Distribution pattern and simplified model of blast load for building columns under near-field near-ground explosion

YU Jun; LIU Fuyu; FANG Qin

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2022-0366

Volume 44 Issue 1

Jan. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2024 > 44(1): 015201

YU Jun, LIU Fuyu, FANG Qin. Distribution pattern and simplified model of blast load for building columns under near-field near-ground explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(1): 015201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0366

Citation:

YU Jun, LIU Fuyu, FANG Qin. Distribution pattern and simplified model of blast load for building columns under near-field near-ground explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(1): 015201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0366

Citation:

PDF( 6077 KB)

Distribution pattern and simplified model of blast load for building columns under near-field near-ground explosion

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0366

YU Jun^{1, 2
,},
LIU Fuyu^{2, 3},
FANG Qin⁴

1.
Engineering Research Center of Safety and Protection of Explosion & Impact of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, China
2.
College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, China
3.
Jinggong Steel Building Group, Shaoxing, 312030, Zhejiang, China
4.
Army Engineering University of PLA, Nanjing 210001, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2022-07-02
Rev Recd Date: 2022-10-08

Available Online: 2022-10-14

Publish Date: 2024-01-11

Abstract

Abstract

To rapidly assess the dynamic responses and failure modes of the building columns under near-field near-ground explosions, in this paper numerical simulation method is employed to investigate the distribution pattern of the shock waves that are applied on the front face of building columns under near-field near-ground blast scenarios, and a corresponding simplified blast load model is proposed. To this end, firstly, the existing experimental data of overpressure and impulse were selected to validate the numerical model for blast load. Then, a typical numerical model under near-field near-ground blast scenarios was established to study the effects of the scaled distance and the scaled height of spherical charges on the characteristic values of the shock waves acting at the building columns. Finally, formulae for the maximum reflected impulse and the representative value of the positive overpressure duration were derived based on nonlinear regression analysis, and the blast load at each location of the column front face was represented by an equivalent triangular load model. The results indicate that when the scaled height of the charge is less than 0.3 m/kg^1/3, the distribution of the maximum reflected impulse along the column length can be represented as a trilinear model and a bilinear model for the scaled distance of 0.4−0.6 m/kg^1/3 and 0.6−1.4 m/kg^1/3, respectively. In comparison, the distribution of the shock waves in the transverse direction of a column section was approximately uniform. Moreover, under a given scaled distance and a scaled height, the peak reflected overpressure remains constant as the charge weight increases, but the maximum reflected impulse is proportional to the cubic root of the charge weight at the locations with the identical scaled height of the column.
- building column,
- near-field blast,
- near-ground blast,
- blast load,
- load model

FullText(HTML)

References(20)

