, and the dynamic mechanical behavior of the material was obtained by analyzing the variation of some mechanical parameters (such as stress or pressure, particle velocity, strain or specific volume and temperature) measured by the sensors. Since the thickness of gap affected the initiation pressure, the manganese-copper sensors were used to measure the pressure changes in different positions of the propellant with the gap thicknesses of 40, 45 and 50 mm, respectively. When the gap thickness was 40 mm, the propellant detonated. In contrast, the propellant burned for the gap thicknesses of 45 and 50 mm. The ionization probes were used to collect the detonation velocity of the propellant. In normal temperature conditions, the detonation velocities with the gap thicknesses of 10 and 40 mm were measured. In low temperature conditions, the detonation velocities with the gap thicknesses of 10, 30 and 40 mm were measured. The growth laws of the detonation were analyzed, and the parameters such as detonation pressure, detonation velocity and detonation distance of the solid propellant were obtained. Numerical simulation was carried out to calculate the shock initiation process of the propellant, and the parameters of the ignition and growth model and the JWL state equation of the nonreactive propellant were determined by fitting the experimental data. The results show that the detonation pressure of the solid propellant is about 12.5 GPa, the critical initiation pressure is 5.16−5.61 GPa, the detonation distance is about 13.3 mm, and the detonation velocity is 5.719−6.013 km/s. The research results indicate that the low temperature has little effect on the shock initiation characteristics of the solid propellant.
- HTPB solid propellant,
- shock initiation,
- adaptability to low temperature,
- ignition and growth model

FullText(HTML)

References(17)

References

[1]	王晓峰, 王亲会, 王宁飞. 开展高能固体推进剂危险性分级研究的建议 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2003, 26(1): 59–61. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2003.01.018. WANG X F, WANG Q H, WANG N F. Suggestion on studying hazard classification of high energy solid propellants [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives and Propellants, 2003, 26(1): 59–61. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2003.01.018.
[2]	廖林泉, 胥会祥, 李勇宏, 等. HTPB推进剂危险性实验研究 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2010, 33(4): 28–31, 43. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2010.04.007. LIAO L Q, XU H X, LI Y H, et al. Experimental study on hazard of HTPB propellants [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives and Propellants, 2010, 33(4): 28–31, 43. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7812.2010.04.007.
[3]	常新龙, 龙兵, 胡宽, 等. HTPB推进剂低温裂纹扩展特性试验研究 [J]. 固体火箭技术, 2015, 38(1): 86–89, 106. DOI: 10.7673/j.issn.1006-2793.2015.01.016. CHANG X L, LONG B, HU K, et al. Experimental study on low temperature crack growth behavior of HTPB propellant [J]. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology, 2015, 38(1): 86–89, 106. DOI: 10.7673/j.issn.1006-2793.2015.01.016.
[4]	TARVER C M, FRIED L E, RUGGIERO A J, et al. Energy transfer in solid explosives: UCRL-JC-111343 [R]. Washington: USDOE, 1993.
[5]	VORTHMAN J E. Facilities for the study of shock induced decomposition of high explosives [J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1982, 78(1): 680–684. DOI: 10.1063/1.33249.
[6]	URTIEW P A, ERICKSON L M, ALDIS D F, et al. Shock initiation of LX-17 as a function of its initial temperature [C]// Proceedings of the Ninth Symposium (International) on Detonation. Portland: OCNR, 1989.
[7]	AVERIN A N, ALEKSEEV A V, BATALOV S V, et al. Investigation into low-temperatures influence on high explosive compounds sensitivity to shock-wave impacts [J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1996, 370(1): 847–850. DOI: 10.1063/1.50838.
[8]	池家春, 刘雨生, 龚晏清, 等. JB9014炸药在常温和−54 ℃低温下冲击引爆压力场发展的实验研究 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2001, 15(1): 39–47. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2001.01.006. CHI J C, LIU Y S, GONG Y Q, et al. Investigation of shock pressure evolution of initiation in IHE’s JB9014 at ambient and −54 ℃ [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2001, 15(1): 39–47. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2001.01.006.
[9]	伍俊英, 陈朗, 鲁建英, 等. 高能固体推进剂冲击起爆特征研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2008, 29(11): 1315–1319. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2008.11.007. WU J Y, CHEN L, LU J Y, et al. Research on shock initiation of the high energy solid propellants [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2008, 29(11): 1315–1319. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2008.11.007.
[10]	GUSTAVSEN R L, GEHR R J, BUCHOLTZ S M, et al. Shock initiation of the tri-amino-tri-nitro-benzene based explosive PBX 9502 cooled to −55 ℃ [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2012, 112(7): 074909. DOI: 10.1063/1.4757599.
[11]	CHEN L, PI Z D, LIU D Y, et al. Shock initiation of the CL-20-based explosive C-1 measured with embedded electromagnetic particle velocity gauges [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2016, 41(6): 1060–1069. DOI: 10.1002/prep.201600048.
[12]	刘丹阳, 陈朗, 杨坤, 等. CL-20基炸药爆轰产物JWL状态方程实验标定方法研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2016, 37(S1): 141–145. LIU D Y, CHEN L, YANG K, et al. Calibration method of parameters in JWL equation of state for detonation products of CL-20-based explosives [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2016, 37(S1): 141–145.
[13]	PI Z D, CHEN L, WU J Y. Temperature-dependent shock initiation of CL-20-based high explosives [J]. Central European Journal of Energetic Materials, 2017, 14(2): 361–374. DOI: 10.22211/cejem/68392.
[14]	裴红波, 钟斌, 李星瀚, 等. RDX基含铝炸药圆筒试验及状态方程研究 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2019, 42(4): 403–409. DOI: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2019.04.015. PEI H B, ZHONG B, LI X H, et al. Study on the cylinder tests and equation of state in RDX based aluminized explosives [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives and Propellants, 2019, 42(4): 403–409. DOI: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2019.04.015.
[15]	黄韵, 王旭, 徐森, 等. HMX基推进剂临界起爆压力的研究 [J]. 爆破器材, 2020, 49(1): 34–39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2020.01.007. HUANG Y, WANG X, XU S, et al. Study on critical initiation pressure of HMX-base propellant [J]. Explosive Materials, 2020, 49(1): 34–39. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8352.2020.01.007.
[16]	孙业斌, 惠君明, 曹欣茂. 军用混合炸药[M]. 北京: 兵器工业出版社, 1995.
[17]	章冠人, 陈大年. 凝聚炸药起爆动力学[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1991.

