Study on dynamic mechanical properties of high-temperature concrete with different cooling methods

WU Xuting; WANG Zhen; ZHOU Hang; ZHANG Guokai; LI Shuobiao

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2024-0097

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2024 >

WU Xuting, WANG Zhen, ZHOU Hang, ZHANG Guokai, LI Shuobiao. Study on dynamic mechanical properties of high-temperature concrete with different cooling methods[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0097

Citation:

WU Xuting, WANG Zhen, ZHOU Hang, ZHANG Guokai, LI Shuobiao. Study on dynamic mechanical properties of high-temperature concrete with different cooling methods[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0097

Citation:

PDF( 10473 KB)

Study on dynamic mechanical properties of high-temperature concrete with different cooling methods

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0097

School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2024-04-09
Rev Recd Date: 2024-06-15

Available Online: 2024-06-17

Abstract

Abstract

Concrete materials are widely used in the construction of infrastructure and defense facilities. In order to study the dynamic mechanical properties of high-temperature concrete with different cooling methods, the dynamic mechanical properties of C30 cylindrical concrete samples at different temperatures with different cooling methods were tested by $\varnothing $74 mm split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB), and their mechanical properties under the combined influence of heat, water and force were obtained, while the effects of cooling methods, temperature and loading velocity on the average strain rate were studied, with the focus on the analysis of the dynamic stress-strain curve of high-temperature concrete with different cooling methods, as well as the effects of cooling methods, temperature and loading velocity on its crushing morphology, dynamic compressive strength, elastic modulus, peak strain and a range of dynamic effects. The main findings are as following. In the static mechanical tests, the peak points of the concrete stress-strain curve are shifted down and to the right with the two cooling methods. The average strain rate of concrete specimens is more obviously affected by temperature during water-cooling, and the loading velocity is approximately varying linearly with the average strain rate under different cooling methods. When the temperature reaches 400 °C or above, the color of the sample changes significantly, and cracking, at the same temperature, the water-cooled sample is darker than the air-cooled color, more fine cracks appear, and the aggregate morphological damage is more serious. The dynamic stress-strain curves of concrete under different temperatures and cooling methods maintain their basic shape, and the dynamic compressive strength of concrete with different cooling methods is proportional to the loading velocity and inversely proportional to the heating temperature. The damage coefficient of elastic modulus of concrete under various loading velocity and temperatures when cooled by water is lower than that under air cooling. The peak strain of high-temperature concrete is directly proportional to the heating temperature and inversely proportional to the loading velocity, and the peak strain under water cooling is higher than that under air cooling. The dynamic increase factor (DIF) of concrete is proportional to temperature and loading velocity, and the higher the temperature, the more obvious the strain rate effect of concrete. When the temperature is 200 °C, the energy consumption coefficient of concrete rebounds.
- cooling method,
- impact,
- high-temperature concrete,
- split Hopkinson pressure bar,
- dynamic mechanical properties,
- patterns of destruction

