Analysis of dynamic mechanics and energy characteristics of concrete impact failure

DANG Faning; LI Yutao; REN Jie; ZHOU Mei

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2021-0444

Volume 42 Issue 8

Sep. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2022 > 42(8): 083202

Zhang Zhu, Jin Yan -juan. Shock wave loading of reverse detonation model[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(2): 223-228. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)02-0223-06

Citation:

DANG Faning, LI Yutao, REN Jie, ZHOU Mei. Analysis of dynamic mechanics and energy characteristics of concrete impact failure[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(8): 083202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0444

Zhang Zhu, Jin Yan -juan. Shock wave loading of reverse detonation model[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(2): 223-228. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)02-0223-06

Citation:

PDF( 4562 KB)

Analysis of dynamic mechanics and energy characteristics of concrete impact failure

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0444

Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, Shaanxi, China

Received Date: 2021-10-28
Rev Recd Date: 2022-01-25

Available Online: 2022-08-10

Publish Date: 2022-09-09

Abstract

Abstract

To investigate the mechanics, deformation, and energy evolution characteristics of concrete under dynamic loading, impact compression tests at impact velocities of 5, 6, and 7 m/s, and splitting tensile tests at 4 m/s were carried out on concrete specimens with aggregate volume rates of 0, 32%, 37%, and 42% using a 100 mm diameter split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) device. The failure process of concrete specimens was acquired by a high-speed camera, and the damaged concrete fragments were collected and sorted. Furthermore, the fractal dimension of fragments was calculated by dividing the fragments into different grades. The stress and strain of the concrete specimen were obtained through the corresponding calculation formulas. The relationships between specimen deformation, dynamic strength, and fractal dimension with impact velocity and aggregate rate were studied, and the expression for dynamic strength with respect to impact velocity and aggregate rate was developed. In addition, the fractal dimension was used to characterize the surface roughness of the concrete fragments, and the function expression between crack surface energy and fractal dimension was established. The relationship between sample absorption energy and crack surface energy was analyzed and compared. The results show that deformation hysteresis occurs when concrete specimens are destroyed and the failure is mainly in the form of splitting tensile damage. The dynamic strength increases with the increase of impact velocity and aggregate ratio, the dynamic strength of concrete can be better predicted by using the proposed dynamic strength formula. The fractal dimension of concrete breaking fragments, absorbed energy and crack surface energy all increase with the increase of impact velocity and decrease with the increase of aggregate rate, and the absorbed energy is always higher than the crack surface energy. The highest conversion rate of absorbed energy is achieved when the aggregate rate is 37%, with approximately 91% converts to crack surface energy.
- concrete,
- dynamic strength,
- aggregate rate,
- impact velocity,
- crack surface energy

FullText(HTML)

本文在完成过程中得到北京理工大学爆炸科学与技术国家重点实验室宁建国教授和赵衡阳教授的很多指导, 在此表示感谢。

References(30)

