A control method for attenuation history of shock wave generated by blast simulation shock tube based on high pressure gas driving technic

CHENG Shuai; TONG Nianxue; LIU Wenxiang; YIN Wenjun; LI Qinchao; ZHANG Dezhi

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2023-0094

Volume 44 Issue 5

May 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2024 > 44(5): 052201

CHENG Shuai, TONG Nianxue, LIU Wenxiang, YIN Wenjun, LI Qinchao, ZHANG Dezhi. A control method for attenuation history of shock wave generated by blast simulation shock tube based on high pressure gas driving technic[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 052201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0094

Citation:

CHENG Shuai, TONG Nianxue, LIU Wenxiang, YIN Wenjun, LI Qinchao, ZHANG Dezhi. A control method for attenuation history of shock wave generated by blast simulation shock tube based on high pressure gas driving technic[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 052201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0094

Citation:

CHENG Shuai, TONG Nianxue, LIU Wenxiang, YIN Wenjun, LI Qinchao, ZHANG Dezhi. A control method for attenuation history of shock wave generated by blast simulation shock tube based on high pressure gas driving technic[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 052201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0094

PDF( 1663 KB)

A control method for attenuation history of shock wave generated by blast simulation shock tube based on high pressure gas driving technic

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0094

National Key Laboratory of Intense Pulsed Radiation Simulation and Effect, Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology, Xi’an 710024, Shaanxi, China

Received Date: 2023-03-14
Rev Recd Date: 2023-11-24

Available Online: 2024-03-11

Publish Date: 2024-05-08

Abstract

Abstract

A high-pressure-gas-driving blast wave simulation shock tube, commonly composed of driving section, throat section and expansion section, is an ideal platform for explosion damage effect research of long positive shock pressure duration time in the laboratory, as the ability of generating simulated shock wave with similar characteristics to real explosion wave. One of the core problems in the design of blast simulation shock tubes, is the control method of the simulated wave attenuation process by modifying the variable section structure and the driving section shape of the shock tube. In this article, a numerical calculation model of one-dimensional flow in the shock tube is established based on the explosion simulation shock tube in the laboratory, a similarity evaluation method of simulated shock wave and standard explosion wave in a shock tube based on determination coefficient is proposed referring to the statistical theory. Then, based on the flow characteristics of the variable section shock tube, the influence of the shape of the driving section on the shock wave attenuation history is studied. The results show that, it is feasible to acquire simulated wave with approximate exponential attenuation history of real blast wave, by using variable cross-section driving tube, of which the section diameter decreases with the growth of distance to the throat, optimizing the variable cross-section structure due to the determination coefficient, and controlling the motion property of expansion and compression wave in the shock tube.
- shock tube,
- blast wave simulation,
- shock wave overpressure,
- decay process control,
- similarity evaluation method

FullText(HTML)

References(19)

References

[1]	任辉启, 王世合, 周松柏, 等. 大型爆炸波模拟装置研制及其应用 [C]//第十六届全国激波与激波管学术会议论文集. 河南,洛阳: 中国力学学会激波与激波管专业委员会, 2014.
[2]	NIAN W M, SUBRAMANIAM K V L, ANDREOPOULOS Y. Experimental investigation on blast response of cellular concrete [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2016, 96: 105–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.05.021.
[3]	RENEER D V, HISEL R D, HOFFMAN J M, et al. A multi-mode shock tube for investigation of blast-induced traumatic brain injury [J]. Journal of Neurotrauma, 2011, 28(1): 95–104. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2010.1513.
[4]	RESLER E L, LIN S C, KANTROWITZ A. The production of high temperature gases in shock tubes [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1952, 23(12): 1390–1399. DOI: 10.1063/1.1702080.
[5]	CHESTER W. The quasi-cylindrical shock tube [J]. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 1954, 45(371): 1293–1301. DOI: 10.1080/1478641208561138.
[6]	CHISNELL R F. The motion of a shock wave in a channel, with applications to cylindrical and spherical shock waves [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1957, 2(3): 286–298. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112057000130.
[7]	WHITHAM G B. On the propagation of shock waves through regions of non-uniform area or flow [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1958, 4(4): 337–360. DOI: 10.1017/S0022112058000495.
[8]	CHESTER W. The propagation of shock waves along ducts of varying cross section [J]. Advances in Applied Mechanics, 1960, 6: 119–152. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70111-X.
[9]	COULTER G A, BULMASH G, KINGERY C. Feasibility study of shock wave modification in the BRL 2.44 m blast simulator: AD-A139631 [R]. U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, 1984.
[10]	HISLEY D M. Computational studies of wave-shaping in a blast simulator by perforated plates in the driver: AD-A188200 [R]. Aberdeen, UK: Ballistic Research Laboratory, 1987.
[11]	MARK A. Computational design of large-scale blast simulators [C]//19th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. St. Louis: AIAA, 1981.
[12]	OPALKA K O. Large blast and thermal simulator advanced concept driver design by computational fluid dynamics: AD-A-211364 [R]. Aberdeen, UK: Ballistics Research Laboratory, 1989.
[13]	JOSEY T, SAWYER T W. High fidelity simulation of free-field blast loading: the importance of dynamic pressure: DRDC-RDDC-2018-P003 [R]. Canada: Defense Research and Development, 2016.
[14]	GION E J. A multidriver shock tube model of a large blast simulator: AD-A208324 [R]. U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, 1989.
[15]	SCHRAML S J. Performance predictions for the large blast/thermal simulator based on experimental and computational results: AD-A-235728 [R]. Aberdeen, UK: Ballistics Research Laboratory, 1991.
[16]	张德良. 计算流体力学教程 [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010: 151. ZHANG D L. A course in computational fluid dynamics [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2010: 151.
[17]	OPALKA K O, MARK A. The BRL-Q1D Code: a tool for the numerical simulation of flows in shock tubes with variable cross-sectional areas: AD-A174254 [R]. U.S. Army Ballistic Research Laboratory, 1986.
[18]	SCHRAML S J, PEARSON R J. Computer programs for LB/TS test design: technical description, usage instructions and source code listings: AD-A-299247 [R]. Aberdeen, UK: Ballistics Research Laboratory, 1995.
[19]	刘剑平, 陆元鸿, 曹宵临. 概率论与数理统计方法 [M]. 2版. 上海: 华东理工出版社, 2004: 186–195.

