Bird impact response and damage of carbon fiber blades

ZHANG Jingjing; XIE Yang; LIU Zhifang; MA Xiaomin; LI Shiqiang

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2023-0130

Volume 43 Issue 12

Dec. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2023 > 43(12): 123301

ZHANG Jingjing, XIE Yang, LIU Zhifang, MA Xiaomin, LI Shiqiang. Bird impact response and damage of carbon fiber blades[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(12): 123301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0130

Citation:

ZHANG Jingjing, XIE Yang, LIU Zhifang, MA Xiaomin, LI Shiqiang. Bird impact response and damage of carbon fiber blades[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(12): 123301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0130

Citation:

PDF( 18233 KB)

Bird impact response and damage of carbon fiber blades

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0130

Institute of Applied Mechanics, College of Mechanical and Vehicle Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, Shanxi, China

Received Date: 2023-04-10
Rev Recd Date: 2023-06-27

Available Online: 2023-08-21

Publish Date: 2023-12-05

Abstract

Abstract

The impact resistance of T300 carbon fiber blades was studied through experiments and numerical simulations. The deformation damage pattern and the effect of the number of fiber layers on the impact resistance of the blade are studied. The impact experiment was conducted on the carbon fiber blades of different layers. Based on the macro-level continuum damage mechanics theory and the Hashin failure criterion, a vectorized user-material subroutine was written for the carbon fiber material, and the smooth particle hydrodynamics algorithm was used to simulate the gelatin projectiles. Numerical simulations of bird impact on the composite blades with different layers were carried out in ABAQUS/Explicit. The blade deformation process, bird flow state, and impact duration time of the experiments agree well with the numerical results. In the initial impact stage, the blade specimens have large deformations, and the deformation modes of the three carbon fiber blades with different layers are similar to each other. However, in the impact attenuation and constant flow stages, the deflection and fracture of different layers of carbon fiber blades are quite different. The damage mode of the 6-layer carbon fiber blade is complete fractures at the blade root and top, the damage mode of the 8-layer carbon fiber blade is root fracture, and there is no obvious macroscopic visible damage in the 10-layer carbon fiber blade. Under the gelatin projectile impact loading, the blade deformation mode is mainly coupled with the bending and torsional deformation process, and the bending deformation dominates the damage and failure process. Experimental results show that the damage pattern of carbon fiber blades is mainly classified as (1) edge damage at the root, (2) complete fracture at the root, and (3) complete fracture at the root and top edge. The impact resistance of carbon fiber is greatly influenced by the number of layers. The mechanism analysis of gelatin projectile impact on carbon fiber blades through experiments and numerical simulations can provide a reference for the engineering design and application of carbon fiber blades.
- carbon fiber blade,
- bird impact,
- gelatin projectiles,
- dynamic response,
- fracture damage

FullText(HTML)

References(24)

