High-pressure sound velocity of PbF2: a high-impedance standard window material
-
摘要: 为了给动高压声速精准测量寻求理想的高阻抗窗口材料,在64~198 GPa压力范围内,结合动高压实验和量子分子动力学模拟,系统研究了氟化铅(PbF2)单晶的Hugniot状态方程、声速,理论模拟结果与实验测试数据高度吻合。研究发现,PbF2在冲击压力约89.6 GPa时转变为液态金属,该金属化特征可实现冲击波阵面对激光信号的有效反射,依托高精度激光测速装置,可精准捕获冲击波传播速度和稀疏波追及冲击波的时间特征参数,为极端高压下各类材料的精准声测试提供了关键技术支撑。高压下PbF2兼具高阻抗、高压相结构稳定性、压力诱导金属化等多重优异特性,满足高阻抗标准窗口的核心要求。Abstract: Accurate sound velocity measurement under high pressure requires high-impedance window materials. However, no ideal candidates have been reported to date. In this study, the Hugoniot data and sound velocity of single-crystal lead fluoride (PbF2) in the pressure range from 64 GPa to 198 GPa were investigated by applying shock compression techniques and quantum molecular dynamics simulations. The theoretical simulation results of Hugoniot data and sound velocities are in excellent agreement with the experimental data. Along the Hugoniot curve, the sound velocities of liquid FbF2 increase linear with particle velocity. The signal from a displacement interferometer system for any reflector (DISAR) and simulation results confirm that PbF2 transforms into a liquid metal at 89.6 GPa, which enables efficient laser reflection at the shock front. Using a DISAR, both the shock wave velocity and the catch-up time of rarefaction waves can be accurately measured, providing critical technical support for the precise determination of sound velocity in materials under extremely high pressure. These superior properties, including high impedance, structural stability under high pressure, and pressure-induced metallization, enable PbF2 fully meet the core requirements for high-impedance standard windows.
-
Key words:
- PbF2 /
- Hugoniot equation of state /
- high impedance /
- window material /
- sound velocity /
- phase transition
-
表 1 飞片材料的Hugoniot参数
Table 1. Hugoniot parameters for flyer materials
表 2 冲击加载下PbF2的实验结果
Table 2. Experimental data of PbF2 under shock compression
实验编号 飞片材料 W/(km·s−1) Ds/(km·s−1) up/(km·s−1) pH/GPa ρ/(g·cm−3) cs/(km·s−1) T/kK 0527 Ta 3.612(18) 5.684(22) 2.353(15) 103.5(8) 13.21(7) 5.61(7) 4.65(30) 0531 Ta 4.088(20) 6.085(25) 2.644(17) 124.5(10) 13.69(8) 5.95(8) 5.61(40) 0605 Ta 3.278(16) 5.385(20) 2.150(13) 89.6(6) 12.88(6) 5.37(6) 3.67(11) 0627 Ta 4.620(23) 6.570(22) 2.963(15) 150.6(9) 14.10(7) 6.28(8) 6.29(46) 0628 Ta 4.937(25) 6.855(32) 3.152(21) 167.2(14) 14.33(10) 6.53(11) 7.73(29) 0701 Ta 5.402(27) 7.218(35) 3.436(23) 191.9(16) 14.77(11) 6.78(11) 9.00(77) 0702 Cu 3.336(17) 5.081(19) 1.931(13) 75.9(6) 12.48(6) 5.05(5) 3.10(6) 0704 Ta 5.506(28) 7.315(35) 3.497(23) 198.0(16) 14.83(11) 6.82(15) 9.22(52) 0710 Cu 2.971(15) 4.781(16) 1.733(11) 64.1(5) 12.14(5) 4.88(5) 2.63(4) 0715 Cu 4.247(21) 5.775(23) 2.426(15) 108.4(8) 13.34(7) 5.62(6) 4.77(36) 注:W为飞片速度 -
[1] BROWN J M, MCQUEEN R G. Phase transitions, Grüneisen parameter, and elasticity for shocked iron between 77 GPa and 400 GPa [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1986, 91(B7): 7485–7494. DOI: 10.1029/JB091iB07p07485. [2] HU J B, ZHOU X M, TAN H, et al. Successive phase transitions of tin under shock compression [J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2008, 92(11): 111905. DOI: 10.1063/1.2898891. [3] BEASON M T, JENSEN B J, CROCKETT S D. Shock melting and the hcp-bcc phase boundary of Mg under dynamic loading [J]. Physical Review B, 2021, 104(14): 144106. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.144106. [4] HAWRELIAK J A, WINEY J M, TOYODA Y, et al. Shock-induced melting of [100] lithium fluoride: Sound speed and Hugoniot measurements to 230 GPa [J]. Physical Review B, 2023, 107(1): 014104. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.107.014104. [5] NGUYEN J H, HOLMES N C. Melting of iron at the physical conditions of the Earth's core [J]. Nature, 2004, 427(6972): 339–342. DOI: 10.1038/nature02248. [6] BROWN J M, SHANER J W. Rarefaction velocities in shocked tantalum and the high pressure melting point [C]// ASAY J R, GRAHAM R A, STRAUB G K. Shock Waves in Condensed Matter 1983. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984: 91–94. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-86904-3.50022-1. [7] MCCOY C A, KNUDSON M D, DESJARLAIS M P. Sound velocity, shear modulus, and shock melting of beryllium along the Hugoniot [J]. Physical Review B, 2019, 100(5): 054107. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.054107. [8] SONG P, CAI L C, TAO T J, et al. Melting along the Hugoniot and solid phase transition for Sn via sound velocity measurements [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2016, 120(19): 195101. DOI: 10.1063/1.4967515. [9] MCCOY C A, KNUDSON M D, ROOT S. Absolute measurement of the Hugoniot and sound velocity of liquid copper at multimegabar pressures [J]. Physical Review B, 2017, 96(17): 174109. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.174109. [10] OCAMPO I K, WINEY J M, DUFFY T S. Sound velocity and Grüneisen parameter in shock-melted silica at deep earth pressures [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2025, 130(9): e2025JB031366. DOI: 10.1029/2025JB031366. [11] HUANG S X, WU X, QIN S. Ultrahigh-pressure phase transitions in FeS2 and FeO2: Implications for super-Earths' deep interior [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2018, 123(1): 277–284. DOI: 10.1002/2017JB014766. [12] HUANG H J, FAN L L, LIU X, et al. Inner core composition paradox revealed by sound velocities of Fe and Fe-Si alloy [J]. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 616. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28255-2. [13] HUANG H J, FEI Y W, CAI L C, et al. Evidence for an oxygen-depleted liquid outer core of the Earth [J]. Nature, 2011, 479(7374): 513–516. DOI: 10.1038/nature10621. [14] HIROSE K, LABROSSE S, HERNLUND J. Composition and state of the core [J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2013, 41: 657–691. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-earth-050212-124007. [15] ZHANG Y J, WANG Y, HUANG Y Q, et al. Collective motion in HCP-Fe at Earth’s inner core conditions [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023, 120(41): e2309952120. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2309952120. [16] HAWRELIAK J A, WINEY J M, TOYODA Y, et al. Sound speed determination in copper shock compressed to 190 GPa [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2024, 136(16): 165902. DOI: 10.1063/5.0220264. [17] DUFFY T S, AHRENS T J. Compressional sound velocity, equation of state, and constitutive response of shock-compressed magnesium oxide [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1995, 100(B1): 529–542. DOI: 10.1029/94JB02065. [18] YOUNG G, LIU X, LENG C W, et al. Refractive index of [100] lithium fluoride under shock pressures up to 151 GPa [J]. AIP Advances, 2018, 8(12): 125310. DOI: 10.1063/1.5065543. [19] ZHOU X M, NELLIS W J, LI J B, et al. Optical emission, shock-induced opacity, temperatures, and melting of Gd3Ga5O12 single crystals shock-compressed from 41 to 290 GPa [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2015, 118(5): 055903. DOI: 10.1063/1.4928081. [20] MASHIMO T, CHAU R, ZHANG Y, et al. Transition to a virtually incompressible oxide phase at a shock pressure of 120 GPa (1.2 Mbar): Gd3Ga5O12 [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2006, 96(10): 105504. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 96.105504. [21] CAO X X, WANG Y, LI X H, et al. Refractive index and phase transformation of sapphire under shock pressures up to 210 GPa [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2017, 121(11): 115903. DOI: 10.1063/1.4978746. [22] LI J, ZHOU X M, ZHU W J, et al. A shock-induced phase transformation in a LiTaO3 crystal [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2007, 102(8): 083503. DOI: 10.1063/1.2794721. [23] FURNISH M D, ELERT M. Shock Compression of Condensed Matter-2005: proceedings of the conference of the American Physical Society topical group on shock compression of condensed matter[C]. Melville: American Institute of Physics, 2006. [24] CAO X X, YU Y H, HE H Z, et al. Optical properties of transparent ceramics under shock compression: correlation mechanism and design strategies [J]. Matter and Radiation at Extremes, 2025, 10(6): 063601. DOI: 10.1063/5.0259332. [25] LIU X, GAO C, MASHIMO T, et al. Shock-induced polymorphic transitions of PbF2 up to 1 TPa and their implications for the universal behavior of shocked AX2 compounds [J]. Physical Review B, 2021, 103(9): 094106. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.094106. [26] ERSKINE D. High pressure Hugoniot of sapphire [J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1994, 309(1): 141–143. DOI: 10.1063/1.46499. [27] MARSH S P. LASL shock Hugoniot data [M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980: 1–658. [28] ZHOU X M, LIU X, LI J B, et al. Shock-induced decomposition of a high density glass (ZF6) [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2011, 110(1): 013507. DOI: 10.1063/1.3601115. [29] HU X J, YANG G, ZHAO B, et al. Shock compression behavior of a mixture of cubic and hexagonal boron nitride [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2018, 123(17): 175903. DOI: 10.1063/1.5023490. [30] WENG J D, TAN H, WANG X, et al. Optical-fiber interferometer for velocity measurements with picosecond resolution [J]. Applied Physics Letters, 2006, 89(11): 111101. DOI: 10.1063/1.2335948. [31] AKIN M C, NGUYEN J H, BECKWITH M A, et al. Tantalum sound velocity under shock compression [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2019, 125(14): 145903. DOI: 10.1063/1.5054332. [32] XI F, JIN K, CAI L C, et al. Sound velocity of tantalum under shock compression in the 18-142 GPa range [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2015, 117(18): 185901. DOI: 10.1063/1.4919845. [33] HU J B, DAI C D, YU Y Y, et al. Sound velocity measurements of tantalum under shock compression in the 10-110 GPa range [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2012, 111(3): 033511. DOI: 10.1063/1.3681815. [34] 俞宇颖, 谭华, 胡建波, 等. 钽和LY12铝的高压声速测量 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2006, 26(6): 486–491. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)06-0486-06.YU Y Y, TAN H, HU J B, et al. Measurements of sound velocities in shock-compressed tantalum and LY12 Al [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2006, 26(6): 486–491. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2006)06-0486-06. [35] RIGG P A, SCHARFF R J, HIXSON R S. Sound speed measurements in tantalum using the front surface impact technique [J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2014, 500(3): 032018. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/500/3/032018. [36] MITCHELL A C, NELLIS W J. Shock compression of aluminum, copper, and tantalum [J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1981, 52(5): 3363–3374. DOI: 10.1063/1.329160. [37] PERDEW J P, BURKE K, ERNZERHOF M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple [J]. Physical Review Letters, 1996, 77(18): 3865–3868. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [38] RAPPE A M, RABE K M, KAXIRAS E, et al. Optimized pseudopotentials [J]. Physical Review B, 1990, 41(2): 1227–1230. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.1227. [39] MEYERS M A. Dynamic behavior of materials [M]. New York: Wiley, 1994: 1–668. [40] JAMIESON J C, MANGHNANI M H, MATSUI T, et al. Variation of elastic constants of cubic PbF2 with volume [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1986, 91(B5): 4643–4649. DOI: 10.1029/JB091iB05p04643. [41] ASIMOW P D, AHRENS T J. Shock compression of liquid silicates to 125 GPa: the anorthite-diopside join [J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2010, 115(B10): B10209. DOI: 10.1029/2009JB007145. [42] RENGANATHAN P, DUFFY T S, GUPTA Y M. Sound velocities in shock-compressed soda lime glass: melting and liquid-state response [J]. Physical Review B, 2021, 104(1): 014113. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.014113. [43] DE KOKER N P, STIXRUDE L, KARKI B B. Thermodynamics, structure, dynamics, and freezing of Mg2SiO4 liquid at high pressure [J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2008, 72(5): 1427–1441. DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2007.12.019. [44] KNUDSON M D, DESJARLAIS M P. Shock compression of quartz to 1.6 TPa: redefining a pressure standard [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2009, 103(22): 225501. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.225501. [45] KNUDSON M D, DESJARLAIS M P. Adiabatic release measurements in α-quartz between 300 and 1200 GPa: characterization of α-quartz as a shock standard in the multimegabar regime [J]. Physical Review B, 2013, 88(18): 184107. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.184107. [46] BONESS D A, BROWN J M, MCMAHAN A K. The electronic thermodynamics of iron under Earth core conditions [J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1986, 42(4): 227–240. DOI: 10.1016/0031-9201(86)90025-7. -


下载: