Resistance of all-metallic honeycomb sandwich structures to underwater explosion shock

WEI Zihan; ZHAO Zhenyu; YE Fan; PEI Yiqun; WANG Xin; ZHANG Qiancheng; LU Tianjian

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2020-0392

Volume 41 Issue 8

Aug. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2021 > 41(8): 083104

WEI Zihan, ZHAO Zhenyu, YE Fan, PEI Yiqun, WANG Xin, ZHANG Qiancheng, LU Tianjian. Resistance of all-metallic honeycomb sandwich structures to underwater explosion shock[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 083104. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0392

Citation:

WEI Zihan, ZHAO Zhenyu, YE Fan, PEI Yiqun, WANG Xin, ZHANG Qiancheng, LU Tianjian. Resistance of all-metallic honeycomb sandwich structures to underwater explosion shock[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 083104. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0392

Citation:

WEI Zihan, ZHAO Zhenyu, YE Fan, PEI Yiqun, WANG Xin, ZHANG Qiancheng, LU Tianjian. Resistance of all-metallic honeycomb sandwich structures to underwater explosion shock[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 083104. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0392

PDF( 9035 KB)

Resistance of all-metallic honeycomb sandwich structures to underwater explosion shock

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0392

WEI Zihan^{1, 2
,},
ZHAO Zhenyu^{2, 3
,
,},
YE Fan⁴,
PEI Yiqun⁵,
WANG Xin^{1, 2},
ZHANG Qiancheng¹,
LU Tianjian^{2, 3
,
,}

1.
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, Shaanxi, China
2.
MIIT Key Laboratory of Multifunctional Lightweight Materials and Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, China
3.
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu, China
4.
Marine Design and Research Institute of China, Shanghai 200011, China
5.
Shanghai Shipbuilding Technology Research Institute, Shanghai 200032, China

Received Date: 2020-10-16
Rev Recd Date: 2021-01-14

Available Online: 2021-07-22

Publish Date: 2021-08-05

Abstract

Abstract

All-metallic honeycomb sandwich structure is a new kind of ship protection structure, which has a broad application prospect in the field of ship protection. However, there is not enough research on the dynamic response of honeycomb sandwich structures under an actual underwater explosion load. The dynamic behavior and protective performance of honeycomb sandwich structures subjected to the underwater explosion load were investigated, both experimentally and numerically. A backplane stiffened honeycomb sandwich structure and the corresponding buoyant box were designed and fabricated for the subsequent experimental study in a large open water pool. The structural response was numerically simulated by using the coupled acoustic-structural approach (integrated in commercial FE code ABAQUS/Explicit). The numerical simulation results are in good agreement with the experimental measurements. Then, the deformation process and energy absorption characteristics of the honeycomb sandwich structure subjected to underwater explosion load were investigated. The effects of the load parameter (impact factor) and two geometric parameters (i.e., facesheet thickness ratio and core relative density) on the dynamic response of the sandwich structure were analyzed. Finally, the Pareto optimal designs with minimize value of non-dimensional areal density and minimize value of non-dimensional maximum deformation of the central point on back facesheet were obtained by using the NSGA-Ⅱ algorithm. The results show that with the increase of the impact factor, the overall deformation of the structure increases significantly. The honeycomb core is the main energy absorbing substructure during this process, and its energy absorption ratio gradually decreases. With the increase of either face sheet thickness ratio or core relative density, the deformation of the structure first decreases and then increases, accompanied by changes in deformation modes. The influence of core relative density is more significant. The optimized structures obtained from multi-objective optimal design effectively reduce the areal density and the maximum deformation, which can be used as a reference for the future design of honeycomb sandwich structures.
- honeycomb sandwich,
- underwater explosion,
- coupled acoustic-structural simulation,
- optimal design

FullText(HTML)

References(28)

