氢气抑爆材料及其抑爆机理研究进展

陈晓坤; 王君; 程方明

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2023-0418

氢气抑爆材料及其抑爆机理研究进展

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0418

陈晓坤^{1, 2,},
王君¹,
程方明^{1, 3, ,}

1.
西安科技大学安全科学与工程学院，陕西西安 710054
2.
西安科技大学安全科学与工程学院陕西省煤火灾害防治重点实验室，陕西西安 710054
3.
西安市城市公共安全与消防救援重点实验室，陕西西安 710054

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划（2021YFB4000905）

详细信息

作者简介:
陈晓坤（1961－　），男，博士，教授，Chenxk@xust.edu.cn

通讯作者:
程方明（1982－　），男，博士，教授，chengfm@xust.edu.cn

中图分类号: O389
计量
- 文章访问数: 304
- HTML全文浏览量: 61
- PDF下载量: 103
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2023-11-21
- 修回日期: 2024-04-10
- 网络出版日期: 2024-04-11

Research progress on hydrogen gas explosion suppression materials and their suppression mechanisms

CHEN Xiaokun^{1, 2
,},
WANG Jun¹,
CHENG Fangming^{1, 3
, ,}

1.
School of Safety Science and Engineering, Xiʼan University of Science and Technology, Xiʼan 710054, Shaanxi, China
2.
Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Coal Fire Disaster Prevention, School of Safety Science and Engineering, Xiʼan University of Science and Technology, Xiʼan 710054, Shaanxi, China
3.
Xiʼan Key Laboratory of Urban Public Safety and Fire Emergency Rescue, Xiʼan 710054, Shaanxi, China

摘要

摘要: 氢气在全球清洁能源转型中扮演着关键角色，但其可燃性和高爆炸危害性也使得氢气安全成为研究热点。聚焦氢气抑爆领域的最新研究成果，对不同种类抑爆材料及抑爆机理进行了综合评述。首先，介绍了气体、液体、固体以及多相复合抑爆材料的研究进展，对比分析了抑爆效果、关键参数及其变化规律。其次，探讨了抑爆材料影响氢气爆炸的物理、化学以及物理化学综合的作用过程，以揭示各类材料的抑爆机理。最后，展望了氢气抑爆材料的未来发展趋势，强调对高效能抑爆材料探索和机理研究的深化以及在实际应用中所面临的诸多挑战。
- 氢气爆炸 /
- 抑爆 /
- 抑爆材料 /
- 抑爆效果 /
- 抑爆机理
Abstract: Hydrogen is crucial in the global shift towards clean energy and is gaining significance in the energy industry, while its high flammability and explosive hazard make its safety a research hotspot. It is crucial to thoroughly investigate and assess the safety of hydrogen as it progresses toward commercialization in the energy sector. This article reviews the latest advancements in hydrogen explosion suppression conducted by researchers around the world, aiming at offering a scientific foundation and technical approach to efficiently manage and reduce the damaging impacts of hydrogen explosion incidents. The article focuses on the study of hydrogen explosion suppression materials and their suppression mechanisms, so as to provide scientific understanding and technical support for the safe application of hydrogen. Firstly, it systematically introduces the research progress in hydrogen explosion suppression by discussing four significant categories, i.e., gas, liquid, solid, and multiphase composite explosion suppression materials. By comparing and analyzing the effects, key performance parameters, and the variation rules of these materials, the current research status and effectiveness of various explosion suppression materials are sorted out, helping to deepen the understanding of the explosion suppression effects of these materials. Secondly, focusing on the suppression mechanism, the research delves into the vital role of explosion suppression materials in suppressing hydrogen explosions. Starting from three dimensions, i.e., physical suppression, chemical suppression, and physicochemical comprehensive suppression, it elucidates the mechanisms of action of explosion suppression materials in the suppression process, contributing to a deeper understanding of the role of explosion suppression materials in suppressing or mitigating hydrogen explosions. Finally, the article looks forward to the future development directions of hydrogen explosion suppression materials, especially emphasizing the importance of further studies on the high-efficiency explosion suppression materials and the challenges faced in practical applications. This review is aimed to provide scientific reference and inspiration for the research, development, and application of new hydrogen explosion suppression materials.
- hydrogen gas explosion /
- explosion suppression /
- suppression materials /
- suppression effect /
- suppression mechanism

HTML全文

图 1 不活泼气体对掺氢混合气体燃爆特性的影响^{[18, 20]}

Figure 1. The impact of inert gases on the deflagration characteristics of hydrogen-doped gas mixture^{[18, 20]}

