Dynamic response and failure mechanism for urban continuous beam bridges under far-field blast loads

LI Tuoheng; YANG Shanglin; ZHONG Lian; ZHENG Xiaohong; YAO Xiaohu

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2025-0170

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2026 > Accepted Manuscript

LI Tuoheng, YANG Shanglin, ZHONG Lian, ZHENG Xiaohong, YAO Xiaohu. Dynamic response and failure mechanism for urban continuous beam bridges under far-field blast loads[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0170

Citation:

LI Tuoheng, YANG Shanglin, ZHONG Lian, ZHENG Xiaohong, YAO Xiaohu. Dynamic response and failure mechanism for urban continuous beam bridges under far-field blast loads[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0170

Citation:

PDF( 82351 KB)

Dynamic response and failure mechanism for urban continuous beam bridges under far-field blast loads

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0170

LI Tuoheng^1
,,
YANG Shanglin^{1, 2
,
,},
ZHONG Lian¹,
ZHENG Xiaohong^{1
,
,},
YAO Xiaohu¹

1.
School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, China
2.
Guangzhou Metro Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd, Guangzhou 510420, Guangdong, China

Received Date: 2025-06-10
Rev Recd Date: 2026-01-16

Available Online: 2026-01-21

Abstract

Abstract

Urban bridges are frequently exposed to blast threats arising from accidental explosions and terrorist attacks. However, existing studies on bridge responses under blast loading remain limited, particularly for far-field blast conditions. To investigate the dynamic response and damage mechanisms of urban continuous beam bridges subjected to far-field blast loading, LS-DYNA was employed to efficiently apply blast loads and perform numerical simulations accounting for blast-induced fluid–structure interaction. Based on a typical continuous beam bridge, a refined numerical model was developed to analyze the response process and representative damage modes of the bridge under different blast scenarios. Furthermore, the effects of blast distance, explosive charge weight, and impact angle on structural response and damage were systematically examined. The results indicate that, under far-field blast loading, the continuous beam bridge exhibits a global structural response, with uplift of the superstructure and tilting of the bridge piers being the dominant characteristics. The uplift of the superstructure is primarily influenced by the blast load and the spatial geometric characteristics of the bridge, whereas the tilting of the piers is associated with the direct action of the blast wave and the displacement of the superstructure. Under perpendicular impact, typical damage modes include wet joint failure, flexural deformation of box girders, crushing damage at the tops and bases of piers, and bending cracks in bent caps. Under oblique blast loading, torsional deformation of pier columns is additionally observed in the substructure. A decrease in the impact angle or the scaled distance results in an increase in the overall damage of the bridge structure. Evaluation based on the proposed weighted damage factor indicates that, compared with the impact angle, the overall damage of the continuous beam bridge is more sensitive to variations in the scaled distance. The findings of this study provide useful analytical approaches and mechanistic insights for understanding blast responses and guiding the blast-resistant design of bridge structures.
- far-field blast,
- continuous beam bridge,
- dynamic response,
- failure mechanism

FullText(HTML)

References(38)

