Determination method of tunnel blasting parameters using electronic detonator under changing condition of free surface

LIU Xiangyu; GONG Min; WU Haojun; AN Di

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2020-0428

Volume 41 Issue 10

Oct. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2021 > 41(10): 105202

LIU Xiangyu, GONG Min, WU Haojun, AN Di. Determination method of tunnel blasting parameters using electronic detonator under changing condition of free surface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(10): 105202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0428

Citation:

LIU Xiangyu, GONG Min, WU Haojun, AN Di. Determination method of tunnel blasting parameters using electronic detonator under changing condition of free surface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(10): 105202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0428

Citation:

PDF( 1675 KB)

Determination method of tunnel blasting parameters using electronic detonator under changing condition of free surface

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0428

School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2020-11-24
Rev Recd Date: 2021-04-16

Available Online: 2021-09-16

Publish Date: 2021-10-13

Abstract

Abstract

The technical potential of an electronic detonator has not yet been fully utilized in tunnel engineering. An important reason is that there is no calculation method of blasting parameters supported by rigorous theory. The pivotal blasting parameters such as charge and delay time, etc. are mostly designed following ordinary mining methods. And it can not solve the problem of calculation accuracy of blasting parameters after the formation of the second free surface. Taking Guanyinqiao Tunnel in Chongqing as the research background, based on the Anderson principle and the delay characteristics of the electronic detonator, a new method for designing the blasting parameters of electronic detonators was proposed under the different free surface conditions changing in the process of tunnel blasting, from single free surface to dual free surface. Firstly, based on the single-hole and single free surface blasting vibration curves of different charges acquired on site, the superimposed vibration of multiple blast-holes under each delay time was calculated one by one. After comparing the superimposed vibration curves of different charges and delays, it was determined the blasting parameters of single free surface, including the maximum single-hole charge and the optimal inter-hole delay. Secondly, according to the characteristics of the electronic detonator, the short-delay cut blasting field test was designed. By comparing the calculated waveform without considering the influence of the second free surface with the measured waveform affected by the vibration reduction effect of the second free surface, it was found that the second free surface had formed at 48 ms after initiation. Based on this, a single-hole blasting test was designed after the formation of the second free surface. By calculating the superimposed vibration velocity based on the single-hole waveforms before and after the formation of the second free surface, it was determined the blasting parameters under the dual free surfaces condition, including single-hole charge, inter-hole delay time, and delay between different types of holes. Finally, the calculation method of blasting parameters in the whole blasting process was formed. After the comprehensive analysis of the calculated results, the single-hole charge of the main cutting holes is 1.2 kg, and it is 1.4 kg of the auxiliary cutting holes, then the delay time between holes is 5 ms on site; the minimum delay time between the main cut holes and the auxiliary cut holes is 35 ms. The field test was carried out with the optimized parameters mentioned above, and it got high-efficiency footage as well as a low vibration velocity.
- tunnel blasting,
- electronic detonator,
- vibration superposition,
- delay time,
- the second free surface

FullText(HTML)

References(20)

