Pressure distribution and dynamic response of a submerged tunnel under explosion loading

DU Chuang; ZHANG Jiangpeng; ZHUANG Tieshuan; WU Jun; XU Wenxuan; ZHANG Tao

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2023-0255

Volume 44 Issue 5

May 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2024 > 44(5): 053202

DU Chuang, ZHANG Jiangpeng, ZHUANG Tieshuan, WU Jun, XU Wenxuan, ZHANG Tao. Pressure distribution and dynamic response of a submerged tunnel under explosion loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 053202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0255

Citation:

DU Chuang, ZHANG Jiangpeng, ZHUANG Tieshuan, WU Jun, XU Wenxuan, ZHANG Tao. Pressure distribution and dynamic response of a submerged tunnel under explosion loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(5): 053202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0255

Citation:

PDF( 22317 KB)

Pressure distribution and dynamic response of a submerged tunnel under explosion loading

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0255

1.
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
2.
Institute of Defense Engineering, Academy of Militory Science of PLA, Luoyang 471023, Henan, China

Received Date: 2023-07-20
Rev Recd Date: 2024-03-22

Available Online: 2024-03-22

Publish Date: 2024-05-08

Abstract

Abstract

In order to study the load distribution and dynamic response of tunnel structures under underwater explosion, a 1/10 scaled tunnel model was designed and manufactured, and underwater explosion tests were conducted for three times.The pressure, impulse, and displacement of the tunnel model were studied. The results show that the shock wave produces a significant water surface truncation effect in the shallow water area, which reduces the impulse near the water surface. The experimental value of the peak pressure of the free field shock wave is in good agreement with the theoretical value, and the error is within 20%. The peak pressure on the front surface of the circular cross-section tunnel is about 1.626－1.716 times that of the free field, the peak pressure on the top surface is about 55.4%－65.2% of the free field, and the peak pressure on the back surface is about 25.5%－31.3% of the free field. The impulse time history curve under the action of underwater explosion shows a clear step shape, and each bubble pulsation is accompanied by a corresponding increase in impulse.The displacement analysis shows that the underwater explosion causes the vibration of the tunnel structure. The vibration process can be divided into three stages: the rapid deformation of the tunnel structure, the large amplitude vibration of the tunnel structure, and the tremor of the tunnel structure. The maximum displacement of the tunnel structure occurs during the large amplitude vibration of the tunnel structure.
- submerged tunnel,
- underwater explosion,
- peak pressure,
- dynamic response,
- scaled model test

FullText(HTML)

References(18)

