• ISSN 1001-1455  CN 51-1148/O3
  • EI、Scopus、CA、JST、EBSCO、DOAJ收录
  • 力学类中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊、CSCD统计源期刊
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
GUO Hongze, CHEN Xi, YANG Hengyi. Experimental study of the multi-factor coupling effect of coal dust explosion intensity based on Box-Behnken response surface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0045
Citation: GUO Hongze, CHEN Xi, YANG Hengyi. Experimental study of the multi-factor coupling effect of coal dust explosion intensity based on Box-Behnken response surface[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0045

Experimental study of the multi-factor coupling effect of coal dust explosion intensity based on Box-Behnken response surface

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0045
  • Received Date: 2025-02-18
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-06-06
  • Available Online: 2025-06-10
  • Using the Box-Behnken experimental design method, the influence of multi-factor coupling effects on the intensity of coal dust explosion during the transient explosion reaction process was studied. Forty-five sets of explosion tests were carried out in a 20L spherical explosion test system, examining the macroscopic characteristics of the coal dust explosion intensity under the coupling effects of five factors: coal dust concentration (ρ), coal dust particle size (D), coal volatile matter (w), ignition energy (E), and ignition delay (td). The explosion process was monitored by measuring pressure changes, and the maximum explosion pressure (response value pmax) and the maximum explosion pressure rise rate (response value $ {\dot{p}}_{\max } $) were determined from the pressure-time curve. The Design-Expert software was used to analyze the experimental results to establish a quadratic regression model for response values pmax and $ {\dot{p}}_{\max } $, and the models were verified by four different methods. The results show that in the variance analysis, the coefficient of determination R2 for pmax and $ {\dot{p}}_{\max } $ is 0.9771 and 0.9258, respectively, indicating a good fit between the model and experimental data. The single factors with the greatest influence on the maximum explosion pressure (pmax) are ignition energy (E) and ignition delay(td), while the single factors with the greatest influence on the rise rate of the maximum explosion pressure ($ {\dot{p}}_{\max } $) is coal dust particle size(D) and ignition delay(E). In the quadratic regression model, the significant two-factor interaction affecting pmax are ρD, ρE, ρtd, Dw, wE, wtd, and Etd, wheras the significant two-factor interaction affecting $ {\dot{p}}_{\max } $ are ρtd, Dw, Dtd, wtd, and Etd. Among these, ignition delay (td) plays a decisive role in response values pmax and $ {\dot{p}}_{\max } $.
  • loading
  • [1]
    DING J F, YAN X Q, CHEN L, et al. Effect of airflow velocity in vessel-pipelines on dust explosion during pneumatic conveying [J]. Powder Technology, 2024, 447: 120230. DOI: 10.1016/J.POWTEC.2024.120230.
    [2]
    赵峰宇, 高伟, 聂仲恒, 等. 含磷抑爆剂对煤尘爆炸抑制机理的原位分析 [J]. 清华大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 64(6): 959–964. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.22.016.

    ZHAO F Y, GAO W, NIE Z H, et al. In-situ analysis of the inhibition mechanism of phosphorus-containing inhibitor on coal dust explosion [J]. Journal of Tsinghua University (Science and Technology), 2024, 64(6): 959–964. DOI: 10.16511/j.cnki.qhdxxb.2024.22.016.
    [3]
    高嘉慧, 陈曦, 范超男, 等. 离子液体对煤尘表面润湿性能影响的试验研究 [J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2023, 50(4): 7–12. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2023.04.002.

    GAO J H, CHEN X, FAN C N, et al. Experimental study on the effect of ionic liquid on surface wettability of coal dust [J]. Mining Safety & Environmental Protection, 2023, 50(4): 7–12. DOI: 10.19835/j.issn.1008-4495.2023.04.002.
    [4]
    CHEN X, BAI X, FAN C N, et al. Experimental investigation of atomization characteristics of sonic blasting nozzle based on De-Laval dynamics [J]. Energy, 2024, 297: 131188. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.131188.
    [5]
    张延松, 徐畅, 秦江, 等. 纳米复合抑爆粉体抑制甲烷煤尘混合爆炸动力学机理研究 [J]. 安全与环境学报, 2024, 24(11): 4296–4305. DOI: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2024.0731.

