多孔聚氨酯基复合削爆屏障的防护性能

周颖; 黄广炎; 王涛; 解亚宸; 张旭东

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2022-0375

多孔聚氨酯基复合削爆屏障的防护性能

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0375

周颖^1,,
黄广炎^{1, 2, ,},
王涛¹,
解亚宸¹,
张旭东³

1.
北京理工大学机电学院，北京 100081
2.
北京理工大学重庆创新中心，重庆 401120
3.
奥卓新材料有限公司，山东滕州 277599

基金项目: 国家自然科学基金（11772059）；国家重点研发计划（2017yfc0822304）

详细信息

作者简介:
周　颖（1997－　），女，博士研究生，zhouying@bit.edu.cn

通讯作者:
黄广炎（1982－　），男，博士，教授， huanggy@bit.edu.cn

中图分类号: O383
计量
- 文章访问数: 235
- HTML全文浏览量: 72
- PDF下载量: 69
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-08-30
- 修回日期: 2023-07-11
- 刊出日期: 2023-10-27

Blast mitigation performance of porous polyurethane-basedcomposite explosion-proof barrier

1.
School of Mechatronics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
2.
Chongqing Innovation Center, Beijing Institute of Technology, Chongqing 401120, China
3.
Aozhuo New Materials Co., Ltd., Tengzhou 277599, Shandong, China

摘要

摘要: 针对削弱爆炸恐怖袭击危害这一公共安全领域的热点难题，开展新型削/防爆结构的研究刻不容缓。聚氨酯泡沫具有密度低、微观结构易设计、在爆炸载荷作用下不会产生二次杀伤性破片等优点，在新型削爆结构方面具有良好的应用前景。基于削弱爆炸危害的研究背景，搭建了定向冲击波流场装置对聚氨酯平板进行爆炸加载实验，并通过流固耦合数值模拟对实验进行了验证。在此基础上，利用已验证的模拟方法针对聚氨酯(polyurethane, PU)、水体环形复合屏障面向内爆炸载荷的削弱效应进行了模拟分析。以屏障的总体积相等作为设计前提，对比了PU/水、水、水/PU这3种屏障的冲击波削弱性能，并分析了聚氨酯密度对性能的影响规律。结果表明：削爆屏障的存在迫使冲击波发生反射、绕射、透射以及波与波之间的相互作用。相比于纯水屏障，PU/水屏障在自重下降32%的同时，依然能够有效削减冲击波峰值(可达13.3%)，主要利用了内侧聚氨酯波的低阻抗来降低冲击波的反射强度。
- 多孔聚氨酯泡沫 /
- 削爆屏障 /
- 爆炸冲击 /
- 冲击波削弱
Abstract: In view of the hot problem of reducing the harm of explosive terrorist attacks in public security field, the research on explosion-proof structures is urgent. Polyurethane foam has the advantages of being lightweight, has excellent mechanical properties, and can avoid secondary debris damage. It has a good application prospect in the new explosive disposal equipment. Based on the research background of explosion hazard reduction, the mechanism and effectiveness of shock wave weakening of polyurethane foam and polyurethane-based composite barriers need to be investigated. The microstructure and mechanical properties of porous polyurethane were tested firstly. It was to obtain the basic parameters and contribute to construct the simulation model of the samples with different densities (100-300 kg/m³). A directional flow field device was set up to impact the polyurethane plate and the feasibility of the corresponding numerical model was analyzed to study its protective performance against the plane shock wave. On this basis, the weakening effect of the polyurethane-water annular composite barrier under internal explosive loading was analyzed numerically by using the verified numerical model. The design premise was that the total volume of barriers was equal, and the shockwave weakening performances of PU/water, pure water and water/PU barriers were compared. The influence of polyurethane density on shock wave weakening performance was analyzed. The results show that the existence of a barrier forces the shock wave to reflect, diffract, transmit and interact with each other. Compared with a pure water barrier, the PU/water barrier can effectively reduce shock wave peak (up to 13.3%) when the total mass decreases by 32%. This is mainly because of the lower impedance of the inner polyurethane foam, which can reduce the strength of the shock wave reflected back from the barrier wall. Under current simulation conditions, it is more effective for the protection of corresponding barrier when the density of PU is 200 kg/m³ in the PU/water barrier.
- polyurethane foam /
- explosion-proof barrier /
- explosion impact /
- shock wave weakening

