• ISSN 1001-1455  CN 51-1148/O3
  • EI、Scopus、CA、JST、EBSCO、DOAJ收录
  • 力学类中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊、CSCD统计源期刊

杆状弹丸头形对其超高速撞击薄板的影响分析

文肯 柯发伟 邹胜宇 李毅

文肯, 柯发伟, 邹胜宇, 李毅. 杆状弹丸头形对其超高速撞击薄板的影响分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0248
引用本文: 文肯, 柯发伟, 邹胜宇, 李毅. 杆状弹丸头形对其超高速撞击薄板的影响分析[J]. 爆炸与冲击. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0248
WEN Ken, KE Fawei, ZOU Shengyu, LI Yi. Head-shape effects on the hypervelocity impact between a rod onto a thin plate[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0248
Citation: WEN Ken, KE Fawei, ZOU Shengyu, LI Yi. Head-shape effects on the hypervelocity impact between a rod onto a thin plate[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0248

杆状弹丸头形对其超高速撞击薄板的影响分析

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0248
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金(12202481)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    文 肯(1994- ),男,博士,工程师,wenkensc@163.com

  • 中图分类号: O383

Head-shape effects on the hypervelocity impact between a rod onto a thin plate

  • 摘要: 为研究杆状弹丸头形对其超高速撞击薄板的影响,采用SPH(smoothed particle hydrodynamics)方法,开展了平头、半球头、锥头等典型头形杆状弹丸超高速撞击薄板的数值仿真。结果表明,大钝角锥头及平头与薄板撞击产生的冲击波最强、弹体破碎最为剧烈、弹体质量和轴向动能损失最大,小钝角锥头、尖锥头及半球头次之。对弹头与薄板撞击产生冲击波的过程进行了建模分析,结果表明,存在弹头临界半锥角(与撞击速度、弹靶材料相关),使弹体破碎最为剧烈。研究结果可为非球形空间碎片防护设计等超高速碰撞问题提供参考。
  • 图  1  超高速撞击碎片云的试验和仿真结果对比

    Figure  1.  Comparison of test and simulation results for hypervelocity impact debris cloud

    图  2  不同头形杆状弹丸示意图

    Figure  2.  Schematic of rod projectiles with different heads

    图  3  杆状弹丸超高速撞击薄板的典型碰撞过程示意

    Figure  3.  Schematic of typical collision process for hypervelocity impact

    图  4  撞击速度为3.3 km/s、弹丸长径比为2∶1时的冲击波传播和材料失效(碎片云)仿真结果

    Figure  4.  Simulation results of shock wave propagation, material failure (debris clouds) within projectiles of different heads when v0 = 3.3 km/s, LD = 2∶1

    图  5  弹丸的轴向动能损失统计

    Figure  5.  Statistical result of projectile mass loss

    图  6  弹丸的质量损失统计

    Figure  6.  Statistical result of projectile axial kinetic energy loss

    图  7  锥形弹丸超高速撞击薄板的波系分析示意图

    Figure  7.  Schematic coordinate system for wave sysem analysis of hypervelocity impact of obtuse head on thin plate

    表  1  2A12铝和 Al-6061铝的材料参数

    Table  1.   Material parameters for 2A12 Al and Al-6061 Al

    材料 密度/(g·cm−3) 参考温度/K 比热/(J·kg−1∙K−1) Grüneisen 系数 C1 /(m·s−1) S1 S2 剪切模量/GPa
    2A12铝 2.784 300 850 2 5370 1.29 0 28.6
    Al-6061铝 2.703 300 885 1.97 5240 1.4 0 27.6
    材料 初始屈服强度/MPa 最大屈服应力/MPa 硬化系数 硬化指数 dG/dP (dG/dT) /(MPa·K−1) dY/dP 熔化温度/K
    2A12铝 325 760 310 0.185 1.865 −17.62 0.017 1220
    Al-6061铝 290 680 125 0.1 1.8 −17.00 0.01891 1220
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  超高速撞击地面试验参数

    Table  2.   the set-up of the hypervelocity impact tests

    编号 弹丸材料 弹丸形状 弹丸尺寸 弹丸质量/g 撞击速度/(km·s−1) 弹丸攻角/(°) 薄板材料 薄板厚度/mm
    T01 2A12铝 D=8.00 mm 0.7478 3.29 Al-6061铝 1.00
    T02 2A12铝 圆柱
    (L/D=3/2)
    D=6.11 mm,
    L=9.16 mm
    0.7490 3.27 −3.5° Al-6061铝 1.00
    T03 2A12铝 圆柱
    (L/D=1/4)
    D=11.18 mm,
    L=2.78 mm
    0.7332 3.34 −1.5° Al-6061铝 1.00
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  不同长径比柱形弹丸超高速撞击数值仿真工况设置