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不活泼气体对氢气燃爆现象的影响^[23]

Figure 2. Influences of inert gases on the combustion behaviors of hydrogen gas^[23]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 惰性粒子云对氢气燃爆的影响^[32]

Figure 3. The influence of inert particle cloud on the explosion behavior of hydrogen gas^[32]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不活泼气体及卤代烷烃对氢气爆炸极限的影响^[33]

Figure 4. Influence of inert gases and halogenated hydrocarbons on the explosion limits of hydrogen gas^[33]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 七氟丙烷^[35]、CH₂FCF₃和C₂HF₅^[37]对氢气燃爆的影响

Figure 5. Effects of CF₃CHFCH₃^[35], CH₂FCF₃, and C₂HF₅^[37] on hydrogen deflagration

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 CHF₃和 C₂HF₅对不同当量比下氢气预混气体火焰形态的影响^[38]

Figure 6. Influence of CHF₃ and C₂HF₅ on the flame morphology of hydrogen premixed gas with different equivalence ratios^[38]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 i-C₄H₈对氢气燃爆的影响^[39]

Figure 7. Influence of i-C₄H₈ on the explosion behavior of hydrogen gas^[39]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 i-C₄H₈+CO₂对氢气燃爆的影响^[40]

Figure 8. Influence of i-C₄H₈+CO₂ on the explosion behavior of hydrogen gas^[40]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 细水雾抑制氢气燃爆特性的影响^[47-50]

Figure 9. Effect of fine water mist on suppressing hydrogen deflagration characteristics^[47-50]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 NaHCO₃水雾对预混气体火焰传播、平均火焰传播速度的影响^[51]

Figure 10. Influence of NaHCO₃ water mist on premixed gas flame propagation and average flame propagation velocity^[51]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 细水雾和含DMMP细水雾对氢气预混气体的抑制作用分析^[52]

Figure 11. Analysis of the suppression effects of fine water mist and fine water mist with DMMP on hydrogen premixed gas^[52]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 12 粉体对氢气预混气体爆炸压力及其峰值的影响^[54-56]

Figure 12. Effects of particulate matters on the explosion pressure and its peak value of hydrogen premixed gas^[54-56]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 13 多相复合材料抑爆作用^[63-64]

Figure 13. Explosive suppression effect of multiphase composite materials^[63-64]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 14 不活泼气体对氢气燃爆特性的影响^[23,27,73]

Figure 14. Effects of inert gases on the deflagration characteristics of hydrogen^[23,27,73]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 15 卤代烃的敏感性分析^[38]

Figure 15. Sensitivity analysis of halogenated hydrocarbons^[38]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 16 HFC-227ea的敏感性分析^[81]

Figure 16. Sensitivity analysis of HFC-227ea^[81]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 17 抑制机理示意图^[51,74]

Figure 17. Fire extinguishing mechanism schemati^[51,74]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 18 BC粉末爆炸抑制过程^[54]

Figure 18. Explosion process suppressed by BC powder^[54]

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 近年氢气泄漏爆炸事故

Table 1. Recent hydrogen gas leak explosion incidents

事故时间	事故地点	事故原因	事故后果
2018年3月12日	中国江西省九江市一石化企业	柴油加氢装置原料缓冲罐超压爆炸着火	2人死亡，1人受伤直接经济损失约338万元
2019年5月23日	韩国江原道江陵市	在水电解氢气试验的过程中，因操作失误而导致爆炸	2人死亡，6人受伤
2019年6月1日	美国加州圣塔克拉拉一化工厂	储氢罐发生泄漏爆炸	无人伤亡，经济损失数万美元，当地氢燃料供应被迫中断
2019年6月	挪威桑维卡一合营加氢站	高压储氢罐一特殊插头装配错误	2人受伤经济损失约2亿欧元
2019年12月	威斯康星州沃基工厂	储氢区发生爆炸起火	1人受伤
2020年1月14日	中国珠海长炼石化设备有限公司	重整加氢装置预加单元发生闪爆	无人伤亡直接经济损失198万元
2020年4月	美国北卡州朗维尤一氢燃料工厂	加氢站爆炸	无人伤亡，损失数百美元
2021年8月4日	中国辽宁沈阳经济开发区一企业院	加氢站内卸车柱上软管破裂导致氢气罐爆燃	无人伤亡直接经济损失1475万元
2021年9月11日	湖南省永兴镇马田镇	个人私自利用液化石油气钢瓶制氢，导致其制氢罐发生爆炸	1人死亡，1人受伤直接经济损失超93万元
2022年4月24日	中国石化齐鲁石化胜利炼油厂	氢气泄漏着火	无人伤亡直接经济损失180万元