HTML全文

图 1 多孔聚氨酯试样及对应的SEM图像

Figure 1. Physical pictures and SEM images of porous polyurethane

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 聚氨酯泡沫的应力-应变曲线

Figure 2. Stress-strain curves of polyurethane foam

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 定向流场爆炸冲击实验布局示意图(单位: mm)

Figure 3. Arrangement of a tubular explosive directional flow field device (unit in mm)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 起爆后不同密度的聚氨酯试样的响应过程

Figure 4. Response process of polyurethane samples with different densities after explosion

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 实验靶后压力峰值对比

Figure 5. Comparison of peak pressure behind sample in experiment

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 AUTODYN二维轴对称数值模型示意图(单位：mm)

Figure 6. Numerical model of axially symmetric 2D on AUTODYN (unit in mm)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 实验与数值模拟在观测点处的压力时程曲线对比

Figure 7. Comparison of the overpressure–time histories between the experimentaldata and numerical results on gauge

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 数值模型示意图(单位: mm)

Figure 8. Schematic of numerical model (unit in mm)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 起爆后不同时刻冲击波及爆炸产物形态

Figure 9. Process of shock waves and explosion products in the case of structures at different moments after explosion

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 3种防护结构水、PU/水和水/PU对应的不同测点处的无量纲超压峰值参数

Figure 10. Dimensionless peak overpressure at different gauges of protective structures of water, PU/water, and water/PU

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 防护结构水，PU/水对应的无量纲超压峰值参数M_p变化曲线对比

Figure 11. Comparison of dimensionless peak overpressure parameter M_p variation curves correspondingto structures of water, PU/water

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 防护结构水、水/PU对应的无量纲超压峰值参数M_p变化曲线对比

Figure 12. Comparison of dimensionless peak overpressure parameter M_p variation curves correspondingto structures of water, water/PU

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 冲击波超压对有生力量的破坏作用阈值^[19]

Table 1. Threshold value of destructive effect ofshockwave overpressure on effectives^[19]

等级	超压峰值范围/MPa	破坏作用
Ⅰ	< 0.02	没有杀伤作用
Ⅱ	0.02～0.03	轻伤（轻微的挫伤）
Ⅲ	0.03～0.05	中等损伤（听觉器官损伤、中等挫伤、骨折等）
Ⅳ	0.05～0.10	重伤、甚至死亡（内脏严重挫伤）
Ⅴ	> 0.10	大部分死亡

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 泡沫材料参数

Table 2. Material parameters for PU foams

密度/(kg·m⁻³)	体积模量/MPa	剪切模量/MPa	最大拉伸应力/MPa	泊松比
100	5.53	8.30	0.69	0.12
200	11.27	16.90	2.77	0.13
300	37.35	56.02	3.64	0.18

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 实验与数值模拟的靶后压力峰值及对比

Table 3. Comparison between experimental and numerical simulation on peak pressure behind target

工况	靶后压力峰值/kPa			衰减率/%
工况	实验	数值模拟	相对误差/%	实验	数值模拟	相对误差/%
0-0	524	560	6.9	0	0	0
100-40	172	191	11.1	67.2	65.9	1.9
200-60	123	126	2.4	76.5	77.5	1.0
300-20	126	129	2.4	75.9	76.9	1.3
300-60	109	113	3.7	79.2	79.8	0.8

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 数值模型中不同防护结构的几何参数

Table 4. Geometrical parameters of different protective structures in the numerical model

屏障名称	壁厚 A₁/mm	壁厚 A₂/mm	迎爆面内圆半径R/mm	屏障高度 H/mm
水	0	100	90	310
PU/水	50	50	90	310
水/PU	50	50	90	310

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(32)