References

[1]	YU J, RINDER T, STOLZ A, et al. Dynamic progressive collapse of an RC assemblage induced by contact detonation [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2014, 140(6): 04014014. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000959.
[2]	SHI Y C, LI Z X, HAO H. A new method for progressive collapse analysis of RC frames under blast loading [J]. Engineering Structures, 2010, 32(6): 1691–1703. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.02.017.
[3]	LI J, HAO H. Numerical study of structural progressive collapse using substructure technique [J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 52: 101–113. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.02.016.
[4]	BRODE H L. Blast wave from a spherical charge [J]. The Physics of Fluids, 1959, 2(2): 217–229. DOI: 10.1063/1.1705911.
[5]	BAKER W E. Explosions in air [M]. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press, 1973: 6–10.
[6]	HENRYCH J. The dynamics of explosion and its use [M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific, 1979: 161–164.
[7]	Department of Defense (DOD). UFC 3-340-02 Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions [S]. Washington: Department of Defense, 2008.
[8]	汪维, 刘光昆, 赵强, 等. 近爆作用下方形板表面爆炸载荷分布函数研究 [J]. 中国科学: 物理学力学天文学, 2020, 50(2): 024615. DOI: 10.1360/SSPMA-2019-0188. WANG W, LIU G K, ZHAO Q, et al. Study on load distributing function of square slab surface under close-in blast loading [J]. Scientia Sinica: Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 2020, 50(2): 024615. DOI: 10.1360/SSPMA-2019-0188.
[9]	WU C Q, HAO H. Modeling of simultaneous ground shock and airblast pressure on nearby structures from surface explosions [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2005, 31(6): 699–717. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.03.002.
[10]	XIAO W, ANDRAE M, GEBBEKEN N. Development of a new empirical formula for prediction of triple point path [J]. Shock Waves, 2020, 30(6): 677–686. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-020-00968-7.
[11]	CUI J, SHI Y C, LI Z X, et al. Failure analysis and damage assessment of RC columns under close-in explosions [J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2015, 29(5): B4015003. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000766.
[12]	闫秋实, 杜修力. 典型地铁车站柱在爆炸荷载作用下损伤评估方法研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(1): 1–7. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.01.001. YAN Q S, DU X L. Damage evaluation for a column of a typical subway station subjectedto internal blast loading [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(1): 1–7. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.01.001.
[13]	CHEN L, HU Y, REN H Q, et al. Performances of the RC column under close-in explosion induced by the double-end-initiation explosive cylinder [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 132: 103326. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103326.
[14]	DUA A, BRAIMAH A, KUMAR M. Experimental and numerical investigation of rectangular reinforced concrete columns under contact explosion effects [J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 205: 109891. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109891.
[15]	YU J, YU X F, TANG J H, et al. Local damage of precast concrete columns with grout sleeve connections under contact detonation [J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 265: 114499. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114499.
[16]	HU Y, CHEN L, FANG Q, et al. Blast loading model of the RC column under close-in explosion induced by the double-end-initiation explosive cylinder [J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 175: 304–321. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.08.013.
[17]	彭玉林, 吴昊, 方秦. 爆炸荷载在圆截面桥梁墩柱上的分布规律 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(12): 122201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0317. PENG Y L, WU H, FANG Q. Blast loading distributions on the circular sectional bridge columns [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(12): 122201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0317.
[18]	WOODSON S C, BAYLOT J T. Structural collapse: quarter-scale model experiments [R]: Vicksburg: Engineer Research and Development Center, US Army Corps of Engineers, 1999.
[19]	LIU L, MA Z J, ZONG Z H, et al. Blast response and damage mechanism of prefabricated segmental RC bridge piers [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2021, 26(4): 04021012. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001698.
[20]	胡志乐, 马亮亮, 吴昊, 等. 远距离近地面爆炸空气冲击波计算的网格尺寸优化与验证 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(11): 114201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0499. HU Z L, MA L L, WU H, et al. Optimization and verification of mesh size for air shock wave from large distance and near ground explosion [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(11): 114201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0499.

