Research on damage and cavitation characteristics of propellers under far field shock waves

WANG Zhikai; ZHENG Jingzhou; YANG Yang; XIA Huiheng; YAO Xiongliang

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2023-0395

Volume 45 Issue 3

Mar. 2025

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2025 > 45(3): 033401

WANG Zhikai, ZHENG Jingzhou, YANG Yang, XIA Huiheng, YAO Xiongliang. Research on damage and cavitation characteristics of propellers under far field shock waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2025, 45(3): 033401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0395

Citation:

WANG Zhikai, ZHENG Jingzhou, YANG Yang, XIA Huiheng, YAO Xiongliang. Research on damage and cavitation characteristics of propellers under far field shock waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2025, 45(3): 033401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0395

Citation:

PDF( 8214 KB)

Research on damage and cavitation characteristics of propellers under far field shock waves

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0395

1.
College of Shipbuilding Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, Heilongjiang, China
2.
China Shipbuilding Group Engineering Management Center, Beijing 100081, China

Received Date: 2023-10-31
Rev Recd Date: 2024-03-29

Available Online: 2024-04-01

Publish Date: 2025-03-05

Abstract

Abstract

The propeller is a critical component of a ship’s propulsion system that significantly influences the vessel’s performance through its stability and efficiency. Current research on the propulsion shaft system’s anti-shock properties often oversimplifies the propeller as a uniform circular disk, which disregards its structural intricacies and leads to inaccuracies in the transient damage characteristics during underwater explosions. This research focused on the propeller’s structural details and developed both an equivalent shell model and a more intricate solid model. Through structural wet modal numerical simulations, the study had determined that solid modeling outperforms shell modeling in accuracy. This finding is corroborated by comparisons with empirical formulas, thereby validating the fluid-structure coupling analysis model. Building upon this foundation, the research examines the propeller’s transient shock response and damage characteristics when subjected to far-field shockwaves. Utilizing the total wave algorithm in ABAQUS, the investigation extends to the cavitation and damage patterns of the propeller under such conditions, with confirmation provided by the one-dimensional Bleich-Sandler finite element model. To delve deeper into the phenomenon of hydrodynamic cavitation caused by the propeller’s high-speed rotation, the coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) method was applied. Initially, a simplified propeller model was created to confirm the cavitation bubble layer’s fragmentation due to the flow field load resulting from explosive product expansion. Subsequent modifications to the propeller’s transient fluid-structure coupling calculation model allow for a more thorough analysis of its transient damage characteristics. The findings indicate that at attack angles of 0° and 90°, the propeller surface experiences heightened shockwave loads, albeit with a threshold linked to the propeller’s structural properties. When hydrodynamic cavitation is factored in, the stress distribution on the propeller blade tends to be more uniform; the blade’s primary plastic damage is localized at the root, exhibiting both localized and complete plastic deformation patterns. This research elucidates the damage and cavitation effects on propellers due to far-field explosions, offering valuable insights for enhancing the anti-shock defenses of both the propulsion shaft system and the propeller itself.
- underwater explosion,
- propeller,
- damage characteristics,
- cavitation effect

FullText(HTML)

References(19)