References

[1]	张海洋, 王相平, 杜少辉, 等. 航空发动机风扇叶片的抗鸟撞设计 [J]. 航空动力学报, 2020, 35(6): 1157–1168. DOI: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2020.06.005. ZHANG H Y, WANG X P, DU S H, et al. Design for anti-bird impact of aero-engine fan blade [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2020, 35(6): 1157–1168. DOI: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2020.06.005.
[2]	李玉龙, 石霄鹏. 民用飞机鸟撞研究现状 [J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(2): 189–198. LI Y L, SHI X P. Investigation of the present status of research on bird impacting on commercial airplanes [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 189–198.
[3]	LAVOIE M A, GAKWAYA A, ENSAN M N, et al. Bird’s substitute tests results and evaluation of available numerical methods [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2009, 36(10/11): 1276–1287. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.03.009.
[4]	LIU H B, LIU J, KABOGLU C, et al. The behaviour of fibre-reinforced composites subjected to a soft impact-loading: an experimental and numerical study [J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 111: 104448. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104448.
[5]	MEGUID S A, MAO R H, NG T Y. FE analysis of geometry effects of an artificial bird striking an aeroengine fanblade [J]. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2008, 35(6): 487–498. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.04.008.
[6]	李志强, 韩强, 杨建林, 等. 基于SPH方法的鸟撞飞机风挡的数值模拟 [J]. 华南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 37(12): 147–151. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-565X.2009.12.028. LI Z Q, HAN Q, YANG J L, et al. SPH-based numerical simulation of aircraft windshield under bird impact [J]. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2009, 37(12): 147–151. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-565X.2009.12.028.
[7]	SHMOTIN Y N, CHUPIN P V, GABOV D V, et al. Bird strike analysis of aircraft engine fan [C]//Proceedings of the 7th European LS-DYNA Conference. DYNAmore GmbH, 2009: 6.
[8]	AMOO L M. On the design and structural analysis of jet engine fan blade structures [J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2013, 60: 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.08.002.
[9]	TAHERI-BEHROOZ F, KASHANI A R S, HEFZABAD R N. Effects of material nonlinearity on load distribution in multi-bolt composite joints [J]. Composite Structures, 2015, 125: 195–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.047.
[10]	LIU L L, SHAO H Y, ZHU X Y, et al. Bird impact response and damage mechanism of 3D orthogonal woven composite aeroengine blades [J]. Composite Structures, 2023, 304: 116311. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116311.
[11]	LIU L L, LUO G, CHEN W, et al. Dynamic behavior and damage mechanism of 3D braided composite fan blade under bird impact [J]. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2018, 2018: 5906078. DOI: 10.1155/2018/5906078.
[12]	ZHOU Y D, SUN Y C, CAI W C. Bird-striking damage of rotating laminates using SPH-CDM method [J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2019, 84: 265–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.10.009.
[13]	于永强, 李成, 铁瑛. 基于SPH方法的鸟撞复合材料层合板数值分析 [J]. 玻璃钢/复合材料, 2017(5): 48–52. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0999.2017.05.008. YU Y Q, LI C, TIE Y. SPH-based numercial simulation of composite material under bird impact [J]. Composites Science and Engineering, 2017(5): 48–52. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0999.2017.05.008.
[14]	郝红勋, 李长季. 航空发动机风扇叶片结构损伤识别研究 [J]. 中国民航大学学报, 2009, 27(6): 17–20. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5590.2009.06.005. HAO H X, LI C J. Research of fan blade of aero-engine damage identification in structures [J]. Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 2009, 27(6): 17–20. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5590.2009.06.005.
[15]	梁智洪, 詹超, 张芝芳. 基于频率识别纤维增强树脂复合材料加筋板的分层损伤 [J]. 复合材料学报, 2019, 36(11): 2614–2627. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20190305.004. LIANG Z H, ZHAN C, ZHANG Z F. Frequency-based delamination detection in stiffened fiber reinforced polymer composite plates [J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2019, 36(11): 2614–2627. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20190305.004.
[16]	HOU J P, RUI Z C. Measurement of the properties of woven CFRP T300/914 at different strain rates [J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2000, 60(15): 2829–2834. DOI: 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00151-2.
[17]	柴象海, 侯亮, 王志强, 等. 航空发动机宽弦风扇叶片鸟撞损伤模型标定 [J]. 航空动力学报, 2016, 31(5): 1032–1038. DOI: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2016.05.002. CHAI X H, HOU L, WANG Z Q, et al. Bird strike model calibration for an aero engine wide-chord fan blade [J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2016, 31(5): 1032–1038. DOI: 10.13224/j.cnki.jasp.2016.05.002.
[18]	TU H, FUNG T C, DEL LINZ P, et al. Projectile impact-induced spalling damage on carbon fiber reinforced polymer strengthened RC plates [J]. Composite Structures, 2023, 319: 117129. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117129.
[19]	HORSLEY J. The Rolls-Royce way of validating fan integrity: AIAA 93-2602 [R]. AIAA, 1993.
[20]	谭焕成, 许善迎, 黄雄, 等. 三维四向编织复合材料宏观有限元模型冲击损伤仿真及试验验证 [J]. 复合材料学报, 2018, 35(5): 1139–1148. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20170821.002. TAN H C, XU S Y, HUANG X, et al. Macro-scale finite element model for impact damage simulation and experimental verification of three-dimensional four-directional braided composites [J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2018, 35(5): 1139–1148. DOI: 10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20170821.002.
[21]	HASHIN Z. Fatigue failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites [J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1981, 48(4): 846–852. DOI: 10.1115/1.3157744.
[22]	马小敏. 强动载荷下纤维-金属层合板及其增强梯度夹芯结构的力学行为 [D]. 太原: 太原理工大学, 2019. MA X M. The mechanical behavior of fiber-metal laminates and the reinforced gradient sandwich panels under intensive loading [D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2019.
[23]	SMOJVER I, IVANČEVIĆ D. Bird strike damage analysis in aircraft structures using Abaqus/Explicit and coupled Eulerian Lagrangian approach [J]. Composites Science and Technology, 2011, 71(4): 489–498. DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.12.024.
[24]	BARBER J P, TAYLOR H R, WILBECK J S. Bird impact forces and pressures on rigid and compliant targets: ADA061313 [R]. Dayton: University of Dayton Research Institute, 1978.