References

[1]	汪旭光, 沈立晋. 工业雷管技术的现状和发展 [J]. 工程爆破, 2003, 9(3): 52–57. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2003.03.013. WANG X G, SHEN L J. The state-of-the-arts of industrial detonators [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2003, 9(3): 52–57. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2003.03.013.
[2]	颜景龙. 中国电子雷管技术与应用 [J]. 中国工程科学, 2015, 17(1): 36–41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1742.2015.01.005. YAN J L. Technology and application of Chinese electronic detonator [J]. Engineering Sciences, 2015, 17(1): 36–41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1742.2015.01.005.
[3]	HASHEMI A S, KATSABANIS P. The effect of stress wave interaction and delay timing on blast-induced rock damage and fragmentation [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53(5): 2327–2346. DOI: 10.1007/s00603-019-02043-9.
[4]	LENG Z D, SUN J S, LU W B, et al. Mechanism of the in-hole detonation wave interactions in dual initiation with electronic detonators in bench blasting operation [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2021, 129: 103873. DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103873.
[5]	SINGH P K, ROY M P, PASWAN R K, et al. Blast vibration effects in an underground mine caused by open-pit mining [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2015, 80: 79–88. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.09.009.
[6]	FU H X, WONG L N Y, ZHAO Y, et al. Comparison of excavation damage zones resulting from blasting with nonel detonators and blasting with electronic detonators [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 47(2): 809–816. DOI: 10.1007/s00603-013-0419-2.
[7]	赵勇, 傅洪贤, 谢晋水, 等. 电子雷管在隧道钻爆法开挖中降振试验研究 [J]. 工程爆破, 2012, 18(1): 82–85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2012.01.022. ZHAO Y, FU H X, XIE J S, et al. Experimental research on decreasing blasting vibration velocity by digital detonator [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2012, 18(1): 82–85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2012.01.022.
[8]	曹杨, 王旭春, 余志伟, 等. 隧道近距下穿老旧建筑物爆破振动监测及减振技术研究 [J]. 施工技术, 2017, 46(11): 82–85. DOI: 10.7672/sgjs2017110082. CAO Y, WANG X C, YU Z W, et al. Blasting vibration monitoring and reduction technology of tunnel under-passing aging buildings in a short distance [J]. Construction Technology, 2017, 46(11): 82–85. DOI: 10.7672/sgjs2017110082.
[9]	傅洪贤, 沈周, 赵勇, 等. 隧道电子雷管爆破降振技术试验研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(3): 597–603. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.03.018. FU H X, SHEN Z, ZHAO Y, et al. Experimental study of decreasing vibration technology of tunnel blasting with digital detonator [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(3): 597–603. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.03.018.
[10]	管晓明, 傅洪贤, 王梦恕. 隧道近距下穿山坡楼房爆破振动测试研究 [J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(7): 1995–2003. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2014.07.027. GUAN X M, FU H X, WANG M S. Blasting vibration characteristics monitoring of tunnel under-passing hillside buildings in short-distance [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2014, 35(7): 1995–2003. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2014.07.027.
[11]	程围峰, 王振宇, 陈银鲁, 等. 引水隧洞电子雷管爆破震动特征研究 [J]. 铁道工程学报, 2014(5): 79–84. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2014.05.015. CHENG W F, WANG Z Y, CHEN Y L, et al. Research on the vibration characteristic of electronic detonator blasting for water diversion tunnel [J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2014(5): 79–84. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2106.2014.05.015.
[12]	马晓明, 王振宇, 陈银鲁, 等. 精确微差爆破震动能量分布特征分析 [J]. 解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 13(4): 449–454. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3443.2012.04.018. MA X M, WANG Z Y, CHEN Y L, et al. Analysis of energy distribution of accurate millisecond blasting vibration [J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 13(4): 449–454. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3443.2012.04.018.
[13]	田振农, 孟祥栋, 王国欣. 城区隧道电子雷管起爆错相减震机理分析 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2012, 31(21): 108–111. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2012.21.022. TIAN Z N, MENG X D, WANG G X. Mechanism analysis of fault-phase vibration reduction for tunnel blasting initiated by electronic detonators in city area [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(21): 108–111. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2012.21.022.
[14]	ANDERSON D A. A method site-specific prediction and control of ground vibration from blasting [C]// Proceedings of the First Mini-symposium on Explosives and Blasting Research, 1985: 28−42.
[15]	HINZEN K G. Modelling of blast vibrations [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1988, 25(6): 439–445. DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(88)90984-9.
[16]	AZIZABADI H R M, MANSOURI H, FOUCHÉ O. Coupling of two methods, waveform superposition and numerical, to model blast vibration effect on slope stability in jointed rock masses [J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 61: 42–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.04.008.
[17]	龚敏, 吴昊骏, 孟祥栋, 等. 密集建筑物下隧道开挖微振控制爆破方法与振动分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2015, 35(3): 350–358. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)03-0350-09. GONG M, WU H J, MENG X D, et al. A precisely-controlled blasting method and vibration analysis for excavation under dense buildings [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2015, 35(3): 350–358. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)03-0350-09.
[18]	吴昊骏, 龚敏. 基于雷管实际延时范围的逐孔爆破振动合成计算与应用 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(2): 151–161. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0415. WU H J, GONG M. Calculation and application of hole by hole blasting vibration superposition based on measured delay times of detonators [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(2): 151–161. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0415.
[19]	IWANO K, HASHIBA K, NAGAE J, et al. Reduction of tunnel blasting induced ground vibrations using advanced electronic detonators [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 105: 103556. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103556.
[20]	龚敏, 吴昊骏. 隧道爆破现场高速图像采集与精确控制爆破参数研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(5): 3–12. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0319. GONG M, WU H J. High-speed photography image acquisition system in tunnel blasting and parameters study on precisely controlled blasting [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(5): 3–12. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0319.