[1]	毛益明, 方秦, 张亚栋, 等. 水体与混凝土防爆墙消波减爆作用对比研究 [J]. 兵工学报, 2009, 30(S2): 84–89. MAO Y M, FANG Q, ZHANG Y D, et al. Comparison investigation on mitigation effect of water and concrete explosion proof walls [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2009, 30(S2): 84–89.
[2]	ZHU W H, XUE H L, ZHOU G Q, et al. Dynamic response of cylindrical explosive chambers to internal blast loading produced by a concentrated charge [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1997, 19(9): 831–845. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00022-5.
[3]	DOUGLAS K, ANDREW A, KATHERINE H, et al. A comparison of the blast & fragment mitigation performance of several structurally weak materials [C]// AIP Conference Proceedings 2007. Waikoloa: American Institute of Physics, 2007, 955(1): 951–954. DOI: 10.1063/1.2833286.
[4]	宁建国, 王仲琦, 赵衡阳, 等. 爆炸冲击波绕流的数值模拟研究 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 1999, 19(5): 543–547. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.1999.05.003. NING J G, WANG Z Q, ZHAO H Y, et al. Study on the flow of the explosive shock wave around the wall numerical simulation [J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 1999, 19(5): 543–547. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.1999.05.003.
[5]	SHEN Y L, NING J G. Numberical simulation of the 2-d explosion field for the effect of protective wall’s shape [J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (English Edition), 2001(1): 39–44.
[6]	GELFAND B E, SILNIKOV M V, CHERNYSHOV M V. Modification of air blast loading transmission by foams and high density materials[C]// HANNEMANN K, SEILER F. In Proceeding of the 26th International Symposium on Shock Waves. Germany: Springer, 2007: 103–108. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85168-4_15.
[7]	BAILEY J L, LINDSAY M S, SCHWER D A, et al. Blast mitigation using water mist: NRL/MR/6180-06-8933 [R]. Washington DC: Naval Research Laboratory, 2006.
[8]	BORNSTEIN H, PHILLIPS P, ANDERSON C. Evaluation of the blast mitigating effects of ﬂuid containers [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 75: 222–228. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2014.08.014.
[9]	ZHAO H Z, LAN K Y, CHONG O Y . Water mitigation effects on the detonations in confined chamber and tunnel system [J]. Shock and Vibration, 2001, 8(6): 349–355. DOI: 10.1155/2001/124019.
[10]	ZHU W, HUANG G Y, LIU C M, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation of a hollow cylindrical water barrier against internal blast loading [J]. Engineering Structures, 2018, 172: 789–806. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.062.
[11]	蔡军锋, 傅孝忠, 易建政. 超高分子量聚乙烯-聚氨酯泡沫复合材料的抗爆实验与数值模拟 [J]. 高分子材料科学与工程, 2013, 29(11): 79–83. DOI: 10.16865/j.cnki.1000-7555.2013.11.019. CAI J F, FU X Z, YI J Z. Anti-explosion experiment and numerical simulation of UHMWPE-PUF composite [J]. Analysis of Polymers Polymer Materials Science and Engineering, 2013, 29(11): 79–83. DOI: 10.16865/j.cnki.1000-7555.2013.11.019.
[12]	石少卿, 张湘冀, 刘颖芳, 等. 硬质聚氨酯泡沫塑料抗爆炸冲击作用的研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2005, 24(5): 56–59. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2005.05.017. SHI S Q, ZHANG X Y, LIU Y F, et al. Studies on the properties of anti-detonation and anti-penetration of rigid polyurethane foam [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2005, 24(5): 56–59. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2005.05.017.
[13]	王海福, 冯顺山. 爆炸载荷下聚氨酯泡沫材料中冲击波压力特性 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 1999, 19(1): 78–83. WANG H F, FENG S S. Properties of shock pressure caused by explosion loads in polyurethane foam [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 1999, 19(1): 78–83.
[14]	陈网桦, 彭金华, 葛桂兰, 等. 聚氨酯泡沫塑料抗冲击性能的实验研究 [J]. 弹道学报, 1997(4): 88–92. CHEN W H, PENG J H, GE G L, et al. The experimental investigation of the shock-resistant properties of polyurethane foam plastics [J]. Journal of Ballistics, 1997(4): 88–92.
[15]	卢子兴, 袁应龙. 高应变率加载下复合泡沫塑料的吸能特性及失效机理研究 [J]. 复合材料学报, 2002, 19(5): 114–117. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.2002.05.022. LU Z X, YUAN Y L. Investigation into the energy absorption and failure characteristics of syntactic foams at high strain rates [J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2002, 19(5): 114–117. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.2002.05.022.
[16]	ZHOU T Y, ZHANG P, XIAO W, et al. Experimental investigation on the performance of PVC foam core sandwich panels under air blast loading [J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 226: 111081. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111081.
[17]	曾祥, 刘彦, 许泽建, 等. 爆炸载荷作用下玻璃钢/硬质聚氨酯泡沫夹层结构抗冲击性能实验研究 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2021, 41(11): 1145–1153. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2021.036. ZENG X, LIU Y, XU Z J, et al. Experimental study on impact resistance of glass fiber reinforced plastic/rigid polyurethane foam sandwich structures under air blast loading [J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2021, 41(11): 1145–1153. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2021.036.
[18]	张勇. 聚氨酯泡沫铝复合结构抗爆吸能试验及数值模拟分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(4): 045101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0182. ZHANG Y. Testing the antiknock energy absorption of polyurethane foam aluminum composite structure and numerical simulation [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(4): 045101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0182.
[19]	李剑. 爆炸与防护 [M]. 第1版. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2014: 258.
[20]	闫伟杰. 水下爆炸数值模拟研究 [D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2007: 17–21.
[21]	CHEN L, ZHANG L, FANG Q, et al. Performance based investigation on the construction of anti-blast water wall [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2015, 81: 17–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.03.003.
[22]	年鑫哲, 严东晋, 张耀, 等. 水体防爆墙和混凝土防爆墙对爆炸冲击波的消减效应 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(18): 214–220. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.18.035. NIAN X Z, YAN D J, ZHANG Y, et al. Mitigation effects of explosion-proof water walls and explosion-proof concrete walls on blast shock wave [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(18): 214–220. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.18.035.
[23]	CHENG Y, ZHOU T, WANG H, et al. Numerical investigation on the dynamic response of foam-filled corrugated core sandwich panels subjected to air blast loading [J]. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 2019, 21(3): 838–864. DOI: 10.1177/1099636217700350.
[24]	王宇新, 顾元宪, 孙明, 等. 冲击载荷作用下多孔材料复合结构防爆理论计算 [J]. 兵工学报, 2006, 27(2): 375–379. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2006.02.042. WANG Y X, GU Y X, SUN M, et al. Blast-resistant calculation of compound structure with porous material under impact load [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2006, 27(2): 375–379. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2006.02.042.
[25]	宋博, 胡时胜, 王礼立. 分层材料的不同排列次序对透射冲击波强度的影响 [J]. 兵工学报, 2000, 21(3): 272–274. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2000.03.021. SONG B, HU S S, WANG L L. Influence on the transmitted intensity of shock wave through different tactic orders of layered materials [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2000, 21(3): 272–274. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1093.2000.03.021.
[26]	刘秀, 刘国胜, 郝建薇, 等. 阻燃硬质聚氨酯泡沫燃烧热值对阻燃性能的影响 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2015, 35(2): 197–202. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2015.02.017. LIU X, LIU G S, HAO J W, et al. Effect of heat of combustion on flame retardancy of rigid polyurethane foams [J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2015, 35(2): 197–202. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2015.02.017.
[27]	RESNYANSKY A, DELANEY T. Experimental study of blast mitigation in a water mist: DSTO technical report: DSTO-TR-1944 [R]. Australia: Defence Science and Technology Organisation Weapons Systems Division, 2006.
[28]	洪武, 徐迎, 金丰年. 水体防爆机理研究进展 [J]. 防护工程, 2011, 33(3): 73–78. HONG W, XU Y, JIN F N. Development of blast-resistant water walls [J]. Protective Engineering, 2011, 33(3): 73–78.
[29]	CHAPMAN T C, ROSE T A, SMITH P D. Blast wave simulation using AUTODYN 2D: a parametric study [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 1995, 16(5): 777–787. DOI: 10.1016/0734-743X(95)00012-Y.
[30]	CHENG M, HUNG K C, CHONG O Y. Numerical study of water mitigation effects on blast wave [J]. Shock Waves, 2005, 14(3): 217–223. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-005-0267-4.
[31]	YANG Y F, HE J M. Mechanical characterization of phenolic foams modified by short glass fibers and polyurethane prepolymer [J]. Polym Composite, 2015, 36(9): 1584–1589. DOI: 10.1002/pc.23066.
[32]	JIN M, HAO Y F, HAO H. Numerical study of fence type blast walls for blast load mitigation [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 131: 238–255. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2019.05.007.