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 CO₂等不活泼气体抑制氢气的实验研究^[21-30]

Table 2. Experimental studies on the inhibition of hydrogen by inert gases, including CO₂^[21-30]

研究人员	研究对象	实验装置	抑爆剂	结论
刘原一等^[21]	H₂/CO	2 m长不锈钢管道	N₂、CO₂	CO₂对混合气爆燃特性的影响强于N₂，主要表现在燃爆下限和压力波传播上
Yan等^[22]	H₂/CO	球形爆炸室	N₂、CO₂	随着CO₂和N₂含量的增加，绝热火焰温度、热扩散系数和活性自由基摩尔分数不断降低，使层流燃烧速度降低。其次，CO₂抑制氢气爆炸压力比N₂更有效
Li等^[23]	H₂	肥皂泡装置	He、Ar、 N₂、CO₂	影响热扩散系数、绝热火焰温度、层流燃烧速度和热膨胀率的降低排序：He>Ar>N₂>CO₂，且N₂不存在第三体效应，第三体效应:CO₂>Ar>He，因此，CO₂是缓解氢气爆炸较为有效的添加物
Wei等^[24]	H₂	定容燃烧弹	Ar、N₂、CO₂	不活泼气体的稀释减缓了火焰在燃烧室中的传播。抑制作用由小到大依次是Ar、N₂、CO₂
Wang等^[25]	H₂	7.3 L圆筒封闭容器	Ar、N₂、CO₂	CO₂比热高于N₂和Ar，且CO₂对能量损失的增加最显著，N₂和Ar次之，故CO₂的抑制效果优于Ar和N₂
邹颖等^[26]	H₂	20L爆炸球	N₂、CO₂	CO₂在爆炸压力及压力增长率方面的抑制效果优于N₂
Wang等^[27]	H₂/LPG	20L爆炸球	N₂、CO₂	比较了爆炸压力、自由基的摩尔分数和产生速率，得出CO₂抑制作用优于N₂。其中N₂主要起到了物理抑制作用，而CO₂还发挥了化学抑制作用
Chang等^[28]	H₂	20 L标准球形爆炸容器中	N₂、CO₂	N₂、CO₂气体稀释的抑制作用可以平衡湍流的促进作用。在某些情况下，由于CO₂的分子量较大，其对爆炸行为的增强作用比N₂射流更明显
Wu等^[29]	H₂	圆柱形停滞室	N₂、CO₂	从火焰长度减速比的比较可知，CO₂与N₂的减缓效果非常接近
Zhang等^[30]	H₂	爆炸管道	N₂、CO₂	比较了爆炸压力、燃烧持续时间和火焰传播等爆炸参数，验证了CO₂比N₂抑制效果强。此外，多层爆炸抑制对不同侧缓蚀剂的抑制效果最好

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 惰性气体对绝热火焰温度的影响^[23]

Table 3. Effect of inert gases on adiabatic flame temperature^[23]

当量比	绝热火焰温度/K
当量比	He	Ar	N₂	CO₂
0.6	2764.9	2764.9	2222.5	1645.6
0.8	2988.8	2988.8	2566.2	1955.6
1.0	3090.1	3090.1	2760.8	2464.1
1.4	3069.8	3069.8	2705.8	2076.7
2.0	2853.0	2853.0	2478.2	1865.4

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 卤代烃与活化中心化学反应参数对比^[77]

Table 4. Comparison of halogenated hydrocarbons and activation center chemical reaction parameters^[77]

反应过程	活化能$ {E}_{\mathrm{a}} $/(kJ∙mol⁻¹)	反应速率常数$ K $/(cm³∙mol⁻¹∙s⁻¹)
CHF₃+OH·→CF₃+H₂O	19.10	2.71×10^-16
CHClF₂+OH·→CClF₂+ H₂O	12.72	4.60×10^-15
CH₂FCF₃+OH·→CHFCF₃+H₂O	12.80	4.16×10^-15
C₂HF₅+OH·→C₂F₅+H₂O	13.80	1.90×10^-15

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(89)

