Damage mitigation effect of polymer sacrificial cladding on reinforced concrete slabs under blast loading

LIU Zhidong; ZHAO Xiaohua; FANG Hongyuan; WANG Gaohui; SHI Mingsheng

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2022-0435

Volume 43 Issue 2

Feb. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2023 > 43(2): 023301

LIU Zhidong, ZHAO Xiaohua, FANG Hongyuan, WANG Gaohui, SHI Mingsheng. Damage mitigation effect of polymer sacrificial cladding on reinforced concrete slabs under blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(2): 023301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0435

Citation:

LIU Zhidong, ZHAO Xiaohua, FANG Hongyuan, WANG Gaohui, SHI Mingsheng. Damage mitigation effect of polymer sacrificial cladding on reinforced concrete slabs under blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(2): 023301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0435

Citation:

LIU Zhidong, ZHAO Xiaohua, FANG Hongyuan, WANG Gaohui, SHI Mingsheng. Damage mitigation effect of polymer sacrificial cladding on reinforced concrete slabs under blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(2): 023301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0435

PDF( 14522 KB)

Damage mitigation effect of polymer sacrificial cladding on reinforced concrete slabs under blast loading

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0435

1.
Yellow River Laboratory, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China
2.
Hubei Key Laboratory of Blasting Engineering, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, Hubei, China
3.
State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, China

Received Date: 2022-10-11
Rev Recd Date: 2022-11-04

Available Online: 2022-11-17

Publish Date: 2023-02-25

Abstract

Abstract

The blast resistance of sacrificial cladding has been extensively studied in the field of blast protection. As a polymer material with a cellular structure, non-water reactive foaming polyurethane also has the potential to act as a sacrificial cladding due to its good mechanical properties. In order to study the blast damage mitigation effect of polymer sacrificial cladding on reinforced concrete structures, a contact explosion test on the reinforced concrete slab with polymer sacrificial cladding was carried out, while an ordinary reinforced concrete slab was set as the control group, and the effect of polymer sacrificial cladding on the damage characteristics of the reinforced concrete slab was compared and analyzed. In addition, the SPH-FEM (coupled smooth particle hydrodynamics and finite element method) coupling model of the field explosion test was established by using AUTODYN software, and the reliability of the coupling model was verified by comparing with the test results. On this basis, the effects of explosive charge, the density, and the thickness of polymer sacrificial cladding on the damage features and energy absorption characteristics of reinforced concrete slabs with polymer sacrificial cladding were investigated through parametric sensitivity analysis. The results show that the polymer sacrificial cladding can effectively disperse the blast loads and mitigate the impact of the blast loads on the reinforced concrete slab with good protective performance under contact explosions. The polymer sacrificial cladding can maintain a high level of energy absorption even with the explosive charge increased within limits. Increasing the density and thickness of the cladding is beneficial to enhance the energy absorption ability of the polymer sacrificial cladding, while the change in thickness will cause a change in the damage mode of the protected reinforced concrete slab. The research results are helpful in providing a relevant reference for the further research and application of the new non-water reactive foaming polyurethane in the field of blast protection of engineering structures.
- polymer,
- sacrificial cladding,
- reinforced concrete slabs,
- contact explosions,
- damage features

FullText(HTML)

References(19)

