• ISSN 1001-1455  CN 51-1148/O3
  • EI、Scopus、CA、JST、EBSCO、DOAJ收录
  • 力学类中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊、CSCD统计源期刊
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
GUO Kailing, LIAO Yong, ZHU Zhikui, LIU Dong, ZHU Ling. Experimental study on dynamic responses of aluminum honeycomb sandwich plates subjected to water impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0274
Citation: GUO Kailing, LIAO Yong, ZHU Zhikui, LIU Dong, ZHU Ling. Experimental study on dynamic responses of aluminum honeycomb sandwich plates subjected to water impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0274

Experimental study on dynamic responses of aluminum honeycomb sandwich plates subjected to water impact

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0274
  • Received Date: 2024-08-02
  • Rev Recd Date: 2024-12-02
  • Available Online: 2024-12-04
  • The pressure characteristics and structural deformation mechanism of aluminum honeycomb sandwich plates (AHSPs) under water-entry impact were investigated through experimental methods. A self-designed drop experimental platform in the water tank was established, and the water-entry impact experiments of AHSPs at different drop heights were carried out. Meanwhile, the deformation of the face sheets was measured by a 3D scanner, and the time history of water impact pressure at different measuring points was monitored. Furthermore, the repeatability of the experiment was verified. On this basis, the water impact load characteristics of AHSPs during the process of water entry were studied and compared with those of other structures in published papers. In addition, the deformation modes and permanent deflection characteristics of AHSPs were analyzed, and the fitting formulas of the permanent deflection of the face sheets and the compression of the core were proposed. Results show that the distribution of the water impact pressure on the front sheet of AHSPs is uneven. However, within the range of drop heights studied, the peak value of the water impact pressure is approximately linear with the drop height. Additionally, compared to the water entry of rigid plates, the peak value of the water impact pressure of AHSPs is smaller. Compared with the mass equivalent aluminum plates, the peak value of the water impact pressure of AHSPs is much smaller, while the pressure duration of AHSPs is longer. The deformation modes of the face sheets of AHSPs at different drop heights are almost the same. Besides, with the increase of the drop height, the permanent deflections of the front and back faces of AHSPs increase approximately in the form of a quadratic parabola with decreasing slope. Suffering from water entry impact loadings, the permanent deflections of the back sheet of AHSPs are smaller than those of the equivalent aluminum plates, indicating that the AHSPs have better impact resistance compared with the equivalent aluminum plates.
  • loading
  • [1]
    王永虎, 石秀华. 入水冲击问题研究的现状与进展 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2008, 28(3): 276–282. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)03-0276-07.

    WANG Y H, SHI X H. Review on research and development of water-entry impact problem [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2008, 28(3): 276–282. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2008)03-0276-07.
    [2]
    张伟, 郭子涛, 肖新科, 等. 弹体高速入水特性实验研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2011, 31(6): 579–584. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)06-0579-06.

    ZHANG W, GUO Z T, XIAO X K, et al. Experimental investigations on behaviors of projectile high-speed water entry [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2011, 31(6): 579–584. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)06-0579-06.
    [3]
    潘光, 杨悝. 空投鱼雷入水载荷 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2014, 34(5): 521–526. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)05-0521-06.

    PAN G, YANG K. Impact force encountered by water-entry airborne torpedo [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2014, 34(5): 521–526. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2014)05-0521-06.
    [4]
    CHUANG S L. Experiments on flat-bottom slamming [J]. Journal of Ship Research, 1966, 10(1): 10–17. DOI: 10.5957/jsr.1966.10.1.10.
    [5]
    CHUANG S L. Investigation of impact of rigid and elastic bodies with water: NSRDC-3284 [R]. Bethesda: Naval Ship Research and Development Center, 1970.
    [6]
    SHIN H, SEO B, CHO S R. Experimental investigation of slamming impact acted on flat bottom bodies and cumulative damage [J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2018, 10(3): 294–306. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2017.06.004.
    [7]
    TALIOUA A, BERKANE B, MARTIN M B, et al. Flat plate pressure impact on a still water surface: the effect of surrounding ambient pressure and plate size [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2022, 263: 111926. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111926.
    [8]
    ZHU L, ZHU Z K, YU T X, et al. An experimental study of the saturated impulse for metal plates under slamming [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2023, 178: 104601. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104601.
    [9]
    VON KARMAN T. The impact on seaplane floats during landing: NACA-TN-321 [R]. Washington: National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, 1929.
    [10]
    WAGNER H. Über stoß- und gleitvorgänge an der oberfläche von flüssigkeiten [J]. Zeitschrift fuer Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 1932, 12(4): 193–215. DOI: 10.1002/zamm.19320120402.
    [11]
    陈小平, 李军伟, 王辉, 等. 大尺度楔形体板架钢模落体试验和仿真研究 [J]. 船舶力学, 2012, 16(10): 1152–1163. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2012.10.007.

