Damage characteristic of target penetrated by WF/Zr-MG and 93W rods

WU Shuogang; DU Chengxin; ZHOU Feng; GAO Guangfa; LYU Wenzheng; CHEN Xi

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2023-0312

Volume 44 Issue 4

Apr. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2024 > 44(4): 043302

Xiang Mei, Huang Yi-min, Rao Guo-ning, Peng Jin-hua. Cook-off test and numerical simulation for composite charge at different heating rates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(4): 394-400. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)04-0394-07

Citation:

WU Shuogang, DU Chengxin, ZHOU Feng, GAO Guangfa, LYU Wenzheng, CHEN Xi. Damage characteristic of target penetrated by WF/Zr-MG and 93W rods[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(4): 043302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0312

Citation:

PDF( 6013 KB)

Damage characteristic of target penetrated by WF/Zr-MG and 93W rods

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0312

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2023-08-28
Rev Recd Date: 2024-01-22

Available Online: 2024-01-23

Publish Date: 2024-04-07

Abstract

Abstract

In order to compare and analyze the characteristic and mechanism of damaging on 45 steel target plate penetrated by the WF/Zr-MG and 93W rod, a penetration experiment under hypervelocity impact was carried out. The analysis of penetration was performed at both macro and micro levels, in which the macroscopic quantitative characterization quantity was studied by equivalent diameter of reamer, and the microscopic morphology, phase transition and hardness characteristics of the target plate were obtained by scanning electron microscopy, optical microscope, X-ray diffraction and microhardness tester.The experimental results indicate that the WF/Zr-MG rod completely penetrated the target plate, while the 93W rod remained in the target plate. The armor-piercing capacity of WF/Zr-MG rod is higher than that of 93W rod with equivalent reaming diameter of 16.7 mm and 18.4 mm respectively, and the former is 10.18% lower than the latter. From the microscopic perspective, the aspect ratios of the fine grain layer after penetrated by the WF/Zr-MG rod and the 93W rod are 4.5 and 7.3, respectively. In addition, the width of the high-hardness layer are 10.2 mm and 8.9 mm, with Vickers hardness HV peaks at 249 and 287, respectively. The wider high-hardness layer observed in the former case can be attributed to the continuous burning of the Zr-based amorphous alloy during the penetration process, resulting in a larger temperature affected zone and consequently a greater area of hardness enhancement. On the other hand, in the latter case, the strength of the target plate during penetration is significantly higher due to the buckling and backflow of the WF/Zr-MG rod, while the 93W alloy core exhibits a "mushroom head" phenomenon. This reduces extrusion deformation on the target plate, thereby weakening the effect of grain elongation, reducing the increase in hardness peak value, and minimizing energy loss per unit length of the target plate. Ultimately, it enhances the armor-piercing capability of the WF/Zr-MG rod.
- WF/Zr-MG,
- 93W,
- micro analysis,
- hardness analysis,
- damage characteristic

FullText(HTML)

References(25)

