Simulation method of spall damage for self-radiation damage aging materials with helium bubbles

ZHANG Fengguo; LIU Jun; WANG Yanjin; WANG Pei; ZHENG Hui

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2022-0486

Volume 43 Issue 10

Oct. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2023 > 43(10): 103105

YE Xiang-ping, LI Ying-lei, LI Ying-hua. AnexperimentaltechniqueforexpandingofmetalcylinderbasedonSHPB[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(5): 528-534. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)05-0528-07

Citation:

ZHANG Fengguo, LIU Jun, WANG Yanjin, WANG Pei, ZHENG Hui. Simulation method of spall damage for self-radiation damage aging materials with helium bubbles[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(10): 103105. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0486

YE Xiang-ping, LI Ying-lei, LI Ying-hua. AnexperimentaltechniqueforexpandingofmetalcylinderbasedonSHPB[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(5): 528-534. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)05-0528-07

Citation:

PDF( 686 KB)

Simulation method of spall damage for self-radiation damage aging materials with helium bubbles

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0486

Institute of Applied Physics and Computational Mathematics, Beijing 100094, China

Received Date: 2022-11-02
Rev Recd Date: 2023-03-20
Publish Date: 2023-10-27

Abstract

Abstract

Under irradiation conditions, a large number of micro-defects such as helium bubbles are produced in some materials, and the size and number density of helium bubbles increase with the increase of irradiation years. The variation of helium bubble distribution not only affects the physical and mechanical properties of the material itself, but also directly affects the distribution characteristics of fracture particle size in the later stage of spallation damage evolution. The evolution process of spallation damage in ductile materials generally includes nucleation, growth and confluence of pores. However, due to the inhibition of existing pores on new nucleation pores, when the initial number density of pores reaches a certain critical value, the calculation of spallation damage may not consider the influence of new nucleation. Based on the characteristics of early damage evolution, a formula for calculating this critical value is given, and based on this formula, the calculation method of spallation damage of plutonium materials irradiated by helium bubbles is further discussed. Then, in view of the difference between the initial damage parameters of the damage model and the real initial damage of the material, we propose a method to determine the damage parameters in the void growth (VG) model. Finally, this problem is analyzed qualitatively by using the experimental results of spallation of conventional aluminum materials containing helium bubbles. The analysis results show that for the calculation of spallation damage of irradiated materials containing helium bubbles, only when the helium bubble size changes little and the helium bubble concentration is lower than the critical helium bubble concentration given in this paper, it is necessary to consider the comprehensive influence of initial helium bubbles and new holes. otherwise, a simple spallation damage model can be adopted, and the nucleation of holes does not need to be calculated.
- helium bubbles,
- spall damage,
- self-radiation damage aging,
- critical concentration of helium bubbles

FullText(HTML)

References(28)

References

[1]	肖瑶, 黄理, 邱睿智, 等. 钚中氦行为研究进展 [J]. 材料导报A, 2020, 34(6) : 11137–11144. DOI: 10.11896/cldb.19050148. XIAO Y, HUANG L, QIU R Z, et al. Progress in the behavior of helium in plutonium [J]. Materials Reports A, 2020, 34(6) : 11137–11144. DOI: 10.11896/cldb.19050148.
[2]	MARTZ J C, SCHWARTZ A J. Plutonium: aging mechanisms and weapon pit lifetime assessment [J]. JOM Journal of the Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 2003, 55: 19–23. DOI: 10.1007/s11837-003-0023-0.
[3]	SCHWARTZ A J, WALL M A, ZOCCO T G, et al. Characterization and modeling of helium bubbles in self-irradiated plutonium alloys [J]. Philosophical Magazine, 2005, 85: 479–488. DOI: 10.1080/02678370412331320026.
[4]	敖冰云, 汪小琳, 陈丕恒, 等. 钚自辐照老化过程中氦效应理论研究进展 [J]. 原子能科学技术, 2009, 43(12): 37–42. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2009.43.suppl.0037. AO B Y, WANG X L, CHEN P H, et al. Advances in theoretical research of helium effects in plutonium during aging process of self-radiation damage [J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2009, 43(12): 37–42. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2009.43.suppl.0037.
[5]	余鑫祥, 邓爱红, 程祥, 等. 钚中空位对氦泡生长影响的动力学Monte Carlo研究 [J]. 四川大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 47(1): 133–136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0490-6756.2010.01.026. YU X X, DENG A H, CHEN X, et al. A kinetic Monte Carlo study of the vacancies’ effects on helium bubble growth in plutonium [J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Natural Science Edition) , 2010, 47(1): 133–136. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0490-6756.2010.01.026.
[6]	VALONE S M, BASKES M I. Self-irradiation cascade simulations in plutonium metal: model behavior at high energy [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Materials Design , 2007, 14: 357–365. DOI: 10.1007/s10820-007-9049-x.
[7]	SHAO J L, WANG P, HE A M, et al. Influence of voids or He bubbles on the spall damage in single crystal Al [J]. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 2014, 22(2): 025012. DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/22/2/025012.
[8]	ZHOU T T, HE A M, WANG P. Dynamic evolution of He bubble and its effects on void nucleation-growth and thermomechanical properties in the spallation of aluminum [J]. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 2020, 542: 152496. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152496.
[9]	万曦, 姚松林, 裴晓阳. 冲击加载下金属铝中氦泡演化行为的相场模拟 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2022, 36(1): 014203. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20210791. WAN X, YAO S L, PEI X Y. Phase field modeling of the evolution of helium bubbles in shock loaded aluminum [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2022, 36(1): 014203. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20210791.
[10]	王海燕, 祝文军, 邓小良, 等. 冲击加载下铝中氦泡和孔洞的塑性变形特征研究 [J]. 物理学报, 2009, 58(2): 1154–1159. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3290.2009.02.075. WANG H Y, ZHU W J, DENG X L, et al. Plastic deformation of cc and void in aluminum under shock loading [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(2): 1154–1159. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3290.2009.02.075.
[11]	程扬名, 陈浩, 沈琴, 等. 纯铝中氦泡分布特点的研究 [J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(3): 385–389. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2017.youxian.0312. CHENG Y M, CHEN H, SHEN Q, et al. Study on distribution characteristics of helium bubble in aluminum [J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2018, 52(3): 385–389. DOI: 10.7538/yzk.2017.youxian.0312.
[12]	祁美兰, 贺红亮 , 王永刚, 等. 高应变率拉伸下纯铝中氦泡长大的动力学研究 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2007, 21(2): 145–150. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2007.02.005. QI M L, HE H L, WANG Y G, et al. Dynamic analysis of helium bubble growth in the pure Al under high strain-rate loading [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2007, 21(2): 145–150. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2007.02.005.
