• ISSN 1001-1455  CN 51-1148/O3
  • EI、Scopus、CA、JST、EBSCO、DOAJ收录
  • 力学类中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊、CSCD统计源期刊
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LIANG Yifan, XU Xiaohui, GUO Wei, XU Tianhan, CHEN Liangyu, JI Yuguo, SHI Benjun. Vacuum chamber simulation test system for large-yield multi-point concentrated explosion cratering effects[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0095
Citation: LIANG Yifan, XU Xiaohui, GUO Wei, XU Tianhan, CHEN Liangyu, JI Yuguo, SHI Benjun. Vacuum chamber simulation test system for large-yield multi-point concentrated explosion cratering effects[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0095

Vacuum chamber simulation test system for large-yield multi-point concentrated explosion cratering effects

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0095
  • Received Date: 2025-03-25
  • Rev Recd Date: 2025-07-25
  • Available Online: 2025-07-23
  • The multi-point focused explosions of new low-yield earth-penetrating nuclear weapons pose a serious threat to deep underground engineering projects. Addressing the challenge that traditional single-point simulations struggle to replicate the cratering effects of such multi-point synergistic damage, and considering that current explosive testing, while efficient, faces significant limitations hindering normal operations, research innovatively designs and develops a vacuum chamber-based simulation test system for large-yield multi-point focused explosion cratering effects. The core innovation lies in applying similarity theory to convert prototype tests into simulated tests. The vacuum chamber simulation technology enables efficient and rapid simulation of large-yield multi-point explosion cratering effects, with low experimental costs and repeatable results. Based on vacuum chamber explosion simulation theory, the similarity laws governing large-yield multi-point focused explosion cratering were established, defining key parameters such as vacuum chamber pressure and multi-point simulated blast cavity pressure. Synchronization tests verified the simultaneity of multiple explosive sources. Referencing the underground nuclear test, we conducted vacuum chamber simulations for three-point sources under deep burial (4.3 kt, 85 m depth) and shallow burial (5 kt, 20 m depth) scenarios, comparing results with single-point explosion prototype data and empirical formulas. Through synchronization tests and three-point explosive source cratering tests, differences in cratering parameters under varying burial depths and yields were quantitatively analyzed. This revealed a significant advantage in damage range for multi-point sources compared to single-point sources when the total yield is identical. Key results indicate: A vacuum chamber simulation system is successfully developed, relying on a miniature explosive device based on the two-stage gas gun principle and the vacuum chamber. Synchronization tests confirmed good simultaneity among explosive sources using a common detonation control switch; Compared to single-point explosions, multi-point explosions significantly increased crater radius, volume, and free surface projection area, greatly expanding the damage zone; Explosive source burial depth significantly impacts the damage effect.
  • loading
  • [1]
    SADOVSKII M A, ADUSHKIN V V, RODIONOV V N, et al. A method of modeling large cratering explosions [J]. Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves, 1967, 3(1): 73–79. DOI: 10.1007/BF00741616.
    [2]
    ADUSHKIN V V, PERNIK L M. Design of linear charges for caving a slope by a large-scale explosion [J]. Soviet Mining, 1989, 25(6): 505–509. DOI: 10.1007/BF02528298.
    [3]
    ADUSHKIN V V, KAMALYAN R Z, KOROLEV K D. Character of the interaction of concentrated excavation charges detonated at different times [J]. Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves, 1989, 25(6): 782–785. DOI: 10.1007/BF00758751.
    [4]
    BLINOV I M, VAKHRAMEEV Y S. The method for modelling large-scale outburst explosions by microexplosions of explosive charges [J]. Fizika Goreniya I Vzryva, 1995, 31(2): 102–109.
    [5]
    VAKHRAMEEV Y S. Physical foundations for approximately modeling explosions with ejecta [J]. Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves, 1995, 31(1): 120–125. DOI: 10.1007/BF00755969.
    [6]
    徐小辉, 邱艳宇, 王明洋, 等. 大当量浅埋地下爆炸抛掷成坑效应的缩比模拟实验装置 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(6): 1333–1343. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0144.

    XU X H, QIU Y Y, WANG M Y, et al. Development of the testing apparatus for modeling large equivalent underground cratering explosions [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(6): 1333–1343. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0144.
    [7]
    徐小辉, 邱艳宇, 王明洋, 等. 大当量地下浅埋爆炸真空室模拟相似材料研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(S1): 3550–3556. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.1539.

    XU X H, QIU Y Y, WANG M Y, et al. Similar materials for vacuum chamber model test under large scale throw blasting [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(S1): 3550–3556. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.1539.
    [8]
    王明洋, 徐小辉, 邱艳宇, 等. 一种用于模拟爆炸效应的爆源装置: CN201710295250.6 [P]. 2017-04-28.

    WANG M Y, XU X H, QIU Y Y, et al. Explosion resource device for simulating explosion effect: CN201710295250.6 [P]. 2017-04-28.
    [9]
    ADUSHKIN V V, SPIVAK A. Underground explosions: WGC-2015-03 [R]. Lexington: Weston Geophysical Corp, 2015.
    [10]
    郭纬, 徐小辉, 李干, 等. 二级高压驱动阵列弹珠同步弹射微型爆源的研制 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2022, 42(8): 084101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0343.

    GUO W, XU X H, LI G, et al. Development of a miniature explosion device initiated by a synchronous launcher of marbles driven by two-stage high-pressure gas [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2022, 42(8): 084101. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0343.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(14)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1605) PDF downloads(152) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return