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	江见鲸, 冯乃谦. 混凝土力学 [M]: 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 1991. JIANG J J, FENG N Q. Concrete mechanics [M]: Beijing: China Railway Press, 1991.
[2]	JIN L, YU W X, DU X L, et al. Meso-scale modelling of the size effect on dynamic compressive failure of concrete under different strain rates [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 125: 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.10.011.
[3]	李圣童, 汪维, 梁仕发, 等. 长持时爆炸冲击波荷载作用下梁板组合结构的动力响应 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(7): 075103. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0495. LI S T, WANG W, LIANG S F, et al. Dynamic response of beam-plate composite structure under blast shock wave load during long-term holding [J]. Explsion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(7): 075103. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0495.
[4]	余志武, 丁发兴, 罗建平. 高温后不同类型混凝土力学性能试验研究 [J]. 安全与环境学报, 2005, 5(5): 1–6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2005.05.001. YU Z W, DING F X, LUO J P. Experimental research on mechanical properties of different type of concrete after high temperature [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2005, 5(5): 1–6. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6094.2005.05.001.
[5]	王孔藩, 许清风, 刘挺林. 高温下及高温冷却后混凝土力学性能的试验研究 [J]. 施工技术, 2005, 34(8): 1–3. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8498.2005.08.001. WANG K F, XU Q F, LIU T L. Experimental research on mechanical performance of concrete under high temperature and cooled down from high temperature [J]. Construction Technology, 2005, 34(8): 1–3. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8498.2005.08.001.
[6]	HAGER I, TRACZ T, NSKA M C, et al. Effect of cement type on the mechanical behavior and permeability of concrete subjected to high temperatures [J]. Materials, 2019, 12(18): 3021. DOI: 10.3390/ma12183021.
[7]	吕天启, 赵国藩, 林志伸. 高温后静置混凝土力学性能试验研究 [J]. 建筑结构学报, 2004, 25(1): 63–70. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6869.2004.01.009. LYU T Q, ZHAO G F, LIN Z S. Experimental study on mechanical properties of long standing concrete after exposure to high temperature [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2004, 25(1): 63–70. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6869.2004.01.009.
[8]	郑钰涛, 李玉成, 彭晨鑫. 高温后不同冷却方式对混凝土力学特性的影响 [J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2019, 30(4): 189–194. DOI: 10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2019.04.30. ZHENG Y T, LI Y C, PENG C X. Effect of different cooling methods on mechanical properties of concrete after high temperature [J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2019, 30(4): 189–194. DOI: 10.11705/j.issn.1672-643X.2019.04.30.
[9]	王珍. 高性能混凝土建筑火灾烧损试验研究 [D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2011. DOI: 10.7666/d.y1957672. WANG Z. Experimental study on fire burning damage of high-performance concrete buildings [D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2011. DOI: 10.7666/d.y1957672.
[10]	王宇涛, 刘殿书, 李胜林, 等. 高温后混凝土静动态力学性能试验研究 [J]. 振动与冲击, 2014, 33(20): 16–19, 39. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.20.004. WANG Y T, LIU D S, LI S L, et al. Experimental study on static and dynamic mechanical properties of concrete after high temperature [J]. Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(20): 16–19, 39. DOI: 10.13465/j.cnki.jvs.2014.20.004.
[11]	KOU X, LI L, DU X, et al. Elastoplastic dynamic constitutive model of concrete with combined effects of temperature and strain rate [J]. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 2023, 18. DOI: 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01905.
[12]	WATSTEIN D. Effect of straining rate on the compressive strength and elastic properties of concrete [J]. ACI Journal Proceedings, 1953, 49(4): 729–744. DOI: 10.14359/11850.
[13]	HUO J S, XIAO L P, CHEN B S, et al. Impact behaviour of concrete after exposure to high temperatures [C]//The 4th International Conference on Protection of Structures against Hazards. Beijing, 2009.
[14]	李胜林, 刘殿书, 李祥龙, 等. $\varnothing $ 75 mm分离式霍普金森压杆试件长度效应的试验研究 [J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2010, 39(1): 93–97. LI S L, LIU D S, LI X L, et al. The effect of specimen length in $\varnothing $ 75 mm split Hopkinson pressure bar experiment [J]. Journal of China University of Mining and Technology, 2010, 39(1): 93–97.
[15]	卢芳云, 陈荣, 林玉亮, 等. 霍普金森杆实验技术 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013. LU F Y, CHEN R, LIN Y L, et al. Hopkinson bar experimental technique [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2013.
[16]	尹土兵. 考虑温度效应的岩石动力学行为研究 [D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2012. DOI: 10.7666/d.y2198475. YIN T B. Study on the dynamic behavior of rocks considering temperature effect [D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2012. DOI: 10.7666/d.y2198475.
[17]	LU Y B, LI Q M. Appraisal of pulse-shaping technique in split Hopkinson pressure bar tests for brittle materials [J]. International Journal of Protective Structures, 2010, 1(3): 363–390. DOI: 10.1260/2041-4196.13.363.
[18]	陶俊林. SHPB实验技术若干问题研究 [D]. 绵阳: 中国工程物理研究院, 2005. TAO J L. Research on some problems of SHPB experimental technology [D]. Mianyang: China Academy of Engineering Physics, 2005.
[19]	朋改非, 边松华, 杨学超, 等. 快速冷却引起的热冲击对纤维混凝土高温残余力学性能的影响 [C]//中国硅酸盐学会混凝土与水泥制品分会七届二次理事会议暨学术交流会论文汇编. 2007: 66–72. PENG G F, BIAN S H, YANG X C, et al. Effect of thermal shock caused by rapid cooling on high temperature residual mechanical properties of fiber reinforced concrete [C]//Proceedings of the Second Council Meeting of the Seventh Session of the Concrete and Cement Products Branch of the Chinese Ceramic Society and Academic Exchange Meeting. 2007: 66–72.
[20]	王统辉, 江树辉, 曹学敏, 等. 不同冷却方式、不同静置时下高温混凝土物理性能变化的研究 [J]. 中国住宅设施, 2020(10): 20–22. WANG T H, JIANG S H, CAO X M, et al. Different cooling methods, different standing study on the change of physical properties of high-temperature concrete [J]. China Residential Facilities, 2020(10): 20–22.
[21]	ZHANG B, BICANIC N. Residual fracture toughness of normal-and high-strength gravel concrete after heating to 600 ℃ [J]. ACI Materials Journal, 2002(3): 217–226. DOI: 10.14359/11966.
[22]	李龙钰, 马芹永, 袁璞, 等. 不同冷却方式下蒸压轻质混凝土高温劣化损伤试验研究 [J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(8): 3254–3260. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.08.036. LI L Y, MA Q Y, YUAN P, et al. Experimental study on high temperature deterioration damage of autoclaved lightweight concrete under different cooling methods [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(8): 3254–3260. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2022.08.036.