Influence of end non-reactive fillers on the dispersion of the fragments in an axially-enhanced warhead

LI Guojie; WANG Chenglong; GUO Zhiwei; LI Xiang; HUANG Guangyan

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2021-0281

Volume 42 Issue 8

Sep. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2022 > 42(8): 082202

ZHU Lei, LIU Yang, MENG Jinhui, LI Zhiguo, HU Jianbo, LI Guoping, WANG Yonggang. Dynamic mechanical properties and constitutive relationship of selective laser melted Ti-6Al-4V alloy[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(9): 091405. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0227

Citation:

LI Guojie, WANG Chenglong, GUO Zhiwei, LI Xiang, HUANG Guangyan. Influence of end non-reactive fillers on the dispersion of the fragments in an axially-enhanced warhead[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(8): 082202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0281

Citation:

PDF( 2005 KB)

Influence of end non-reactive fillers on the dispersion of the fragments in an axially-enhanced warhead

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0281

1.
Beijing Institute of Space Long March Vehicle, Beijing 100074, China
2.
State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China

Received Date: 2021-07-05
Rev Recd Date: 2022-02-22

Available Online: 2022-04-06

Publish Date: 2022-09-09

Abstract

Abstract

In the current design of the dynamic damage field of the fragment warheads, the central blind area effect is regarded as an essential factor affecting the warhead damage efficiency improvement. The axially-enhanced warhead has become an important design means to eliminate the dynamic central blind area of the warhead, which attracts more and more attention from relevant researchers. In the present paper, based on the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) computation method, a series of numerical models for the shell breaking and fragment dispersion processes of axially-reinforced warheads with non-filler, polyurethane filler nylon filler and explosive filler, respectively, at the end under the explosive loadings are established, and used to study the influence of the characteristics of the fillers in the front of the warhead on the dynamic response of the shell. It is found from the numerical simulations that the filler has a significant influence on the velocity of the fragments in the front of the warhead but a minor influence on the dispersion angle of the fragments. The mechanism of the influence of the non-reactive filler on the fragment velocity is analyzed by comparing the velocity history curves of the specific fragments. The results show that the polyurethane foam filling can significantly delay the acceleration process of the explosive shock wave to the forward fragment and reduce the explosive load to a certain extent. The nylon filler can reduce the acceleration of the forward fragment and the acceleration of the lateral fragment to a certain extent. Thus, the explosion loading is guided to be evenly distributed around the circumference of the end position. Considering the synthesis of the involved velocity of the warhead, using low-density and low-mass filler instead of head charge has the same dynamic damage effect of improving the energy utilization efficiency of the axially-enhanced warhead. The numerical models established in this paper and the research finding can provide some reference for the dynamic damage field design of conventional fragment warheads.
- axially-enhanced warhead,
- dynamic blind region,
- non-reactive filler,
- fragment,
- dispersion angle

FullText(HTML)

References(18)