References

[1]	陈永念. 舰船水下爆炸数值仿真及抗爆结构研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2008: 1−2.
[2]	NURICK G N, OLSON M D, FAGNAN J R, et al. Deformation and tearing of blast-loaded stiffened square plates [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1995, 16(2): 273–291. DOI: 10.1016/0734-743X(94)00046-Y.
[3]	朱锡, 白雪飞, 黄若波, 等. 船体板架在水下接触爆炸作用下的破口试验 [J]. 中国造船, 2003, 44(1): 46–52. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2003.01.007. ZHU X, BAI X F, HUANG R B, et al. Crevasse experiment research of plate membrance in vessels subjected to underwater contact explosion [J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2003, 44(1): 46–52. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4882.2003.01.007.
[4]	梅志远, 朱锡, 刘润泉. 船用加筋板架爆炸载荷下动态响应数值分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2004, 24(1): 80–84. MEI Z Y, ZHU X, LIU R Q. Dynamic response researches of ship’s stiffened plate structure under explosive load [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2004, 24(1): 80–84.
[5]	JEN C Y, TAI Y S. Deformation behavior of a stiffened panel subjected to underwater shock loading using the non-linear finite element method [J]. Materials and Design, 2010, 31(1): 325–335. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.011.
[6]	GUPTA N K, KUMAR P, HEGDE S. On deformation and tearing of stiffened and un-stiffened square plates subjected to underwater explosion: a numerical study [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2010, 52(5): 733–744. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2010.01.005.
[7]	方斌, 朱锡, 张振华. 水下爆炸冲击波载荷作用下船底板架的塑性动力响应 [J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2008, 29(4): 326–331. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.2008.04.002. FANG B, ZHU X, ZHANG Z H. Plastic dynamic response of ship hull grillage to underwater blast loading [J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2008, 29(4): 326–331. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.2008.04.002.
[8]	牟金磊, 朱锡, 张振华, 等. 水下爆炸载荷作用下加筋板变形及开裂试验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2008, 27(1): 57–60. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2008.01.013. MU J L, ZHU X, ZHANG Z H, et al. Experimental study on deformation and rupture of stiffened plates subjected to underwater shock [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2008, 27(1): 57–60. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2008.01.013.
[9]	KEIL A H. The response of ships to underwater explosions [R]. Washington: David Taylor Model Basin, 1961.
[10]	FLECK N A, DESHPANDE V S. The resistance of clamped sandwich beams to shock loading [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2004, 71(3): 386–401. DOI: 10.1115/1.1629109.
[11]	张延昌, 顾金兰, 王自力. 蜂窝式夹层板结构单元的防护性能分析 [J]. 舰船科学技术, 2008, 30(6): 108–113. DOI: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2008.06.022. ZHANG Y C, GU J L, WANG Z L. Research on the anti-shock capacity of square honeycomb sandwich plane [J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2008, 30(6): 108–113. DOI: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2008.06.022.
[12]	王自力, 张延昌, 顾金兰. 基于夹层板抗水下爆炸舰船底部结构设计 [J]. 舰船科学技术, 2010, 32(1): 22–27. DOI: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2010.01.002. WANG Z L, ZHANG Y C, GU J L. Anti-shock double bottom structure design of warship based on sandwich panel [J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2010, 32(1): 22–27. DOI: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2010.01.002.
[13]	XUE Z Y, HUTCHINSON J W. A comparative study of impulse-resistant metal sandwich plates [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2004, 30(10): 1283–1305. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.08.007.
[14]	WADLEY H N G, DHARMASENA K P, QUEHEILLALT D T, et al. Dynamic compression of square honeycomb structures during underwater impulsive loading [J]. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, 2007, 2(10): 2025–2048. DOI: 10.2140/jomms.2007.2.2025.
[15]	MORI L F, LEE S, XUE Z Y, et al. Deformation and fracture modes of sandwich structures subjected to underwater impulsive loads [J]. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, 2007, 2(10): 1981–2006. DOI: 10.2140/jomms.2007.2.1981.
[16]	任鹏. 非药式水下冲击波加载技术及铝合金结构抗冲击特性研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2014: 99−116.
[17]	陈高杰, 沈晓乐, 王树乐, 等. 基于声固耦合法的环肋壳水下冲击数值仿真试验 [J]. 兵工自动化, 2015, 34(2): 7–10. DOI: 10.7690/bgzdh.2015.02.002. CHEN G J, SHEN X L, WANG S L, et al. Numerical simulation test of ring-stiffened hull subjected to underwater shock based on coupled acoustic-structural arithmetic [J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2015, 34(2): 7–10. DOI: 10.7690/bgzdh.2015.02.002.
[18]	YU B, HAN B, NI C Y, et al. Dynamic crushing of all-metallic corrugated panels filled with close-celled aluminum foams [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2015, 82(1): 011006. DOI: 10.1115/1.4028995.
[19]	STOUT M G, FOLLANSBEE P S. Strain rate sensitivity, strain hardening, and yield behavior of 304L stainless steel [J]. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 1986, 108(4): 344–353. DOI: 10.1115/1.3225893.
[20]	李金河, 赵继波, 谭多望, 等. 炸药水中爆炸的冲击波性能 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2009, 29(2): 172–176. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0172-05. LI J H, ZHAO J B, TAN D W, et al. Underwater shock wave performances of explosives [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 172–176. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0172-05.
[21]	ZAMYSHLYAEV B V, YAKOVLEV Y S. Dynamic loads in underwater explosion: AD0757183 [R]. Washington: Naval Intelligence Support Center Washington DC Translation DIV, 1973.
[22]	O’HARA G J, CUNNIFF P F. Scaling for shock response of equipment in different submarines [J]. Shock and Vibration, 1993, 1(2): 161–170. DOI: 10.3233/SAV-1993-1207.
[23]	张延昌, 周红, 王果, 等. U型折叠式夹层板防护性能数值仿真分析 [J]. 船舶力学, 2013, 17(10): 1191–1201. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2013.10.013. ZHANG Y C, ZHOU H, WANG G, et al. Numerical simulation analysis on protective performance of U-type corrugated cores sandwich panel [J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2013, 17(10): 1191–1201. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2013.10.013.
[24]	孙晓旺, 陶晓晓, 王显会, 等. 负泊松比蜂窝材料抗爆炸特性及优化设计研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(9): 66–76. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0011. SUN X W, TAO X X, WANG X H, et al. Research on explosion-proof characteristics and optimization design of negative Poisson’s ratio honeycomb material [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(9): 66–76. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0011.
[25]	YANG M, HAN B, SU P B, et al. Axial crushing of ultralight all-metallic truncated conical sandwich shells with corrugated cores [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2019, 140: 318–330. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.03.048.
[26]	吕小青, 王旭, 徐连勇, 等. 基于径向基函数神经网络和NSGA-Ⅱ的气保焊工艺多目标优化 [J]. 天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版), 2020, 53(10): 1013–1018. DOI: 10.11784/tdxbz201909067. LÜ X Q, WANG X, XU L Y, et al. Multi-objective optimization of gas metal arc welding process parameters based on radial based function neural network and NSGA-Ⅱ [J]. Journal of Tianjin University (Science and Technology), 2020, 53(10): 1013–1018. DOI: 10.11784/tdxbz201909067.
[27]	DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-Ⅱ [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2): 182–197. DOI: 10.1109/4235.996017.
[28]	WANG X, LI X, YUE Z S, et al. Optimal design of metallic corrugated sandwich panels with polyurea-metal laminate face sheets for simultaneous vibration attenuation and structural stiffness [J]. Composite Structures, 2021, 256: 112994. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112994.