References

[1]	RAJENDRAN R. Reloading effects on plane plates subjected to non-contact underwater explosion [J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2008, 206(1/2/3): 275–281. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.022.
[2]	许斐, 周力, 宗智. 铝合金舰艇在水下冲击波作用下动态响应的数值研究 [J]. 舰船科学技术, 2011, 33(1): 31–40. XU F, ZHOU L, ZONG Z. A numerical analysis on dynamic responses of aluminum vessels subjected to underwater shock wave [J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2011, 33(1): 31–40. DOI: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7649.2011.006.
[3]	宗智, 陈岗, 叶帆, 等. 水下爆炸冲击波作用下的空化效应数值仿真研究 [J]. 船舶力学, 2014, 18(4): 385–394. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2014.04.005. ZONG Z, CHEN G, YE F, et al. Numerical simulation of cavitation caused by underwater explosion [J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2014, 18(4): 385–394. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2014.04.005.
[4]	PAN J Y, FARAG N, LIN T, et al. Propeller induced structural vibration through the thrust bearing [C]//Proceedings of Australia Acoustical Society Annual Conference. Adelaide, 2002.
[5]	KOBAYASHI S. Effects of shaft vibration on occurrence of asymmetric cavitation in inducer [J]. JSME International Journal Series B Fluids and Thermal Engineering, 2006, 49(4): 1220–1225. DOI: 10.1299/jsmeb.49.1220.
[6]	孙文林. 冰区航行船舶螺旋桨强度研究 [D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2016. DOI: 10.7666/d.D01105449. SUN W L. Research on the propeller strength of ice-going ships [D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2016. DOI: 10.7666/d.D01105449.
[7]	徐学伟, 刘寅桐, 张耀林. 爆炸声源对舰船螺旋桨效能损伤评估研究 [J]. 舰船电子工程, 2018, 38(10): 153–155, 164. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2018.10.038. XU X W, LIU Y T, ZHANG Y L. Research on evaluation of damage to ship propeller effectiveness for explosion sound source [J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2018, 38(10): 153–155, 164. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9730.2018.10.038.
[8]	UCAR H. Dynamic response of a catamaran-hull ship subjected to underwater explosions [D]. Monterey: Naval Postgraduate School, 2006.
[9]	孙帅, 常欣, 叶礼裕, 等. 四桨推进船舶螺旋桨负荷数值计算分析 [J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2017, 38(9): 1351–1358. DOI: 10.11990/jheu.201607004. SUN S, CHANG X, YE L Y, et al. Numerical analysis of the propeller load of a four-propeller propulsion ship [J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2017, 38(9): 1351–1358. DOI: 10.11990/jheu.201607004.
[10]	刘强, 王永生, 董蕾, 等. 船用螺旋桨振动特性数值计算与分析 [J]. 海军工程大学学报, 2016, 28(3): 17–23. DOI: 10.7495/j.issn.1009-3486.2016.03.005. LIU Q, WANG Y S, DONG L, et al. Numerical analysis on vibration of marine propeller [J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2016, 28(3): 17–23. DOI: 10.7495/j.issn.1009-3486.2016.03.005.
[11]	娄本强, 嵇春艳. 船用螺旋桨流固耦合振动特性分析 [J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2019, 59(2): 154–161. DOI: 10.7511/dllgxb201902007. LOU B Q, JI C Y. FSI vibrations characteristics analysis of marine propeller [J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2019, 59(2): 154–161. DOI: 10.7511/dllgxb201902007.
[12]	李程辉. 基于声固耦合法的水下爆炸冲击波在复杂边界附近空化特性研究 [D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2018: 26–30. LI C H. Investigation on cavitation of underwater explosion shockwave near complex boundaries with coupled CEL method [D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2018: 26–30.
[13]	陈高杰, 贾则, 宗智, 等. 考虑空化效应的舰艇水下爆炸仿真研究 [J]. 爆破, 2012, 29(2): 1–3, 25. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2012.29.0213. CHEN G J, JIA Z, ZONG Z, et al. Investigation on simulation of underwater explosion cavitation surface ship [J]. Blasting, 2012, 29(2): 1–3, 25. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1001-487X.2012.29.0213.
[14]	BLEICH H H, SANDLER I S. Interaction between structures and bilinear fluids [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1970, 6(5): 617–639. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(70)90034-X.
[15]	姚熊亮, 许维军, 梁德利. 水下爆炸时舰船冲击环境与冲击因子的关系 [J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2004, 25(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.2004.01.002. YAO X L, XU W J, LIANG D L. The relation of impulsive environment and impulsive factor on underwater explosion of ship [J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2004, 25(1): 1–12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7043.2004.01.002.
[16]	马艳, 陆芳, 黄红波, 等. 集装箱船模型螺旋桨空泡与脉动压力比对试验研究 [C]//第二十五届全国水动力学研讨会暨第十二届全国水动力学学术会议文集北京: 海洋出版社, 2013. MA Y, LU F, HUANG H B, et al. Experimental study on comparison of propeller cavitation and fluctuating pressure of container ship model [C]//Proceedings of the 25th National Hydrodynamics Symposium and the 12th National Hydrodynamics Conference. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 2013.
[17]	王波, 熊鹰, 时立攀. 确定螺旋桨螺距及拱度分布的一种数值优化方法 [C]//2015年船舶水动力学学术会议. 哈尔滨: 中国造船工程学会, 2015. WANG B, XIONG Y, SHI L P. A numerical optimization method for determining propeller pitch and camber distribution [C]//Proceedings of the 2015 Ship Hydrodynamics Symposium. Harbin: Chinese Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 2015.
[18]	SALVATORE F. The INSEAN E779A database on propeller flow experimental investigations [R]. INSEAN Technical Report 99, 2006.
[19]	寇晓枫, 王高辉, 卢文波, 等. 空气隔层对水下爆炸冲击波的缓冲效应 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2017, 36(3): 7–13. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.03.002. KOU X F, WANG G H, LU W B, et al. Mitigation effects of air interlayer on underwater explosion shock wave [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2017, 36(3): 7–13. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2017.03.002.

