非冲击点火反应驱动的吉帕级缓前沿斜波加载技术

杨天昊; 种涛; 李涛; 傅华; 胡海波

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2022-0238

非冲击点火反应驱动的吉帕级缓前沿斜波加载技术

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0238

中国工程物理研究院流体物理研究所冲击波物理与爆轰物理重点实验室，四川绵阳 621999

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（11902306）

详细信息

作者简介:
杨天昊（1997－　），男，硕士研究生，18845786585@163.com

通讯作者:
胡海波（1965－　），男，博士，研究员，huhaibo@caep.cn

中图分类号: O381; TJ55
计量
- 文章访问数: 485
- HTML全文浏览量: 106
- PDF下载量: 76
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-05-31
- 修回日期: 2022-06-06
- 网络出版日期: 2022-06-07
- 刊出日期: 2023-06-05

GPa-level slow-front ramp wave loading technology driven by non-shock initiation reaction

National Key Laboratory of Shock Wave and Detonation Physics, Institute of Fluid Physics, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Mianyang 621999, Sichuan, China

摘要

摘要: 为研究在吉帕、十微秒级缓前沿斜波作用下压装PBX炸药基体中微介观热点点火行为，设计了一种强约束压装PBX炸药非冲击点火反应驱动的斜波加载装置，基于炸药层流燃烧的燃速模型和自编的二维轴对称有限差分程序对装置输出的压力波形特性进行了分析，讨论了燃烧过程中加载炸药破碎程度和装置结构参数（壳体和隔层厚度）对输出波形的影响。计算结果表明，加载炸药破碎形成的燃烧比表面积大小是影响非冲击点火反应压力演化的关键因素，燃烧比表面积越大，输出的斜波压力越大，峰值压力可达吉帕以上，对应的压力上升前沿可从数十微秒降至数微秒。加载炸药外部壳体厚度即约束强度对非冲击点火反应产生的压力大小影响显著，壳体越厚输出的斜波压力越大。加载炸药与受试炸药之间的隔层厚度直接关系到输出至受试炸药处的斜波压力大小，随着隔层厚度的增大，输出的斜波压力以近似指数的关系衰减。参考计算结果完成了装置的结构设计，对受试PBX炸药进行了斜波加载实验，采用PVDF测得受试炸药入射界面处的压力为1.6 GPa、前沿宽度为25 μs，初步证明了采用强约束压装PBX炸药非冲击点火反应实现吉帕、十微秒级斜波压力输出的可行性。
- 压装PBX /
- 强约束 /
- 非冲击点火反应 /
- 层流燃烧 /
- 燃烧表面积 /
- 斜波加载
Abstract: To study the ignition behavior of micro-mesoscopic hot spots in the matrix of pressed PBXs under GPa and 10 μs-level slow-front ramp wave loading, a ramp wave loading device driven by non-shock initiation reaction of pressed PBX with heavy constraint was designed. With the help of the output pressure from the explosion reaction of the donor explosive, the acceptor explosive was loaded by a ramp wave. A two-dimensional axisymmetric finite difference program was developed based on the burn rate equation of laminar combustion on the explosive surface to guide the structural design of the device. The pressure history during the combustion process of the explosive crack surface formed by the explosive fragmentation in the late stage of the non-shock initiation reaction of the donor explosive in the device configuration and the pressure waveform acting on the acceptor explosive are analyzed. And the influence of crushing degree of donor explosive and device structure parameters (thickness of case and interlayer) on output pressure waveform during the combustion process is discussed. The calculation results show that the specific combustion surface area formed by the crushing of the donor explosive is the key factor affecting the pressure evolution of the non-shock initiation reaction. The larger the specific combustion surface area, the greater the ramp wave pressure is. The ramp wave pressure can reach above GPa, and the corresponding rising front of the pressure wave can be reduced from tens of milliseconds to several milliseconds. The thickness of the case of the donor explosive, namely the constraint strength, has a significant effect on the pressure during the non-shock initiation reaction. As the thickness of the interlayer increases, the output ramp wave pressure decays approximately exponentially. The structural design of the device was completed according to the calculation results, and the ramp wave loading experiment was carried out on the tested PBX. The pressure at the incident interface of the tested explosive measured by PVDF is 1.6 GPa, and the front of the ramp wave is 25 μs, which preliminarily proved the feasibility of realizing GPa and 10 μs-level ramp wave pressure output by using the non-shock initiation reaction of heavily constrained pressed PBX explosives.
- pressed PBX /
- heavily constraint /
- non-shock initiation reaction /
- laminar burning /
- combustion surface area /
- ramp wave load

HTML全文

图 1 斜波加载装置

Figure 1. Ramp loading device

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 计算模型

Figure 2. Computational model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同时刻压力云图（S/S₀=50）

Figure 3. Pressure clouds at different times while S/S₀=50

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同相对燃烧面积S/S₀下压力波形对比

Figure 4. Comparison of pressure wave under different relative burning areas

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 不同壳体厚度H下的压力波形对比

Figure 5. Comparison of pressure wave under different case thickness

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 不同隔层厚度D下受试炸药前界面处的压力波形

Figure 6. Pressure waveforms at the front interface of the tested explosive at different thickness of interlayer

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 斜波压力峰值p_m与隔层厚度的关系

Figure 7. Relationship between the peak pressure of ramp wave and the thickness of interlayer

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 受试炸药前、后界面此处的压力波形

Figure 8. Pressure wave at the front and back interfaces of the acceptor explosive