References

[1]	LIANG K, FENG K, ZHANG L, et al. Failure mechanism of underwater shield tunnel: an experimental and theoretical study [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 137: 105155. DOI: 10.1016/J.TUST.2023.105155.
[2]	JIA M W, LI F, ZHANG Y Z, et al. The Nord Stream pipeline gas leaks released approximately 220, 000 tonnes of methane into the atmosphere [J]. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 2022, 12: 100210. DOI: 10.1016/J.ESE.2022.100210.
[3]	STEWART M G, THÖNS S, BECK A T. Assessment of risk reduction strategies for terrorist attacks on structures [J]. Structural Safety, 2023, 104: 102353. DOI: 10.1016/J.STRUSAFE.2023.102353.
[4]	VYSHNEVSKYI V, SHEVCHUK S, KOMORIN V, et al. The destruction of the Kakhovka dam and its consequences [J]. Water International, 2023, 48(5): 631–647. DOI: 10.1080/02508060.2023.2247679.
[5]	XU L F, CHEN L, FANG Q, et al. Blast resistance of a folded arch cross-section immersed tunnel subjected to internal explosion [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 125: 104521. DOI: 10.1016/J.TUST.2022.104521.
[6]	KRISTOFFERSEN M, MINORETTI A, BØRVIK T. On the internal blast loading of submerged floating tunnels in concrete with circular and rectangular cross-sections [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 103: 462–480. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.04.074.
[7]	YANG G D, WANG G H, LU W B, et al. Damage assessment and mitigation measures of underwater tunnel subjected to blast loads [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 94: 103131. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.103131.
[8]	YANG G D, FAN Y, WANG G H, et al. Numerical study on dynamic response of submerged tunnel subjected to underwater explosion [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 156: 107216. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107216.
[9]	DE A, NIEMIEC A, ZIMMIE T F. Physical and numerical modeling to study effects of an underwater explosion on a buried tunnel [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2017, 143(5): 04017002. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001638.
[10]	DE A, NIEMIEC A, ZIMMIE T F. Pore pressure development near tunnel due to underwater explosion from centrifuge tests [J]. International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 2021, 21(5): 234–250. DOI: 10.1680/jphmg.19.00037.
[11]	王雪霁, 刘罡. 悬浮隧道(水下连续梁桥)跨越海峡方案研究 [J]. 路基工程, 2017(6): 152–155. DOI: 10.13379/j.issn.1003-8825.2017.06.31. WANG X J, LIU G. Research on the scheme of submerged floating tunnel (underwater continuous girder bridge) crossing the strait [J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2017(6): 152–155. DOI: 10.13379/j.issn.1003-8825.2017.06.31.
[12]	中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部, 国家市场监督管理总局. 沉管法隧道设计标准: GB/T 51318-2019 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2019.
[13]	ZHANG Y, ZHOU Y D, WU H. Influence of water level on RC caisson subjected to underwater explosions [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 266: 113162. DOI: 10.1016/J.OCEANENG.2022.113162.
[14]	ZAMYSHLYAEV B V, YAKOVLEV Y S. Dynamic loads in underwater explosion: AD-757183 [R]. 1972: 86–120.
[15]	COLE R H. Underwater explosion [M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1948.
[16]	张守中. 爆炸与冲击动力学 [M]. 北京: 兵器工业出版社, 1993.
[17]	邵宗战. 水下爆炸作用下圆柱壳周围压力场分布 [J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2017, 38(3): 38–41. SHAO Z Z. Pressure field distribution around cylindrical shell subjected to underwater explosion [J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2017, 38(3): 38–41. DOI: 10.11809/scbgxb2017.03.009.
[18]	宋敬利, 张姝红, 周学滨. 水下爆炸作用下船体结构应变信号修正方法 [J]. 爆破, 2011, 28(3): 30–33. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2011.03.008. SONG J L, ZHANG S H, ZHOU X B. Revision method of ship structure strain signal induced by underwater explosion [J]. Blasting, 2011, 28(3): 30–33. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2011.03.008.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Qimin, ZHANG Xu, ZHAO Kang, SHU Junxiang, ZHANG Rong, ZHONG Bin. Law of reaction growth of shock initiation on the TATB based insensitive explosive JB-9014[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(4): 041405. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0050
[2]	PEI Hongbo, LIU Junming, ZHANG Xu, SHU Junxiang, HUANG Wenbin, ZHENG Xianxu. Measurement of Hugoniot relation for unreacted JB-9014 explosive with reverse-impact method[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(5): 052301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0395
[3]	LU Qiang, WANG Zhanjiang, ZHANG Jingsen, DING Yang, LI Jin, GUO Zhiyun. Comparative studies on characteristics of elastic wave radiated from the tamped explosion in loess and rock-like sandy soil[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(5): 052202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0025
[4]	LU Qiang, WANG Zhanjiang, ZHU Yurong, DING Yang, GUO Zhiyun. Construction of motion and deformation field in granite under tamped explosion using wave propagation coefficient[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(8): 083103. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0140
[5]	ZHANG Zhen, WANG Yonggang. Measurement system for split Hopkinson pressure bar apparatus based on laser interferometry technique[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1165-1171. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0116
[6]	PEI Hongbo, HUANG Wenbin, QIN Jincheng, ZHANG Xu, ZHAO Feng, ZHENG Xianxu. Reaction zone structure of JB-9014 explosive measured by PDV[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 485-490. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0379
[7]	Yao Cheng-bao, Li Ruo, Tian Zhou, Guo Yong-hui. Two dimensional simulation for shock wave produced by strong explosion in free air[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 585-590. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0585-06
[8]	ZHOU Jie, TAO Gang, WANG Jian. Numericalsimulationoflunginjuryinducedbyshockwave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4): 418-422. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)04-0418-05
[9]	LI Hai-tao, ZHU Xi, WANG Lu, ZHANG Zhen-hua. Asimplifiedtheorymodelforbulkmovementofship-likebeams subjectedtosphericalshockwaves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(1): 85-90. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0085-06
[10]	CHEN Jun, ZENG Dai-peng, SUN Cheng-wei, ZHANG Zhen-yu, TAND uo-wang. Equationsofstateforoverdriven-detonationproducts ofJB-9014explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(6): 583-587. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)06-0583-05
[11]	YAN Feng, JIANG Fu-xing. Experiment on rock damage under blasting load[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(3): 275-280. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)03-0275-06
[12]	SHI Hua-qiang, ZONG Zhi, JIA Jing-bei. Short-range characters of underwater blast waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 125-130. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0125-06
[13]	LI Jin-he, ZHAO Ji-bo, TAN Duo-wang, WANG Yan-ping, ZHANG Yuan-ping. Underwater shock wave performances of explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 172-176. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0172-05
[14]	WANG Gui-ji, DENG Xiang-yang, TAN Fu-li, LIU Jun, ZHANG Ning, GU Yan, PENG Qi-xian, WU Gang, HAN Mei. Velocity measurement of the small size flyer of an exploding foil initiator[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(1): 28-31. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)01-0028-05
[15]	ZHANG Xin-hua, TANG Zhi-ping, XU Wei-wei, TANG Xiao-jun, ZHENG Hang. Experimental study on characteristics of shock-induced phase transition and spallation in FeMnNi alloy[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(2): 103-108. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)02-0103-06
[16]	LI Zhi-peng, LONG Xin-ping, HUANG Yi-min, HE Bi, WANG Rong, HE Song-wei. Electromagnetic gauge measurements of shock initiating JOB-9003 explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(3): 269-272. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)03-0269-04
[17]	YU De-shui, ZHAO Feng, TAN Duo-wang, PENG Qi-xian, FANG Qing. Experimental studies on detonation driving behavior of JOB-9003 and JB-9014 slab explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(2): 140-144. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)02-0140-05
[18]	ZHAO Jian-heng, SUN Cheng-wei, TAN Fu-li, PENG Qi-xian, WANG Gui-ji. Launch technique for isentropic compression flyer plates magnetically driven by using fast pulsed power[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(4): 303-308. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)04-0303-06
[19]	JIANG Xiao-hua, LONG Xin-ping, HE Bi, CHEN Lang, HUANG Yi-min, ZHANG Hai-bin. Numerical simulation of detonation in aluminized explosives containing oxidiser (AP)[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(1): 26-30. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)01-0026-05
[20]	DENG Xiang-yang, ZHAO Jian-heng, MA Dong-li, PENG Qi-xian. Experimental study on velocity of a film flyer driven by electrical gun[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(4): 382-384. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)04-0382-03