Meticulous analysis of one-dimensional elastic-plastic wave evolution in sandwich bar system (part Ⅰ): transmitted and reflected waves for typical loading waves

GAO Guangfa

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2023-0389

Volume 44 Issue 8

Aug. 2024

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2024 > 44(8): 081441

GAO Guangfa. Meticulous analysis of one-dimensional elastic-plastic wave evolution in sandwich bar system (part Ⅰ): transmitted and reflected waves for typical loading waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(8): 081441. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0389

Citation:

GAO Guangfa. Meticulous analysis of one-dimensional elastic-plastic wave evolution in sandwich bar system (part Ⅰ): transmitted and reflected waves for typical loading waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(8): 081441. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0389

Citation:

GAO Guangfa. Meticulous analysis of one-dimensional elastic-plastic wave evolution in sandwich bar system (part Ⅰ): transmitted and reflected waves for typical loading waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(8): 081441. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0389

PDF( 3262 KB)

Meticulous analysis of one-dimensional elastic-plastic wave evolution in sandwich bar system (part Ⅰ): transmitted and reflected waves for typical loading waves

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0389

GAO Guangfa

School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2023-10-24
Rev Recd Date: 2023-12-04

Available Online: 2024-02-04

Publish Date: 2024-08-05

Abstract

Abstract

The reflected and transmitted waves in split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests provide crucial information for obtaining the stress-strain relationship of materials. Accurately analyzing the formation process and influencing mechanisms of the reflected and incident waves is a key prerequisite for precise experimental design and accurate data processing. In this paper, the propagation and evolution of one-dimensional elastic-plastic waves in the loading stages of the SHPB test are presented particularly for a sandwich bar system consisting of the incident wave, specimen, and transmitted bar. Based on the theory of elastic-plastic incremental waves and numerical simulation calculations, the propagation of elastic-plastic waves in the specimen, the transmission and reflection of elastic-plastic waves at the two interfaces, and the interaction of the resulting series of transmitted and reflected waves are quantitatively investigated. The research findings are as follows. Firstly, although the design principle of the SHPB apparatus is based on linear elastic wave theory, the elastic-plastic waves, especially the stress waves, have a major influence on the transmission and reflection at the elastic-plastic interface, while the transmission and propagation of purely elastic waves have a relatively minor effect. Secondly, when the loading interval of the incident wave has a certain width, the multiple transmission and reflection of elastic waves at the two interfaces in bar 2 attenuate the reflected wave while further strengthening the transmitted wave. This attenuation causes the peak of the reflected wave for the half-sine wave to occur earlier than at 0.5 nondimensional time. Thirdly, in contrary to the preliminary laws of elastic wave transmission and reflection at interfaces in traditional SHPB analysis, variations in the Young’s modulus and density of the specimen material have little effect on the waveform and peak intensity of the transmitted wave, regardless of whether the incident wave is rectangular, trapezoidal, or half-sine. This investigationprovides a scientific basis for the refined design of SHPB experiments and precise analysis of data.
- SHPB,
- elastic-plastic wave transmission and reflection,
- reflected wave,
- transmitted wave,
- generalized wave impedance

FullText(HTML)

References(15)

References

[1]	LIU F, LI Q M. Strain-rate effect of polymers and correction methodology in a SHPB test [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2022, 161: 104109. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104109.
[2]	LIU P, HU D A, WU Q K, et al. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of interfacial effect in SHPB tests for concrete-like materials [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 163: 414–427. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.118.
[3]	KARIEM M A, BEYNON J H, RUAN D. Misalignment effect in the split Hopkinson pressure bar technique [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2012, 47: 60–70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.03.006.
[4]	NIE H L, MA W F, HE X L, et al. Misalignment tolerance in one-side and symmetric loading Hopkinson pressure bar experiments [J]. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica, 2022, 35(2): 273–281. DOI: 10.1007/s10338-021-00267-3.
[5]	GUO Y B, GAO G F, JING L, et al. Dynamic properties of mortar in high-strength concrete [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2022, 165: 104216. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104216.
[6]	PANOWICZ R, JANISZEWSKI J, KOCHANOWSKI K. Effects of sample geometry imperfections on the results of split Hopkinson pressure bar experiments [J]. Experimental Techniques, 2019, 43(4): 397–403. DOI: 10.1007/s40799-018-0293-7.
[7]	BRIZARD D, JACQUELIN E. Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of longitudinal wave propagation in circular bars. application to SHPB device [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2018, 134: 264–271. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.11.005.
[8]	YANG H S, LI Y L, ZHOU F H. Propagation of stress pulses in a Rayleigh-Love elastic rod [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2021, 153: 103854. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.103854.
[9]	BRAGOV A M, LOMUNOV A K, LAMZIN D A, et al. Dispersion correction in split-Hopkinson pressure bar: theoretical and experimental analysis [J]. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 2022, 34(4): 895–907. DOI: 10.1007/s00161-019-00776-0.
[10]	RIGBY S E, BARR A D, CLAYTON M. A review of Pochhammer-Chree dispersion in the Hopkinson bar [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering and Computational Mechanics, 2018, 171(1): 3–13. DOI: 10.1680/jencm.16.00027.
[11]	REN L, YU X M, HE Y, et al. Numerical investigation of lateral inertia effect in dynamic impact testing of UHPC using a Split-Hopkinson pressure bar [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 246: 118483. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118483.
[12]	AL-MALIKY N S. Dimension effect on dynamic stress equilibrium in SHPB tests [J]. International Journal of Materials Physics, 2014, 5(1): 15–26. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15864.19200.
[13]	PRAKASH G, SINGH NK, GUPTA NK. Flow behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V alloy in a wide range of strain rates and temperatures under tensile, compressive and flexural loads [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2023, 176: 104549. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104549.
[14]	WU X Q, YIN Q Y, WEI Y P, et al. Effects of imperfect experimental conditions on stress waves in SHPB experiments [J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2015, 31(6): 827–836. DOI: 10.1007/s10409-015-0439-0.
[15]	高光发. 量纲分析理论与应用 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2021: 434–435. GAO G F. Dimensional analysis: theories and applications [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2021: 434–435.