References

[1]	赵耘晨. 前向增强杀爆弹前置破片初速及飞散方向研究 [D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2016: 1–9. ZHAO Y C. The study of fragment initial velocity and scattering direction of front fragment on forward enhanced lethal he projectile [D]. Nanjing, Jiangsu, China: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2016: 1–9.
[2]	HUANG G Y, LI W, FENG S S. Fragment velocity distribution of cylindrical rings under eccentric point initiation [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2015, 40(2): 215–220. DOI: 10.1002/prep.201400180.
[3]	NING J G, DUAN Y, XU X Z, et al. Velocity characteristics of fragments from prismatic casing under internal explosive loading [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 109: 29–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.05.018.
[4]	DHOTE K D, MURTHY K P S, RAJAN K M, et al. Directional warhead design methodology for a tailored fragment beam [J]. Central European Journal of Energetic Materials, 2015, 12(4): 637–649.
[5]	DING L L, LI Z D, LIANG M Z, et al. The dispersion rule of fragments about the asymmetric shell [J]. Shock and Vibration, 2017, 2017: 9810978. DOI: 10.1155/2017/9810978.
[6]	李超, 李向东, 陈志斌, 等. 前向增强杀伤榴弹对人员目标杀伤威力分析 [J]. 兵工学报, 2014, 35(7): 1119–1123. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.07.028. LI C, LI X D, CHEN Z B, et al. Lethality of forward enhanced lethal he projectile against personnel targets [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2014, 35(7): 1119–1123. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2014.07.028.
[7]	石志彬, 高敏, 米双山, 等. 前向战斗部破片散布均匀性研究 [J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2014, 34(1): 95-97; 138. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2014.01.024. SHI Z B, GAO M, MI S S, et al. Study on fragment dispersion uniformity of forward-firing warhead [J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2014, 34(1): 95-97; 138. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2014.01.024.
[8]	崔俊杰, 姜建东, 牛新立, 等. 轴向预制破片初速影响因素的研究 [J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2014, 34(2): 84-86; 97. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2014.02.023. CUI J J, JIANG J D, NIU X L, et al. The research on impacting factors of axial preformed fragment velocity [J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2014, 34(2): 84-86; 97. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9728.2014.02.023.
[9]	郭子云, 赵太勇, 陈智刚. 战斗部端面预制破片威力性能影响的数值仿真 [J]. 计算机仿真, 2015, 32(3): 33–37. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2015.03.008. GUO Z Y, ZHAO T Y, CHEN Z G. Numerical simulation of lethality influence of warhead end premade fragment [J]. Computer Simulation, 2015, 32(3): 33–37. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9348.2015.03.008.
[10]	李明星, 王志军, 黄阳洋, 等. 不同形状轴向预制破片的飞散特性研究 [J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2017, 38(12): 65–69. DOI: 10.11809/scbgxb2017.12.016. LI M X, WANG Z J, HUANG Y Y, et al. Study on the scattering characteristics of different shape axial prefabricated fragment [J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2017, 38(12): 65–69. DOI: 10.11809/scbgxb2017.12.016.
[11]	谭振, 陈鹏万, 周强, 等. 战斗部轴向威力的增强 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(4): 876–882. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0342. TAN Z, CHEN P W, ZHOU Q, et al. Enhancement of axial lethality of warhead [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 876–882. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0342.
[12]	JOHNSON G R, COOK W H . A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures[C]//Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics. The Hague, Netherlands, 1983: 12–21.
[13]	陈刚, 陈忠富, 陶俊林, 等. 45钢动态塑性本构参量与验证 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2005, 25(5): 69–74. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)05-0451-06. CHEN G, CHEN Z F, TAO J L, et al. Investigation and validation on plastic constitutive parameters of 45 steel [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2005, 25(5): 69–74. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)05-0451-06.
[14]	DOBRATZ B M, CRAWFORD P C. LLNL explosives handbook [M]. Livermore, CA, USA: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1985.
[15]	DOBRATZ B M. LLNL explosives handbook: properties of chemical explosives and explosives and explosive simulants [R] . Livermore, CA, USA: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1981.
[16]	恽寿榕, 涂侯杰, 梁德寿, 等. 爆炸力学计算方法[M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 1995. YUN S R, TU H J, JIANG D S, et al. Explosion mechanics calculation method[M]. Beijing, China: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 1995.
[17]	ZHOU Y, WANG T, ZHU W, BIAN X, HUANG G. Evaluation of blast mitigation effects of hollow cylindrical barriers based on water and foam [J]. Composite Structures, 2022, 282: 115016. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115016.
[18]	MATUSKA D A, NEEDHAM C E, DURRETT R E. The AFWL HULL code codes for large problems fluid dynamics[C]//Proceedings of the SIGNUM Meeting on Software for Partial Differential Equations. New York, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 1975. DOI: 10.1145/800207.806410.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Lang, ZHAO Fengpeng, ZHANG Yuzhong, DENG Yongjun, LI Jicheng. Ballistic performance of tungsten fiber-reinforced metallic glass composite in the long rod oblique penetration/perforation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2025, 45(3): 033302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0158
[2]	ZHANG Quan, CHEN Jianbin, SHI Tongya, WANG Xiaofeng, NAN Xiaolong, WANG Yonggang. Mechanical behavior of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy with annealing state under extreme conditions[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2025, 45(3): 033102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0138
[3]	CHANG Baixue, ZHANG Yuanrui, WANG Shaohua, PENG Kefeng, YU Jilin, ZHENG Zhijun. Review on dynamic mechanical analysis and design of graded cellular materials[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(8): 081411. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0086
[4]	GUO Delong, REN Yunyan, XU Yuxin, LI Yongpeng, LI Xudong, YANG Xiang. Effect of explosion location on impact response of titanium alloy directional detonation container[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(2): 025102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0126
[5]	ZHANG Yuanrui, ZHU Yudong, WANG Kehong, ZHOU Qi, YU Jilin, ZHENG Zhijun. Dynamic response analysis of cellular projectile impacting foam sandwich beam[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(9): 091442. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0045
[6]	LIANG Hanliang, LUO Ning, CHEN Yanlong, RUI Tianan, PAN Yulong. Interfacial microstructure characteristics and dynamic mechanical properties of TA2/AZ31B/2024Al explosively-welded composite plates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(4): 045301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0367
[7]	LI Zhiyang, LEI Jianyin, LIU Zhifang. Dynamic response of nacre-like structure under explosion load[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(8): 083101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0145
[8]	ZHANG Renbo, JIN Liu, DU Xiuli, DOU Guoqin. Mechanical behavior of SFRC beams subjected to both impact and fire loadings[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 093102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0191
[9]	GUO Zitao, GAO Bin, GUO Zhao, ZHANG Wei. Dynamic constitutive relation based on J-C model of Q235 steel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 804-810. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0333
[10]	Xu Songlin, Wang Pengfei, Zhao Jian, Hu Shisheng. Dynamic behavior of concrete under static triaxial loadingusing 3D-Hopkinson bar[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 180-185. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0180-06
[11]	Jiang Meng, Guo Zhikun, Chen Wanxiang, Zou Huihui, Liang Wenguang. Mechanical properties of reactive powder concrete-filled steel tube after exposure to high temperature under impact loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 405-414. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0405-10
[12]	ZhaoGuang-ming, XieLi-xiang, MengXiang-rui. Aconstitutivemodelforsoftrockunderimpactload[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(2): 126-132. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)02-0126-07
[13]	WEI Yan-peng, YU Gang, DUAN Zhu-ping. Mechanicalpropertiesoflaser-weldeddissimilarstainlesssteelsstructure atelevatedtemperatureandhighstrainrates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(5): 504-509. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)05-0504-06
[14]	HU Chang-ming, WANG Xiang, LIU Cang-li, CAI Ling-cang. ApplicationsofDPSarraystestingtechnique todynamicpropertiesstudyofmaterial[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(1): 105-108. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0105-04
[15]	LI Xiang-long, LIU Dian-shu, FENG Ming-de, LI Sheng-lin, YAN Zhi-guo. Dynamic mechanical properties of concrete materials subjected to passive confining pressure produced by a steel sleeve[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(5): 463-468. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)05-0463-05
[16]	LUO Bin-qiang, HU Shi-sheng. Dynamic mechanical properties of SnAgCu solder[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(5): 542-545. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)05-0542-04
[17]	SONG Yan-ze, LI Zhi-qiang, ZHAO Long-mao. Finite element analysis of dynamic crushing behaviors of closed-cell foams based on a tetrakaidecahedron model[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(1): 49-55. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)01-0049-07
[18]	XUE Zhi-gang, HU Shi-sheng. Dynamic behavior of cement mortar under active confinement[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(6): 561-564. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)06-0561-04
[19]	LAN Sheng-wei, ZENG Xin-wu. Effect of grain size on dynamic mechanical properties of pure aluminum[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(5): 462-466. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)05-0462-05
[20]	JIANG Xi-quan, TAO Jie, WANG Yu-zhi. Application of modified split Hopkinson pressure bar techanique in the study of dynamic behavior of a polyurethane foam[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(4): 358-363. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)04-0358-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