[1]	RICCI M, BELLABY P, FLYNN R. What do we know about public perceptions and acceptance of hydrogen? a critical review and new case study evidence [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(21): 5868–5880. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.07.106.
[2]	TANG C L, ZHANG Y J, HUANG Z H. Progress in combustion investigations of hydrogen enriched hydrocarbons [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 30: 195–216. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.10.005.
[3]	ACAR C, DINCER I. The potential role of hydrogen as a sustainable transportation fuel to combat global warming [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(5): 3396–3406. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.149.
[4]	SINGH S, JAIN S, PS V, et al. Hydrogen: A sustainable fuel for future of the transport sector [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 51: 623–633. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.040.
[5]	MAYRHOFER M, KOLLER M, SEEMANN P, et al. Assessment of natural gas/hydrogen blends as an alternative fuel for industrial heat treatment furnaces [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(41): 21672–21686. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.228.
[6]	MORADI R, GROTH K M. Hydrogen storage and delivery: Review of the state of the art technologies and risk and reliability analysis [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(23): 12254–12269. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.03.041.
[7]	林言訓, 秦家俊. 小型氮肥厂的爆炸事故及預防措施 [J]. 劳动, 1963(5): 32–33. LIN Y, QIN J J. Explosion accidents and preventive measures in small nitrogen fertilizer plants [J]. Labor, 1963(5): 32–33.
[8]	汪德山. 氢气燃爆现象种种 [J]. 甘肃消防, 1999(8): 17. Wang D S. Various hydrogen explosion phenomena [J]. Gansu Fire Protection, 1999(8): 17.
[9]	LAHNAOUI A, WULF C, HEINRICHS H, et al. Optimizing hydrogen transportation system for mobility via compressed hydrogen trucks [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(35): 19302–19312. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.10.234.
[10]	SAZALI N. Emerging technologies by hydrogen: a review [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(38): 18753–18771. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.021.
[11]	AARSKOG F G, HANSEN O R, STRØMGREN T, et al. Concept risk assessment of a hydrogen driven high speed passenger ferry [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(2): 1359–1372. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.05.128.
[12]	郑凯. 管道中氢气/甲烷混合燃料爆燃预混火焰传播特征研究 [D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2017. ZHENG K. Study on the propagation characteristics of premixed flame of hydrogen/methane deflagration in ducts [D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2017.
[13]	高玉刚. 管道中可燃气体燃爆特性研究 [D]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2011. GAO Y G. Study on burning explosion characteristics of flammable gas in tube [D]. Huainan: Anhui University of Science & Technology, 2011.
[14]	孙占强, 余磊. 长输管道合于使用评价常见问题总结 [J]. 云南化工, 2023, 50(6): 163–165. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-275X.2023.06.44. SUN Z Q, YU L. Summary of common problems in the evaluation of suitability for use of long-distance pipelines [J]. Yunnan Chemical Technology, 2023, 50(6): 163–165. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-275X.2023.06.44.
[15]	CROWL D A, JO Y D. The hazards and risks of hydrogen [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2007, 20(2): 158–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2007.02.002.
[16]	NG H D, LEE J H S. Comments on explosion problems for hydrogen safety [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2008, 21(2): 136–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2007.06.001.
[17]	李一鸣. 七氟丙烷抑制甲烷-空气爆炸的实验研究 [D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2018. LI Y M. Experimental study of suppressing the methane/air explosion by heptafluoropropane [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2018.
[18]	SU Y, LUO Z M, WANG T, et al. Effect of nitrogen on deflagration characteristics of hydrogen / methane mixture [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(15): 9156–9168. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.013.
[19]	RAZUS D, MITU M, GIURCAN V, et al. Numerical study of pressure and composition influence on laminar flame propagation in nitrogen-diluted H₂-O₂ mixtures [J]. Revue Roumaine de Chimie, 2020, 65(6): 529–537. DOI: 10.33224/rrch.2020.65.6.02.
[20]	PARK J, KIM J S, CHUNG J O, et al. Chemical effects of added CO₂ on the extinction characteristics of H₂/CO/CO₂ syngas diffusion flames [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(20): 8756–8762. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.08.046.