Relative Articles

[1]	HUANG Zixuan, ZHANG Xinchun, GU Lirong, AN Liqiang, RAO Lixiang, ZHANG Weiqi. Dynamic response prediction of cylindrical lithium-ion batteries under impact loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2025, 45(2): 021443. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0188
[2]	ZHAO Weicheng, ZHAI Hongbo, MAO Boyong, YANG Feng. Dynamic response of a metal target plate to simultaneous initiation of two charges[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(12): 122201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0153
[3]	ZOU Guangping, LIANG Zheng, WU Songyang, CHANG Zhongliang. Numerical analysis of dynamic response of ceramic particle reinforced polyurethane composites under explosive loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(7): 073104. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0254
[4]	WEI Jianhui, LI Xu, HUANG Wei, XU Hongjian, FANG Bopeng. Dynamic response and failure of sandwich beams with graded metal foam core under high-velocity impact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(5): 053301. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0156
[5]	HU Chaolei, SUN Hailiang, WANG Zhipeng, BAO Zhaopeng, CUI Tianning, QIN Qinghua. Dynamic response and mechanism of mitigation and energy absorption of sandwich beams with a mechanical metamaterial core of negative Poisson’s ratio subjected to high-velocity impact of granular slug[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(12): 123101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2022-0045
[6]	ZHANG Pengzhou, DONG Qi, YANG Sha. Influence of blast loading parameters on elastic dynamic response of an infinite-length cylindrical shell[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(6): 063101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0269
[7]	ZHU Ling, GUO Kailing, YU Tongxi, LI Yinggang. Dynamic responses of metal foam sandwich beams to repeated impacts[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(7): 073101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0198
[8]	JIANG Zhaoxiu, GAO Guangfa, WANG Yonggang. Discrete element simulation on dynamic response and damage evolution in porous ferroelectric ceramics under shock compression[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(5): 053103. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0410
[9]	ZHAO Wuchao, QIAN Jiang, ZHANG Wenna. Performance and damage evaluation of RC beams under impact loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(1): 015102. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0288
[10]	ZHANG Peiwen, LI Shiqiang, WANG Zhihua, ZHAO Longmao. Dynamic response of sandwich beam with foldable core under blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(1): 140-147. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2017-0017
[11]	Ye Nan, Zhang Wei, Huang Wei, Li Dacheng, Gao Yubo, Xie Wenbo. Dynamic response and failure mode of PVC sandwich plates subjected to impact loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(1): 37-45. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)01-0037-09
[12]	Zhang Boyi, Zhao Wei, Wang Li, Wang Wei, Wu Gaohui, Zhang Qiang. Dynamic response of aluminum matrix syntactic foams sandwich panel subjected to foamed aluminum projectile impact loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(4): 600-610. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0600-11
[13]	Ma Xiaomin, Li Shiqiang, Li Xin, Wang Zhihua, Wu Guiying. Dynamic response of woven Kevlar/Epoxy composite laminatesunder impact loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(2): 170-176. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)02-0170-07
[14]	Cui Yun-xiao, Hu Yong-le, Wang Chun-ming, Hu Hao, Chen Peng-wan. Dynamic response of multi-layer steel cylinder under internal intense blast loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 820-824. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0820-05
[15]	HouJun-liang, JiangJian-wei, MenJian-bing, WangShu-you. Dynamicresponseofthinplatewithholesunderblastloading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(6): 662-666. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)06-0662-05
[16]	Wang Shi-ping, Guo Jun, Zhang Zhong-yu, Chen Hai-long, Sun Feng. Dynamic response of a cylindrical shell under bubble jet loading[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(4): 337-343. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)04-0337-07
[17]	CAO Yuan, JIN Xian-long, LI Zheng. Dynamicanalysisofflexiblecontainersunderimpact[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2011, 31(5): 469-474. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2011)05-0469-06
[18]	QIN Jian, ZHANG Zhen-hua. Ascalingmethodforpredictingdynamicresponsesofstiffenedplates madeofmaterialsdifferentfromexperimentalmodels[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(5): 511-516. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)05-0511-06
[19]	CHENG Su-qiu, FAN Bao-shun, XUE Fei, WANG Wei. Dynamical response measurement of a cabin model subjected to noncontact underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2008, 28(4): 360-366. doi: 10.1188/1001-1455(2008)04-0360-07
[20]	ZHANG Zhen-hua, WANG Cheng, HUANG Yu-ying, ZHU Xi, LI Zhen-huan. Experiment research of the dynamic response of fluid cabin in the bottom of warship subjected to underwater explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2007, 27(5): 431-437. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2007)05-0431-07