Penetration resistance of ceramic/UHMWPE composite structures with porous titanium alloy sandwich layer

MA Minghui; WU Yiding; WANG Xiaodong; YU Yilei; WANG Botong; GAO Guangfa

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2023-0375

Volume 44 Issue 4

Apr. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2024 > 44(4): 041001

MA Minghui, WU Yiding, WANG Xiaodong, YU Yilei, WANG Botong, GAO Guangfa. Penetration resistance of ceramic/UHMWPE composite structures with porous titanium alloy sandwich layer[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(4): 041001. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0375

Citation:

MA Minghui, WU Yiding, WANG Xiaodong, YU Yilei, WANG Botong, GAO Guangfa. Penetration resistance of ceramic/UHMWPE composite structures with porous titanium alloy sandwich layer[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(4): 041001. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0375

Citation:

MA Minghui, WU Yiding, WANG Xiaodong, YU Yilei, WANG Botong, GAO Guangfa. Penetration resistance of ceramic/UHMWPE composite structures with porous titanium alloy sandwich layer[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(4): 041001. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0375

PDF( 13914 KB)

Penetration resistance of ceramic/UHMWPE composite structures with porous titanium alloy sandwich layer

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0375

School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2023-10-16
Rev Recd Date: 2024-01-06

Available Online: 2024-01-08

Publish Date: 2024-04-07

Abstract

Abstract

The fiber back plate in ceramic/fiber composite armor cannot provide sufficient support for the ceramic panel due to its low stiffness, which weakens the erosion effect of the ceramic panel on the projectile. In order to enhance the overall structural stiffness of composite armor, a metal sandwich layer material was added to the ceramic/fiber composite armor. The ballistic performance of the sandwich composite armor against 12.7-mm incendiary projectiles was studied through experiments and numerical simulations. The experimental results indicate that the core of the penetrator exhibits a brittle fracture failure mode, while composite armor exhibits multiple failure modes, including petal-shaped expansion of the sandwich layer, delamination and protrusion deformation of the UHMWPE (ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene) laminate. A three-dimensional numerical model was established to analyze the evolution of the entire ballistic response, and the accuracy of the simulation was verified through experimental results. The simulation results indicate that the armor of the 12.7-mm penetrator will cause damage to the ceramic, which will erode the pointed oval head of the projectile core, making the core head blunt and weakening the penetration ability of the projectile core into the UHMWPE backing plate. Most of the kinetic energy of the residual projectile is absorbed by the UHMWPE layer, and the failure mode of the UHMWPE laminate will change from shear failure to tensile failure as the number of layers increases. In addition, as a sandwich layer, the porous TC4 board can provide support for the ceramic panel, increase the energy absorption of the ceramic panel and erosion of the projectile, and the 12-mm-pore-size TC4 sandwich layer can provide greater stiffness support, increase the energy absorption efficiency of the overall composite structure by 10%.
- ceramic composite armor,
- porous sandwich layer,
- UHMWPE,
- 12.7 mm armor piercing bullet

FullText(HTML)

References(29)