References

[1]	WANG H K, LI Z Z, ZHANG Z H, et al. Microstructure evolution of 6252 armor steel under hypervelocity impact [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2022, 170(12): 104356. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104356.
[2]	HE Y, ZHANG Z, YANG S, et al. Deformation and fracture mechanism of Ti-6Al-4V target at high and hyper velocity impact [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2022, 169(12): 104312. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104312.
[3]	ZHENG Z, ZHU D, DING X, et al. Hypervelocity impact damage and microstructure evolution of woven Ti6Al4V fabric reinforced aluminum matrix composites [J]. Materials & Design, 2016, 108(10): 86–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.075.
[4]	ZHOU F, DU C X, CHENG C, et al. Penetration performance and fragmentation mechanism behind target of tungsten fibre/zirconium-based bulk metallic glass matrix composite rod [J]. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 2023, 112(4): 106160. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2023.106160.
[5]	李名锐, 冯娜, 蔡青山, 等. 93W杆式弹超高速撞击多层Q345钢靶毁伤及微观分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(2): 021408. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0303. LI M R, FENG N, CAI Q S, et al. Damage of a multi-layer Q345 target under hypervelocity impact of a rod-shaped 93W projectile [J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(2): 021408. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0303.
[6]	高华, 熊超, 殷军辉. 弹丸侵彻多层异质复合靶板中装甲钢变形细观和微观机理研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2018, 39(8): 1565–1575. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.08.013. GAO H, XIONG C, YIN J H. Research on macroscopic and microscopic mechanisms of deformation of armor steel in multilayer heterogeneous compositetarget subjected to projectile [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2018, 39(8): 1565–1575. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2018.08.013.
[7]	罗荣梅, 黄德武, 杨明川, 等. 杆式穿甲弹侵彻靶板时弹坑表面熔化快凝层研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2015, 36(7): 1167–1175. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2015.07.003. LUO R M, HUANG D W, YANG M C, et al. Research on melted and rapidly solidified layer on the surface of crater penetrated by long tungsten rod [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2015, 36(7): 1167–1175. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2015.07.003.
[8]	邹敏明, 郭珉, 柴东升, 等. 钨丝增强锆基非晶材料弹芯侵彻弹坑特征研究 [J]. 兵器材料科学与工程, 2021, 44(4): 56–60. DOI: 10.14024/j.cnki.1004-244x.20210514.009. ZOU M M, GUO M, CHAI D S, et al. Morphological characteristics of penetration crater of tungsten wire reinforced zirconium based amorphous matrix composite [J]. Ordnance Material Science and Engineering, 2021, 44(4): 56–60. DOI: 10.14024/j.cnki.1004-244x.20210514.009.
[9]	侯杰, 陈曦, 杜忠华, 等. W-Cu-Zr基非晶粉末药型罩射孔弹侵彻行为研究 [J]. 兵器材料科学与工程, 2022, 45(4): 12–17. DOI: 10.14024/j.cnki.1004-244x.20220701.004. HOU J, CHEN X, DU Z H, et al. Penetration behavior of W-Cu-Zr amorphous powder liner [J]. Ordnance Material Science and Engineering, 2022, 45(4): 12–17. DOI: 10.14024/j.cnki.1004-244x.20220701.004.
[10]	晁振龙, 姜龙涛, 陈圣朋, 等. 55%B₄C/7075Al复合材料抗弹性能与损伤行为研究 [J]. 兵器材料科学与工程, 2020, 43(3): 1–7. DOI: 10.14024/j.cnki.1004-244x.20200115.005. CHAO Z L, JIANG L T, Chen S P , et al. Ballistic property and damage behavior of 55% B₄C/7075Al composites [J]. Ordnance Material Science and Engineering, 2020, 43(3): 1–7. DOI: 10.14024/j.cnki.1004-244x.20200115.005.
[11]	黄竣皓, 王琳, 刘小品, 等. Ti-6321钛合金力学性能和抗弹性能 [J]. 兵工学报, 2021, 42(1): 124–132. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.01.014. HUANG J H, WANG L, LIU X P, et al. Mechanical properties and ballistic performance of Ti-6321 alloy [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2021, 42(1): 124–132. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2021.01.014.
[12]	李明兵, 王新南, 商国强, 等. 双态组织TC32钛合金的抗弹性能及损伤机制 [J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2021, 31(2): 365–372. DOI: 10.11817/j.ysxb.1004.0609.2021-37761. LI M B, WANG X N, SHANG G Q, et al. Ballistic properties and failure mechanisms of TC32 titanium alloy with bimodal microstructure [J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2021, 31(2): 365–372. DOI: 10.11817/j.ysxb.1004.0609.2021-37761.
[13]	苏冠龙, 龚煦, 李玉龙, 等. TC4在动态载荷下的剪切行为研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2015, 35(4): 527–535. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0527-09. SU G L, GONG X, LI Y L, et al. Shear behavior of TC4 alloy under dynamic loading [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 527–535. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0527-09.
[14]	张博. 高速撞击条件下镁合金损伤行为及变形机制研究 [D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2020: 1–25. DOI: 10.27061/d.cnki.ghgdu.2020.001729.
[15]	陈海华, 张先锋, 刘闯, 等. 高熵合金冲击变形行为研究进展 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(4): 041402. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0414. CHEN H H, ZHANG X F, LIU C, et al. Research progress on impact deformation behavior of high-entropy alloys [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2021, 41(4): 041402. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0414.
[16]	高玉魁, 陶雪菲. 高速冲击表面处理对金属材料力学性能和组织结构的影响 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(4): 041401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0342. GAO Y K, TAO X F. A review on the influences of high speed impact surface treatments on mechanical properties and microstructures of metallic materials [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2021, 41(4): 041401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0342.
[17]	夏龙祥. 钨纤维增强块体金属非晶复合材料侵彻行为研究 [D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2014: 11–22. DOI: 10.7666/d.Y2520745.
[18]	ZHOU F, DU C X, DU Z, et al. Penetration gain study of a tungsten-fiber/zr-based metallic glass matrix Composite [J]. Crystals, 2022, 12(2): 284. DOI: 10.3390/cryst12020284.
[19]	WALKER J. Hypervelocity penetration modeling: momentum vs. energy and energy transfer mechanisms [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2001, 26(1-10): 809–822. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00134-8.
[20]	ELSHENAWY T, ELBEIH A, LI Q. Influence of target strength on the penetration depth of shaped charge jets into RHA targets [J]. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2018, 136: 234–242. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.12.041.
[21]	HALL E O. The deformation and ageing of mild steel: III discussion of results [C]// Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section B. London, UK: Institute of Physics and the Physical Society, 1951: 747. DOI: 10.1088/0370-1301/64/9/303.
[22]	陈昊, 陶钢. 铜射流侵彻后45#钢穿孔处的微观组织分层研究 [J]. 南京理工大学学报, 2011, 35(4): 498–501. DOI: 10.14177/j.cnki.32-1397n.2011.04.001. CHEN H, TAO G. Microstructure’s delamination on bore of 45# steel penetrated by copper jet [J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2011, 35(4): 498–501. DOI: 10.14177/j.cnki.32-1397n.2011.04.001.
[23]	胡昌明, 贺红亮, 胡时胜. 45号钢的动态力学性能研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2003, 23(2): 188–192. HU C M, HE H L, HU S S. Study on dynamic mechanical properties of No. 45 steel [J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2003, 23(2): 188–192.
[24]	尚春明, 施冬梅, 张云峰等. Zr基非晶合金的燃烧释能特性[J]. 含能材料, 2020, 28(6): 564–568. DOI: 10.11943/CJEM2019219. SHANG C M, SHI D M, ZHANG Y F, at al. Combustion and energy release characteristics of zr-based amorphous alloys [J]. Chinese Journal of Energetic Materials, 2020, 28(6): 564–568. DOI: 10.11943/CJEM2019219.
[25]	LI D F, DONG H Y, WU K M, at al. Effects of cooling after rolling and heat treatment on microstructures and mechanical properties of Mo-Ti microalloyed medium carbon steel [J]. Materials Science & Engineering A, 2020, 773(C): 138808. DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2019.138808.