Relative Articles

[1]	CHEN Xiaokun, WANG Jun, CHENG Fangming. Research progress on hydrogen gas explosion suppression materials and their suppression mechanisms[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(11): 111101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0418
[2]	WANG Zhenning, YIN Jianping, YI Jianya, LI Xudong. A study on the circumferential propagation law of the shock waves produced by the near ground dynamic explosion of cylindrical charge[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(6): 063201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0313
[3]	PAN Yahao, ZONG Zhouhong, QIAN Haimin, HUANG Jie, SHAN Yulin. Experimental study on blast wave propagation in calcareous sand[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(5): 053201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0117
[4]	LIU Jiajia, ZHANG Yang, ZHANG Xiang, NIE Zishuo. Simulation study on propagation characteristics of gas explosion in Y-shaped ventilated coal face[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(8): 085401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0018
[5]	HAO Zheng, XU Kaili, ZHANG Yuyuan, LIU Bo. Study on the effect of Al(OH)₃ on the flame propagation characteristics of polyacrylonitrile powder[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(6): 065401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0322
[6]	LI Jingye, JIANG Xinsheng, YU Binbin, WANG Chunhui, WANG Zituo. Visualization experimental research of oil gas vapor cloud deflagration in large-scale unconfined space[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(3): 035401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0176
[7]	HAN Wenhu, ZHANG Bo, WANG Cheng. Progress in studying mechanisms of initiation and propagation for gaseous detonations[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(12): 121402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0398
[8]	MENG Xiangbao, WANG Junfeng, ZHANG Yansong, LI Zhiyong. Study on the inhibitory property and mechanism of inert powder on dust explosion flame of oil shale[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(10): 105401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0306
[9]	LI Yanchao, BI Mingshu, GAO Wei. Theoretical prediction of hydrogen cloud explosion overpressure considering self-accelerating flame propagation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(7): 072101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0140
[10]	XUE Shao, TAO Ruyi, WANG Hao, CHENG Shenshen. Experimental research on the law of flame spreading in the charge bed of a central ignition tube[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(11): 112101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0030
[11]	Chen Xi, Chen Xianfeng, Zhang Hongming, Liu Xuanya, Zhang Ying, Niu Yi, Hu Dongtao. Effects of inerting agent with different particle sizes onthe flame propagation of aluminum dust[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 759-765. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0759-07
[12]	Sun Shaochen, Bi Mingshu, Ding Chunhui, Hu Xiyu, Liu Gang, Feng Yu. Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of flame propagation and quenching process in the in-line crimped-ribbon flame arrester[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 353-364. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0353-12
[13]	Cui Yu, Ma Honghao, Shen Zhaowu, Wang Fei, Hong Yong, Wang Luqing. A new type of explosive diode and its mechanism[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(6): 1031-1038. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)06-1031-08
[14]	CHU Huai-bao, YANG Xiao-lin, HOU Ai-jun, YU Yong-qiang, LIANG Wei-min. Asimulation-basedexperimentalstudyonexplosionstresswavepropagation andattenuationincoa[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(2): 185-189. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)02-0185-05
[15]	WANG Qi-rui, ZHANG Xiao-zhong, KONG Fu-li, ZHANG Fu-ming. Shockwavepropagationofanexplosioninsideitsentrance toamultilevelgallerytunnel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(5): 449-454. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)05-0449-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(6)

1.	陈洋，王肇喜，翟师慧，盛鹏，王者蓝，朱明亮. 3D打印点阵夹芯结构冲击损伤的近场动力学模拟. 爆炸与冲击. 2024(03): 146-160 . 本站查看
2.	郭孝欢，孙法亮，卿华，雍霄驹，夏鑫园. 破片群作用下复合材料结构损伤特性及抢修需求分析. 空军工程大学学报. 2024(03): 121-126 .
3.	陈洋，汤杰，易果，吴亮，蒋刚. 泡沫铝夹层结构抗冲击性能的近场动力学模拟分析. 爆炸与冲击. 2023(03): 149-159 . 本站查看
4.	刘仁伟，宋明，白晓龙. 微势近场动力学在材料变形的适用性研究. 舰船科学技术. 2023(15): 52-58 .
5.	康煌，王舒，闫文敏，崔海林，郭香华，张庆明. 轮胎破片冲击机身的非等比例相似模型研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2022(07): 84-96 . 本站查看
6.	赖震宇. 爆炸荷载下舰船复合材料上层建筑结构动力响应分析. 舰船科学技术. 2022(16): 20-23 .