References

[1]	MEDVEDOVSKI E. Ballistic performance of armour ceramics: influence of design and structure: Part 2 [J]. Ceramics International, 2010, 36(7): 2117–2127. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.05.022.
[2]	LUO D J, WANG Y W, WANG F C, et al. The influence of metal cover plates on ballistic performance of silicon carbide subjected to large-scale tungsten projectile [J]. Materials and Design, 2020, 191: 108659. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108659.
[3]	NAGLIERI V, GLUDOVATZ B, TOMSIA A P, et al. Developing strength and toughness in bio-inspired silicon carbide hybrid materials containing a compliant phase [J]. Acta Materialia, 2015, 98: 141–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.07.022.
[4]	LI J Z, ZHANG L S, HUANG F L. Experiments and simulations of tungsten alloy rods penetrating into alumina ceramic/603 armor steel composite targets [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 101: 1–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.09.009.
[5]	余毅磊, 蒋招绣, 王晓东, 等. 背板对氧化铝陶瓷薄板断裂锥形态的影响 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2021, 41(7): 713–720. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2020.107. YU Y L, JIANG Z X, WANG X D, et al. Effect of backing plate condition on fracture cone shape of alumina ceramic thin tiles [J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2021, 41(7): 713–720. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2020.107.
[6]	ZAERA R, SÁNCHEZ-SÁEZ S, PÉREZ-CASTELLANOS J L, et al. Modelling of the adhesive layer in mixed ceramic/metal armours subjected to impact [J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2000, 31(8): 823–833. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00027-0.
[7]	NGUYEN L H, RYAN S, CIMPOERU S J, et al. The effect of target thickness on the ballistic performance of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene composite [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 75: 174–183. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.07.008.
[8]	CAI S P, LIU J, ZHANG P, et al. Dynamic response of sandwich panels with multi-layered aluminum foam/UHMWPE laminate cores under air blast loading [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2020, 138: 103475. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.103475.
[9]	CAI S P, LIU J, ZHANG P, et al. Experimental study on failure mechanisms of sandwich panels with multi-layered aluminum foam/UHMWPE laminate core under combined blast and fragments loading [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 159: 107227. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107227.
[10]	SHEN Z W, HU D A, YANG G, et al. Ballistic reliability study on SiC/UHMWPE composite armor against armor-piercing bullet [J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 213: 209–219. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.078.
[11]	武一丁, 王晓东, 余毅磊, 等. 纤维背板结构对B₄C陶瓷复合装甲抗侵彻破碎特性的影响 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(9): 091411. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0133. WU Y D, WANG X D, YU Y L, et al. Affection of fiber backboard structure on the penetration and crushing resistance of B₄C ceramic composite armor [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2023, 43(9): 091411. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0133.
[12]	DE OLIVEIRA BRAGA F, MILANEZI T L, MONTEIRO S N, et al. Ballistic comparison between epoxy-ramie and epoxy-aramid composites in Multilayered Armor Systems [J]. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2018, 7(4): 541–549. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.06.018.
[13]	DE OLIVEIRA BRAGA F, BOLZAN L T, RAMOS F J H T V, et al. Ballistic efficiency of multilayered armor systems with sisal fiber polyester composites [J]. Materials Research, 2018, 20(S2): 767–774. DOI: 10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2017-1002.
[14]	KARTIKEYA K, CHOUHAN H, RAM K, et al. Ballistic evaluation of steel/UHMWPE composite armor system against hardened steel core projectiles [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2022, 164: 104211. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104211.
[15]	WU K K, CHEN Y L, YEH J N, et al. Ballistic impact performance of SiC ceramic-dyneema fiber composite materials [J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 2020: 9457489. DOI: 10.1155/2020/9457489.
[16]	NGUYEN L H, LÄSSIG T R, RYAN S, et al. A methodology for hydrocode analysis of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene composite under ballistic impact [J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2016, 84: 224–235. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.01.014.
[17]	HAZZARD M K, TRASK R S, HEISSERER U, et al. Finite element modelling of Dyneema® composites: from quasi-static rates to ballistic impact [J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2018, 115: 31–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.005.
[18]	NUNES S G, SCAZZOSI R, MANES A, et al. Influence of projectile and thickness on the ballistic behavior of aramid composites: experimental and numerical study [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 132: 103307. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.05.021.
[19]	JOHNSON G R, HOLMQUIST T J. An improved computational constitutive model for brittle materials [J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1994, 309(1): 981–984. DOI: 10.1063/1.46199.
[20]	MA Y Y, WANG J T, ZHAO G Z, et al. New insights into the damage assessment and energy dissipation weight mechanisms of ceramic/fiber laminated composites under ballistic impact [J]. Ceramics International, 2023, 43(13): 21966–21977. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.04.021.
[21]	HASHIN Z. Fatigue failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1981, 48(4): 846–852. DOI: 10.1115/1.3157744.
[22]	TAN L B, TSE K M, LEE H P, et al. Performance of an advanced combat helmet with different interior cushioning systems in ballistic impact: experiments and finite element simulations [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2012, 50: 99–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.06.003.
[23]	JOHNSON G R, COOK W H. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1985, 21(1): 31–48. DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9.
[24]	JIANG Y, QIAN K, ZHANG Y L, et al. Experimental characterisation and numerical simulation of ballistic penetration of columnar ceramic/fiber laminate composite armor [J]. Materials and Design, 2022, 224: 111394. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.111394.
