• ISSN 1001-1455  CN 51-1148/O3
  • EI、Scopus、CA、JST、EBSCO、DOAJ收录
  • 力学类中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊、CSCD统计源期刊
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
QI Zhi, WANG Guohua, WU Xuean, SUN Quanfu, ZHOU Baihang, WANG Hao, RUAN Wenjun. Coupling mechanism between jet and ground effect for a triangular three-nozzle rocket-sled and its layout effects[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0308
Citation: QI Zhi, WANG Guohua, WU Xuean, SUN Quanfu, ZHOU Baihang, WANG Hao, RUAN Wenjun. Coupling mechanism between jet and ground effect for a triangular three-nozzle rocket-sled and its layout effects[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0308

Coupling mechanism between jet and ground effect for a triangular three-nozzle rocket-sled and its layout effects

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2025-0308
  • Received Date: 2025-09-23
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-03-23
  • Available Online: 2026-04-09
  • To investigate the complex wake flow characteristics of multi-motor parallel rocket sleds, this study focuses on the mechanisms by which the nozzle horizontal spacing and the impingement height influence the flow structure and ground effect. A three-dimensional physical model was constructed for a dual-rail rocket sled system featuring three nozzles arranged in a triangular pyramid configuration. Four operating conditions were established, including large spacing (l = 7d), small spacing (l = 1d), low impingement height (h = 2d), and high impingement height (h=5.5d). The effects of nozzle center distance and impingement height on the flow field structure and ground effect were comparatively analyzed. Numerical simulations were performed using a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method based on the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations, coupled with the Realizable k-ε turbulence model for transient solutions. The combustion chamber pressure-time curve derived from interior ballistic theory was applied to the nozzle inlet via a user-defined function (UDF). The sled velocity-time curve, determined from the exterior ballistic particle trajectory equation, was assigned as the far-field pressure boundary condition, enabling a coupled simulation framework of interior ballistics, exterior ballistics and flow field. The computational domain utilized a structured grid with refinement in the jet interaction region and near the ground to ensure calculation accuracy. The velocity and pressure fields obtained from numerical simulations were compared and validated against jet morphology, impingement height, and vortex core positions recorded by high-speed photography (2000 Hz). The flow field structure, pressure distribution, and thermal erosion behavior on the ground under different configurations are systematically revealed. The results indicate that the small-spacing nozzle arrangement triggers intense jet interference without ground effect participation, leading to a multi-peak and slow-recovery pressure evolution feature and substantially delays the flow field relaxation process. The coupling relationship between ground effect and jet interference is dominated by impingement height. At low impingement height conditions, the jet impinging on the ground induces intense reorganization and fragmentation of vortex structures, generating wall jets with velocities up to 960 m/s. Consequently, the peak ground surface temperatures reaches 1286.6 K with sustained high temperatures, which significantly elevates the risk of rail ablation. Conversely, a high impingement height effectively suppresses the ground effect, resulting in a more homogeneous and stable flow field structure. In this case, the peak ground temperature reduced by approximately 65% and maximum velocity reduced by 58%, significantly mitigating ablation risk. The initial phase (0-8 m) of the rocket sled is identified as the critical region subjected to the most severe thermomechanical loads. During this stage, the average acceleration reaches 832.7 m/s2, and the specific action time per unit distance is prolonged to 1.84 ms/m. Coupled with the transient complex flow field, this constitutes an extremely high risk for rail ablation. The numerical simulation results show excellent agreement with high-speed photographic experimental data regarding flow field morphology, impingement height, and vortex core positions, thereby validating the reliability of the established coupled model. This study elucidates the complex flow mechanisms of multi-nozzle parallel systems under strongly constrained conditions, and provids important theoretical foundations and design parameters for structural layout optimization and thermal protection design in high-acceleration, heavy-load rocket sled test systems.
  • loading
  • [1]
    王栋, 封锋, 陈军. 固体火箭发动机基础 [M]. 北京: 北京理工大学出版社, 2016: 1–324.

    WANG D, FENG F, CHEN J. Solid rocket engine foundation [M]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology Press, 2016: 1–324.
    [2]
    夏有财, 孔维红, 孙其会, 等. 两级推进单轨火箭橇试验研究 [J]. 航空动力学报, 2025, 40(3): 20230370. DOI: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230370.

    XIA Y C, KONG W H, SUN Q H, et al. Experimental study on two-stage propulsion monorail rocket sled [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2025, 40(3): 20230370. DOI: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.20230370.
    [3]
    王文杰, 马鑫雨, 赵旭, 等. 基于无翼载荷的火箭橇多场耦合特性分析 [J]. 兵工学报, 2025, 46(4): 240394. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0394.

    WANG W J, MA X Y, ZHAO X, et al. Analysis of multi-field coupling characteristics of rocket sled with a wingless payload [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2025, 46(4): 240394. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0394.
    [4]
    DOIG G. Transonic and supersonic ground effect aerodynamics [J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2014, 69: 1–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.02.002.
    [5]
    SZMEREKOVSKY A G, PALAZOTTO A N, BAKER W P. Scaling numerical models for hypervelocity test sled slipper-rail impacts [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2006, 32(6): 928–946. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.011.
    [6]
    QIAN H J, NIU Y S, JIANG Y, et al. Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic characteristics of rocket sled under strong ground effect [J]. International Journal of Aeroacoustics, 2024, 23(5-6): 494–514. DOI: 10.1177/1475472X241259101.
    [7]
    余元元, 王方元, 王彬, 等. 超声速火箭橇流动特征和气动力激励振动分析 [J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2022, 40(5): 1080–1089. DOI: 10.1051/jnwpu/20224051080.

    YU Y Y, WANG F Y, WANG B, et al. Analysis on flow characteristics and aerodynamic-force-induced vibration of supersonic rocket-sled [J]. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2022, 40(5): 1080–1089. DOI: 10.1051/jnwpu/20224051080.
    [8]
    周柏航, 王浩, 阮文俊, 等. 地面效应对火箭橇发动机尾喷管流场特性的影响研究 [J]. 推进技术, 2021, 42(6): 1380–1386. DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200717.

    ZHOU B H, WANG H, RUAN W J, et al. Influence of ground effect on flow field characteristics of rocket skid motor tail nozzle [J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2021, 42(6): 1380–1386. DOI: 10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.200717.
    [9]
    张俊, 田中旭, 高天宇, 等. 固体火箭发动机尾流场数值模拟 [J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2018, 38(6): 15–18. DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2018.06.004.

    ZHANG J, TIAN Z X, GAO T Y, et al. Numerical simulation for wake flow field of solid rocket motor [J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missiles and Guidance, 2018, 38(6): 15–18. DOI: 10.15892/j.cnki.djzdxb.2018.06.004.
    [10]
    赵鹏刚, 刘振, 党天骄, 等. 地面效应影响下的高速火箭橇气动特性数值与风洞试验研究 [J]. 计算力学学报, 2023, 40(2): 314–322. DOI: 10.7511/jslx20210914001.

    ZHAO P G, LIU Z, DANG T J, et al. Numerical and wind tunnel test research on aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed rocket sled under the influence of ground effect [J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2023, 40(2): 314–322. DOI: 10.7511/jslx20210914001.
    [11]
    WANG B, ZHENG J, YU Y Y. Shock-wave/rail-fasteners interaction for two rocket sleds in the supersonic flow regime [J]. Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing, 2020, 16(4): 675–684. DOI: 10.32604/fdmp.2020.09681.
    [12]
    王明清. 基于固体火箭发动机的火箭橇动力系统研究 [D]. 南京: 南京理工大学, 2017.

    WANG M Q. Research on dynamical system of rocket sled with solid rocket motors [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Science and Technology, 2017.
    [13]
    ANDERSON J D JR. Computational fluid dynamics: the basics with applications [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995: 1–547.
    [14]
    SHIH T H, LIOU W W, SHABBIR A, et al. A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows [J]. Computers & Fluids, 1995, 24(3): 227–238. DOI: 10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T.
    [15]
    SUTHERLAND W. LII. The viscosity of gases and molecular force [J]. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 1893, 36(223): 507–531. DOI: 10.1080/14786449308620508.
    [16]
    王福军. 计算流体动力学分析: CFD软件原理与应用 [M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2004: 39–40.

    WANG F J. Computational fluid dynamics analysis: CFD software principle and application [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2004: 39–40.
    [17]
    ANDERSON J D JR. Modern compressible flow: with historical perspective [M]. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(16)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (175) PDF downloads(40) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return