Low-velocity impact response and failure mechanism of CFRP sandwich beams with a square honeycomb core fabricated by the interlocking method
-
摘要: 采用嵌锁组装工艺制备了碳纤维/树脂基复合材料方形蜂窝夹芯梁,实验研究了低速冲击载荷下简支和固支夹芯梁的动态响应及失效机理,获得了不同冲击速度下夹芯梁的失效模式,分析了其损伤演化过程和失效机理,探讨了冲击速度、边界条件、面板质量分布以及槽口方向等因素对夹芯梁破坏模式及承载能力的影响。研究结果表明,芯材长肋板槽口方向对夹芯梁的失效模式有较大影响,槽口向上的芯材跨中部分产生了挤压变形,而槽口向下的芯材跨中部分槽口在拉伸作用下出现了沿槽口开裂失效,继而引起面板脱粘和肋板断裂;同等质量下,较厚的上面板设计可以提高夹芯梁的抗冲击能力,冲击速度越大,夹芯梁的峰值载荷和承载能力越高;固支边界使得夹芯梁的后失效行为呈现出明显的强化效应,在夹芯梁跨中部分发生初始失效后出现了后继的固支端芯材和面板断裂失效模式。
-
关键词:
- 碳纤维/树脂基复合材料 /
- 方形蜂窝 /
- 嵌锁组装工艺 /
- 低速冲击
Abstract: Composite sandwich beams with a carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) square honeycomb core were designed and fabricated by using the interlocking method. The dynamic response and failure mechanism of fully-clamped and simply- supported sandwich beams subjected to low-velocity impact were investigated experimentally and the corresponding failure modes of the sandwich beams were obtained. Meanwhile, the damage evolvement process and the failure mechanism were analyzed in detail. Influences of the impact velocity, boundary conditions, the mass distributions of face sheets and the direction of the slots on the failure modes and load-carrying capacity of the sandwich beams were explored. The low-velocity impact experiments of composites specimens with two kinds of boundary conditions were carried out by using the drop-hammer impact test system. Three kinds of initial impact velocity were considered for the simply-supported and the fully- clamped sandwich beams sandwich beams, respectively. In the experiments, the time history curves of the impact load and the midspan deflection of the specimens were recorded by a load cell and a laser displacement sensor. Meanwhile, the deformation processes of the sandwich beams were captured by a high-speed camera. The experimental results show that the directions for the slots of the long ribs have significant influence on the failure modes of the sandwich beams. The sandwich core with the upward slots at the midspan has compression deformation whilst the cracking failure along the direction of the downward slots at the midspan is observed due to the tension, which results in the face-sheet debonding and rib fracture successively. It is found that for the same mass, the design of the thicker upper face sheet can enhance the impact resistance of the sandwich beams. The peak load and load-carrying capacity of the sandwich beams increase with increasing the impact velocity. The fully-clamped boundary conditions make the sandwich beams exhibit hardening post-failure behaviors obviously. After the initial failure at the midspan, the fully-clamped ends of the cores and the face-sheets of the sandwich beams experience the fracture failure. -
表 1 CFRP方形蜂窝简支夹芯梁低速冲击实验设计
Table 1. Experimental design of simply-supported CFRP sandwich beams subjected to low-velocity impact
试样 上面板厚度/mm 芯材厚度/mm 下面板厚度/mm 冲击速度/(m·s−1) 长肋板槽口方向 S-0.017×10−3-[1.2/16/1.2][7] 1.2 16 1.2 0.017×10−3 −Z S-0.99-[0.8/16/1.6] 0.8 16 1.6 0.99 −Z S-0.99-[1.2/16/1.2] 1.2 16 1.2 0.99 +Z S-0.99-[1.6/16/0.8] 1.6 16 0.8 0.99 −Z S-1.98-[0.8/16/1.6] 0.8 16 1.6 1.98 −Z S-1.98-[1.2/16/1.2] 1.2 16 1.2 1.98 −Z S-1.98-[1.6/16/0.8] 1.6 16 0.8 1.98 −Z S-2.80-[0.8/16/1.6] 0.8 16 1.6 2.80 +Z S-2.80-[1.2/16/1.2] 1.2 16 1.2 2.80 −Z S-2.80-[1.6/16/0.8] 1.6 16 0.8 2.80 +Z 表 2 CFRP方形蜂窝固支夹芯梁低速冲击实验设计
Table 2. Experimental design of fully-clamped CFRP sandwich beams subjected to low-velocity impact
试样 上面板厚度/mm 芯材厚度/mm 下面板厚度/mm 冲击速度/(m·s−1) 长肋板槽口方向 C-2.80-[0.8/16/1.6] 0.8 16 1.6 2.80 +Z C-2.80-[1.2/16/1.2] 1.2 16 1.2 2.80 +Z C-2.80-[1.6/16/0.8] 1.6 16 0.8 2.80 −Z C-3.43-[0.8/16/1.6] 0.8 16 1.6 3.43 −Z C-3.43-[1.2/16/1.2] 1.2 16 1.2 3.43 −Z C-3.43-[1.6/16/0.8] 1.6 16 0.8 3.43 −Z C-3.96-[0.8/16/1.6] 0.8 16 1.6 3.96 −Z C-3.96-[1.2/16/1.2] 1.2 16 1.2 3.96 −Z C-3.96-[1.6/16/0.8] 1.6 16 0.8 3.96 −Z 表 3 简支CFRP方形蜂窝夹芯梁峰值载荷
Table 3. The peak loads of simply supported CFRP sandwich beams subjected to low-velocity impact