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 Mie-Grüneisen状态方程参数

Table 1. Parameters of Mie-Grüneisen equation of state

材料	Γ	ρ₀/(g·cm⁻³)	c₀/(km·s⁻¹)	s
Donor explosive^[15]	2.78	1.84	2.17	1.99
Acceptor explosive^[15]	2.78	1.84	2.17	1.99
PTFE	0.59	2.15	1.84	1.71
Case	2.17	7.90	4.57	1.49
注：Γ为Grüneisen常数，ρ₀为材料密度，c₀和s为状态方程中的常数。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 壳体材料Johnson-Cook本构模型参数

Table 2. Parameters of Johnson-Cook constitutive model for case materials

A/MPa	B/MPa	C	n	m	T_m/K	ε^*/s⁻¹
350	275	0.022	0.36	1.0	1811	1.0
注：A、B、C、n、m为材料常数，T_m为材料熔点，ε^*为无量纲塑性应变率。

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(15)

[1]	ASAY B W. Shock wave science and technology reference library, Vol. 5: non-shock initiation of explosives [M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2010: 1–14. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-87953-4.
[2]	郭应文, 胡海波, 李涛, 等. 压装PBX炸药DDT管实验初始反应演化过程分析 [J]. 火炸药学报, 2017, 40(3): 77–79, 89. DOI: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2017.03.014. GUO Y W, HU H B, LI T, et al. Analysis of initial reaction evolution process of experiment of DDT tube filled with pressed PBX explosives [J]. Chinese Journal of Explosives & Propellants, 2017, 40(3): 77–79, 89. DOI: 10.14077/j.issn.1007-7812.2017.03.014.
[3]	HU H B, GUO Y W, LI T, et al. Reactive behavior of explosive billets in deflagration tube of varied confinements [J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2018, 1979(1): 150020.
[4]	胡海波, 傅华, 李涛, 等. 压装密实炸药装药非冲击点火反应传播与烈度演化实验研究进展 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(1): 011401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0346. HU H B, FU H, LI T, et al. Progress in experimental studies on the evolution behaviors of non-shock initiation reaction in low porosity pressed explosive with confinement [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(1): 011401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0346.
[5]	邱天, 文尚刚, 李涛, 等. 长管强约束条件下压装PBX炸药点火实验研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(1): 011405. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0360. QIU T, WEN S G, LI T, et al. Experimental study on initiated reaction evolution of pressed explosives in long thick wall cylinder confinement [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(1): 011405. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0360.
[6]	李涛, 胡海波, 尚海林, 等. 强约束球形装药反应裂纹传播和反应烈度表征实验 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(1): 011402. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0348. LI T, HU H B, SHANG H L, et al. Propagation of reactive cracks and characterization of reaction violence in spherical charge under strong confinement [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(1): 011402. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0348.
[7]	李涛, 程赋, 胡海波, 等. 一种单向柱壳约束反应烈度量化诊断装置和诊断方法: CN201910955979.0 [P]. 2019-10-10. LI T, CHENG F, HU H B, et al. One-way cylindrical shell constraint reaction intensity quantitative diagnosis device and diagnosis method: CN201910955979.0 [P]. 2019-10-10.
[8]	SALISBURY D A, TAYLOR P, WINTER R E, et al. Single and double shock initiation of EDC37 [J]. Dimensions, 2002, 2000(10): 150.
[9]	WINTER R E, SORBER S S, SALISBURY D A, et al. Experimental study of the shock response of an HMX-based explosive [J]. Shock Waves, 2006, 15(2): 89–101. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-006-0010-9.
[10]	GARCIA F, FORBES J W, TARVER C M, et al. Pressure wave measurements from thermal cook-off of an HMX based high explosive PBX 9501 [J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2002, 620(1): 882–885.
[11]	杨天昊. 炸药非冲击点火爆炸事故反应主控因素及GPa级斜波作用下PBX基体中微介观热点响应行为研究 [D]. 绵阳: 中国工程物理研究院, 2022. YANG T H. Study on main controlling factors of explosive non-shock initiation explosion accident reaction and the response behavior of micro-mesoscopic hot spots in PBX under the GPa-level ramp wave [D]. Mianyang, China: China Academy of Engineering Physics, 2022.
[12]	尚海林, 杨洁, 胡秋实, 等. 炸药裂缝中的对流燃烧现象实验研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(1): 99–106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.01.012. SHANG H L, YANG J, HU Q S, et al. Experimental research on convective burning in explosive cracks [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(1): 99–106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1093.2019.01.012.
[13]	尚海林, 胡秋实, 李涛, 等. 炸药裂缝燃烧增压过程的一维理论 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(1): 011403. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0345. SHANG H L, HU Q S, LI T, et al. One-dimensional theory for pressurization process in explosive crack burning [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(1): 011403. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0345.
[14]	姚奎光, 赵学峰, 樊星, 等. 高压下PBX-1炸药的燃速-压力特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(1): 011404. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0347. YAO K G, ZHAO X F, FAN X, et al. Burn rate-pressure characteristic for PBX-1 explosive at high pressures [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(1): 011404. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0347.
[15]	王延飞, 刘杰, 张旭, 等. 未反应炸药JOB-9003的JWL状态方程 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2016, 30(5): 387–391. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2016.05.007. WANG Y F, LIU J, ZHANG X, et al. JWL equation of state of unreacted JOB-9003 explosive [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2016, 30(5): 387–391. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.2016.05.007.