[21]	刘原一, 朱轶铭, 熊英莹, 等. N₂/CO₂气氛对CO/H₂爆燃特性的影响 [J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2014, 20(5): 383–387. DOI: 10.11715/rskxjs.R201404011. LIU Y Y, ZHU Y M, XIONG Y Y, et al. Influence ofN₂/CO₂ on deflagration characteristics of CO/H₂ [J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2014, 20(5): 383–387. DOI: 10.11715/rskxjs.R201404011.
[22]	YAN C C, BI M S, LI Y C, et al. Effects of nitrogen and carbon dioxide on hydrogen explosion behaviors near suppression limit [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 67: 104228. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104228.
[23]	LI Y C, BI M S, HUANG L, et al. Hydrogen cloud explosion evaluation under inert gas atmosphere [J]. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 180: 96–104. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.08.015.
[24]	WEI H Q, XU Z L, ZHOU L, et al. Effect of hydrogen-air mixture diluted with argon/nitrogen/carbon dioxide on combustion processes in confined space [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43(31): 14798–14805. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.038.
[25]	WANG L Q, MA H H, SHEN Z W. Explosion characteristics of hydrogen-air mixtures diluted with inert gases at sub-atmospheric pressures [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(40): 22527–22536. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.01.059.
[26]	邹颖, 董冰岩, 查裕学, 等. 密闭受限空间内N₂、CO₂对H₂/Air混合气体的抑爆效果研究 [J]. 科技与创新, 2022(17): 87–92. DOI: 10.15913/j.cnki.kjycx.2022.17.028. ZOU Y, DONG B Y, ZHA Y X, et al. Study on the explosion suppression effect of N2 and CO2 on H2/air mixed gas in confined enclosed spaces [J]. Science and Innovation, 2022(17): 87–92. DOI: 10.15913/j.cnki.kjycx.2022.17.028.
[27]	WANG J Y, LIANG Y T, ZHAO Z Z. Effect of N₂ and CO₂ on explosion behavior of H₂-Liquefied petroleum gas-air mixtures in a confined space [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(56): 23887–23897. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.152.
[28]	CHANG X Y, BAI C H, ZHANG B. The effect of gas jets on the explosion dynamics of hydrogen-air mixtures [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2022, 162: 384–394. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.04.032.
[29]	WU Y, YU X, WANG Z C, et al. The flame mitigation effect of N₂ and CO₂ on the hydrogen jet fire [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2022, 165: 658–670. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.07.027.
[30]	ZHANG S Y, WEN X P, GUO Z D, et al. Experimental study on the multi-level suppression of N₂ and CO₂ on hydrogen-air explosion [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2023, 169: 970–981. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2022.11.069.
[31]	邹颖. 密闭空间内H₂爆炸及CO₂、N₂抑爆过程的数值模拟及实验研究 [D]. 赣州: 江西理工大学, 2022. DOI: 10.27176/d.cnki.gnfyc.2022.000560. ZOU Y. Numerical simulation and experimental study of H₂ explosion and SUPPR ESSION of CO₂ and N₂ explosion in confined space [D]. Ganzhou: Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, 2022. DOI: 10.27176/d.cnki.gnfyc.2022.000560.
[32]	TROPIN D. Numerical modeling of suppression of detonation waves in hydrogen-air mixture by system of inert particles clouds [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(66): 28699–28709. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.169.
[33]	姜程山. 氢气的爆炸极限抑制研究 [D]. 济南: 山东建筑大学, 2017. JIANG C S. Inhibition of hydrogen's explosion limits [D]. Ji’nan: Shandong Jianzhu University, 2017.
[34]	马文丽. 哈龙灭火剂替代产品的分类及特点研究 [J]. 忻州师范学院学报, 2008, 24(4): 132–134. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1491.2008.04.047. MA W L. Study on classification and characteristics of Halon fire extinguishing agent substitute products [J]. Journal of Xinzhou Teachers University, 2008, 24(4): 132–134. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1491.2008.04.047.
[35]	FAN R J, WANG Z R, GUO W J, et al. Experimental and theoretical study on the suppression effect of CF₃CHFCF₃ (FM-200) on hydrogen-air explosion [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(26): 13191–13198. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.02.062.
[36]	DRAKON A, EREMIN A, MATVEEVA N, et al. The opposite influences of flame suppressants on the ignition of combustible mixtures behind shock waves [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2017, 176: 592–598. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.11.001.
[37]	DRAKON A, EREMIN A. On relative effectiveness of halogenated hydrocarbons for suppression of hydrogen-oxygen mixture autoignition [J]. Combustion Science and Technology, 2018, 190(3): 550–555. DOI: 10.1080/00102202.2017.1402011.
[38]	GAO M D, BI M S, YE L L, et al. Suppression of hydrogen-air explosions by hydrofluorocarbons [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2021, 145: 378–387. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.08.036.
[39]	SHANG S, BI M S, ZHANG K, et al. Suppression of hydrogen-air explosions by isobutene with special molecular structure [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(61): 25864–25875. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.012.
