• ISSN 1001-1455  CN 51-1148/O3
  • EI、Scopus、CA、JST、EBSCO、DOAJ收录
  • 力学类中文核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊、CSCD统计源期刊
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
TIAN Qinwu, ZHAI Hongbo, XU Qipeng, FAN Ruijun, CHEN Xi. Ultimate load-bearing capacity of prestressed T-girder bridges under typical explosion loads[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2026-0056
Citation: TIAN Qinwu, ZHAI Hongbo, XU Qipeng, FAN Ruijun, CHEN Xi. Ultimate load-bearing capacity of prestressed T-girder bridges under typical explosion loads[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2026-0056

Ultimate load-bearing capacity of prestressed T-girder bridges under typical explosion loads

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2026-0056
  • Received Date: 2026-02-06
  • Rev Recd Date: 2026-06-11
  • Available Online: 2026-06-11
  • To clarify the ultimate load-bearing capacity characteristics of prestressed concrete T-girder bridges under typical blast loads and address the technical difficulties in the residual load-bearing capacity evaluation of blast-damaged bridge structures, a two-stage test method combining blast damage test and post-blast static loading test is adopted in this study. A full-scale (1:1) prestressed concrete T-girder bridge specimen consistent with practical engineering structural parameters is taken as the test object to carry out large-equivalent field blast tests. Multi-stage graded static loading tests are further implemented on the blast-damaged specimen to obtain structural damage evolution features and deflection response data under post-blast service conditions. Based on the measured damage morphologies, deformation data and mechanical response laws acquired from physical tests, a refined three-dimensional finite element (FE) numerical simulation model for prestressed concrete T-girder bridges is established. Key structural characteristics including concrete and reinforcement strain-rate effects, material nonlinearity, prestress loss and structural contact interaction are fully considered in model establishment. The accuracy and reliability of the numerical model are validated through comparative calibration with experimental results. The validated model is subsequently employed to quantitatively investigate the ultimate load-bearing performance of bridges under three typical blast working conditions, including deck central contact blast, combined blast of deck central explosion and inter-girder internal explosion, and bilateral inter-girder internal explosion. The research results demonstrate distinct structural damage and bearing degradation characteristics under different blast scenarios. Contact blast acting on the bridge deck mainly induces local slab perforation failure and concentrated plastic deformation of deck concrete. For internal explosion occurring between main girders, structural damage presents a more severe and extensive pattern. In addition to concrete spalling and fragmentation on the bottom surface of the bridge deck, obvious outward bulging deformation, concrete crushing and local collapse failure occur on the webs and transverse diaphragms of T-girders. Among the three typical blast damage states, the combined blast condition with deck central explosion followed by secondary inter-girder explosion causes the most significant degradation of structural ultimate load-bearing capacity due to the superimposed synergistic damage effect. Reasonable optimization of live load layout effectively avoids severe damage areas of blast-affected bridges, eliminates the adverse influence of blast-induced structural defects, and achieves a remarkable improvement in the ultimate load-bearing capacity of damaged bridges. An integrated evaluation system covering the whole process from blast damage characterization to ultimate load-bearing capacity quantification is established in this research. The proposed evaluation method provides a systematic theoretical basis and feasible technical support for residual load-bearing capacity assessment, damage prediction and blast-resistant reinforcement design of prestressed concrete T-girder bridges suffering blast loads.
  • loading
  • [1]
    范立础. 桥梁工程-上册 [M]. 2版. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2012: 118–122.

    FAN L C. Bridge engineering [M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2012: 118–122.
    [2]
    张宇, 李国强, 陈可鹏, 等. 桥梁结构抗爆安全评估研究进展 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2016, 36(1): 135–144. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)01-0135-10.

    ZHANG Y, LI G Q, CHEN K P, et al. Research advances of safety assessment of bridges under blast load [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2016, 36(1): 135–144. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)01-0135-10.
    [3]
    BOLOORANI A D, DARVISHI M, WENG Q H, et al. Post-war urban damage mapping using InSAR: the case of Mosul city in Iraq [J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2021, 10(3): 140. DOI: 10.3390/ijgi10030140.
    [4]
    陈代果, 马宏昊, 沈兆武, 等. 非接触爆炸作用下预应力T型梁桥的动态响应研究 [J]. 工程爆破, 2023, 29(3): 17–23,54. DOI: 10.19931/j.EB.20220034.

    CHEN D G, MA H H, SHEN Z W, et al. Study on dynamic response of prestressed T-beam bridge under non-contact explosion [J]. Engineering Blasting, 2023, 29(3): 17–23,54. DOI: 10.19931/j.EB.20220034.
    [5]
    张见升, 景建斌, 孙浩, 等. 爆炸荷载下预应力T型梁毁伤效应数值仿真分析 [J]. 兵工学报, 2024, 45(S2): 193–198. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0961.

    ZHANG J S, JING J B, SUN H, et al. Numerical simulation and experimental study on damage effect of prestressed T-shaped beam under blast load [J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2024, 45(S2): 193–198. DOI: 10.12382/bgxb.2024.0961.
    [6]
    徐赵威, 汪维, 李奕硕, 等. 接触爆炸下聚脲/钢筋混凝土厚板复合结构的抗爆性能 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2025, 45(3): 033104. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0083.

