Detonation driving energy release characteristics of laminated composite charge of DNTF-based aluminized explosivesbased on cylinder tests

SHEN Fei; WANG Hui; WANG Jintao; YU Wenli; WANG Xuanjun

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2023-0085

Volume 43 Issue 11

Nov. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2023 > 43(11): 112301

SHEN Fei, WANG Hui, WANG Jintao, YU Wenli, WANG Xuanjun. Detonation driving energy release characteristics of laminated composite charge of DNTF-based aluminized explosivesbased on cylinder tests[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(11): 112301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0085

Citation:

SHEN Fei, WANG Hui, WANG Jintao, YU Wenli, WANG Xuanjun. Detonation driving energy release characteristics of laminated composite charge of DNTF-based aluminized explosivesbased on cylinder tests[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(11): 112301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0085

Citation:

SHEN Fei, WANG Hui, WANG Jintao, YU Wenli, WANG Xuanjun. Detonation driving energy release characteristics of laminated composite charge of DNTF-based aluminized explosivesbased on cylinder tests[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(11): 112301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0085

PDF( 4073 KB)

Detonation driving energy release characteristics of laminated composite charge of DNTF-based aluminized explosivesbased on cylinder tests

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0085

SHEN Fei^{1, 2
,},
WANG Hui²,
WANG Jintao¹,
YU Wenli¹,
WANG Xuanjun^{1
,
,}

1.
Rocket Force University of Engineering, Xi’an 710025, Shaanxi, China
2.
Xi’an Modern Chemistry Research Institute, Xi’an 710065, Shaanxi, China

Received Date: 2023-03-08
Rev Recd Date: 2023-08-08

Available Online: 2023-09-01

Publish Date: 2023-11-17

Abstract

Abstract

To investigate the releasing characteristics of detonation-driving energy in a laminated composite charge, a meticulously prepared composite charge of two distinct types of 3,4-dinitrofurazanfuroxan (DNTF) based explosives with uniform layer thickness was employed. These explosives demonstrated a noticeable detonation velocity difference of 1.85 km/s, one with exceptionally high detonation velocity while the other with exceedingly high detonation heat. The trajectory of the detonation wave at the bus bar of the composite charge was observed using the GSJ streak camera to analyze the velocity change process of the detonation wave as it crossed the two explosives. Subsequently, a $\varnothing $25 mm cylinder test was conducted to assess the expansion velocity and specific kinetic energy of the copper tube in the corresponding area of each explosive by using the photon Doppler velocimeter (PDV). The rupture process of the copper tube was observed synchronically using a high-speed framing camera to gain further insights. Lastly, the interaction process between the two explosives was investigated based on the pressure-volume relationship of the detonation products for each explosive, and the main difference in the energy release process between the laminated composite charge and the single charge was carefullydetermined. The results demonstrated that both explosives within the laminated composite charge swiftly transition into a stable detonation state as the detonation waves propagate alternately. When the products expand, the interaction between the two explosives significantly alters the distribution characteristics of the detonation-driving energy. The loading area of the high detonation velocity explosive enlarges, leading to a decrease in the velocity of the copper tube, resulting in a 6.7% reduction in its specific kinetic energy compared to the simple high detonation velocity charge. Conversely, the loading area of the high detonation heat explosive reduces, causing an increase in the velocity of the copper tube, resulting in a 14.1% improvement in its specific kinetic energy compared to the simple high detonation heat charge. Additionally, the detonation products of the high detonation heat explosive are in a compressed state, which is advantageous for enhancing the reaction rate of its aluminum powder and is expected to further enhance the detonation driving capability of the laminated composite charge.
- 3,4-dinitrofurazanfuroxan (DNTF),
- aluminized explosive,
- composite charge,
- detonation wave,
- cylinder test