[13]	李英华, 常敬臻, 张林, 等. 氦泡铝的层裂特性实验研究 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2021, 35(5): 054101. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20210770. LI Y H, CHANG J Z, ZHANG L, et al. Experimental investigation of spall damage in pure aluminum with helium bubbles [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2021, 35(5): 054101. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20210770.
[14]	张凤国, 胡晓棉, 王裴, 等. 含氦泡金属铝层裂响应的数值分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2017, 37(4): 699–704. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0699-06. ZHANG F G, HU X M, WANG P, et al. Numerical analysis of spall response in aluminum with helium bubble [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 699–704. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0699-06.
[15]	GLAM B, STRAUSS M, ELIEZER S, et al. Shock compression and spall formation in aluminum containing helium bubbles at room temperature and near the melting temperature: experiments and simulations [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2014, 65: 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2013.10.010.
[16]	DURAND O, SOULARD L. Power law and exponential ejecta size distributions from the dynamic fragmentation of shock-loaded Cu and Sn metals under melt conditions [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2013, 114: 194902. DOI: 10.1063/1.4832758.
[17]	张凤国, 刘军, 何安民, 等. 强冲击加载下延性金属卸载熔化损伤/破碎问题的物理建模及其应用 [J]. 物理学报, 2022, 71(24): 244601. DOI: 10.7498/aps.71.20221340. ZHANG F G, LIU J, HE A M, et al. Modelling of spall damage evolution and fragment distributing for melted metals under shock release [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2022, 71(24): 244601. DOI: 10.7498/aps.71.20221340.
[18]	TRUMEL H, HILD F, ROY G, et al. On probabilistic aspects in the dynamic degradation of ductile materials [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2009, 57: 1980–1998. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2009.07.001.
[19]	JOHNSON J N. Dynamic fracture and spallation in ductile solids [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1981, 52(4): 2812–2825. DOI: 10.1063/1.329011.
[20]	CARROLL M M, HOLT A C. Static and dynamic pore-collapse relations for ductile porous materials [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1972, 43: 1626–1636. DOI: 10.1063/1.1661372.
[21]	WU X Y, RAMESH K T, WRIGHT T W. The dynamic growth of a single void in a viscoplastic material under transient hydrostatic loading [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 2003, 51: 1–26. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5096(02)00079-0.
[22]	SEAMAN L, CURRAN D R, SHOCKEY D A. Computational models for ductile and brittle fracture [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1976, 47: 4814–4826. DOI: 10.1063/1.322523.
[23]	GLAM B, ELIEZER S, MORENO D, et al. Dynamic fracture and spall in aluminum with helium bubbles [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2010, 163: 217–224. DOI: 10.1007/s10704-009-9437-1.
[24]	张凤国, 刘军, 王昆, 等. 孔洞增长层裂损伤模型初始参数的确定方法及其应用 [J]. 物理学报, 2020, 69(20): 204601. DOI: 10.7498/aps.69.20200527. ZHANG F G, LIU J, WANG K, et al. Determination method of parameters of void growth damage model and its application to simulation of spall test [J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2020, 69(20): 204601. DOI: 10.7498/aps.69.20200527.
[25]	IKKURTHI V R, CHATURVWDI S. Use of different damage models for simulating impact-driven spallation in metal plates [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2004, 30 : 275–301. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(03)00070-8.
[26]	张凤国, 王裴, 王昆, 等. 关于延性金属材料层裂强度概念的解读 [J]. 防护工程, 2020, 42(5): 33–36 ZHANG F G, WANG P, WANG K, et al. Interpretation of the concept of spalling strength of ductile metals materials [J]. Protective Engineering, 2020, 42(5): 33–36.
[27]	ROMANCHENKO V I, STEPANOV G V. Dependence of the critical stresses on the loading time parameters during spall in copper, aluminum, and steel [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics Technical Physics, 1980, 21: 555–561 DOI: 10.1007/BF00916495.
[28]	MAYER A E, MAYWER P N. Strain rate dependence of spall strength for solid and molten lead and tin [J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2020, 222: 171–195 DOI: 10.1007/s10704-020-00440-8.