Relative Articles

[1]	CHEN Ziwei, WANG Zhongqi, ZENG Linghui. A method for predicting peak pressure in an explosion shock tube based on BP neural network[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 054101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0187
[2]	ZHANG Shizhong, LI Jinping, KANG Yue, HU Jianqiao, CHEN Hong. Generation of near-field blast wave by means of shock tube[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(12): 121434. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0204
[3]	LIU Bowen, LONG Renrong, ZHANG Qingming, JU Yuanyuan, ZHONG Xianzhe, WANG Haiyang, LIU Wenjin. Study on the corner overpressure characteristics of concentrated reflected shock wave due to internal blast in cabin[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(1): 012201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0232
[4]	ZHANG Tengyue, XIAO Chuan, CHEN Pengwan, JIAO Xiaolong, WU Zongya, CHEN Fang. Experimental study on the lethality of blasting warhead with PEEK shell[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(9): 091414. doi: 10.11883/bzycj/2022-0477
[5]	CHEN De, WU Hao, XU Shilin, WEI Jianshu. Shock tube tests and dynamic behavior analyses on one-way masonry-infilled walls[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(8): 085103. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0147
[6]	DAI Xianghui, WANG Kehui, ZHOU Gang, LI Ming, SHEN Zikai, DUAN Jian, LI Pengjie, YANG Hui, WU Haijun. Experimental study on explosion characteristics of penetrator with elliptical cross-section[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(5): 053302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0079
[7]	CHAO Hongxiao, HU Hao, LEI Qiang, GAO Rui, YAO Guoqing. Experimental study on shock wave from dynamic explosion of a warhead based on seismic wave triggering[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 083201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0196
[8]	KANG Yue, ZHANG Shizhong, ZHANG Yuanping, LIU Zhanli, HUANG Xiancong, MA Tian. Research on anti-shockwave performance of the protective equipment for the head of a soldier based on shock tube evaluation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 085901. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0395
[9]	LIU Erwei, XU Shengli. Influence of ignition criterion and dilution gas on ignition delay of ethylene[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(6): 062101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0402
[10]	DAI Xianghui, WANG Kehui, SHEN Zikai, DUAN Jian, LI Ming, GU Renhong, LI Pengjie, YANG Hui, KE Ming, ZHOU Gang. Experiment of fast cook-off safety characteristic for penetrator[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(9): 092301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj/2020-0016
[11]	LI Bo, HUANG Nan, YANG Jun, QIN Haifeng, YIN Xiao, ZHANG Zhaojing. Effects of medium and static pressure on dynamic characteristics of piezoresistive absolute pressure sensor calibrated by shock tube[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(5): 054101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0309
[12]	HU Yang, YIN Shangxian, Bjørn J. ARNTZEN, ZHU Jianfang, LI Xuebing, Ragnhild Dybdal OIE, QIN Hansheng. Experimental study of multi-objective coupling synchronous control in gas/air premixed gas deflagration flow test system[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 094201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0312
[13]	HE Qiguang, ZHANG Wei, CHEN Xiaowei, XU Jianpeng. Analysis on the deformation process of PET shock tube diaphragm[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(3): 033201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0409
[14]	WANG Xinying, WANG Shushan, LU Xi, WANG Jianmin. Overpressure-impulse damage criterion of air shock waves on biological targets[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(1): 106-111. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0031
[15]	Huang Xilong, Liao Shenfei, Zou Liyong, Liu Jinhong, Cao Renyi. Experiment on interaction of shock and elliptic heavy-gas cylinder by using PLIF[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(5): 829-836. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)05-0829-08
[16]	Nie Yuan, Jiang Jianwei, Li Mei. Overpressure calculation model of sphere charge blastingwith moving velocity[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(5): 951-956. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)05-0951-06
[17]	Jiang Qi, Liu Tong, Wang Ru -heng, Pan Ting. Action of explosion shock wave on three kinds of architectural glass[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2014, 34(2): 229-234. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)02-0229-06
[18]	DingYong-hong, YouWen-bin, MaTie-hua. Designandapplicationofashockwaverecorderusedin warshipsubjectedtodynamicexplosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(2): 194-199. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)02-0194-06
[19]	LIU Jin-hong, ZOU Li-yong, BAI Jing-song, TAN Duo-wang, HUANG Wen-bin, GUO Wen-can. Richtmyer-Meshkovinstabilityofshock-acceleratedair/SF6interfaces[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(2): 135-140. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)02-0135-06
[20]	西北核技术研究所, 陕西, 西安. Application of sound-vibration coupling analysis in shock wave measurement[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(5): 427-432. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)05-0427-06