    ZHANG Y S, XU C, QIN J, et al. Study on the dynamic mechanism of nanocomposite explosion suppression powder in mitigating the combined explosion of methane and coal dust [J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2024, 24(11): 4296–4305. DOI: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2024.0731.
    [6]
    国家矿山安全监察局事故调查和统计司. 山东能源集团肥城矿业公司梁宝寺煤矿“8·20”较大煤尘爆炸事故案例 [EB/OL]. (2021-07-27)[2021-07-27]. https://www.chinamine-safety.gov.cn/zfxxgk/fdzdgknr/sgcc/sgalks/202107/t20210727_393063.shtml.
    [7]
    国务院安委会办公室. 国务院安委会办公室关于陕西省榆林市神木市百吉矿业有限责任公司李家沟煤矿“1·12”重大煤尘爆炸等四起煤矿事故的通报 [EB/OL]. (2019-01-29)[2020-12-06]. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2019-10/31/content_5447171.htm.
    [8]
    国家矿山安全监察局事故调查和统计司. 黑龙江龙煤集团双鸭山矿业公司双阳煤矿“11·28”重大瓦斯爆炸事故案例 [EB/OL]. (2025-01-16)[2025-01-16]. http://nmg.chinamine-safety.gov.cn/Item/13386.aspx.
    [9]
    江丙友, 洪汉, 苏明清, 等. 密闭管道内瓦斯爆炸卷扬沉积煤尘爆炸传播特性 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2024, 49(4): 1941–1951. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.1095.

    JIANG B Y, HONG H, SU M Q, et al. Characterization of explosion propagation of coal dust deposited by gas explosion convolutions in closed pipelines [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2024, 49(4): 1941–1951. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.1095.
    [10]
    张江石, 孙龙浩. 分散度对煤粉爆炸特性的影响 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2019, 44(4): 1154–1160. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2018.1499.

    ZHANG J S, SUN L H. Effect of dispersity on explosion characteristics of coal dust [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019, 44(4): 1154–1160. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2018.1499.
    [11]
    刘天奇, 李雨成, 罗红波. 不同变质程度煤尘爆炸压力特性变化规律实验研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(9): 095403. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0265.

    LIU T Q, LI Y C, LUO H B. Experimental study on explosion pressure variation law of coal dust with different degrees of metamorphism [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(9): 095403. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0265.
    [12]
    刘天奇. 不同煤质煤尘云与煤尘层最低着火温度实验研究 [J]. 燃烧科学与技术, 2019, 25(5): 445–450. DOI: 10.11715/rskxjs.R201807010.

    LIU T Q. Experimental study on minimum ignition temperature of coal dust cloud and coal dust layer of different metamorphism [J]. Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, 2019, 25(5): 445–450. DOI: 10.11715/rskxjs.R201807010.
    [13]
    ZHOU Y, LI G, JIN L J, et al. In situ analysis of catalytic effect of calcium nitrate on Shenmu coal pyrolysis with pyrolysis vacuum ultraviolet photoionization mass spectrometry [J]. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(2): 1061–1069. DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b02385.
    [14]
    TAN B, SHAO Z Z, XU B, et al. Analysis of explosion pressure and residual gas characteristics of micro-nano coal dust in confined space [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2020, 64: 104056. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104056.
    [15]
    LIU S S, XU J D, GONG J H, et al. Experimental study of methane explosion containing coal dust in flame instability and pressure variation process [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2023, 178: 675–684. DOI: 10.1016/J.PSEP.2023.08.072.
    [16]
    LIU L, MAO X Y, JING Y H, et al. Study on the explosion mechanism of low-concentration gas and coal dust [J]. Fire, 2024, 7(12): 475. DOI: 10.3390/fire7120475.
    [17]
    YU M G, LI S S, ZHAI F E, et al. Effects of volatile contents on the deflagration characteristics and soot formation of methane/coal volatiles hybrid explosion using reaction kinetics simulation [J]. Fuel, 2022, 319: 123767. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123767.
    [18]
    WANG J C, LI H T, DIAO S T, et al. Reactive behaviors and mechanism of methane/coal dust hybrid explosions inhibited by NH4H2PO4 and (NH4)2HPO4: a combined ReaxFF-MD and DFT study [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024, 498: 155577. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.155577.
    [19]
    LI Z B, ZHAO W C, LI C, et al. The characteristics and mechanism of core-shell structure fly ash/KH2PO4 composite inhibitor in suppressing coal dust explosions [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2025, 94: 105533. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105533.
    [20]
    KHURI A I, MUKHOPADHYAY S. Response surface methodology [J]. WIREs Computational Statistics, 2010, 2(2): 128–149. DOI: 10.1002/wics.73.
    [21]
    FERREIRA S L C, BRUNS R E, FERREIRA H S, et al. Box-Behnken design: an alternative for the optimization of analytical methods [J]. Analytica Chimica Acta, 2007, 597(2): 179–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.07.011.
    [22]
    陈春燕, 龙思华, 肖国清, 等. 基于响应面方法的甘薯粉尘爆炸研究 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2017, 27(1): 42–47. DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.01.008.