试样 峰值载荷/kN S-0.017×10−3-[1.2/16/1.2] 3.05 S-0.99-[0.8/16/1.6] 4.05 S-0.99-[1.6/16/0.8] 4.25 S-1.98-[0.8/16/1.6] 3.03 S-1.98-[1.2/16/1.2] 3.17 S-1.98-[1.6/16/0.8] 3.77 S-2.80-[0.8/16/1.6] 4.94 S-2.80-[1.2/16/1.2] 3.81 S-2.80-[1.6/16/0.8] 5.38 表 4 固支CFRP方形蜂窝夹芯梁峰值载荷
Table 4. The peak loads of fully-clamped CFRP sandwich beams subjected to low-velocity impact
试样 峰值载荷/kN C-2.80-[0.8/16/1.6] 7.39 C-2.80-[1.2/16/1.2] 7.24 C-2.80-[1.6/16/0.8] 6.65 C-3.43-[0.8/16/1.6] 8.91 C-3.43-[1.2/16/1.2] 10.62 C-3.43-[1.6/16/0.8] 11.80 C-3.96-[1.6/16/0.8] 10.43 -
[1] 马立, 杨凤龙, 陈维强, 等. 尺寸高稳定性复合材料桁架结构的研制 [J]. 航天器环境工程, 2016, 33(3): 229–234. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1379.2016.03.001.MA L, YANG F L, CHEN W Q, et al. Development of a high dimensional stable composite truss [J]. Spacecraft Environment Engineering, 2016, 33(3): 229–234. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1379.2016.03.001. [2] CASCIELLO A, WEIGEL T, RAUNHARDT M, et al. Ultra stable off-axis telescope: lessons learnt from the optical design to the correlation of the test results [C]//Proceedings of SPIE 8550, Optical Systems Design. Barcelona, Spain: The International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE), 2012: 855017. DOI: 10.1117/12.981201. [3] STUTE T, WULZ G, SCHEULEN D. Recent developments of advanced structures for space optics at Astrium Germany [C]//Proceedings of SPIE 5179, Optical Materials and Structures Technologies. San Diego, USA: The International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE), 2003: 292−302. DOI: 10.1117/12.507425. [4] LUTZ M, CORNILLON L, VITUPIER Y, et al. Evaluation of ultrastable carbon/carbon sandwich structures joined with ceramic cement [C]//61st International Astronautical Congress. Prague, The Czech Republic, 2010: 4829−4832. [5] WANG Z P, ZHANG G L, ZHU Y X, et al. Theoretical analysis of braiding strand trajectories and simulation of three-dimensional parametric geometrical models for multilayer interlock three-dimensional tubular braided preforms [J]. Textile Research Journal, 2019, 89(19/20): 4306–4322. DOI: 10.1177/0040517519826888. [6] 张峻铭, 杨伟东, 李岩. 人工智能在复合材料研究中的应用 [J]. 力学进展, 2021, 51(4): 865–900. DOI: 10.6052/1000-0992-21-019.ZHANG J M, YANG W D, LI Y. Application of artificial intelligence in composite materials [J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2021, 51(4): 865–900. DOI: 10.6052/1000-0992-21-019. [7] 王志鹏, 李剑峰, 李海波, 等. 嵌锁式碳纤维/树脂基复合材料方形蜂窝夹芯结构的力学性能及损伤失效 [J]. 复合材料学报, 2022, 39(4): 1778–1789. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210601.001.WANG Z P, LI J F, LI H B, et al. Mechanical properties and damage failure of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite sandwich structure with square honeycomb core using the interlocking method [J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2022, 39(4): 1778–1789. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20210601.001. [8] RIZOV V, SHIPSHA A, ZENKERT D. Indentation study of foam core sandwich composite panels [J]. Composite Structures, 2005, 69(1): 95–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.013. [9] PEHLIVAN L, BAYKASOĞLU C. An experimental study on the compressive response of CFRP honeycombs with various cell configurations [J]. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2019, 162: 653–661. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.044. [10] LIU J L, LIU J Y, MEI J, et al. Investigation on manufacturing and mechanical behavior of all-composite sandwich structure with Y-shaped cores [J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2018, 159: 87–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.026. [11] COMPTON B G, LEWIS J A. 3D-printing of lightweight cellular composites [J]. Advanced Materials, 2014, 26(34): 5930–5935. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201401804. [12] SUGIYAMA K, MATSUZAKI R, UEDA M, et al. 3D printing of composite sandwich structures using continuous carbon fiber and fiber tension [J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2018, 113: 114–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.029. [13] 陈向明, 姚辽军, 果立成, 等. 3D打印连续纤维增强复合材料研究现状综述 [J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(10): 524787. DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24787.CHEN X M, YAO L J, GUO L C, et al. 3D printed continuous fiber-reinforced composites: state of the art and perspectives [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2021, 42(10): 524787. DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24787. [14] VITALE J P, FRANCUCCI G, XIONG J, et al. Failure mode maps of natural and synthetic fiber reinforced composite sandwich panels [J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2017, 94: 217–225. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.12.021. [15] SHROFF S, ACAR E, KASSAPOGLOU C. Design, analysis, fabrication, and testing of composite grid-stiffened panels for aircraft structures [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2017, 119: 235–246. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.06.006. [16] 熊健, 韦兴宇, 李达夫. 一种复合材料蜂窝芯子及其制备方法: CN110667091A [P]. 2020-01-10.XIONG J, WEI X Y, LI D F. Composite honeycomb core and preparation method thereof: CN110667091A [P]. 2020-01-10. [17] WEI X Y, LI D F, XIONG J. Fabrication and mechanical behaviors of an all-composite sandwich structure with a hexagon honeycomb core based on the tailor-folding approach [J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2019, 184: 107878. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107878. [18] WEI X Y, WU Q Q, GAO Y, et al. Bending characteristics of all-composite hexagon honeycomb sandwich beams: experimental tests and a three-dimensional failure mechanism map [J]. Mechanics of Materials, 2020, 148: 103401. DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103401. [19] HAN D, TSAI S W. Interlocked composite grids design and manufacturing [J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 2003, 37(4): 287–316. DOI: 10.1177/0021998303037004681. [20] RUSSELL B, DESHPANDE V S, WADLEY H N G. Quasi-static deformation and failure modes of composite square honeycombs [J]. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, 2008, 3(7): 1315–1340. DOI: 10.2140/jomms.2008.3.1315. [21] RUSSELL B P, LIU T, FLECK N A, et al. The soft impact of composite sandwich beams with a square-honeycomb core [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2012, 48: 65–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.04.007. [22] RUSSELL B P, LIU T, FLECK N A, et al. Quasi-static three-point bending of carbon fiber sandwich beams with square honeycomb cores [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2011, 78(3): 031008. DOI: 10.1115/1.4003221. [23] PARK S, RUSSELL B P, DESHPANDE V S, et al. Dynamic compressive response of composite square honeycombs [J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2012, 43(3): 527–536. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.022. [24] ZHOU H, LIU T, GUO R, et al. Numerical investigation on water blast response of freestanding carbon fiber reinforced composite sandwich plates with square honeycomb cores [J]. Applied Composite Materials, 2019, 26(2): 605–625. DOI: 10.1007/s10443-018-9737-6. [25] 周昊, 郭锐, 刘荣忠, 等. 碳纤维增强聚合物复合材料方形蜂窝夹层结构水下爆炸动态响应数值模拟 [J]. 复合材料学报, 2019, 36(5): 1226–1234. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20180814.001.ZHOU H, GUO R, LIU R Z, et al. Simulations on dynamic responses of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite sandwich plates with square honeycomb cores subjected to water blast [J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2019, 36(5): 1226–1234. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20180814.001. [26] ZHOU H, LIU R Z, HU Y B, et al. Quasi-static compressive strength of polymethacrylimide foam-filled square carbon fiber reinforced composite honeycombs [J]. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 2021, 23(6): 2358–2374. DOI: 10.1177/1099636220909819.