Relative Articles

[1]	NIU Huanhuan, YAN Xiaopeng, LUO Haoshun, CHEN Jiajun, LI Zhiqiang. Mechanical response of sapphire transparent ceramic glass at different strain rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(7): 073105. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0434
[2]	GAO Yukui, TAO Xuefei. A review on the influences of high speed impact surface treatments on mechanical properties and microstructures of metallic materials[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(4): 041401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0342
[3]	WANG Zhuangzhuang, XU Peng, FAN Zhiqiang, MIAO Yuzhong, GAO Yubo, NIE Taoyi. Study on static and dynamic mechanical properties and fracture mechanism of cenospheres[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(6): 063101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0337
[4]	YU Zhongshen, FANG Xiang, LI Yuchun, REN Junkai, ZHANG Jun, SONG Jiaxing. Effects of TiH₂ content on dynamic mechanical properties and impact sensitivity of Al/PTFE[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 092301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0256
[5]	WANG Zhen, ZHANG Chao, WANG Yinmao, WANG Xiang, SUO Tao. Mechanical behaviours of aeronautical inorganic glass at different strain rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 295-301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0186
[6]	Xi Xulong, Bai Chunyu, Liu Xiaochuan, Mu Rangke, Wang Jizhen. Dynamic mechanical properties of 2A16-T4 aluminum alloy at wide-ranging strain rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(5): 871-878. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)05-0871-08
[7]	Guo Chun-huan, Zhou Pei-jun, Lu Zi-chun, Chang Yun-peng, Zou Guang-ping, Jiang Feng-chun. Application of pulse shaping technique in Hopkinson bar experiments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 881-887. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0881-07
[8]	Wang Peng-fei, Xu Song-lin, Li Zhi-bin, Hu Shi-sheng. An experimental study on dynamic mechanical property ofultra-light aluminum foam under high temperatures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(4): 433-438. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)04-0433-06
[9]	WANG Peng-fei, HU Shi-sheng. Mechanicalpropertiesoffoamaluminum withdifferentsizes[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4): 393-398. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)04-0393-06
[10]	REN Xing-tao, ZHOU Ting-qing, ZHONG Fang-ping, HU Yong-le, WANG Wan-peng. Dynamicmechanicalbehaviorofsteel-fiberreactivepowderconcrete[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(5): 540-547. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)05-0540-08
[11]	CHEN Rong, LU Fang-yun, LIN Yu-liang, XIA Kai-wen. Applicationsofalaserdisplacementgauge inHopkinsonbarexperiments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(1): 36-42. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)01-0036-07
[12]	TAO Jun-lin, QIN Li-bo, LI Kui, LIU Dan, JIA Bin, CHEN Xiao-wei, CHEN Gang. Experimentalinvestigationondynamiccompressionmechanical performanceofconcreteathightemperature[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(1): 101-106. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)01-0101-06
[13]	XIE Ruo-ze, HU Wen-jun, CHEN Cheng-jun, PAN Xiao-xia, HE Peng, ZHANG Fang-ju, CHEN Jie. DynamiccompressivemechanicalpropertiesofV-5Cr-5Ti atroomtemperature[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(6): 641-646. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)06-0641-06
[14]	LUO Bin-qiang, HU Shi-sheng. Dynamic mechanical properties of SnAgCu solder[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(5): 542-545. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)05-0542-04
[15]	CHEN Cheng-jun, XIE Ruo-ze, ZHANG Fang-ju, ZHAO Ya-bin, LU Zi-xing. An application of Taylor impact experiment to study mechanical behaviors of an aluminum-alloy foam[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(2): 166-171. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)02-0166-06
[16]	SHANG Bing, SHENG Jing, WANG Bao-zhen, HU Shi-sheng. Dynamic mechanical behavior and constitutive model of stainless steel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(6): 527-531. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)06-0527-05
[17]	TANG Tie-gang, LI Qing-zhong, SUN Xue-lin, SUN Zhan-feng, JIN Shan, GU Yan. Strain-rate effects of expanding fracture of 45 steel cylinder shells driven by detonation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(2): 129-133. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)02-0129-05
[18]	WANG Zhi-hua, CAO Xiao-qing, MA Hong-wei, ZHAO Long-mao, YANG Gui-tong. Experimental studies on the dynamic compressive properties of open-celled aluminum alloy foams[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(1): 46-52. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)01-0046-07
[19]	LI Yu-long, GUO Wei-guo. Miniature-Hopkinson bar technique[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(4): 303-308. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)04-0303-06
[20]	LI Yu-long, SUO Tao, GUO Wei-guo, HU Rui, LI Jin-shan, FU Heng-zhi. Determination of dynamic behavior of materials at elevated temperatures and high strain rates using Hopkinson bar[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(6): 487-492. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)06-0487-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(7)

1.	李祥辉，张兴渝，胡家豪，刘洋，马伯翰，王永刚，蒋招绣. AISI 4340钢靶大塑性模型及断裂起始模型参数研究. 兵工学报. 2025(01): 301-316 .
2.	甘志鹏，涂灿，陈剑斌，谢超，王永刚，汪小锋. 退火态增材制造AZ91D镁合金在极端条件下的力学行为. 中国有色金属学报. 2024(04): 1268-1284 .
3.	刘涛，史正宏，雷经发，王璐，柏威. TC4钛合金在不同固溶温度下的微观结构及动态力学行为. 材料热处理学报. 2024(12): 100-109 .
4.	王丰，刘蒙，李国和，王大春，闫冬，范建勋. 金属增减材制造本构模型获取方法研究进展. 表面技术. 2023(03): 52-63 .
5.	史京帅，李忠华，刘斌，蒯泽宙，李霍东，陈彦磊，温海骏. 基于选区激光熔化的钛合金薄壁结构等刚度设计及性能研究. 应用激光. 2023(04): 1-8 .
6.	朱磊，杨勇，张继元，范树迁，魏文猴. N_2对增材制造钛基复合材料组织和性能的影响. 工程科学学报. 2023(09): 1509-1516 .
7.	刘涛，邵博，雷经发，王璐，孙虹. 固溶温度对TC4钛合金微观组织和动态拉伸力学性能的影响. 稀有金属材料与工程. 2023(12): 4133-4140 .