Relative Articles

[1]	CHEN Jianliang, YANG Pu, LI Jicheng, CHEN Gang, DENG Hongjian, FAN Zhigeng. Numerical simulation on the deflection behavior of large caliber conical nose projectile at oblique high-speed water entry[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(7): 073301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0398
[2]	QIAN Bingwen, ZHOU Gang, LI Mingrui, YIN Lixin, GAO Pengfei, CHEN Chunlin, MA Kun. Rigid-body critical transformation velocity of a high-strength steel projectile penetrating concrete targets at high velocities[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(10): 103301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0309
[3]	FANG Houlin, LU Qiang, GUO Quanshi, LI Guoliang, LIU Cunxu, TAO Sihao, ZHANG Dezhi. Experimental research on the free surface effect of shock wave and bubble behavior of small yield underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(8): 081444. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0003
[4]	MA Chenyang, WU Li, SUN Miao. Influence of free surface numbers on the energy distribution and attenuation of vibration signals of underwater drilling blasting[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(1): 015201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0436
[5]	LI Ming, WANG Kehui, ZOU Huihui, DUAN Jian, GU Renhong, DAI Xianghui, YANG Hui. Crater morphology of a projectile penetrating a thick concrete target[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(8): 083302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0294
[6]	WANG Yuntian, ZENG Xiangguo, CHEN Huayan, YANG Xin, WANG Fang, QI Zhongpeng. Multi-scale simulation study on characteristics of free surface velocity curve in ductile metal spallation[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 084202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0467
[7]	LIU Xiangyu, GONG Min, WU Haojun, AN Di. Determination method of tunnel blasting parameters using electronic detonator under changing condition of free surface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(10): 105202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0428
[8]	GAO Weitao, PENG Kefeng, ZHANG Yongliang, ZHENG Hang, ZHAO Kai, ZHENG Zhijun. On ballistic performance of a metal target with crescent-shaped cavity structure[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(5): 053303. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0473
[9]	GUO Hu, HE Liling, CHEN Xiaowei, CHEN Gang, LI Jicheng. Penetration mechanism of a high-speed projectile into a shelter made of spherical aggregates[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(10): 103301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0428
[10]	DUAN Zhuoping, LI Shurui, MA Zhaofang, OU Zhuocheng, HUANG Fenglei. Analytical model for attitude deflection of rigid projectile during oblique perforation of concrete targets[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(6): 063302. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0411
[11]	JIN Yunsheng, SUN Chengwei, ZHAO Jianheng, LUO Binqiang, WANG Guiji, TAN Fuli. Direct calculation method for free surface data processing of step target in ICE[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(4): 044201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0294
[12]	HONG yong, MA Honghao, SHEN Zhaowu, REN Lijie, CUI Yu, ZHAO Kai. Research and application on efficient rock blasting based on circular free surface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(1): 98-105. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0176
[13]	Deng Yongjun, Chen Xiaowei, Yao Yong, Yang Tao. On ballistic trajectory of rigid projectile normal penetration based on a meso-scopic concrete model[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 377-386. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0377-10
[14]	MINGFu-ren, ZHANGA-man, YANG Wen-shan. Three-dimensionalsimulationsonexplosiveloadcharacteristicsof underwaterexplosionnearfreesurface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(5): 508-514. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)05-0508-07
[15]	GONG Bai-lin, LU Fang-yun, LI Xiang-yu. Atheoreticalmodelforforecastingdeformationshapes ofdeformablewarheads[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(1): 65-69. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0065-05
[16]	WANG Cheng-hua, CHEN Pei-yin, XU Xiao-cheng. Filtering of penetration deceleration data and determining of penetration deceleration on the rigid-body[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(5): 416-419. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)05-0416-04