    Table  3.   Numerical simulation case settings for rod projectiles with different aspect ratios

    编号 弹丸尺寸 弹头形状 半锥角/(°) 速度/(km·s−1) 编号 弹丸尺寸 弹头形状 半锥角/(°) 速度/(km·s−1)
    S111 D=5.55 mm,
    L=11.09 mm
    平头 3.30 S211 D=4.85 mm,
    L=14.54 mm
    平头 3.30
    S112 半球 3.30 S212 半球 3.30
    S113 钝锥1 70.22 3.30 S213 钝锥1 67.55 3.30
    S114 钝锥2 54.27 3.30 S214 钝锥2 50.43 3.30
    S115 尖锥1 42.82 3.30 S215 尖锥1 38.89 3.30
    S116 尖锥2 29.07 3.30 S216 尖锥2 25.83 3.30
    S121 平头 6.00 S221 平头 6.00
    S122 半球 6.00 S222 半球 6.00
    S123 钝锥1 70.22 6.00 S223 钝锥1 67.55 6.00
    S124 钝锥2 54.27 6.00 S224 钝锥2 50.43 6.00
    S125 尖锥1 42.82 6.00 S225 尖锥1 38.89 6.00
    S126 尖锥2 29.07 6.00 S226 尖锥2 25.83 6.00
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  不同头形杆状弹丸撞击薄板的质量损失和轴向动能损失

    Table  4.   Mass loss and axial kinetic energy loss for rods with different heads impacting onto thin plate

    编号 m/g E/kJ mloss Eloss 编号 m/g E/kJ mloss Eloss
    S111 0.677 3.25 9.56% 20.26% S211 0.674 3.39 9.46% 16.37%
    S112 0.696 3.37 −1.75% 9.52% S212 0.710 3.53 −1.12% 7.67%
    S113 0.682 3.23 3.08% 15.70% S213 0.682 3.39 3.96% 12.32%
    S114 0.632 3.04 4.00% 15.20% S214 0.635 3.21 6.02% 12.75%
    S115 0.570 2.80 7.09% 16.18% S215 0.624 3.19 2.70% 8.65%
    S116 0.517 2.57 1.22% 9.82% S216 0.562 2.92 1.92% 6.41%
    S121 0.312 5.30 58.32% 60.66% S221 0.497 8.70 33.24% 35.08%
    S122 0.561 9.21 18.14% 25.34% S222 0.658 1.11 6.29% 12.18%
    S123 0.280 4.79 60.21% 62.18% S223 0.435 7.61 38.74% 40.46%
    S124 0.494 8.07 24.97% 31.90% S224 0.587 9.91 13.12% 18.51%
    S125 0.467 7.72 23.88% 30.09% S225 0.557 9.52 13.15% 17.53%
    S126 0.372 6.28 28.92% 33.34% S226 0.502 8.63 12.39% 16.33%
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 龚自正, 高珂佳, 宋光明, 等. 超高速碰撞研究在航天领域的应用现状与展望 [J]. 现代应用物理, 2018, 9(4): 040101. DOI: 10.12061/j.issn.2095-6223.2018.040101.

    GONG Z Z, GAO K J, SONG G M, et al. Research progress and prospect of hypervelocity impact and its space application [J]. Modern Applied Physics, 2018, 9(4): 040101. DOI: 10.12061/j.issn.2095-6223.2018.040101.
    [2] 龚自正, 赵秋艳, 李明, 等. 空间碎片防护研究前沿问题与展望 [J]. 空间碎片研究, 2019, 19(3): 2–13.

