• ISSN 1001-1455  CN 51-1148/O3
  • EI、Scopus、CA、JST、EBSCO、DOAJ收录
  • 力学类中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊、CSCD统计源期刊

锂离子电池环境的建构物泄爆研究

李刚,  李世龙,  李秋平,  杨雨憧,  陆宏利,  胥科含

李刚, 李世龙, 李秋平, 杨雨憧, 陆宏利, 胥科含. 锂离子电池环境的建构物泄爆研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2026, 46(9): 091501. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0067
引用本文: 李刚, 李世龙, 李秋平, 杨雨憧, 陆宏利, 胥科含. 锂离子电池环境的建构物泄爆研究[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2026, 46(9): 091501. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0067
LI Gang, LI Shilong, LI Qiuping, YANG Yuchong, LU Hongli, XU Kehan. Explosion venting studies of constructure in lithium-ion battery environments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2026, 46(9): 091501. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0067
Citation: LI Gang, LI Shilong, LI Qiuping, YANG Yuchong, LU Hongli, XU Kehan. Explosion venting studies of constructure in lithium-ion battery environments[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2026, 46(9): 091501. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0067

锂离子电池环境的建构物泄爆研究

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0067
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(52274180)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    李 刚(1969- ),男,博士,教授,ligang@mail.neu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: O389; X932

Explosion venting studies of constructure in lithium-ion battery environments

  • 摘要: 利用8 L柱形爆炸测试装置通过设置10.5、15.0、21.2、30.0和60.0 mm五种泄爆口径,模拟探究了锂离子电池热失控环境下建构物的泄爆规律。结果显示:锂离子电池热失控释放气体(BVG)的泄爆压力pred高于BVG-石墨粉杂混物的pred,可以不考虑热失控喷出的固体颗粒的影响;pred随泄爆口径的增大呈指数衰减、与泄爆装置开启压力pstat呈对数增长关系;结合规范得到了涉及锂离子电池建构物的泄爆面积计算公式,并给出了常用的泄压比C可取0.11。
  • 图  1  石墨粉尘粒径分布

    Figure  1.  Particle size distribution of graphite dust

    图  2  8 L实验测试系统示意图

    Figure  2.  8 L experimental testing system

    图  3  泄爆装置实物图

    Figure  3.  Physical drawing of the explosion venting device

    图  4  不同泄爆口径和泄爆膜层数n下泄爆装置静态动作压力

    Figure  4.  Static operating pressure of the venting device under different venting diameters and explosion-venting membrane layers

    图  5  湍流态下不同体积浓度BVG的pmax和(dp/dt)max

    Figure  5.  pmax and (dp/dt)max at different volume concentrations of BVG in turbulent flow regime

    图  6  不同泄爆口径下BVG添加石墨粉尘后的pred

    Figure  6.  pred after adding graphite dust at 29.0% volume concentration BVG at different venting calibers

    图  7  不同泄爆口径下29.0%体积浓度BVG容器内压力曲线

    Figure  7.  Pressure curves of BVG vessels with 29.0% volume concentration under different discharge diameters

    图  8  不同泄爆口径下29.0%体积浓度BVG的pred及拟合曲线

    Figure  8.  pred and fitting curves of BVG at 29.0% volume concentration under different discharge diameters

    图  9  不同pstat下29.0%体积浓度BVG的pred及拟合曲线

    Figure  9.  pred and fitting curves of BVG at 29.0% volume concentration under different pstat

    图  10  泄压比C随建构物抗爆强度pred,max的拟合曲线

    Figure  10.  Fitting curve of pressure relief ratio C with pred,max of explosion strength of structures

    表  1  NCM锂离子电池热失控释放气体典型组分及浓度[9]

    Table  1.   Typical components and concentrations of NCM lithium-ion battery thermal runaway release gas

    气体种类CO2COH2CH4C2H4
    体积分数/%37.328.922.75.45.7
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 王京. 锂电池储能现状及前景研究 [J]. 电子测试, 2020(6): 118–119. DOI: 10.16520/j.cnki.1000-8519.2020.06.048.