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

[1]	罗观, 李海波, 郑保辉, 等. 高活性金属在炸药中的应用思考 [J]. 含能材料, 2021, 29(10): 885–887. DOI: 10.11943/CJEM2021227. LUO G, LI H B, ZHENG B H, et al. Application of highly active metals in explosives [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2021, 29(10): 885–887. DOI: 10.11943/CJEM2021227.
[2]	MAIZ L, TRZCIŃSKI W A, PASZULA J. Optical spectroscopy to study confined and semi-closed explosions of homogeneous and composite charges [J]. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2017, 88(1): 111–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.08.006.
[3]	TRZCINSKI W A, BARCZ K. Investigation of blast wave characteristics for layered thermobaric charges [J]. Shock Waves, 2012, 22(2): 119–127. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-012-0357-z.
[4]	HONG X W, LI W B, LI W B, et al. Experimental study on explosion dispersion process of a multi-layer composite charge under different initiation modes [J]. Defence Technology, 2020, 16(4): 883–892. DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2019.11.002.
[5]	李梅, 蒋建伟, 王昕. 复合装药空气中爆炸冲击波传播特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(2): 367–372. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0209. LI M, JIANG J W, WANG X. Shock wave propagation characteristics of double layer charge explosion in the air [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(2): 367–372. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0209.
[6]	沈飞, 王辉, 罗一鸣. 一种同轴双元组合装药的爆轰波形及驱动性能 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2018, 41(6): 588–593. DOI: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2018.06.010. SHEN F, WANG H, LUO Y M. Detonation waveform and driving performance of a kind of coaxial binary composite charge [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives and Propellants, 2018, 41(6): 588–593. DOI: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2018.06.010.
[7]	沈飞, 罗一鸣, 余文力, 等. 典型同轴双元装药爆轰波传播特性试验研究 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2022, 45(3): 412–418. DOI: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.202202002. SHEN F, LUO Y M, YU W L, et al. Experimental study on propagation characteristics of detonation wave of typical coaxial binary charge [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives and Propellants, 2022, 45(3): 412–418. DOI: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.202202002.
[8]	HANDLEY C A, LAMBOURN B D, WHITWORTH N J, et al. Understanding the shock and detonation response of high explosives at the continuum and meso scales [J]. Applied Physics Reviews, 2018, 5(1): 011303. DOI: 10.1063/1.5005997.
[9]	向梅, 黄毅民, 饶国宁, 等. 不同升温速率下复合药柱烤燃实验与数值模拟研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2013, 33(4): 394–400. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)04-0394-07. XIANG M, HUAMG Y M, RAO G N, et al. Cook-off test and numerical simulation for composite charge at different heating rates [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2013, 33(4): 394–400. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)04-0394-07.
[10]	李兴隆, 吴奎先, 路中华, 等. 叠层复合装药殉爆安全性试验及数值模拟 [J]. 含能材料, 2022, 30(3): 204–213. DOI: 10.11943/CJEM2021014. LI X L, WU K X, LU Z H, et al. Sympathetic detonation test and simulation of laminated composite charge [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2022, 30(3): 204–213. DOI: 10.11943/CJEM2021014.
[11]	黄瑨, 王军, 毛耀峰, 等. TATB/CL-20复合装药结构的3D打印成型技术 [J]. 含能材料, 2019, 27(11): 931–935. DOI: 10.11943/CJEM2019042. HUANG J, WANG J, MAO Y F, et al. Preparation of CL-20/TATB composite charge structure by 3D printing technology [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2021, 29(10): 885–887. DOI: 10.11943/CJEM2019042.
[12]	炸药圆筒试验光学扫描和激光干涉联合测试方法: GJB 8381—2015 [S]. 2015.
[13]	BAUST T M. Improving the design and evaluation of PDV-based cylinder test experiments for JWL-parameter determination [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2020, 45(9): 1344–1356. DOI: 10.1002/prep.202000002.
[14]	王辉, 沈飞. 金属柱壳约束对非理想炸药驱动效率的影响 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2017, 40(3): 93–97. DOI: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2017.03.018. WANG H, SHEN F. Influence of cylindrical metal shell constraint on the driving efficiency of non-ideal explosives [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives and Propellants, 2017, 40(3): 93–97. DOI: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2017.03.018.
[15]	HUTCHINSON M D. The effects of yield stress and casing thickness on blast impulse and fragment velocity [J]. Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 2014, 39(5): 733–738. DOI: 10.1002/prep.201400058.