Relative Articles

[1]	FANG Houlin, LU Qiang, GUO Quanshi, LI Guoliang, LIU Cunxu, TAO Sihao, ZHANG Dezhi. Experimental research on the free surface effect of shock wave and bubble behavior of small yield underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(8): 081444. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0003
[2]	SUN He, YAN Ming, DU Zhipeng, ZHANG Lei. Distribution characteristics of underwater explosion damage to ships[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2024, 44(6): 065102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0370
[3]	DENG Yuxuan, ZHANG Xianfeng, LIU Chuang, LIU Junwei, LI Pengcheng, SHENG Qiang, XIAO Chuan. Casing fracture and damage characteristics of an elliptical cross-section warhead under explosive loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(9): 091412. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0135
[4]	HUANG Xieping, KONG Xiangzhen, CHEN Zuyu, FANG Qin. Damage effects of underwater explosions on gravity dams and optimal standoff distances[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(5): 052202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0113
[5]	WU Weichao, XIA Liu, PAN Aigang, WANG Yafei, WANG Qiang. Damage characteristics of reinforced concrete square column components under multi-point simultaneous initiating[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(12): 125101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0025
[6]	ZHAO Haonan, FANG Hongyuan, ZHAO Xiaohua, WANG Gaohui. Analysis on the blast resistance of polymer composite slabs under contact explosions[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(5): 052201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0161
[7]	XU Weizheng, HUANG Yu, LI Yexun, ZHAO Hongtao, ZHENG Xianxu, WANG Yanping. On formation mechanism of local cavitation in the near-wall flow field caused by an underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(3): 032201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0075
[8]	LI Xuejiao, WU Yong, WANG Qi, GAO Yugang, WANG Quan, WANG Yixin, MA Honghao. Study on energy output characteristics of underwater explosion of energetic microballoon sensitized emulsion explosive[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(3): 032301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0188
[9]	WEI Zihan, ZHAO Zhenyu, YE Fan, PEI Yiqun, WANG Xin, ZHANG Qiancheng, LU Tianjian. Resistance of all-metallic honeycomb sandwich structures to underwater explosion shock[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(8): 083104. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0392
[10]	LIU Jinghan, TANG Ting, WEI Zhuobin, LI Lingfeng. Experimental research in damage effects of high-piled wharf under underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(11): 111408. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0467
[11]	DONG Qi, WEI Zhuobin, TANG Ting, LI Lingfeng, LIU Jinghan. Damage effects of caisson gravity wharf under underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(6): 065101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0090
[12]	WANG Changli, MA Kun, ZHOU Gang, CHU Zhe, WANG Kehui, CHEN Chunlin, ZHAO Nan, LI Mingrui, FENG Na. Damage effect of cabin near shipboard under shaped charge exploding underwater[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 1145-1154. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0119
[13]	Wu Linjie, Hou Hailiang, Zhu Xi, Chen Pengyu, Tian Wanping. Internal load characteristics of broadside cabin of defensive structure subjected to underwater contact explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 719-726. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0719-08
[14]	XIANG Da-lin, RONG Ji-li, LIJian, YANG Rong-jie. Shockwavefeaturesofunderwaterexplosionofexplosiveswithmetalshell[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(1): 67-72. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)01-0067-06
[15]	MINGFu-ren, ZHANGA-man, YANG Wen-shan. Three-dimensionalsimulationsonexplosiveloadcharacteristicsof underwaterexplosionnearfreesurface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2012, 32(5): 508-514. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2012)05-0508-07
[16]	JIA Hu, SHEN Zhao-wu. Underwatersoundcharacteristicsofmetal-claddetonatingcords[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(4): 428-432. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)04-0428-05
[17]	LI Jian, RONG Ji-li, XIANG Da-lin. Effectsofchargemassandwaterdepthondynamicbehaviorsof anunderwaterexplosionbubble[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(4): 342-348. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)04-0342-07
[18]	ZHU Xi, MOU Jin-Lei, WANG Heng, ZHANG Zhen-Hua. Damage modes of stiffened plates subjected to underwater explosion load[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(3): 225-231. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)03-0225-07
[19]	MU Jin-lei, ZHU Xi, ZHANG Zhen-hua, WANG Heng. Failure modes of stiffened plates subjected to underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(5): 457-462. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)05-0457-06
[20]	SHI Hua-qiang, ZONG Zhi, JIA Jing-bei. Short-range characters of underwater blast waves[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(2): 125-130. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)02-0125-06