References

[1]	赵春风, 何凯城, 卢欣, 等. 弧形双钢板混凝土组合板抗爆性能数值研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(2): 025101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0205. ZHAO C F, HE K C, LU X, et al. Numerical study of blast resistance of curved steel-concrete-steel composite slabs [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(2): 025101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0205.
[2]	赵春风, 卢欣, 何凯城, 等. 单钢板混凝土剪力墙抗爆性能研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(12): 121403. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0058. ZHAO C F, LU X, HE K C, et al. Blast resistance property of concrete shear wall with single-side steel plate [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(12): 121403. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0058.
[3]	赵春风, 何凯城, 卢欣, 等. 双钢板混凝土组合板抗爆性能分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(9): 095102. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0291. ZHAO C F, HE K C, LU X, et al. Analysis on the blast resistance of steel concrete composite slab [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2021, 41(9): 095102. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0291.
[4]	WU C Q, SHEIKH H. A finite element modelling to investigate the mitigation of blast effects on reinforced concrete panel using foam cladding [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2013, 55: 24–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.11.006.
[5]	REBELO H B, LECOMPTE D, CISMASIU C, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on 3D printed PLA sacrificial honeycomb cladding [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 131: 162–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.05.013.
[6]	BOHARA R P, LINFORTH S, GHAZLAN A, et al. Performance of an auxetic honeycomb-core sandwich panel under close-in and far-field detonations of high explosive [J]. Composite Structures, 2022, 280: 114907. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114907.
[7]	范东宇, 苏彬豪, 彭辉, 等. 多孔泡沫牺牲层的动态压溃及缓冲吸能机理研究 [J]. 力学学报, 2022, 54(6): 1630–1640. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-22-047. FAN D Y, SU B H, PENG H, et al. Research on dynamic crushing and mechanism of mitigation and energy absorption of cellular sacrificial layers [J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2022, 54(6): 1630–1640. DOI: 10.6052/0459-1879-22-047.
[8]	ZHAO H L, YU H T, YUAN Y, et al. Blast mitigation effect of the foamed cement-base sacrificial cladding for tunnel structures [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2015, 94(9): 710–718. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.076.
[9]	WANG Z Y, DU M R, FANG H Y, et al. Influence of different corrosion environments on mechanical properties of a roadbed rehabilitation polyurethane grouting material under uniaxial compression [J]. Construction and building materials, 2021, 301: 124092. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124092.
[10]	FANG H Y, LI B, WANG F M, et al. The mechanical behaviour of drainage pipeline under traffic load before and after polymer grouting trenchless repairing [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 74(4): 185–194. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.01.018.
[11]	王复明, 李曼珺, 方宏远, 等. 黄河大堤高聚物防渗墙稳定性分析 [J]. 人民黄河, 2019, 41(10): 48–52,86. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2019.10.009. WANG F M, LI M J, FANG H Y, et al. Analysis of polymer cut-off wall of yellow river dyke [J]. Yellow River, 2019, 41(10): 48–52,86. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1379.2019.10.009.
[12]	FANG H Y, SU Y J, DU X M, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on repairing effect of polymer grouting for settlement of high-speed railway unballasted track [J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(21): 4496. DOI: 10.3390/app9214496.
[13]	WANG Y H, LU J Y, ZHAI X M, et al. Response of energy absorbing connector with polyurethane foam and multiple pleated plates under impact loading [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 133: 103356. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103356.
[14]	WANG Y H, ZHANG B Y, LU J Y, et al. Quasi-static crushing behaviour of the energy absorbing connector with polyurethane foam and multiple pleated plates [J]. Engineering Structures, 2020, 211: 110404. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110404.
[15]	JAMIL A, GUAN Z W, CANTWELL W J, et al. Blast response of aluminium/thermoplastic polyurethane sandwich panels: experimental work and numerical analysis [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 127: 31–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.01.003.
[16]	张勇. 聚氨酯泡沫铝复合结构抗爆吸能试验及数值模拟分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(4): 045101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0182. ZHANG Y. Testingand numerical simulation of the antiknock energy absorption of polyurethane foam aluminum composite structure [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(4): 045101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0182.
[17]	杨广栋, 王高辉, 李麒, 等. 爆炸冲击下水底隧道的动态响应及毁伤模式研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2022, 41(4): 150–158. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2022.04.020. YANG G D, WANG G H, LI Q, et al. Dynamic response and damage patterns of underwater tunnel subjected to blast loads [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2022, 41(4): 150–158. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2022.04.020.
[18]	王银, 孔祥振, 方秦, 等. 弹体对混凝土材料先侵彻后爆炸损伤破坏效应的数值模拟研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(1): 013301. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0132. WANG Y, KONG X Z, FANG Q, et al. Numerical investigation on damage and failure of concrete targets subjected to projectile penetration followed by explosion [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(1): 013301. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0132.
[19]	甘露, 陈力, 宗周红, 等. 近距离爆炸比例爆距的界定标准及荷载模型 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(6): 064902. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0194. GAN L, CHEN L, ZONG Z H, et al. Definition of scaled distance of close-in explosion and blast load calculation model [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2021, 41(6): 064902. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0194.

Relative Articles

[1]	GUO Zhiyun, LU Qiang, DING Yang, ZHANG LiangYong, LI Jin. Detonation performance and specific impulse characteristics of a PETN-based ultra-thin sheet explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0132
[2]	ZHENG Kai, REN Jiale, SONG Chen, JIA Qianhang, XING Zhixiang. Experimental study on influences of copper foam on explosive characteristics of syngas in a closed pipe[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(1): 012102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0036
[3]	XU Qingtao, MA Honghao, ZHOU Zhangtao, YANG Ke, SHEN Zhaowu. Pressure-time formula for underwater explosion based on pressure-impulse curve[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(8): 081445. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0442
[4]	ZHAO Jiaxing, LI Qi, ZHANG Liang, LIU Songhan, JIANG Lin. Experimental study on mitigation effects of water mist on blast wave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(10): 105401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0108
[5]	KANG Penglin, LI Xiaodong, LIU Wenjie, SUN Yantao, GUAN Yunfei, MA Zhigang, ZHAO Ziwen. Influence of the ignition energy on combustion and explosion characteristics of single-base propellant[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(7): 072302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0452
[6]	DING Yang, LU Qiang, LI Jin, GUO Zhiyun, WANG Zhanjiang. Realization of ultra-low specific impulse loading by synchronous initiation of discrete group of cross ultra-fine explosive rods[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(5): 054101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0314
[7]	CAI Yunxiong, JIANG Xinsheng, WANG Shimao, YU Binbin, WANG Zituo, WANG Chunhui, LI Yuxi. Experimental study of gasoline-air mixture explosion in imitated vertical dome oil tank[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(10): 105401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0012
[8]	HU Zhile, MA Liangliang, WU Hao, FANG Qin. Optimization and verification of mesh size for air shock wave from large distance and near ground explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(11): 114201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0499
[9]	LIU Xin, GU Wenbin, CAI Xinghui, WANG Tao, LIU Jianqing, WANG Zhenxiong, SHEN Huiming. Blast loads on the inner wall of cylindrical explosion containment vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(2): 022201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0209
[10]	ZHANG Kai, DU Saifeng, CHEN Hao, GUO Jin, WANG Jingui, HONG Yidu. Experiments on the effects of venting and nitrogen inerting on hydrogen-air explosions[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(12): 125402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0459
[11]	CHEN Hao, GUO Jin, WANG Jingui, HONG Yidu. Effects of vent burst pressure on hydrogen-methane-air deflagration in a vented duct[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(11): 115401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0418
[12]	ZHU Xiaochao, ZHENG Ligang, YU Shuijun, WANG Yalei, LI Gang, DU Depeng, DOU Zengguo. Effect of blocking ratio on aluminum powder explosion’s characteristicsin vertical duct[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(10): 105402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0006
[13]	JIANG Nan, Bi Yixing, LÜ Dong, WANG Lu, MU Yangyang. Explosion overpressure of hydrogen cloud in catalytic reforming process[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(2): 025403. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0371
[14]	FAN Baolong, BAI Chunhua, WANG Bo, GAO Kanghua, LI Bin. Explosion overpressure field of natural gas in a large-scaled confined vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 404-408. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0191
[15]	WANG Yanping, ZENG Dan, ZHANG Tonglai, LI Suling, LIU Ying, WANG Yongtao. Heat radiation propagation law of propellant combustion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(1): 212-216. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0152
[16]	Liu Guibing, Hou Hailiang, Zhu Xi, Zhang Guodong. Attenuation of shock wave passing through liquid droplets[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(5): 844-852. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)05-0844-09
[17]	Lu Qiang, Wang Zhanjiang, Liu Xiaoxin, Guo Zhiyun, Wu Yujiao. A computational model for impulse coupling between sheet explosive and target[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(1): 84-91. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)01-0084-08
[18]	Zhang Peili, Du Yang. Experiments of nitrogen non-premixed suppression of gasoline-air mixture explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(3): 347-352. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)03-0347-06
[19]	Wu Songlin, Du Yang, Ou Yihong, Zhang Peili, Liang Jianjun. Experimental study for lateral gasoline-air venting explosion in cylindrical pipeline[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(5): 680-687. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)05-0680-08
[20]	FengBin-bin, RuiXiao-ting, YunLai-feng, WangYan. Acomputationalmethodforshapecharacteristicparameters offracturedpropellantingrainform[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(3): 292-297. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)03-0292-05