References

[1]	FALLON C, MCSHANE G J. Impact mitigating capabilities of a spray-on elastomer coating applied to concrete [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 128: 72–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.02.003.
[2]	KOLCHUNOV V I, ANDROSO N B. Influence of the structure of the cross-section of load-bearing structures on their deformation during emergency actions [J]. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2018, 463(3). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/463/3/032067.
[3]	高光发, 郭扬波. 高强混凝土动态压缩试验分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(3): 63–72. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0405. GAO G F, GUO Y B. Analysis of the dynamic compressive test of high strength concrete [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(3): 63–72. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0405.
[4]	刘传雄, 李玉龙, 吴子燕, 等. 混凝土材料的动态压缩破坏机理及本构关系 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2011, 30(5): 1–5. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2011.05.015. LIU C X, LI Y L, WU Z Y, et al. Failure mechanism and constitutive model of a concrete material under dynamic compressive loads [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2011, 30(5): 1–5. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2011.05.015.
[5]	李庆斌, 郑丹. 混凝土动力强度提高的机理探讨 [J]. 工程力学, 2005, 22(S1): 188–193. LI Q B, ZHENG D. Micro-mechanism on the enhancement of dynamic strength for concrete [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2005, 22(S1): 188–193.
[6]	EIBL J, CURBACH M. An attempt to explain strength increase due to high loading rates [J]. Nuclear Engineering & Design, 1989, 112: 45–50.
[7]	WEERHEIJM J, REINHARDT H W. Device for testing concrete under impact tensile loading and lateral compression [J]. Nuclear Engineering & Design, 1991, 126(3): 395–401. DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(91)90028-G.
[8]	ROSSI P. Coupling between the crack propagation velocity and the vapour diffusion in concrete [J]. Materials and Structures, 1989, 22(2): 91–97. DOI: 10.1007/BF02472279.
[9]	ROSSI P. Influence of cracking in the presence of free water on the mechanical behaviour of concrete [J]. Magazine of Concrete Research, 2015, 43(154): 53–57. DOI: 10.1680/macr.1991.43.154.53.
[10]	GURUSIDESWAR S, SHUKLA A, JONNALAGADDA K N, et al. Tensile strength and failure of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) composition over a wide range of strain rates [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 258: 119642. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119642.
[11]	马怀发, 王立涛, 陈厚群, 等. 混凝土动态损伤的滞后特性 [J]. 水利学报, 2010, 41(6): 659–664. DOI: 10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.2010.06.013. MA H F, WANG L T, CHEN H Q, et al. Mechanism of dynamic damage delay characteristic of concrete [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2010, 41(6): 659–664. DOI: 10.13243/j.cnki.slxb.2010.06.013.
[12]	秦川, 武明鑫, 张楚汉. 混凝土冲击劈拉实验与细观离散元数值仿真 [J]. 水利发电学报, 2013, 32(1): 196–205. QIN C, WU M X, ZHANG C H. Impact splitting tensile experiments of concrete and numerical modeling by meso-scale discrete elements [J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2013, 32(1): 196–205.
[13]	党发宁, 焦凯, 潘峰. 混凝土抗折动强度及其极值研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(3): 422–428. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)03-0422-07. DANG F N, JIAO K, PAN F. Investigation on concrete dynamic bending intensity and limit flexural intensity [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2016, 36(3): 422–428. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)03-0422-07.
[14]	谢和平, 彭瑞东, 鞠杨, 等. 岩石破坏的能量分析初探 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2005, 24(15): 2604–2608. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.15.001. XIE H P, PENG R D, JU Y, et al. On energy analysis of rock failure [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(15): 2604–2608. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2005.15.001.
[15]	李庆华, 赵昕, 徐世烺. 纳米二氧化硅改性超高韧性水泥基复合材料冲击压缩试验研究 [J]. 工程力学, 2017, 34(2): 85–93. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2015.06.0477. LI Q H, ZHAO X, XU S L. Impact compression properties of nano-sio₂ modified ultrahigh toughness cementitious composites using a split Hopkinson pressure bar [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2017, 34(2): 85–93. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2015.06.0477.
[16]	巫绪涛, 代仁强, 陈德兴, 等. 钢纤维混凝土动态劈裂试验的能量耗散分析 [J]. 应用力学学报, 2009, 26(1): 151–154+218. WU X T, DAI R Q, CHEN D X, et al. Energy dissipation analysis on dynamic splitting-tensile test of steel fiber reinforced concrete [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2009, 26(1): 151–154+218.