    XU Z W, WANG W, LI Y S, et al. Blast resistance of polyurea/reinforced concrete thick slab composite structures under contact explosion [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2025, 45(3): 033104. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0083.
    [7]
    徐其鹏, 唐泓, 翟红波. 爆炸载荷作用下钢筋混凝土预应力T梁桥毁伤模式研究 [J]. 包装工程, 2024, 45(21): 253–259. DOI: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2024.21.034.

    XU Q P, TANG H, ZHAI H B. Damage mode of reinforced concrete prestressed T-beam bridge under explosive load [J]. Packaging Engineering, 2024, 45(21): 253–259. DOI: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2024.21.034.
    [8]
    宋洪雨, 苏春杰, 蔡保硕, 等. 混凝土桁架拱桥荷载试验与承载力评价 [J]. 特种结构, 2024, 41(2): 51–57,64. DOI: 10.19786/j.tzjg.2024.02.010.

    SONG H Y, SU C J, CAI B S, et al. Load test and bearing capacity evaluation of truss arch bridges [J]. Special Structures, 2024, 41(2): 51–57,64. DOI: 10.19786/j.tzjg.2024.02.010.
    [9]
    姜天华, 王强, 杨壮, 等. 在役预应力混凝土桥梁损伤状态承载力评估 [J]. 铁道建筑, 2016(8): 31–34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2016.08.07.

    JIANG T H, WANG Q, YANG Z, et al. Assessment of bearing capacity for damaged prestressed concrete bridge in service [J]. Railway Engineering, 2016(8): 31–34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1995.2016.08.07.
    [10]
    马长龙. 震损RC桥墩剩余承载力及通行能力评估方法研究 [D]. 重庆: 重庆交通大学, 2024: 35–48. DOI: 10.27671/d.cnki.gcjtc.2024.001778.

    MA C L. Research on the evaluation method of residual bearing capacity and traffic capacity of earthquake damaged RC pier [D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2024: 35–48. DOI: 10.27671/d.cnki.gcjtc.2024.001778.
    [11]
    吴光宇, 林伟, 汪劲丰, 等. 有效预应力对大跨P. C. 桥梁极限承载力的影响研究 [J]. 计算力学学报, 2013, 30(3): 362–369. DOI: 10.7511/jslx201303008.

    WU G Y, LIN W, WANG J F, et al. Influence of effective prestress on ultimate bearing capacity for large-span prestressed concrete bridges [J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics, 2013, 30(3): 362–369. DOI: 10.7511/jslx201303008.
    [12]
    邓旭东, 宋泽冈, 李旺. 基于破坏性试验的预应力混凝土简支T梁极限承载力分析 [J]. 公路交通科技: 应用技术版, 2018, 14(7): 259–262.
    [13]
    陈泓宇, 李华伟. 钢筋混凝土墩柱侧向冲击损伤的评估方法 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2026, 46(4): 045102. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0441.

    CHEN H Y, LI H W. Damage assessment method of RC piers under lateral impact loads [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2026, 46(4): 045102. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0441.
    [14]
    朱小青, 陈代海, 陈淮. 先简支后连续T梁桥全过程力学行为及极限承载力分析 [J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2016, 13(1): 89–95. DOI: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.2016.01.014.

    ZHU X Q, CHEN D H, CHEN H. Study on full loading process performance of simply supported continuous T-beam bridge [J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2016, 13(1): 89–95. DOI: 10.19713/j.cnki.43-1423/u.2016.01.014.
    [15]
    徐略勤, 李修君, 王佩, 等. RC空心板抗弯承载性能与振动频率的关系 [J]. 振动、测试与诊断, 2025, 45(2): 301–308. DOI: 10.16450/j.cnki.issn.1004-6801.2025.02.013.

    XU L Q, LI X J, WANG P, et al. Research on the relationship between flexural bearing performance and vibration frequency of RC voided slabs [J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement and Diagnosis, 2025, 45(2): 301–308. DOI: 10.16450/j.cnki.issn.1004-6801.2025.02.013.
    [16]
    JTG/T J21-2011 公路桥梁承载能力检测评定规程 [S]. JTG/T J21-2011 Specification for inspection and evaluation of load-bearing capacity of highway bridges [S].
    [17]
    GB/T 50152-2012 混凝土结构试验方法标准 [S]. GB/T 50152-2012 Standard for test method of concrete structures [S].
    [18]
    彭玉林, 吴昊, 方秦. 爆炸荷载在圆截面桥梁墩柱上的分布规律 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2019, 39(12): 122201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0317.

    PENG Y L, WU H, FANG Q. Blast loading distributions on the circular sectional bridge columns [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2019, 39(12): 122201. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0317.
    [19]
    Livermore Software Technology Corporation. LS-DYNA® keyword user’s manual volume I [EB/OL]. (2021-09-24)[2026-05-08]. https://ftp.lstc.com/anonymous/outgoing/jday/manuals/LS-DYNA_Manual_Volume_I_R13.pdf.
    [20]
    王鹏. 高强钢筋高强混凝土预应力梁受力性能及延性试验研究 [D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2013: 55–56.

    WANG P. Experimental study on performance under loads and ductility of perstressed high-strength concrete beams [D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2013: 55–56.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(14)  / Tables(6)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (181) PDF downloads(56) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return