    GONG Z Z, ZHAO Q Y, LI M, et al. The frontier problem and prospect of space debris protection research [J]. Space Debris Research, 2019, 19(3): 2–13.
    [3] LIOU J C, OPIELA J, COWARDIN H, et al. Successful hypervelocity impacts of DebrisLV and DebriSat [J]. Orbital Debris Quarterly News, 2014, 18(3): 3–5.
    [4] WHIPPLE F L. Meteorites and space travel [J]. Astronomical Journal, 1947, 52: 132–137. DOI: 10.1086/106009.
    [5] PIEKUTOWSKI A J. Debris clouds produced by the hypervelocity impact of nonspherical projectiles [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2001, 26(1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10): 613-624. DOI: 10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00122-1.
    [6] ZHANG P L, XU K B, LI M, et al. Study of the shielding performance of a Whipple shield enhanced by Ti-Al-nylon impedance-graded materials [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 124: 23–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.08.005.
    [7] 郝伟江, 龙仁荣, 张庆明, 等. 球形弹丸超高速撞击靶板时背表面材料破碎的数值模拟分析 [J]. 高压物理学报, 2019, 33(2): 024102. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180651.

    HAO W J, LONG R R, ZHANG Q M, et al. Numerical simulation analysis of back fragmentation of sphere by hypervelocity impact [J]. Chinese Journal of High Pressure Physics, 2019, 33(2): 024102. DOI: 10.11858/gywlxb.20180651.
    [8] GRADY D E, KIPP M E. Experimental measurement of dynamic failure and fragmentation properties of metals [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1995, 32(17/18): 2779–2791. DOI: 10.1016/0020-7683(94)00297-A.
    [9] WEN K, CHEN X W, DI D N. Modeling on the shock wave in spheres hypervelocity impact on flat plates [J]. Defence Technology, 2019, 15(4): 457–466. DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2019.01.006.
    [10] WEN K, CHEN X W. Analysis of the stress wave and rarefaction wave produced by hypervelocity impact of sphere onto thin plate [J]. Defence Technology, 2020, 16(5): 969–979. DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2019.11.017.
    [11] MILLER J, DAVIS B, JUDD T, et al. The development of experimental hypervelocity impact capabilities with non-spherical projectiles [J]. Orbital Debris Quarterly News, 2020, 24(3): 4–7.
    [12] MILLER J. Implication of debris fragment shape on shield protection capability [J]. Orbital Debris Quarterly News, 2018, 22(4): 2–4.
    [13] MILLER J, DAVIS B, MCCANDLESS R, et al. Experimental hypervelocity impacts of non-spherical projectiles on Whipple shields [J]. Orbital Debris Quarterly News, 2021, 25(4): 2–5.
    [14] 宋光明, 武强, 李明, 等. 超高速撞击下空间碎片形状效应研究进展 [J]. 装备环境工程, 2020, 17(3): 45–52. DOI: 10.7643/issn.1672-9242.2020.03.008.

    SONG G M, WU Q, LI M, et al. Research progress in shape effect of space debris under hypervelocity impact [J]. Equipment Environmental Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 45–52. DOI: 10.7643/issn.1672-9242.2020.03.008.
    [15] 陈小伟. 穿甲/侵彻问题的若干工程研究进展 [J]. 力学进展, 2009, 39(3): 316–351. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0992.2009.03.006.

    CHEN X W. Advances in the penetration/perforation of rigid projectiles [J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2009, 39(3): 316–351. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0992.2009.03.006.
    [16] 焦文俊, 陈小伟. 长杆高速侵彻问题研究进展 [J]. 力学进展, 2019, 49(1): 201904. DOI: 10.6052/1000-0992-17-021.

    JIAO W J, CHEN X W. Review on long-rod penetration at hypervelocity [J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2019, 49(1): 201904. DOI: 10.6052/1000-0992-17-021.
    [17] 马文来, 张伟, 庞宝君, 等. 超高速撞击弹丸形状效应数值模拟研究 [J]. 宇航学报, 2006, 27(6): 1174–1177,1232. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1328.2006.06.010.

    MA W L, ZHANG W, PANG B J, et al. Numerical simulation investigation into projectile shape effects in hypervelocity impacts [J]. Journal of Astronautics, 2006, 27(6): 1174–1177,1232. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1328.2006.06.010.
    [18] 徐坤博, 龚自正, 侯明强, 等. 超高速撞击中的弹丸形状效应数值模拟研究 [J]. 航天器环境工程, 2010, 27(5): 570–575. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1379.2010.05.005.

    XU K B, GONG Z Z, HOU M Q, et al. A numerical simulation of projectile shape effects on hypervelocity impacts [J]. Spacecraft Environment Engineering, 2010, 27(5): 570–575. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1379.2010.05.005.
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  376
  • HTML全文浏览量:  54
  • PDF下载量:  80
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-08-04
  • 修回日期:  2025-10-11
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-10-16

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回