Experimental study on local detonation induced by collision between shock wave and obstacle

WANG Ziwen; GUO Yihang; YAN Zihong; LI Min; XIAO Huahua

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2026-0015

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2026 > Accepted Manuscript

WANG Ziwen, GUO Yihang, YAN Zihong, LI Min, XIAO Huahua. Experimental study on local detonation induced by collision between shock wave and obstacle[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2026-0015

Citation:

WANG Ziwen, GUO Yihang, YAN Zihong, LI Min, XIAO Huahua. Experimental study on local detonation induced by collision between shock wave and obstacle[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2026-0015

Citation:

PDF( 7542 KB)

Experimental study on local detonation induced by collision between shock wave and obstacle

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2026-0015

WANG Ziwen^1
,,
GUO Yihang¹,
YAN Zihong¹,
LI Min^{1, 2
,
,},
XIAO Huahua^{1
,
,}

1.
State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, Anhui, China
2.
Institute of Plasma Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, Anhui, China

Received Date: 2026-01-14
Rev Recd Date: 2026-04-16

Available Online: 2026-04-20

Abstract

Abstract

To elucidate the mechanism by which shock and obstacle interactions induce local detonation initiation, an experimental investigation was conducted on flame acceleration of premixed hydrogen–air mixtures in an obstacle-laden tube. Experiments were performed over a range of equivalence ratios from 0.8 to 1.3, spanning both fuel-lean and fuel-rich conditions relative to stoichiometry. Particular emphasis was placed on the interaction between the Mach stem of the leading shock and a single obstacle, and on how this interaction governs the formation of localized hot spots and the subsequent onset of local detonation. At an equivalence ratio of 0.8, initiation was not observed. Under this condition, the reflected shock interacted with the flame front and induced Richtmyer–Meshkov instability, generating pronounced wrinkling of the flame surface. This interaction further densified the pre-existing flame folds and increased the flame surface area, thereby accelerating the flame; however, no local detonation was initiated. In contrast, if the equivalence ratio was within the range from 0.9 to 1.3, successful initiation was observed. Shock reflection in the obstacle vicinity generated localized regions of elevated temperature that acted as hot spots, providing favorable conditions for rapid energy release and the onset of a locally detonative event. However, the locally initiated detonation did not develop into a self-sustained stable detonation. During subsequent diffraction, expansion waves imposed pronounced cooling and attenuation, causing progressive decoupling between the leading shock and the reaction zone, and thereby suppressing further development into a stable detonation wave. Through analysis of the critical initiation characteristics, it is found that increasing either the shock strength or the equivalence ratio increases the critical initiation parameter, and the critical initiation parameter is more sensitive to shock strength than to equivalence ratio. Furthermore, considering the discrepancy between the Thomas critical initiation model and the incident shock wave in the present experiments, the shock reflection zone was divided into sections for calculation. The analysis reveals that, at an equivalence ratio of 1.2, the lower sonic velocity following reflection of the leading shock wave prolongs the time taken for the expansion wave to reach the base of the obstacle, thereby favoring initiation. Conversely, at an equivalence ratio of 0.8, the lower equivalence ratio reduces the reactivity of the mixture, leading to a longer ignition delay time and consequently reducing the likelihood of initiation.
- obstacle,
- flame acceleration,
- shock reflection,
- Mach stem,
- local detonation

FullText(HTML)

References(40)