[40]	SHANG S, BI M S, ZHANG Z L, et al. Synergistic effects of isobutene and carbon dioxide on suppressing hydrogen-air explosions [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(60): 25433–25442. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.256.
[41]	李卓然, 夏远辰, 张彬, 等. 细水雾对置障管内预混气体抑爆机理研究 [J]. 消防科学与技术, 2021, 40(6): 884–887. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2021.06.024. LI Z R, XIA Y C, ZHANG B, et al. Study on the suppression mechanism of water mist on the deflagration of premixed methane gas in a barrier tube [J]. Fire Science and Technology, 2021, 40(6): 884–887. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0029.2021.06.024.
[42]	汪剑辉, 刘飞, 薛一江. 可燃气云抑爆技术初探 [J]. 工程爆破, 2011, 17(2): 19–22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2011.02.005. WANG J H, LIU F, XUE Y J. Preliminary discuss on explosion suppression technique of flammable gas cloud [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2011, 17(2): 19–22. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7051.2011.02.005.
[43]	ZALOSH R G, BAJPAI S N. Effect of water fogs on the deliberate ignition of hydrogen. Final report: EPRI-NP-2637 [R]. Norwood: Factory Mutual Research Corp. , 1982.
[44]	LUANGDILOK W, BENNETT R B. Fog inerting effects on hydrogen combustion in a PWR ice condenser containment [J]. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1995, 117(2): 502–507. DOI: 10.1115/1.2822550.
[45]	BUTZ J R, FRENCH P. Application of fine water mists to hydrogen deflagrations [C]//Proceedings of the Halon Alternatives Technical Working Conference. Albuquerque, NM. 1993: 345-356.
[46]	JONES S J, AVERILL A F, INGRAM J M, et al. Mitigation of hydrogen-air explosions using fine water mist sprays [C]// Symposium on Hazards: Process Safety and Environmental Protection. Manchester, UK: IChemE Symposium Series No. 151, 2006: 1-10.
[47]	INGRAM J M, AVERILL A F, BATTERSBY P N, et al. Suppression of hydrogen–oxygen–nitrogen explosions by fine water mist: Part 1. Burning velocity [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(24): 19250–19257. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.09.092.
[48]	MODAK A U, ABBUD-MADRID A, DELPLANQUE J P, et al. The effect of mono-dispersed water mist on the suppression of laminar premixed hydrogen–, methane–, and propane–air flames [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 144(1/2): 103–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.07.003.
[49]	XIA Y C, ZHANG B, ZHANG J N, et al. Experimental research on combined effect of obstacle and local spraying water fog on hydrogen/air premixed explosion [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(94): 40099–40115. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.152.
[50]	胡耀元, 钟依均, 应桃开, 等. H₂, CO, CH₄多元爆炸性混合气体支链爆炸阻尼效应 [J]. 化学学报, 2004, 62(10): 956–962. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0567-7351.2004.10.006. HU Y Y, ZHONG Y J, YING T K, et al. Damping effect on the branch-chain explosion of polybasic explosive mixture gas containing H2, CO and CH4 [J]. Acta Chimica Sinica, 2004, 62(10): 956–962. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0567-7351.2004.10.006.
[51]	WEI S M, YU M G, PEI B, et al. Experimental and numerical study on the explosion suppression of hydrogen/dimethyl ether/methane/air mixtures by water mist containing NaHCO₃ [J]. Fuel, 2022, 328: 125235. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125235.
[52]	WANG Z R, XU H, LU Y W, et al. Experimental and theoretical study on the suppression effect of water mist containing dimethyl methylphosphonate (DMMP) on hydrogen jet flame [J]. Fuel, 2023, 331: 125813. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125813.
[53]	夏煜, 程扬帆, 胡芳芳, 等. 典型固体抑爆剂对乙炔-空气的抑爆特性 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2022, 36(6): 065201. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20220580. XIA Y, CHENG Y F, HU F F, et al. Inhibition characteristics of typical solid explosion suppressors on acetylene-air explosion [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2022, 36(6): 065201. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20220580.
[54]	LUO Z M, SU Y, CHEN X K, et al. Effect of BC powder on hydrogen/methane/air premixed gas deflagration [J]. Fuel, 2019, 257: 116095. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116095.
[55]	田莉. 受限空间内氢气/甲烷/空气混合物爆炸特性及抑爆研究 [D]. 杭州: 中国计量大学, 2019. DOI: 10.27819/d.cnki.gzgjl.2019.000072. TIAN L. Study on characteristics and suppression of hydrogen/methane/air mixture explosion in enclosed space [D]. Hangzhou: China Jiliang University, 2019. DOI: 10.27819/d.cnki.gzgjl.2019.000072.
[56]	TSAI Y T, FU T, ZHOU Q. Explosion characteristics and suppression of hybrid Mg/H₂ mixtures [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(78): 38934–38943. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.145.