    WANG J. Research on the present situation and prospect of lithium battery energy storage [J]. Electronic Test, 2020(6): 118–119. DOI: 10.16520/j.cnki.1000-8519.2020.06.048.
    [2] FENG X N, OUYANG M G, LIU X, et al. Thermal runaway mechanism of lithium ion battery for electric vehicles: a review [J]. Energy Storage Materials, 2018, 10: 246–267. DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2017.05.013.
    [3] WANG Z, YANG H, LI Y, et al. Thermal runaway and fire behaviors of large-scale lithium ion batteries with different heating methods [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2019, 379: 120730. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.06.007.
    [4] 国家消防救援局. 2022年全国警情与火灾情况 [EB/OL]. [2023-03-24]. https://www.119.gov.cn/qmxfxw/xfyw/2023/362 10.shtml.
    [5] 卢浩, 王明洋, 高康华, 等. 建筑物泄爆结构风险设计方法 [J]. 湘潭大学自然科学学报, 2018, 40(5): 71–78. DOI: 10.13715/j.cnki.nsjxu.2018.05.012.

    LU H, WANG M Y, GAO K H, et al. Risk design method of building explosion-vented structure [J]. Journal of Xiangtan University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 40(5): 71–78. DOI: 10.13715/j.cnki.nsjxu.2018.05.012.
    [6] GUO J, SUN X X, RUI S C, et al. Effect of ignition position on vented hydrogen–air explosions [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(45): 15780–15788. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.09.038.
    [7] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. GB 50016−2014建筑设计防火规范 [S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2018: 2.
    [8] 卫寿平, 孙杰, 李吉刚, 等. 锂离子电池热失控气体产物检测及分析技术研究进展 [J]. 储能科学与技术, 2024, 13(11): 4155–4176. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2024.0537.

    WEI S P, SUN J, LI J G, et al. Research progress on detection and analysis of thermal runaway gas products from lithium-ion batteries [J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2024, 13(11): 4155–4176. DOI: 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2024.0537.
    [9] KOCH S, FILL A, BIRKE K P. Comprehensive gas analysis on large scale automotive lithium-ion cells in thermal runaway [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2018, 398: 106–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.07.051.
    [10] CHEN S C, WANG Z R, YAN W. Identification and characteristic analysis of powder ejected from a lithium ion battery during thermal runaway at elevated temperatures [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 400: 123169. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123169.
    [11] CHANG W D, LI G, LI Q P, et al. Effects of carbonates on explosion characteristics of lithium-ion batteries venting gases [J]. Fuel, 2025, 381: 133523. DOI: 10.1016/J.FUEL.2024.133523.
    [12] ZHOU W, LI G, ZHAO H R, et al. Experimental study of explosion parameters of hybrid mixture caused by thermal runaway of lithium-ion battery [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2023, 178: 872–880. DOI: 10.1016/J.PSEP.2023.08.087.
    [13] ZHANG L, LI Y Q, DUAN Q L, et al. Experimental study on the synergistic effect of gas extinguishing agents and water mist on suppressing lithium-ion battery fires [J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2020, 32: 101801. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101801.
    [14] ZHOU W, ZHAO H R, WU D J, et al. Inhibition effect of inert gas jet on gas and hybrid explosions caused by thermal runaway of lithium-ion battery [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2024, 90: 105336. DOI: 10.1016/J.JLP.2024.105336.
    [15] LIANG X X, LIAO Y L, WANG Z Q, et al. Explosion load characteristics of fuel-air mixture in a vented chamber: analysis and new insights [J]. Energies, 2024, 17(22): 5649. DOI: 10.3390/EN17225649.
    [16] 朱文艳, 汪泉, 张军, 等. 泄爆条件对管内气粉两相混合体系燃爆特性的影响 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2024, 44(7): 075402. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0024.

    ZHU W, WANG Q, Zhang J, et al. Influence of explosion venting conditions on the deflagration characteristicsof gas-powder two-phase mixture system in pipe [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2024, 44(7): 075402. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0024.
    [17] ANSI/CAN/UL 9540A: 2019 Test method for evaluating thermal runaway fire propagation in battery energy storage systems [S]. Ottawa, 2019.
    [18] European Committee for Standardization. BS EN 1839: 2017 Determination of the explosion limits and the limiting oxygen concentration (LOC) for flammable gases and vapours [S]. Brussels: The British Standards Institution, 2017.
    [19] 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB 6722−2011: 爆破安全规程 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014: 1.
  • 加载中
图(10) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1042
  • HTML全文浏览量:  215
  • PDF下载量:  80
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-03-04
  • 修回日期:  2025-05-15
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-05-16
  • 刊出日期:  2026-09-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回