[17]	LI Y, ZHAI Y, LIU X Y, et al. Research on fractal characteristics and energy dissipation of concrete suffered freeze-thaw cycle action and impact loading [J]. Materials, 2019, 12(16): 2585. DOI: 10.3390/ma12162585.
[18]	TAN Y, CHENG Y, LIU J, et al. Experimental study of the dynamic mechanical properties of high-performance equal-sized–aggregate concrete [J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2021, 33(2): 04020463. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003474.
[19]	ZHANG Z X, KOU S Q, JIANG L G, et al. Effects of loading rate on rock fracture: fracture characteristics and energy partitioning [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2000, 37(5): 745–762. DOI: 10.1016/S1365-1609(0)00008-3.
[20]	翟越, 马国伟, 赵均海, 等. 花岗岩和混凝土在单轴冲击压缩荷载下的动态性能比较 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(4): 762–768. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.04.015. ZHAI Y, MA G W, ZHAO J H, et al. Comparison of dynamic capabilities of granite and concrete under uniaxial impact compressive loading [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2007, 26(4): 762–768. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2007.04.015.
[21]	李淼, 乔兰, 李庆文. 高应变率下预制单节理岩石SHPB劈裂试验能量耗散分析 [J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(7): 1336–1343. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201707021. LI M, QIAO L, LI Q W. Energy dissipation of rock specimens under high strain rate with single joint in SHPB tensile tests [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(7): 1336–1343. DOI: 10.11779/CJGE201707021.
[22]	吕太洪, 陈小伟, 陈刚. 基于混凝土试样SHPB实验的波形特征分析 [J]. 解放军理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 17(4): 345–349. DOI: 10.12018/j.issn.1009-3443.20160519005. LV T H, CHEN X W, CHEN G. Waveform features of split Hopkinson pressure bar tests of concrete specimen [J]. Journal of PLA University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 17(4): 345–349. DOI: 10.12018/j.issn.1009-3443.20160519005.
[23]	马芹永, 高常辉. 冲击荷载下玄武岩纤维水泥土吸能及分形特征 [J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(11): 3921–3928;3968. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0666. MA Q Y, GAO C H. Energy absorption and fractal characteristics of basalt fiber-reinforced cement-soil under impact loads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(11): 3921–3928;3968. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0666.
[24]	胡时胜, 王礼立, 宋力, 等. Hopkinson压杆技术在中国的发展回顾 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2014, 34(6): 641–657. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)06-0641-17. HU S S, WANG L L, SONG L, et al. Review of the development of Hopkinson pressure bar technique in China [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2014, 34(6): 641–657. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)06-0641-17.
[25]	马菊荣, 刘海峰, 杨维武. 沙漠砂混凝土动态力学性能实验研究 [J]. 实验力学, 2015, 30(4): 491–498. DOI: 10.7520/1001-4888-14-171. MA J R, LIU H F, YANG W W. Experimrntal study of dynamic mechanical properties of desert sand concrete [J]. Journal of Experimental Mechanics, 2015, 30(4): 491–498. DOI: 10.7520/1001-4888-14-171.
[26]	白二雷, 许金余, 高志刚. 冲击荷载作用下EPS混凝土动态性能研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2012, 31(13): 53–57. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2012.13.011. BAI E L, XU J Y, GAO Z G. Dynamic mechanical property of expanded polystyrene concrete under impact loading [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2012, 31(13): 53–57. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3835.2012.13.011.
[27]	IBRAHIM S M, ALMUSALLAM T H. , AL-SALLOUM Y A, et al. Strain rate dependent behavior and modeling for compression response of hybrid fiber reinforced concrete[J]. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 2019, 13(9). DOI: 10.1590/1679-78252717.
[28]	李占金, 郝家旺, 甘德清, 等. 动载作用下磁铁矿石破坏特性实验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2019, 38(12): 231–238; 245. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2019.12.033. LI Z J, HAO J W, GAN D Q, et al. An experimental study on the failure characteristics of magnetite ore based on dynamic load [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019, 38(12): 231–238; 245. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2019.12.033.
[29]	赵昕, 徐世烺, 李庆华. 高温后超高韧性水泥基复合材料冲击破碎分形特征分析 [J]. 土木工程学报, 2019, 52(2): 44–55. DOI: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2019.02.005. ZHAO X, XU S L, LI Q H. Fractal characteristics of fire-damaged ultrahigh toughness cementitious composite after impact loading [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2019, 52(2): 44–55. DOI: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2019.02.005.
[30]	平琦, 马芹永, 袁璞. 岩石试样SHPB劈裂拉伸试验中能量耗散分析 [J]. 采矿与安全工程学报, 2013, 30(3): 401–407. PING Q, MA Q Y, YUAN P. Energy dissipation analysis of stone specimens in SHPB tensile test [J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2013, 30(3): 401–407.