[57]	LI Y, CHEN X F, YUAN B H, et al. Synthesis of a novel prolonged action inhibitor with lotus leaf-like appearance and its suppression on methane/hydrogen/air explosion [J]. Fuel, 2022, 329: 125401. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125401.
[58]	LI Y, ZHAO Q, LIU L J, et al. Investigation on the flame and explosion suppression of hydrogen/air mixtures by porous copper foams in the pipe with large aspect ratio [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2022, 76: 104744. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2022.104744.
[59]	BIVOL G Y, GOLOVASTOV S V. Suppression of hydrogen-air detonation using porous materials in the channels of different cross section [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(24): 13471–13483. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.052.
[60]	SONG X Z, ZUO X C, YANG Z K, et al. The explosion-suppression performance of mesh aluminum alloys and spherical nonmetallic materials on hydrogen-air mixtures [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(56): 32686–32701. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.197.
[61]	段玉龙, 王硕, 贺森, 等. 多孔材料下气体爆炸转扩散燃烧的特性研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2020, 40(9): 095401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0009. DUAN Y L, WANG S, HE S, et al. Characteristics of gas explosion to diffusion combustion under porous materials [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2020, 40(9): 095401. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0009.
[62]	HOLBORN P G, BATTERSBY P, INGRAM J M, et al. Estimating the effect of water fog and nitrogen dilution upon the burning velocity of hydrogen deflagrations from experimental test data [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38(16): 6882–6895. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.03.063.
[63]	BATTERSBY P N, AVERILL A F, INGRAM J M, et al. Suppression of hydrogen-oxygen-nitrogen explosions by fine water mist: Part 2. Mitigation of vented deflagrations [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(24): 19258–19267. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.10.029.
[64]	苏洋, 罗振敏, 王涛. CO₂/海泡石抑爆剂对氢气/甲烷爆炸特性参数的影响 [J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(11): 5731–5736. DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0044. SU Y, LUO Z M, WANG T. Effect of CO₂/sepiolite explosion suppressant on hydrogen/methane deflagration characteristic parameters [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(11): 5731–5736. DOI: 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2022-0044.
[65]	YANG Z K, ZHAO K, SONG X Z, et al. Effects of mesh aluminium alloys and propane addition on the explosion-suppression characteristics of hydrogen-air mixture [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(70): 34998–35013. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.08.035.
[66]	程方明, 南凡, 罗振敏, 等. 瓦斯抑爆材料及机理研究进展与发展趋势 [J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2021, 49(8): 114–124. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.08.015. CHENG F M, NAN F, LUO Z M, et al. Research progress and development trend of gas explosion suppression materials and mechanism [J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2021, 49(8): 114–124. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2021.08.015.
[67]	陈硕, 路长, 苏振国, 等. 煤矿瓦斯爆炸发展规律及防治的综述及展望 [J]. 火灾科学, 2021, 30(2): 63–79. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5309.2021.02.01. CHEN S, LU C, SU Z G, et al. Review on development and prevention of coal mine gas explosion [J]. Fire Safety Science, 2021, 30(2): 63–79. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5309.2021.02.01.
[68]	MOORE P E. Suppressants for the control of industrial explosions [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 1996, 9(1): 119–123. DOI: 10.1016/0950-4230(95)00045-3.
[69]	王任伟. N₂/CO₂/Ar稀释气体对甲烷预混层流火焰速度影响的物理与化学效应研究 [D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2021. DOI: 10.27157/d.cnki.ghzku.2021.002801. WANG R W. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of engineering [D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2021. DOI: 10.27157/d.cnki.ghzku.2021.002801.
[70]	左前明, 程卫民, 汤家轩. 粉体抑爆剂在煤矿应用研究的现状与展望 [J]. 煤炭技术, 2010, 29(11): 78–80. ZUO Q M, CHENG W M, TANG J X. Current status and prospects of application and research of powder coal mine explosion suppression agent [J]. Coal Technology, 2010, 29(11): 78–80.
[71]	李艳超. 氢气火焰失稳传播与爆炸压力的耦合影响机制研究 [D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2019. DOI: 10.26991/d.cnki.gdllu.2019.003558. LI Y C. Dynamic couplings of unstable hydrogen flame propagation and explosion pressure evolution [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2019. DOI: 10.26991/d.cnki.gdllu.2019.003558.
[72]	SU B, LUO Z M, WANG T, et al. Chemical kinetic behaviors at the chain initiation stage of CH₄/H₂/air mixture [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 403: 123680. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123680.