Relative Articles

[1]	Study on the influence of afterburning effect on implosion characteristics in different energy release rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0442
[2]	Analysis of Load Characteristics and Dynamic Behavior of RC Box Structures under Internal Explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0388
[3]	ZHANG Xuerui, ZHOU Tao. Energy release characteristics of composite charge in confined space[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(6): 062302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0381
[4]	ZHU Jianlei, HAN Lei, FANG Zhanxiang, XU Yuxin. Calculation method for quasi-static pressure of annular composite implosion of active materials and explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0218
[5]	GAO Jinming, ZENG Dan, SUN Lei, CHEN Li, HE Chenglong. Experimental study on TNT equivalent coefficients for two new kinds of propellants[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(10): 102101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0432
[6]	KONG Xiangshao, WANG Zitang, KUANG Zheng, ZHOU Hu, ZHENG Cheng, WU Weiguo. Experimental study on the mitigation effects of confined-blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(6): 062901. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0193
[7]	DUAN Zhongshan, GONG Pengbing, YUAN Wei, GUO Huiping, LUO Yongfeng, LUO Kunsheng. Experimental and simulation of diffusion model and characteristics of explosive cloud at different wind fields[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(5): 055901. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0097
[8]	JIAO Xiaolong, ZHAO Pengduo, YAO Yangwu, ZHANG Lei, LI Xudong, CHI Hai. Regulation of different quantity TNT blasting in multi-cabin structure based on simulation and dimensional analysis[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(8): 085101. doi: 10.11883/bzyjc-2019-0438
[9]	LI Zhirong, ZHANG Yulei, YUAN Jianfei, WANG Shengqiang. Deformation and payload of thin circular plates subjected to internal explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(11): 113101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0045
[10]	Experimental studies on characteristics of explosion pressure loadin cylinder apparatus[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(10): 102202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0327
[11]	HU Bayi, XIAO Zhiqiang, GU Yan, LIU Yu, FENG Dongsheng, LIU Jun. Vibration monitoring and analysis of the 40 kg TNT equivalent blast containment chamber[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 918-924. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0260
[12]	LIU Wenxiang, ZHANG Dezhi, ZHONG Fangping, CHENG Shuai, ZHANG Qingming. Quasi-static gas pressure generated by explosive charge blasting in a spherical explosion containment vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1045-1050. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0056
[13]	Li Ying, Ren Guangwei, Zhang Wei, Zhao Pengduo, Zhang Lei, Du Zhipeng. Water mitigation effect under internal blast[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(6): 1080-1086. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)06-1080-07
[14]	Hu Yang, Zhu Jianfang, Zhu Kai. Experimental study on explosion effect in a closed single rectangular cavity[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(3): 340-346. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)03-0340-07
[15]	Zhong Wei, Tian Zhou, Zhao Yang. Calculation of the quasi-static temperature of confined explosions in consideration of the effect of the chemical reactions with detonation products[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 777-784. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0777-08
[16]	Xue Bing, Ma Hong-hao, Shen Zhao-wu, Yu Yong. Dynamic calibration of pressure sensors by small-scale explosive experiments in an explosion containment vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(3): 437-441. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)03-0437-05
[17]	Zhong Wei, Tian Zhou. Calculation of quasi-static pressures for confined explosions considering chemical reactions under isobaric assumption[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(4): 375-380. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)04-0375-06
[18]	ZHAO Ji-bo, TAN Duo-wang, LI Jin-he, ZENG Hua-long, ZHANG Yuan-ping. Axial pressure damping of cylindrical TNT charges in the near underwater-explosion field[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(6): 539-543. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)06-0539-05
[19]	PANG Wei-bin, LI Yong-chi, HE Xiang. The regularity of arrival time in T-shaped tunnel for shock wave due to explosions from high explosive charges[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(1): 63-67. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)01-0063-05