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(23)

1.	赵越宸，庞维强，苏昌银，龙杰才，郑荣耀，李锡文. 复合固体推进剂混合工艺参数推算方法. 固体火箭技术. 2024(06): 851-858 .
2.	沈飞，王辉，王金涛，余文力，王煊军. 基于圆筒试验的DNTF基叠层复合装药的爆轰驱动释能特性. 爆炸与冲击. 2023(11): 58-66 . 本站查看
3.	李昂，钱江，褚恩义，韩克华，朱朋，沈瑞琪. 爆炸箔起爆器热烤试验与数值模拟研究. 火工品. 2023(06): 33-38 .
4.	肖游，智小琦，王琦，范兴华. 多种复合炸药装药的慢烤特性及其机理. 高压物理学报. 2022(02): 166-175 .
5.	叶青，余永刚. 含能材料热安全性研究进展. 装备环境工程. 2022(03): 1-10 .
6.	刘静，赵非玉. 不同升温速率下模块装药的烤燃特性分析. 装备环境工程. 2022(03): 11-16 .
7.	方远德，姜春兰，毛亮，王在成，王新宇，卢士伟. 聚能装药战斗部烤燃响应的数值模拟研究. 兵器装备工程学报. 2022(07): 121-127 .
8.	王茂，韩志伟，李亚宁，李宏伟，陈坤，王伯良. 基于虚拟仪器的慢速烤燃系统的设计及应用. 爆破器材. 2020(03): 37-42 .
9.	刘子德，智小琦，周捷，王帅. 药量和升温速率对DNAN基熔铸炸药烤燃特性的影响. 爆炸与冲击. 2019(01): 20-24 . 本站查看
10.	蒋超，闻泉，王雨时，张志彪，王光宇. 不敏感弹药烤燃试验技术综述. 探测与控制学报. 2019(02): 1-9 .
11.	王新颖，卢熹. 温升对水雷主装药安全性影响的数值模拟. 科学技术与工程. 2019(15): 125-129 .
12.	屈可朋，李亮亮，肖玮. 高低温循环及对称冲击耦合加载下炸药的安全性研究. 爆破器材. 2019(04): 43-46+53 .
13.	徐洪涛，金朋刚. 炸药缓慢加热条件实验技术进展. 装备环境工程. 2019(09): 5-17 .
14.	常天笑，闻泉，王雨时，王光宇，蒋超，闫丽. 引信内部装药对烤燃试验响应的影响. 探测与控制学报. 2019(05): 17-24 .
15.	邓海，沈飞，梁争峰，王辉. 不同约束条件下B炸药的慢烤响应特性. 火炸药学报. 2018(05): 465-470 .
16.	刘子德，智小琦. DNAN熔铸混合炸药的慢烤试验与模拟. 兵器装备工程学报. 2018(12): 178-181 .
17.	袁俊明，张林炎，唐鑫，刘玉存，张喜亮，陈银刚，李硕. 小型传爆装置慢燃实验及数值计算. 兵工学报. 2017(08): 1541-1546 .
18.	李文凤，余永刚，叶锐，杨后文. 不同升温速率下AP/HTPB底排装置慢速烤燃的数值模拟. 爆炸与冲击. 2017(01): 46-52 . 本站查看
19.	杨筱，智小琦. 炸药烤燃特性的隔热层效应研究. 科学技术与工程. 2016(35): 198-202 .
20.	吴世永，王伟力，苗润，吕鹏博，刘晓夏. 不同尺寸装药烤燃特性的数值模拟研究. 中国测试. 2016(10): 85-89 .
21.	姚奎光，钟敏，代晓淦，吕子剑. 缓慢热作用下PBX-9炸药的响应特性. 火炸药学报. 2015(06): 56-60 .
22.	陈科全，黄亨建，路中华，蒋治海，聂少云，陈红霞. 一种弹体排气缓释结构设计方法与试验研究. 弹箭与制导学报. 2015(04): 15-18 .
23.	杨后文，余永刚，叶锐. AP/HTPB复合固体推进剂慢烤燃特性的数值模拟. 含能材料. 2015(10): 924-929 .