Ye Bo, Wu Xutao, Hu Fenghui, Liao Li. Numerical simulation of fracture toughness test under high strain rate[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(3): 416-421. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)03-0416-06
Citation:
Ye Bo, Wu Xutao, Hu Fenghui, Liao Li. Numerical simulation of fracture toughness test under high strain rate[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(3): 416-421. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)03-0416-06
Ye Bo, Wu Xutao, Hu Fenghui, Liao Li. Numerical simulation of fracture toughness test under high strain rate[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(3): 416-421. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)03-0416-06
Citation:
Ye Bo, Wu Xutao, Hu Fenghui, Liao Li. Numerical simulation of fracture toughness test under high strain rate[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(3): 416-421. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)03-0416-06
In this work we conducted numerical simulations of semi-circular bending (SCB) test of steel with cracks respectively in a static condition and under impact loading, using ANSYS/LS-DYNA, a finite element software. According to the results achieved from the simulation of the static test, we have put forward the formula for the calculation of Steel Ⅰ's fitted stress intensity factor which, when applied to the calculation of the factor under the mixed-mode loading, can keep the maximum error below 10%. The simulation result of dynamic test shows that: for semi-circular bending (SCB) test of pure Steel Ⅰ under impact loading, the dynamic stress intensity factor exhibits regular variation with the change in the specimen's radius, the distance between the supports, and the relative crack length: When the specimen's radius is less than 60 mm, the distance between two supports is 1.2 and the relative crack length is in the range of 0.1 to 0.4, the inertial effect is relatively small and the error of the dynamic stress intensity factor calculated with the above formula is about 10%; when the relative crack length is 0.2 to 0.4 and the crack angle is in the range of 10° to 40°, the error of KId which is calculated with this formula is less than 10% for semi-circular bending (SCB) test under mixed-mode loading.
Nakano M, Kashida K, Yamauchi Y, et al. Dynamic fracture initiation in brittle materials under combined mode Ⅰ/Ⅱ loading[J]. Journal De Physique IV, 1994, 4(8):695-700.
[2]
Yamauchi Y, Nakano M, Kishida K, et al.Measurement of fracture toughness for brittle materials under mixed-mode impact loading using center-notched disk specimen[J]. Journal of the Society of Materials Science Japan, 2000, 49(12):1324-1329. doi: 10.2472/jsms.49.1324
Ayatollahi M R, Aliha M R M. On determination of mode Ⅱ fracture toughness using semi-circular bend specimen[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2006, 43(17):5217-5227. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2005.07.049
[5]
Aliha M R M, Ayatollahi, M R. Mixed mode Ⅰ/Ⅱ brittle fracture evaluation of marble using SCB specimen[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 10:311-318. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.054
[6]
Chen R, Xia K W, Dai F et al. Determination of dynamic fracture parameters using a semi-circular bend technique in split Hopkinson pressure bar testing[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2009, 76(9):1268-1276. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2009.02.001
[7]
Dai F, Xia K W, et al. Rate dependence of the flexural tensile strength of Laurentian granite[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2010, 47(3):469-475. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.05.001
[8]
Dai F, Xia K W, et al. Determination of dynamic rock Mode-I fracture parameters using cracked chevron notched semi-circular bend specimen[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2011, 78(15):2633-2644. doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2011.06.022
[9]
Yau J, Wang S, Corten H. A mixed-mode crack analysis of isotropic solids using conservation laws of elasticity[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1980, 47(2):335-341. doi: 10.1115/1.3153665
DownLoad:
