Influence of different casing materials on borehole wall pressure of high-energy gas-generating agents

WANG Yanbing; LU Xiang

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2025-0219

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2026 > Accepted Manuscript

WANG Yanbing, LU Xiang. Influence of different casing materials on borehole wall pressure of high-energy gas-generating agents[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0219

Citation:

WANG Yanbing, LU Xiang. Influence of different casing materials on borehole wall pressure of high-energy gas-generating agents[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0219

WANG Yanbing, LU Xiang. Influence of different casing materials on borehole wall pressure of high-energy gas-generating agents[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0219

Citation:

WANG Yanbing, LU Xiang. Influence of different casing materials on borehole wall pressure of high-energy gas-generating agents[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0219

PDF( 3231 KB)

Influence of different casing materials on borehole wall pressure of high-energy gas-generating agents

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0219

School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2025-07-16
Rev Recd Date: 2025-08-29

Available Online: 2025-09-01

Abstract

Abstract

Deep coal rock blasting poses high risks, and hydraulic fracturing faces limitations, necessitating the development of controllable rock-breaking technologies. As an advanced high-energy gas fracturing technique, high-energy gas-generating agents demonstrate remarkable advantages in rock fragmentation, providing robust technical support for efficient and safe coal mining. This study focuses on the casing materials of high-energy gas-generating agents, investigating their impact on borehole wall pressure during coal rock fracturing. A comprehensive pressure monitoring system was established, employing three casing materials—transparent PVC, white PVC, and kraft paper tubes—for borehole wall pressure experiments. Attenuation indices and reliability were selected as evaluation metrics to analyze the influence of material physical properties on borehole wall pressure. Results indicate that the initiator, upon ignition, generates stress waves and a small amount of gas. The stress wave induces the first pressure peak, followed by a decline due to gas diffusion. The superposition of reflected stress waves and gas expansion waves forms the second peak, while gas expansion variations produce the third peak. Without the main agent, the initiator group exhibits the lowest pressure peak, shortest pressure rise time, minimal loading rate, limited energy release, and low transmission efficiency. For the three groups containing the main agent, pressure peaks near the high-energy gas-generating agent (10 cm away) approximate 200 MPa, with pressure rise times around 20 ms. The attenuation coefficients of pressure peaks for the three casing materials from the biggest to the smallest follow the order: transparent PVC, white PVC, and kraft paper tube. The attenuation coefficients of pressure rise times from the biggest to the smallest rank as: transparent PVC, kraft paper tube, and white PVC. For loading rate attenuation coefficients, the sequence from the biggest to the smallest is: white PVC, transparent PVC, and kraft paper tube. Because of its high elastic modulus and low Poisson’s ratio, white PVC casing demonstrates optimal performance in pressure peak, rise time, and loading rate near the high-energy gas-generating agent, achieving the highest energy transmission efficiency. Transparent PVC casing exhibits higher pressure peaks and loading rates than the paper tube near the agent but underperforms at longer distances, indicating strong directionality and concentration. The kraft paper tube ensures uniform energy distribution but exhibits the weakest overall energy concentration, along with the longest rise times and lowest loading rates. These findings provide a theoretical foundation for optimizing high-energy gas-generating agent designs and enhancing rock-breaking efficacy.
- borehole wall pressure,
- casing material,
- high-energy gas,
- rock-breaking efficacy

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	袁亮, 王恩元, 马衍坤, 等. 我国煤岩动力灾害研究进展及面临的科技难题 [J]. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(5): 1825–1845. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.0264. YUAN L, WANG E Y, MA Y K, et al. Research progress of coal and rock dynamic disasters and scientific and technological problems in China [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2023, 48(5): 1825–1845. DOI: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2023.0264.
[2]	李玉清, 孙健东, 周宇, 等. 低密度炸药对露天矿煤层爆破关键指标的影响研究 [J]. 中国矿业, 2020, 29(2): 132–137. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2020.02.007. LI Y Q, SUN J D, ZHOU Y, et al. Effect of low density explosives on key indicators in surface coal seam blasting [J]. China Mining Magazine, 2020, 29(2): 132–137. DOI: 10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2020.02.007.
[3]	陈绍杰, 夏治国, 郭惟嘉, 等. 断层影响下岩体采动灾变响应研究现状与展望 [J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2018, 46(1): 20–27. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2018.01.003. CHEN S J, XIA Z G, GUO W J, et al. Research status and prospect of mining catastrophic response of rock mass under the influence of fault [J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2018, 46(1): 20–27. DOI: 10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2018.01.003.
[4]	张嘉凡, 高壮, 程树范, 等. 煤岩HJC模型参数确定及液态CO₂爆破特性研究 [J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(S1): 2633–2642. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0267. ZHANG J F, GAO Z, CHENG S F, et al. Parameters determination of coal-rock HJC model and research on blasting characteristics by liquid CO₂ [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 40(S1): 2633–2642. DOI: 10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2020.0267.
[5]	杨思凡, 郝凯. 高能气体预裂增透抽采瓦斯技术及实践 [J]. 山西焦煤科技, 2023, 47(11): 48–51. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0652.2023.11.011. YANG S F, HAO K. High energy gas pre-cracking and enhanced permeability gas extraction technology and practice [J]. Shanxi Coking Coal Science & Technology, 2023, 47(11): 48–51. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0652.2023.11.011.
[6]	李士超, 李光. 高能气体压裂及评价技术分析与研究 [J]. 化工管理, 2025(11): 162–164. DOI: 10.19900/j.cnki.ISSN1008-4800.2025.11.040. LI S C, LI G. Analysis and research on high-energy gas fracturing and evaluation technologies [J]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 2025(11): 162–164. DOI: 10.19900/j.cnki.ISSN1008-4800.2025.11.040.
[7]	WANG E B, ZHU H Y, YI X Y, et al. Numerical simulation of fracture propagation in high-energy gas fracturing of shale reservoir [J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2025, 252: 213915. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213915.
[8]	WEI X R, WANG X, CAO M T, et al. Study on rock fracture mechanism based on the combustion and explosion characteristics of high-energy expansive agent [J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2023, 289: 109428. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109428.
[9]	潘若寒. 基于高能气体的控制爆破技术及其地震波能量分析 [D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2023. DOI: 10.27381/d.cnki.gwlgu.2023.001143. PAN R H. Energy analysis of high-energy gas seismic waves based on controlled blasting of dangerous rock masses [D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2023. DOI: 10.27381/d.cnki.gwlgu.2023.001143.
[10]	李宁, 陈莉静, 张平. 爆生气体驱动岩石裂缝动态扩展分析 [J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(4): 460–463. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2006.04.007. LI N, CHEN L J, ZHANG P. Dynamic analysis for fracturing progress by detonation gas [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(4): 460–463. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2006.04.007.
[11]	张友澎, 赵利信, 王亚奴, 等. 高能气体致裂技术在低渗砂岩型铀矿地浸开采中的应用 [J]. 铀矿冶, 2024, 43(3): 1–8. DOI: 10.13426/j.cnki.yky.2024.02.02. ZHANG Y P, ZHAO L X, WANG Y N, et al. Application of high energy gas fracturing in in-situ leaching of low-permeable sandstone uranium deposit [J]. Uranium Mining and Metallurgy, 2024, 43(3): 1–8. DOI: 10.13426/j.cnki.yky.2024.02.02.
[12]	黄向飞, 刘佳. 压裂技术在石油工程中的应用及效果评估 [J]. 中国石油和化工标准与质量, 2025, 45(2): 187–189. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4076.2025.02.061. HUANG X F, LIU J. Application and effect evaluation of fracturing technology in petroleum engineering [J]. China Petroleum and Chemical Standard and Quality, 2025, 45(2): 187–189. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4076.2025.02.061.
[13]	俞海玲. 高压气体预裂爆轰作用致裂煤岩机理及应用研究 [D]. 青岛: 山东科技大学, 2019. DOI: 10.27275/d.cnki.gsdku.2019.000003. YU H L. Mechanism and application of high pressure gas presplitting detonation on coal rock fracturing [D]. Qingdao: Shandong University of Science and Technology, 2019. DOI: 10.27275/d.cnki.gsdku.2019.000003.
[14]	蒲春生, 任山, 吴飞鹏, 等. 气井高能气体压裂裂缝系统动力学模型研究 [J]. 武汉工业学院学报, 2009, 28(3): 12–17. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4881.2009.03.003. PU C S, REN S, WU F P, et al. The study on fracture system dynamics models of HEGF in gas wells [J]. Journal of Wuhan Polytechnic University, 2009, 28(3): 12–17. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4881.2009.03.003.
[15]	吴飞鹏, 蒲春生, 陈德春, 等. 多级脉冲爆燃压裂作用过程耦合模拟 [J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014, 41(5): 605–611. DOI: 10.11698/PED.2014.05.13. WU F P, PU C S, CHEN D C, et al. Coupling simulation of multistage pulse conflagration compression fracturing [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(5): 605–611. DOI: 10.11698/PED.2014.05.13.
[16]	刘敬, 吴晋军, 周培尧. 低渗煤层多脉冲压裂激励作用的裂缝模型研究 [J]. 煤炭技术, 2016, 35(1): 1–4. DOI: 10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2016.01.001. LIU J, WU J J, ZHOU P Y. Incentive fracture physical model study on multiple pulse fracturing of low permeability coal [J]. Coal Technology, 2016, 35(1): 1–4. DOI: 10.13301/j.cnki.ct.2016.01.001.
[17]	MOGI T, MATSUNAGA T, DOBASHI R. Propagation of blast waves from a bursting vessel with internal hydrogen-air deflagration [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(11): 7683–7690. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.06.106.
[18]	张延松, 李志勇, 马旭, 等. 高压气体预裂爆轰作用机理及数值模拟实验研究 [J]. 内蒙古煤炭经济, 2020(13): 8–10. DOI: 10.13487/j.cnki.imce.017798. ZHANG Y S, LI Z Y, MA X, et al. Research on the mechanism and numerical simulation experiment of high-pressure gas pre-splitting detonation [J]. Inner Mongolia Coal Economy, 2020(13): 8–10. DOI: 10.13487/j.cnki.imce.017798.
[19]	BAI Y, SUN L, WEI C H. A coupled gas flow-mechanical damage model and its numerical simulations on high energy gas fracturing [J]. Geofluids, 2020, 2020: 3070371. DOI: 10.1155/2020/3070371.
[20]	谢若珺. 高能气体—应力波双重作用下预裂切顶沿空留巷关键技术研究 [D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2023. DOI: 10.27352/d.cnki.gylgu.2023.000229. XIE R J. Research on key technology of pre-crack cutting under dual action of high-energy gas-stress wave [D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2023. DOI: 10.27352/d.cnki.gylgu.2023.000229.
[21]	孙伟, 张广清. 变载荷压裂特征研究进展及展望 [J]. 石油科学通报, 2025, 10(1): 87–106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1693.2025.02.004. SUN W, ZHANG G Q. Progress and prospects of variable load fracturing characteristics [J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2025, 10(1): 87–106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1693.2025.02.004.
[22]	霍晓锋. 高应力环境水耦合预裂爆破成缝机理研究 [D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2023. DOI: 10.27661/d.cnki.gzhnu.2023.000841. HUO X F. Research on pre-split crack formation mechanism of water coupling presplit blasting under high in-situ stress [D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2023. DOI: 10.27661/d.cnki.gzhnu.2023.000841.
[23]	CHI L Y, ZHANG Z X, AALBERG A, et al. Measurement of shock pressure and shock-wave attenuation near a blast hole in rock [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2019, 125: 27–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.11.002.