Relative Articles

[1]	MA Fulin, YANG Nana, ZHAO Tianyou, CHEN Zhipeng, YAO Xiongliang. Peridynamic damage simulation of ship composite structures subjected to combined action of shock wave and fragments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(3): 033304. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0080
[2]	HUANG Chao, ZHANG Pan, ZENG Fan, XU Weizheng, WANG Jie, LIU Na. A method for adjusting and controlling underwater explosion shock wave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(8): 083201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0450
[3]	Zhou Ning, Zhang Bingbing, Feng Lei, Geng Ying, Jiang Shuai, Zhang Lu. Effects of reflected wave on premixed-gas explosion and dynamic response of tube shells[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(4): 541-547. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)04-0541-07
[4]	Lai Fu-wen, Zhang Zhi-jie, Zhang Jian-yu, Li Dong. Processing method of shock wave test data based on dynamic characteristic compensation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 871-875. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0871-05
[5]	Xue Bing, Ma Hong-hao, Shen Zhao-wu, Yu Yong. Dynamic calibration of pressure sensors by small-scale explosive experiments in an explosion containment vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(3): 437-441. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)03-0437-05
[6]	Yao Cheng-bao, Li Ruo, Tian Zhou, Guo Yong-hui. Two dimensional simulation for shock wave produced by strong explosion in free air[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 585-590. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0585-06
[7]	Zhou Pei-jie, Wang Jian, Tao Gang, Zhou Jie. Attenuation characteristics of shock waves interacting with open and closed foams[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(5): 675-681. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)05-0675-07
[8]	Fan Jin, Xu Da-li, Ren Xin-jian. Propagation of shock waves in protective structures with holes under contact explosive loads[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(6): 658-666. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)06-0658-09
[9]	HouJun-liang, JiangJian-wei, MenJian-bing, WangShu-you. Dynamicresponseofthinplatewithholesunderblastloading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(6): 662-666. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)06-0662-05
[10]	ZHOU Jie, TAO Gang, WANG Jian. Numericalsimulationoflunginjuryinducedbyshockwave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4): 418-422. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)04-0418-05
[11]	WANG Qi-rui, ZHANG Xiao-zhong, KONG Fu-li, ZHANG Fu-ming. Shockwavepropagationofanexplosioninsideitsentrance toamultilevelgallerytunnel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(5): 449-454. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)05-0449-06
[12]	CHEN Wen, ZHANG Qing-ming. A preliminary investigation on dynamic analysis models for missile structures subjected to blast wave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 199-204. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0199-06
[13]	WANG Yin-jun, LI Jin-jun, FANG Hong. Influences of emulsion explosive density on its pressure desensitization[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(5): 529-534. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)05-0529-06
[14]	SHI Hua-qiang, ZONG Zhi, JIA Jing-bei. Short-range characters of underwater blast waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 125-130. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0125-06
[15]	西北核技术研究所, 陕西, 西安. Application of sound-vibration coupling analysis in shock wave measurement[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(5): 427-432. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)05-0427-06
[16]	ZHANG A-man, YAO Xiong-liang, WEN Xue-you. Physical behaviors of an underwater explosion bubble in a free field[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(5): 391-400. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)05-0391-10
[17]	PANG Wei-bin, LI Yong-chi, HE Xiang. The regularity of arrival time in T-shaped tunnel for shock wave due to explosions from high explosive charges[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(1): 63-67. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)01-0063-05
[18]	GU Wen-bin, ZHENG Xiang-ping, LIU Jian-qing, LI Dan-jun, LU Ming. Experimental investigation of the oblique collision effects of explosion shock wave on concrete frustum in shallow water[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(4): 361-366. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)04-0361-06
[19]	YAN Shi-long, WANG Yin-jun. Characterization of pressure desensitization of emulsion explosive subjected to shock wave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(5): 441-447. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)05-0441-07
[20]	YU Shang-jiang, LI Ke-jie. Design and performance of PVDF pressure sensor for shock wave measurement in concrete structures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(4): 350-354. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)04-0350-05