Relative Articles

[1]	YANG Zhaowei, LU Wenbo, CHEN Ming, YAN Peng, HU Yingguo, LIU Meishan, WU Xinxia, LENG Zhendong. Calculation of P wave quality factor of rock mass based on measured blasting vibrations[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(6): 065202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0333
[2]	ZHOU Wenhai, LIANG Rui, CHEN Jinlin, ZHU Mian, CHEN Penghui, LOU Xiaoming, WANG Dunfan. Millisecond time for reducing vibration between two holes for slope blasting determined by stability coefficient of time history[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(8): 085202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0337
[3]	MA Chong, ZHAN Hongbing, YAO Wenmin, YU Haibing. Stability and safety criterion of a slope with weak interlayer under blasting vibration[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 563-571. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0275
[4]	Fei Honglu, Zeng Xiangyu, Yang zhiguang. Influence of tunnel excavation blasting vibration on earth's surface based on wavelet packet analysis[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(1): 77-83. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)01-0077-07
[5]	Qiu Xianyang, Shi Xiuzhi, Zhou Jian, Huang Dan, Chen Xin. On vibration reduction effect of short millisecond blasting by high-precision detonator based on HHT energy spectrum[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(1): 107-113. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)01-0107-07
[6]	Lou Xiaoming, Zhou Wenhai, Jian Wenbing, Zheng Junjie. Control of delay time characterized by distribution of peak velocity-displacement vibration of millisecond blasting[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(6): 839-846. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)06-0839-08
[7]	Zhu Jun, Yang Jian-hua, Lu Wen-bo, Chen Ming, Yan Peng. Influences of blasting vibration on the sidewall of underground tunnel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(2): 153-160. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)02-0153-08
[8]	LuLiang, LongYuan, XieQuan-min, . Decompositionandenergydistributionofblastingvibrationsignal basedonsecondgenerationwaveletpacket(SGWP)[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(2): 140-147. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)02-0140-08
[9]	YANG Jian-hua, LU Wen-bo, CHEN Ming, ZHOU Chuang-bing. Anequivalentsimulationmethodforblastingvibrationofsurroundingrock[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(2): 157-163. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)02-0157-07
[10]	YANG Nian-hua, ZHANG Le. Blastingvibrationwaveformpredictionmethod basedonsuperpositionprinciple[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(1): 84-90. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)01-0084-07
[11]	CHAI Xiu-wei. Effectsofdifferentexplosivepropertiesonblastvibration[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(5): 548-552. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)05-0548-05
[12]	XIA Xiang, LI Hai-bo, ZHANG Da-yan, WANG Xin-yuan, LI Jun-ru. Safetythresholdofblasting-inducedrockvibration forHongyanhenuclearpowerplant[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(1): 27-32. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0027-06
[13]	ZHONG Dong-wang, WU Liang, YU Gang. Effectoftunnelingblastingonanexistingadjacenttunnel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(5): 456-462. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)05-0456-07
[14]	LIU Ai-wen, YU Yan-xiang, FU Chang-hua, CHEN Kun, ZHAO Ji-sheng, ZHOU Zheng-hua, WANG Wei, . Attenuationcharacteristicsandtopographiceffectof ascientificexplosionwith50texplosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(1): 21-26. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0021-06
[15]	SHI Xiu-zhi, LIN Da-neng, CHEN Shou-ru. Blasting-vibration-induced damage prediction by rough set-based fuzzy-neural network[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(4): 401-407. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)04-0401-07
[16]	ZHONG Guo-sheng, AO Li-ping, ZHAO Kui, . Influence of explosion parameters on energy distribution of blasting vibration signal based on wavelet packet energy spectrum[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(3): 300-305. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)03-0300-06
[17]	ZHONG Guo-sheng, FANG Ying-guang, GU Ren-guo, ZHAO Kui. Safety assessment of structures by blasting vibration based on wavelet analysis[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(1): 35-40. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)01-0035-06
[18]	LI Hong-tao, LU Wen-bo, SHU Da-qiang, YANG Xing-guo. Response spectrum of blasting vibration induced by tunnel excavation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(4): 331-335. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)04-0331-05
[19]	LI Hong-tao, LU Wen-bo, SHU Da-qiang, ZHU Chuan-yun. Study on the safety velocity for concrete lining under P wave loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(1): 34-39. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)01-0034-06
[20]	LI Wei-guang, ZHANG Ji-chun. Study on rock mass bedding slope stability under blast seism[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(5): 426-430. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)05-0426-05

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(4)

1.	殷鹏志，刘龙飞，刘炼煌，杨涛. 海水腐蚀对薄壁钢管冲击膨胀断裂行为的影响. 兵器材料科学与工程. 2020(04): 12-17 .
2.	刘龙飞，周强. 表面粗糙度对6061铝合金薄壁管冲击膨胀断裂性能的影响. 爆炸与冲击. 2018(04): 749-758 . 本站查看
3.	张绍兴，丁亮亮，李翔宇，张震宇，卢芳云. 一种实现壳体柱面膨胀加载的实验技术研究. 中国测试. 2016(10): 29-33 .
4.	叶想平，李英雷，张祖根. 45钢薄壁圆柱管的冲击膨胀断裂机理研究. 爆炸与冲击. 2014(03): 322-327 . 本站查看