    CHEN C Y, LONG S H, XIAO G Q, et al. Sweet potato dust explosion study based on response surface methodology [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2017, 27(1): 42–47. DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2017.01.008.
    [23]
    JIANG J H, XIA C Y, YAO J, et al. Vulnerability analysis of HSR bridge under near-field blast based on response surface method [J]. Structures, 2023, 55: 983–994. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.06.053.
    [24]
    赵振保, 阎杰, 谢军, 等. 煤尘抑尘剂优化设计的试验研究 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2022, 42(11): 1213–1218. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2022.075.

    ZHAO Z B, YAN J, XIE J, et al. Experiment and optimization method for coal dust restrain reagent [J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2022, 42(11): 1213–1218. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2022.075.
    [25]
    梁文俊, 任思达, 马贺, 等. 环境友好型煤尘抑制剂的制备 [J]. 环境工程学报, 2017, 11(9): 5091–5096. DOI: 10.12030/j.cjee.201609118.

    LIANG W J, REN S D, MA H, et al. Preparation of environment-friendly coal dust inhibitor [J]. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(9): 5091–5096. DOI: 10.12030/j.cjee.201609118.
    [26]
    REN S S, JING D J, GE S C, et al. Investigate the optimum design of atomizing nozzles for coal dust suppression by using multifactor level response surface methodology [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2024, 190: 245–261. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2024.07.010.
    [27]
    聂百胜, 张豪, 宫婕, 等. 煤粉爆炸宏细观四阶段反应机理 [J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2023, 52(6): 1129–1145. DOI: 10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.20230376.

    NIE B S, ZHANG H, GONG J, et al. Macro and micro four-stage reaction mechanism of pulverized coal explosion [J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2023, 52(6): 1129–1145. DOI: 10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.20230376.
    [28]
    王相. 复合粉体抑爆剂对煤尘爆炸的抑制特性及机理研究 [D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2019: 25–31. DOI: 10.27275/d.cnki.gsdku.2019.000015.

    WANG X. Research on the explosion suppression characteristics and mechanism of composite powder explosion suppressant for coal dust explosion [D]. Qingdao: Shandong University of Science and Technology, 2019: 25–31. DOI: 10.27275/d.cnki.gsdku.2019.000015.
    [29]
    BAITHALU R, MISHRA S R, PATTNAIK P K, et al. Optimizing shear and couple stress analysis for the magneto-micropolar dissipative nanofluid flow toward an elongating surface: a comprehensive RSM-ANOVA investigation [J]. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 2024, 149(4): 1697–1713. DOI: 10.1007/S10973-023-12741-w.
    [30]
    EL-MAS S M, HASSAAN M A, EL-SUBRUITI G M, et al. Box-Behnken design optimization of 2D Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheets as a microwave-absorbing catalyst for methylene blue dye degradation [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2024, 500: 156969. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.156969.
    [31]
    CHAURASIA S, DUTTA H, SINGH S, et al. Electrical discharge machining of super alloy incoloy 925: a study based on box Behnken design and response surface methodology [J]. Physica Scripta, 2024, 99(10): 105055. DOI: 10.1088/1402-4896/AD7B25.
    [32]
    贺杰, 程凯, 张金. 氧化煤尘的爆炸特性及其变化规律 [J]. 煤矿安全, 2023, 54(3): 67–72. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2023.03.012.

    HE J, CHENG K, ZHANG J. Explosion characteristics and variation of oxidized coal dust [J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2023, 54(3): 67–72. DOI: 10.13347/j.cnki.mkaq.2023.03.012.
    [33]
    WANG S Y, SHI Z C, PENG X, et al. Effect of the ignition delay time on explosion severity parameters of coal dust/air mixtures [J]. Powder Technology, 2019, 342: 509–516. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.10.020.
    [34]
    郑默, 李晓霞. ReaxFF MD模拟揭示的煤热解挥发分自由基反应的竞争与协调 [J]. 化工学报, 2022, 73(6): 2732–2741. DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20220110.

    ZHENG M, LI X X. Revealing reaction compromise in competition for volatile radicals during coal pryolysis via ReaxFF MD simulation [J]. CIESC Journal, 2022, 73(6): 2732–2741. DOI: 10.11949/0438-1157.20220110.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(8)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (545) PDF downloads(168) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return