    CHEN X P, LI J W, WANG H, et al. Experiments and numerical investigation of water entry of large-scale steel wedge models [J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2012, 16(10): 1152–1163. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2012.10.007.
    [12]
    王明振, 褚林塘, 吴彬, 等. 水陆两栖飞机典型横截面入水撞击实验研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(3): 313–318. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)03-0313-06.

    WANG M Z, CHU L T, WU B, et al. Experimental study on the water impact of a typical cross section for amphibious seaplane [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2016, 36(3): 313–318. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)03-0313-06.
    [13]
    ZHU L, DUAN L L, CHEN M S, et al. Equivalent design pressure for ship plates subjected to moving slamming impact loads [J]. Marine Structures, 2020, 71: 102741. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102741.
    [14]
    DUAN L L, ZHU L, CHEN M S, et al. Experimental study on the propagation characteristics of the slamming pressures [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2020, 217: 107868. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.107868.
    [15]
    PARK I C, SEO B C, LEE S H, et al. A study on slamming impact load characteristics of energy storage system case for ships [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 2023, 11(1): 44. DOI: 10.3390/jmse11010044.
    [16]
    骆寒冰, 刘鑫, 董德龙, 等. 铝制加筋板楔形体入水砰击模型实验研究 [J]. 水动力学研究与进展A辑, 2014, 29(4): 460–468. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn1000-4874.2014.04.011.

    LUO H B, LIU X, DONG D L, et al. Experimental investigation of water impact of one free-drop wedge with stiffened aluminum panels [J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2014, 29(4): 460–468. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn1000-4874.2014.04.011.
    [17]
    CRUPI V, EPASTO G, GUGLIELMINO E. Comparison of aluminium sandwiches for lightweight ship structures: honeycomb vs. foam [J]. Marine Structures, 2013, 30: 74–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2012.11.002.
    [18]
    PALOMBA G, EPASTO G, SUTHERLAND L, et al. Aluminium honeycomb sandwich as a design alternative for lightweight marine structures [J]. Ships and Offshore Structures, 2022, 17(10): 2355–2366. DOI: 10.1080/17445302.2021.1996109.
    [19]
    DAS K, BATRA R C. Local water slamming impact on sandwich composite hulls [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2011, 27(4): 523–551. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2011.02.001.
    [20]
    XIE H, REN H L, QU S, et al. Numerical and experimental study on hydroelasticity in water-entry problem of a composite ship-hull structure [J]. Composite Structures, 2018, 201: 942–957. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.030.
    [21]
    HASSOON O H, TARFAOUI M, EL MOUMEN A, et al. Mechanical performance evaluation of sandwich panels exposed to slamming impacts: comparison between experimental and SPH results [J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 220: 776–783. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.04.051.
    [22]
    赵飞, 程远胜, 刘均, 等. 入水砰击下金字塔点阵夹层板塑性动力响应分析 [J]. 船海工程, 2013, 42(3): 13–16. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1671-7953.2013.03.003.

    ZHAO F, CHENG Y S, LIU J, et al. Dynamic plastic responses of light weight pyramidal sandwich plate structures subjected to water-entry impact [J]. Ship & Ocean Engineering, 2013, 42(3): 13–16. DOI: 10.3963/j.issn.1671-7953.2013.03.003.
    [23]
    HE W T, CUI X F, WANG C Z, et al. Coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) characterization of slamming response and failure mechanism on corrugated sandwich structures [J]. Applied Ocean Research, 2021, 116: 102862. DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2021.102862.
    [24]
    WANG H, CHENG Y S, LIU J, et al. Hydroelastic behaviours of laser-welded lightweight corrugated sandwich panels subjected to water impact: experiments and simulations [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2020, 146: 106452. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.106452.
    [25]
    FALTINSEN O M, KVÅLSVOLD J, AARSNES J V. Wave impact on a horizontal elastic plate [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 1997, 2(2): 87–100. DOI: 10.1007/BF02491523.
    [26]
    OKADA S, SUMI Y. Experimental study on the maximum pressure and the duration time of the horizontal water impact of flat plate [J]. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, 1995, 1995(178): 381–389. DOI: 10.2534/jjasnaoe1968.1995.178_381.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(21)  / Tables(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (269) PDF downloads(57) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return