[73]	闫彩彩. 近抑爆极限氢气爆炸动力学行为研究 [D]. 大连: 大连理工大学, 2020. DOI: 10.26991/d.cnki.gdllu.2020.000377. YAN C C. Study on hydrogen explosion dynamics near explosion suppression limit [D]. Dalian: Dalian University of Technology, 2020. DOI: 10.26991/d.cnki.gdllu.2020.000377.
[74]	LI Y C, BI M S, ZHOU Y H, et al. Hydrogen cloud explosion suppression by micron-size water mist [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(55): 23462–23470. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.132.
[75]	张天巍. 含钾盐添加剂细水雾的灭火有效性及机理研究 [D]. 北京: 北京理工大学, 2017. DOI: 10.26948/d.cnki.gbjlu.2017.000014. ZHANG T W. Fire-extinguishing performance and mechanism study on water mist with potassium additives [D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2017. DOI: 10.26948/d.cnki.gbjlu.2017.000014.
[76]	夏远辰, 张彬, 王博乔, 等. 超细水雾对氢气-甲烷预混气体爆燃抑制机理的实验研究 [J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2022, 48(4): 127–134. DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2022.04.015. XIA Y C, ZHANG B, WANG B Q, et al. Experimental research on suppression mechanism of ultrafine water mist on deflagration of hydrogen-methane premixed gas [J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2022, 48(4): 127–134. DOI: 10.16411/j.cnki.issn1006-7736.2022.04.015.
[77]	ATKINSON R, BAULCH D L, COX R A, et al. Evaluated kinetic, photochemical and heterogeneous data for atmospheric chemistry: supplement V. IUPAC subcommittee on gas kinetic data evaluation for atmospheric chemistry [J]. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 1997, 26(3): 521–1011. DOI: 10.1063/1.556011.
[78]	WILLIAMS B A, L’ESPÉRANCE D M, FLEMING J W. Intermediate species profiles in low-pressure methane/oxygen flames inhibited by 2-H heptafluoropropane: comparison of experimental data with kinetic modeling [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2000, 120(1/2): 160–172. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-2180(99)00081-4.
[79]	XU W, JIANG Y, QIU R, et al. Influence of halon replacements on laminar flame speeds and extinction limits of hydrocarbon flames [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2017, 182: 1–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.03.029.
[80]	KATTA V R, TAKAHASHI F, LINTERIS G T. Fire-suppression characteristics of CF₃H in a cup burner [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2006, 144(4): 645–661. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.09.006.
[81]	ZHANG X, YANG Z, HUANG X, et al. Combustion enhancement and inhibition of hydrogen-doped methane flame by HFC-227ea [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(41): 21704–21714. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.250.
[82]	PAGLIARO J L, LINTERIS G T, SUNDERLAND P B, et al. Combustion inhibition and enhancement of premixed methane–air flames by halon replacements [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2015, 162(1): 41–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.07.006.
[83]	左前明, 程卫民, 邹冠贵, 等. 协同增效原理在煤尘抑爆剂中的应用实验 [J]. 重庆大学学报, 2012, 35(1): 105–109,116. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1000-582X.2012.01.020. ZUO Q M, CHENG W M, ZOU G G, et al. Applied experiments on coal dust inhibitor based on the theory of synergistic effect [J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2012, 35(1): 105–109,116. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1000-582X.2012.01.020.
[84]	LI Y C, BI M S, YAN C C, et al. Inerting effect of carbon dioxide on confined hydrogen explosion [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44(40): 22620–22631. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.04.181.
[85]	LI J, HUANG H Y, KOBAYASHI N, et al. Numerical study on laminar burning velocity and ignition delay time of ammonia flame with hydrogen addition [J]. Energy, 2017, 126: 796–809. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.085.
[86]	AZATYAN V V, SAIKOVA G R, BALAYAN G V, et al. Dependence of the flammability of hydrogen-air mixtures on the chemical and physical properties of admixtures [J]. Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 2015, 89(3): 369–371. DOI: 10.1134/S0036024415030048.
[87]	王志荣. 受限空间气体爆炸传播及其动力学过程研究 [D]. 南京: 南京工业大学, 2005. WANG Z R. Study on the dynamics of gas explosion process in confined space [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Tech University, 2005.
[88]	CAO X Y, WANG Z R, LU Y W, et al. Numerical simulation of methane explosion suppression by ultrafine water mist in a confined space [J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021, 109: 103777. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2020.103777.
[89]	DOUNIA O, VERMOREL O, POINSOT T. Theoretical analysis and simulation of methane/air flame inhibition by sodium bicarbonate particles [J]. Combustion and Flame, 2018, 193: 313–326. DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.03.033.