1.	李祥辉，张兴渝，胡家豪，刘洋，马伯翰，王永刚，蒋招绣. AISI 4340钢靶大塑性模型及断裂起始模型参数研究. 兵工学报. 2025(01): 301-316 .
2.	甘志鹏，涂灿，陈剑斌，谢超，王永刚，汪小锋. 退火态增材制造AZ91D镁合金在极端条件下的力学行为. 中国有色金属学报. 2024(04): 1268-1284 .
3.	刘涛，史正宏，雷经发，王璐，柏威. TC4钛合金在不同固溶温度下的微观结构及动态力学行为. 材料热处理学报. 2024(12): 100-109 .
4.	王丰，刘蒙，李国和，王大春，闫冬，范建勋. 金属增减材制造本构模型获取方法研究进展. 表面技术. 2023(03): 52-63 .
5.	史京帅，李忠华，刘斌，蒯泽宙，李霍东，陈彦磊，温海骏. 基于选区激光熔化的钛合金薄壁结构等刚度设计及性能研究. 应用激光. 2023(04): 1-8 .
6.	朱磊，杨勇，张继元，范树迁，魏文猴. N_2对增材制造钛基复合材料组织和性能的影响. 工程科学学报. 2023(09): 1509-1516 .
7.	刘涛，邵博，雷经发，王璐，孙虹. 固溶温度对TC4钛合金微观组织和动态拉伸力学性能的影响. 稀有金属材料与工程. 2023(12): 4133-4140 .