[25]	XIE Y, WANG T, WANG L M, et al. Numerical investigation of ballistic performance of SiC/TC4/UHMWPE composite armor against 7.62 mm AP projectile [J]. Ceramics International, 2022, 48(16): 24079–24090. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.088.
[26]	STRASSBURGER E, HUNZINGER M, PATEL P, et al. Analysis of the fragmentation of AlON and spinel under ballistic impact [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2013, 80(3): 031807. DOI: 10.1115/1.4023573.
[27]	GAO Y J, FENG X Y, LIU J X, et al. Design and ballistic penetration of “SiC/Ti6Al4V/UHMWPE” composite armor [J]. IOP Conference Series:Materials Science and Engineering, 2019, 563(4): 042043. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/563/4/042043.
[28]	PHOENIX S L, PORWAL P K. A new membrane model for the ballistic impact response and V₅₀ performance of multi-ply fibrous systems [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2003, 40(24): 6723–6765. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00329-9.
[29]	GUO G D, ALAM S, PEEL L D. An investigation of the effect of a Kevlar-29 composite cover layer on the penetration behavior of a ceramic armor system against 7.62 mm APM2 projectiles [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2021, 157: 104000. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104000.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHANG Qimin, ZHANG Xu, ZHAO Kang, SHU Junxiang, ZHANG Rong, ZHONG Bin. Law of reaction growth of shock initiation on the TATB based insensitive explosive JB-9014[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(4): 041405. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0050
[2]	PEI Hongbo, LIU Junming, ZHANG Xu, SHU Junxiang, HUANG Wenbin, ZHENG Xianxu. Measurement of Hugoniot relation for unreacted JB-9014 explosive with reverse-impact method[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(5): 052301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0395
[3]	LU Qiang, WANG Zhanjiang, ZHANG Jingsen, DING Yang, LI Jin, GUO Zhiyun. Comparative studies on characteristics of elastic wave radiated from the tamped explosion in loess and rock-like sandy soil[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(5): 052202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0025
[4]	LU Qiang, WANG Zhanjiang, ZHU Yurong, DING Yang, GUO Zhiyun. Construction of motion and deformation field in granite under tamped explosion using wave propagation coefficient[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(8): 083103. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0140
[5]	ZHANG Zhen, WANG Yonggang. Measurement system for split Hopkinson pressure bar apparatus based on laser interferometry technique[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1165-1171. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0116
[6]	PEI Hongbo, HUANG Wenbin, QIN Jincheng, ZHANG Xu, ZHAO Feng, ZHENG Xianxu. Reaction zone structure of JB-9014 explosive measured by PDV[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(3): 485-490. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0379
[7]	Yao Cheng-bao, Li Ruo, Tian Zhou, Guo Yong-hui. Two dimensional simulation for shock wave produced by strong explosion in free air[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(4): 585-590. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)04-0585-06
[8]	ZHOU Jie, TAO Gang, WANG Jian. Numericalsimulationoflunginjuryinducedbyshockwave[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(4): 418-422. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)04-0418-05
[9]	LI Hai-tao, ZHU Xi, WANG Lu, ZHANG Zhen-hua. Asimplifiedtheorymodelforbulkmovementofship-likebeams subjectedtosphericalshockwaves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(1): 85-90. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0085-06
[10]	CHEN Jun, ZENG Dai-peng, SUN Cheng-wei, ZHANG Zhen-yu, TAND uo-wang. Equationsofstateforoverdriven-detonationproducts ofJB-9014explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(6): 583-587. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)06-0583-05
[11]	YAN Feng, JIANG Fu-xing. Experiment on rock damage under blasting load[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(3): 275-280. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)03-0275-06
[12]	SHI Hua-qiang, ZONG Zhi, JIA Jing-bei. Short-range characters of underwater blast waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 125-130. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0125-06
[13]	LI Jin-he, ZHAO Ji-bo, TAN Duo-wang, WANG Yan-ping, ZHANG Yuan-ping. Underwater shock wave performances of explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 172-176. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0172-05
[14]	WANG Gui-ji, DENG Xiang-yang, TAN Fu-li, LIU Jun, ZHANG Ning, GU Yan, PENG Qi-xian, WU Gang, HAN Mei. Velocity measurement of the small size flyer of an exploding foil initiator[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(1): 28-31. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)01-0028-05
[15]	ZHANG Xin-hua, TANG Zhi-ping, XU Wei-wei, TANG Xiao-jun, ZHENG Hang. Experimental study on characteristics of shock-induced phase transition and spallation in FeMnNi alloy[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(2): 103-108. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)02-0103-06
[16]	LI Zhi-peng, LONG Xin-ping, HUANG Yi-min, HE Bi, WANG Rong, HE Song-wei. Electromagnetic gauge measurements of shock initiating JOB-9003 explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(3): 269-272. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)03-0269-04
[17]	YU De-shui, ZHAO Feng, TAN Duo-wang, PENG Qi-xian, FANG Qing. Experimental studies on detonation driving behavior of JOB-9003 and JB-9014 slab explosives[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2006, 26(2): 140-144. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)02-0140-05
[18]	ZHAO Jian-heng, SUN Cheng-wei, TAN Fu-li, PENG Qi-xian, WANG Gui-ji. Launch technique for isentropic compression flyer plates magnetically driven by using fast pulsed power[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(4): 303-308. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)04-0303-06
[19]	JIANG Xiao-hua, LONG Xin-ping, HE Bi, CHEN Lang, HUANG Yi-min, ZHANG Hai-bin. Numerical simulation of detonation in aluminized explosives containing oxidiser (AP)[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(1): 26-30. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)01-0026-05
[20]	DENG Xiang-yang, ZHAO Jian-heng, MA Dong-li, PENG Qi-xian. Experimental study on velocity of a film flyer driven by electrical gun[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(4): 382-384. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)04-0382-03