References

[1]	LIN Z J, LI M, HE S, et al. Analysis on typical characteristics and causes of coal mine gas explosion accidents in China [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31(43): 55475–55489. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-024-34890-7.
[2]	ÇALIŞKAN C, DAĞ N, KINIK K. Analysis of the medical consequences of global terrorist attacks in Turkic States in the last 50 years by weapon and attack type [J]. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2023, 17: e514. DOI: 10.1017/dmp.2023.172.
[3]	ALSENDI A, EAMON C D. Observations of structural damage to girder bridges in Iraq caused by blast threats [J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2024, 38(6): 04024043. DOI: 10.1061/jpcfev.cfeng-4774.
[4]	ALSENDI A, EAMON C D. Quantitative resistance assessment of steel girder bridges subjected to blast loads [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2024, 29(9): 04024069. DOI: 10.1061/jbenf2.beeng-6821.
[5]	张海鹏, 潘钻峰, 司豆豆. 二次爆炸作用下钢筋混凝土梁动力响应的数值模拟 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2024, 44(10): 101404. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0021. ZHANG H P, PAN Z F, SI D D. Numerical simulation on dynamic response of reinforced concrete beams to secondary explosion [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2024, 44(10): 101404. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0021.
[6]	周广盼, 林志成, 王明洋, 等. 钢筋混凝土箱梁近场爆炸响应的试验与数值模拟 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(7): 072201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0468. ZHOU G P, LIN Z C, WANG M Y, et al. Test and numerical study on the near-field explosion response of reinforced concrete box girder [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2023, 43(7): 072201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0468.
[7]	马世鑫, 纪杨子燚, 钟明寿, 等. 接触爆炸作用下混凝土墩体的易损性研究 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(7): 073201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0538. MA S X, JI Y Z Y, ZHONG M S, et al. Study on the vulnerability of concrete obstacle under contact explosion [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2023, 43(7): 073201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0538.
[8]	AZAR A B, SARI A. Failure analysis and structural resilience of a masonry arch Bridge subjected to blast loads: the case study, Halilviran Bridge [J]. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, 2025, 32(17): 4041–4064. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2024.2400245.
[9]	孙金山, 姚颖康, 吴亮, 等. 高架桥混凝土多室箱梁水压爆破破碎机理数值模拟 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2017, 37(2): 299–306. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0299-08. SUN J S, YAO Y K, WU L, et al. Numerical simulation of water-pressure blasting mechanism in breaking viaduct box girder [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 299–306. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0299-08.
[10]	LYU C, YAN Q S. Field test and fragility analysis of RC box girder bridges subjected to contact explosion [J]. Engineering Structures, 2025, 322: 119063. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.119063.
[11]	YI Z, AGRAWAL A K, ETTOUNEY M, et al. Blast load effects on highway bridges. Ⅰ: modeling and blast load effects [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2014, 19(4): 04013023. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0000547.
[12]	方秦, 杨石刚, 陈力, 等. 天津港“8·12”特大火灾爆炸事故建筑物和人员损伤破坏情况及其爆炸威力分析 [J]. 土木工程学报, 2017, 50(3): 12–18. DOI: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2017.03.002. FANG Q, YANG S G, CHEN L, et al. Analysis on the building damage, personnel casualties and blast energy of the “8·12” explosion in Tianjin port [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2017, 50(3): 12–18. DOI: 10.15951/j.tmgcxb.2017.03.002.
[13]	RIGBY S E, LODGE T J, ALOTAIBI S, et al. Preliminary yield estimation of the 2020 Beirut explosion using video footage from social media [J]. Shock Waves, 2020, 30(6): 671–675. DOI: 10.1007/s00193-020-00970-z.
[14]	YANG S L, LIU Z C, WANG S F, et al. Dynamic response and failure analysis for urban bridges under far-field blast loads [J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 285: 116043. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116043.
[15]	CANNON L, CLUBLEY S K. Structural response of simple partially-clad steel frames to long-duration blast loading [J]. Structures, 2021, 32: 1260–1270. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.03.024.
[16]	MONK S, CLUBLEY S K. Experimental testing of structural arrangement on window response to long-duration blast [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2021, 123: 105304. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105304.
[17]	WANG Y H, ZHAI X M, LEE S C, et al. Responses of curved steel-concrete-steel sandwich shells subjected to blast loading [J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2016, 108: 185–192. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2016.08.018.
[18]	KONG W M, YANG S L, WANG S F, et al. On dynamic response and damage evaluation of bridge piers under far-field explosion loads [J]. Structures, 2023, 51: 985–1003. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2023.03.030.
[19]	YUAN S J, HAO H, ZONG Z H, et al. Numerical analysis of axial load effects on RC bridge columns under blast loading [J]. Advances in Structural Engineering, 2021, 24(7): 1399–1414. DOI: 10.1177/1369433220979443.
[20]	US Department of the Army. Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons: TM5-855-1 [R]. Washington: US Department of the Army, 1986.
[21]	周云波, 郭启涛, 佘磊, 等. 基于LBE方法的驾驶室防护仿真 [J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2016, 36(3): 237–241. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2016.03.004. ZHOU Y B, GUO Q T, SHE L, et al. Simulation of vehicle cabin protection based on load blast enhanced method [J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2016, 36(3): 237–241. DOI: 10.15918/j.tbit1001-0645.2016.03.004.
[22]	HAN Y Z, LIU H B. Finite element simulation of medium-range blast loading using LS-DYNA [J]. Shock and Vibration, 2015, 2015(1): 631493. DOI: 10.1155/2015/631493.
[23]	GILSON L, ROEY J V, GUÉDERS C, et al. A simple coupling of ALE domain with empirical blast load function in LS-DYNA [J]. EPJ Web of Conferences, 2012, 26: 04018. DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20122604018.
[24]	孙晓颖, 许伟, 武岳. 钝体绕流中的计算域设置研究 [C]//第十三届全国结构风工程学术会议论文集(下册). 大连: 中国土木工程学会桥梁与结构工程分会风工程委员会, 2007: 215–220.
[25]	SYED Z I, RAMAN S N, NGO T, et al. The failure behaviour of reinforced concrete panels under far-field and near-field blast effects [J]. Structures, 2018, 14: 220–229. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2018.03.009.
[26]	黄晓莹, 陶俊林. 三种建筑钢筋材料高应变率下拉伸力学性能研究 [J]. 工程力学, 2016, 33(7): 184–189. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2014.12.1064. HUANG X Y, TAO J L. Tensile mechanical properties research of three construction steel bars in high strain rate [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2016, 33(7): 184–189. DOI: 10.6052/j.issn.1000-4750.2014.12.1064.
[27]	ZAKRISSON B, WIKMAN B, HÄGGBLAD H Å. Numerical simulations of blast loads and structural deformation from near-field explosions in air [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2011, 38(7): 597–612. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.02.005.
[28]	WU Y C, CRAWFORD J E. Numerical modeling of concrete using a partially associative plasticity model [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 141(12): 04015051. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000952.
[29]	LIU L, ZONG Z H, LI M H. Numerical study of damage modes and assessment of circular RC pier under noncontact explosions [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2018, 23(9): 04018061. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001273.
[30]	KONG X Z, FANG Q, LI Q M, et al. Modified K&C model for cratering and scabbing of concrete slabs under projectile impact [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2017, 108: 217–228. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.02.016.
[31]	YIN X, LI Q H, CHEN B K, et al. An improved calibration of Karagozian & Case concrete/cementitious model for strain-hardening fibre-reinforced cementitious composites under explosion and penetration loadings [J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 2023, 137: 104911. DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104911.
[32]	SU Q, WU H, POH L H, et al. Dynamic behavior of UHPC-FST under close-in explosions with large charge weight [J]. Engineering Structures, 2023, 277: 115475. DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115475.
[33]	YANG S L, ZHONG W, WANG S F, et al. On dynamic analysis and damage evaluation for bridge girders under high-energy air burst [J]. Structures, 2022, 41: 1488–1500. DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.088.
[34]	Department of the Army. Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions: TM5-1300 [R]. Norfolk: Department of the Army, 1991.
[35]	司豆豆, 潘钻峰, 曾滨, 等. 爆炸荷载作用下大跨预应力混凝土框架动力响应分析 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2023, 43(11): 112201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0080. SI D D, PAN Z F, ZENG B, et al. Analysis of the dynamic response of prestressed concrete frame structures under blast load [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2023, 43(11): 112201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0080.
[36]	王东升, 郭迅, 孙治国, 等. 汶川大地震公路桥梁震害初步调查 [J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2009, 29(3): 84–94. DOI: 10.13197/j.eeev.2009.03.004. WANG D S, GUO X, SUN Z G, et al. Damage to highway bridges during Wenchuan Earthquake [J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2009, 29(3): 84–94. DOI: 10.13197/j.eeev.2009.03.004.
[37]	LIU Z. Reconnaissance and preliminary observations of bridge damage in the great Wenchuan Earthquake, China [J]. Structural Engineering International, 2009, 19(3): 277–282. DOI: 10.2749/101686609788957883.
[38]	中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路桥梁技术状况评定标准: JTG/T H21-2011 [S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2011. Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China. Standards for technical condition evaluation of highway bridges: JTG/T H21-2011 [S]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2011.