References

[1]	LEE J H S. The detonation phenomenon [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[2]	ALLGOOD D, GLASER A, CALDWELL N, et al. Acoustic measurements of a pulse detonation engine [C]//Proceedings of the 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Manchester, United Kingdom, 2004. (AIAA Paper 2004-2879). DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-2879.
[3]	WOLANSKI P. Detonative propulsion [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2013, 34(1): 125–158. DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2012.10.005.
[4]	ROY G D, FROLOV S M, BORISOV A A, et al. Pulse detonation propulsion: challenges, current status, and future perspective [J]. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2004, 30(6): 545–672. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2004.05.001.
[5]	FAN J M, LI M, XIAO H H. Effect of composition gradient on detonation initiation in fuel-rich hydrogen-air mixtures in an obstructed channel [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 72: 976–990. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.443.
[6]	DOROFEEV S B. Flame acceleration and explosion safety applications [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2011, 33(2): 2161–2175. DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.09.008.
[7]	李敏, 肖华华. 障碍物交错阵列内气体爆燃转爆轰研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2025, 45(11): 111001. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0284. LI M, XIAO H H. Study on deflagration-to-detonation transition in a staggered array of obstacles [J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2025, 45(11): 111001. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0284.
[8]	POLUDNENKO A Y, CHAMBERS J, AHMED K, et al. A unified mechanism for unconfined deflagration-to-detonation transition in terrestrial chemical systems and type Ia supernovae [J]. Science, 2019, 366(6465): eaau7365. DOI: 10.1126/science.aau7365.
[9]	ORAN E S. Understanding explosions – From catastrophic accidents to creation of the universe [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2015, 35(1): 1–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.08.019.
[10]	PINTGEN F, SHEPHERD J E. Detonation diffraction in gases [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2009, 156(3): 665–677. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.09.008.
[11]	喻健良, 詹潇兵, 吕先舒, 等. 不同角度分叉管道内氢气-空气爆轰传播特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(12): 125401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0100. YU J L, ZHAN X B, LYU X S, et al. Propagation characteristics of hydrogen-air detonation in bifurcated tubes with different angles [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(12): 125401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0100.
[12]	鲍磊, 王鹏, 党茜, 等. 石化装置工业尺度管道爆轰传播实验研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2021, 41(9): 095401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0295. BAO L, WANG P, DANG Q, et al. Experimental study on detonation propagation in industrial scale pipelines used in petrochemical plants [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2021, 41(9): 095401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0295.
[13]	LEE J H S. Initiation of gaseous detonation [J]. Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, 1977, 28: 75–104. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pc.28.100177.000451.
[14]	BACH G G, KNYSTAUTAS R, LEE J H. Direct initiation of spherical detonations in gaseous explosives [C]//The Combustion Institute. Twelfth Symposium (International) on Combustion. Pittsburgh: The Combustion Institute, 1969: 853–864. DOI: 10.1016/S0082-0784(69)80466-2.
[15]	YOUSEFI-ASLI V, LAU-CHAPDELAINE S, CICCARELLI G. Novel weak detonation initiation from normal shock reflection in square cross-section shock tubes [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2024, 266: 113502. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2024.113502.
[16]	XIAO H H, ORAN E S. Shock focusing and detonation initiation at a flame front [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2019, 203: 397–406. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.02.012.
[17]	董刚, 唐敖, 叶经方, 等. 激波聚焦诱导点火和爆轰的数值研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2005, 25(5): 437–444. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)05-0437-08. DONG G, TANG A, YE J F, et al. Numerical studies on initiation and detonation induced by shock wave focusing [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2005, 25(5): 437–444. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)05-0437-08.
[18]	LIU Z R, LI X X, LI M, et al. Flame acceleration and DDT in a channel with fence-type obstacles: effect of obstacle shape and arrangement [J]. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2023, 39(3): 2787–2796. DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2022.08.046.
[19]	LI X X, DONG J Z, JIN K Q, et al. Flame acceleration and DDT in a channel with continuous triangular obstacles: effect of blockage ratio [J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2024, 196(10): 1554–1574. DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2022.2120767.
[20]	STREHLOW R A, COHEN A. Initiation of detonation [J]. The Physics of Fluids, 1962, 5(1): 97–101. DOI: 10.1063/1.1706497.
[21]	VOEVODSKY V V, SOLOUKHIN R I. On the mechanism and explosion limits of hydrogen-oxygen chain self-ignition in shock waves [J]. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1965, 10(1): 279–283. DOI: 10.1016/S0082-0784(65)80173-4.
[22]	CHAN C K. Collision of a shock wave with obstacles in a combustible mixture [J]. Combustion and Flame, 1995, 100(1-2): 341–348. DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(94)00139-J.
[23]	THOMAS G O, WARD S M, WILLIAMS R Ll, et al. On critical conditions for detonation initiation by shock reflection from obstacles [J]. Shock Waves, 2002, 12: 111–119. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-002-0148-z.
[24]	滕宏辉, 吕俊明, 姜宗林. 可燃气体中激波与障碍物作用在下游形成爆轰波的数值研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2007, 27(3): 251–258. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)03-0251-08. TENG H H, LV J M, JIANG Z L. Downstream detonation initiation induced by interaction between shock wave and obstacle in combustible gas mixtures [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2007, 27(3): 251–258. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)03-0251-08.
[25]	CICCARELLI G, DE WITT B. Detonation initiation by shock reflection from an orifice plate [J]. Shock Waves, 2006, 15: 259–265. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-006-0026-1.
[26]	GAMEZO V N, OGAWA T, ORAN E S. Flame acceleration and DDT in channels with obstacles: Effect of obstacle spacing [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2008, 155(1-2): 302–315. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.06.004.
[27]	LI Q, KELLENBERGER M, CICCARELLI G. Geometric influence on the propagation of the quasi-detonations in a stoichiometric H2-O2 mixture [J]. Fuel, 2020, 269: 117396. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117396.
[28]	ZHOU L P, FAN J M, LI M, et al. Numerical study of the effect of stepped distribution of obstacle height on flame acceleration in a stoichiometric hydrogen-air mixture [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2025, 100: 736–748. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.12.304.
[29]	CICCARELLI G, JOHANSEN C T, PARRAVANI M. The role of shock–flame interactions on flame acceleration in an obstacle laden channel [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2010, 157(11): 2125–2136. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.05.003.
[30]	JOHANSEN C T, CICCARELLI G. Visualization of the unburned gas flow field ahead of an accelerating flame in an obstructed square channel [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2009, 156(2): 405–416. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2008.07.010.
[31]	BYCHKOV V, VALIEV D, ERIKSSON L E. Physical mechanism of ultrafast flame acceleration [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2008, 101(16): 164501. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.164501.
[32]	XIAO H H, LI X X. Experimental and numerical study of flame acceleration and DDT in a channel with continuous obstacles [J]. Combustion Theory and Modelling, 2023, 27(4): 459–486. DOI: 10.1080/13647830.2023.2171905.
[33]	SHI X F, ZHU Y J, YANG J M, et al. Mach stem deformation in pseudo-steady shock wave reflections [J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2019, 861: 407–421. DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2018.920.
[34]	PERALDI O, KNYSTAUTAS R, LEE J H. Criteria for transition to detonation in tubes[C]//Symposium (International) on Combustion, 1988, 21(1): 1629–1637. DOI: 10.1016/S0082-0784(88)80396-5.
[35]	KNYSTAUTAS R, LEE J H S, PERALDI O, et al. Transmission of a flame from a rough to a smooth-walled tube [C]// BOWEN J R, LEYER J-C, SOLOUKHIN R I. Dynamics of Explosions. New York, NY, USA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1986: 37–52. DOI: 10.2514/5.9781600865800.0037.0052.
[36]	GORDON S, MCBRIDE B J. Computer program for calculation of complex chemical equilibrium compositions and applications. Part 1: Analysis: NASA-RP-1311[R/OL]. Cleveland, OH, USA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1994. [2026-02-23]. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19950013764/downloads/19950013764.pdf.
[37]	LEE J H. On the critical diameter problem [C]// BOWEN J R (ed). Dynamics of exothermicity: in honor of Antoni Kazimierz Oppenheim. (Combustion science and technology book series, v. 2). Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach, 1996: 321–336.
[38]	Ó CONAIRE M, CURRAN H J, SIMMIE J M, et al. A comprehensive modeling study of hydrogen oxidation [J]. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics, 2004, 36(11): 603–622. DOI: 10.1002/kin.20036.
[39]	GOODWIN D G, MOFFAT H K, SCHOEGL I, et al. Cantera: An object-oriented software toolkit for chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport processes[CP/OL]. Version 3.1. 0, (2024-12-14)[2025-07-02]. https://www.cantera.org. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14455267.
[40]	EDL. SDToolbox: Numerical Tools for Shock and Detonation Wave Modeling[R/OL]. Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology, 2023[2025-07-02]. http://shepherd.caltech.edu/EDL/PublicResources/sdt/. (GALCIT Report FM2018.001).