Numerical simulation on gas dispersions and vapor cloud explosions induced by gas released from an ethylene storage tank

WANG Qiuhong; SUN Yilin; LI Xin; JIANG Juncheng; ZHANG Mingguang; WANG Liubing

doi:10.11883/bzycj-2020-0202

Volume 40 Issue 12

Dec. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Article Navigation > Explosion And Shock Waves > 2020 > 40(12): 125401

WANG Qiuhong, SUN Yilin, LI Xin, JIANG Juncheng, ZHANG Mingguang, WANG Liubing. Numerical simulation on gas dispersions and vapor cloud explosions induced by gas released from an ethylene storage tank[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(12): 125401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0202

Citation:

WANG Qiuhong, SUN Yilin, LI Xin, JIANG Juncheng, ZHANG Mingguang, WANG Liubing. Numerical simulation on gas dispersions and vapor cloud explosions induced by gas released from an ethylene storage tank[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(12): 125401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0202

Citation:

WANG Qiuhong, SUN Yilin, LI Xin, JIANG Juncheng, ZHANG Mingguang, WANG Liubing. Numerical simulation on gas dispersions and vapor cloud explosions induced by gas released from an ethylene storage tank[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(12): 125401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0202

PDF( 10156 KB)

Numerical simulation on gas dispersions and vapor cloud explosions induced by gas released from an ethylene storage tank

doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2020-0202

1.
College of Safety Science and Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi, China
2.
College of Safety Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China
3.
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Hazardous Chemicals Safety and Control, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, China

Received Date: 2020-01-14
Rev Recd Date: 2020-09-11
Publish Date: 2020-12-05

Abstract

Abstract

Storage tanks may leak due to corrosion or human error, resulting in released gas dispersion and vapor cloud explosion accidents. The computational fluid dynamics software FLACS was employed to reveal the development processes of explosion accidents and estimate their influences on the environment, focusing on the effect of the leakage and environmental wind as two dominant factors on the ethylene gas dispersion and gas explosion. The results show that gas cloud dispersion distance and gas cloud volume increase with the increasing leak rate. When the leak rate is less than 6 kg/s, the gas cloud dispersion distance and gas cloud volume are similar in different leak directions. When the leak rate is greater than 6 kg/s, the dispersion of released gas and formation of gas cloud are influenced by the obstacles. The gas cloud dispersion distance decreases and the gas cloud volume increases as the blockage rate of the geometric obstacles increases. When the leak direction is perpendicular to the central axis of the storage tank group and the leak rate is 18 kg/s, the gas cloud attains its maximum dispersion distance of 81.5 m. When the leak direction is parallel to the central axis of the storage tank group and the leak rate is 24 kg/s, the gas cloud reaches its maximum volume of 9 604 m³. The impact pressure of the explosion wave increases with the increase in the leak rate. Under the influence of the environmental wind, the dilution of combustible gas is prominently accelerated and the combustible gas cloud volume is substantially lessened. Meanwhile, the probability of ignition of gas clouds and the intensity of the vapor cloud explosion are effectively reduced. Moreover, the time corresponding to achieve the peak explosion pressure is earlier and the decrease of the temperature is quicker than their counterparts under the condition without the environmental wind. When the leak rate is 24 kg/s, the explosion overpressure around the leakage location on the surface of the tank is only 6.88 kPa, but the temperature is 2 384 K. Therefore, when the explosion accident occurs, cooling the storage tanks is crucial in rescue in order to avoid the secondary disaster.
- FLACS,
- leakage and dispersion,
- gas cloud explosion,
- explosion pressure,
- explosion temperature

FullText(HTML)

References(31)

References

[1]	CHANG J I, LIN C C. A study of storage tank accidents [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2006, 19(1): 51–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.05.015.
[2]	LIAW H J. Lessons in process safety management learned in the Kaohsiung gas explosion accident in Taiwan [J]. Process Safety Progress, 2016, 35(3): 228–232. DOI: 10.1002/prs.11818.
[3]	朱红亚, 陈昊东, 王青松, 等. 多源重气泄漏扩散模拟研究 [J]. 中国科学技术大学学报, 2014, 44(8): 697–703. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2014.08.010. ZHU H Y, CHEN H D, WANG Q S, et al. Simulation research on leakage and dispersion of multi-source heavy gas [J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology of China, 2014, 44(8): 697–703. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2778.2014.08.010.
[4]	李萍, 丁珏, 翁培奋. 两种颗粒湍流扩散模型数值模拟气液两相流泄漏扩散的比较 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2005, 25(6): 541–546. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)06-0541-06. LI P, DING J, WENG P F. A numerical simulation on liquid gas two phase leakage dispersion by using two particle turbulent models [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2005, 25(6): 541–546. DOI: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)06-0541-06.
[5]	邓小娇, 姚安林, 徐涛龙, 等. 城市综合管廊燃气舱室输气管道泄漏扩散规律研究 [J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2019, 15(11): 83–89. DOI: 10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.11.013. DENG X J, YAO A L, XU T L, et al. Study on leakage and diffusion laws of gas pipeline in gas cabin of urban utility tunnel [J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2019, 15(11): 83–89. DOI: 10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2019.11.013.
[6]	LI X H, CHEN G M, ZHANG R R, et al. Simulation and assessment of underwater gas release and dispersion from subsea gas pipelines leak [J]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2018, 119: 46–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.07.015.
[7]	任少云. 开敞空间液化天然气泄漏低温扩散及爆炸传播规律 [J]. 爆炸与冲击, 2018, 38(4): 891–897. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0323. REN S Y. The leakage, low temperature diffusion and explosion of liquefied natural gas in open space [J]. Explosion and Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 891–897. DOI: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0323.
[8]	LOVREGLIO R, RONCHI E, MARAGKOS G, et al. A dynamic approach for the impact of a toxic gas dispersion hazard considering human behaviour and dispersion modelling [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2016, 318: 758–771. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.06.015.
[9]	黄有波, 董炳燕, 吕淑然, 等. 天然气管道泄漏孔形状对喷射火影响模拟研究 [J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2015, 25(7): 62–67. DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2015.07.010. HUANG Y B, DONG B Y, LYU S R, et al. Simulation study on influence of natural gas pipeline leak hole shape on jet fire [J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2015, 25(7): 62–67. DOI: 10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2015.07.010.
[10]	GEXCON A S. FLACS V10.9 user’s manual [M]. Norway: Gexcon, 2019.
[11]	MIDDHA P, ICHARD M, ARNTZEN B J. Validation of CFD modelling of LH₂ spread and evaporation against large-scale spill experiments [J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(3): 2620–2627. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.122.
[12]	MIDDHA P, HANSEN O R. Using computational fluid dynamics as a tool for hydrogen safety studies [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(3): 295–302. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2008.10.006.
[13]	MIDDHA P, HANSEN O R, STORVIK I E. Validation of CFD-model for hydrogen dispersion [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2009, 22(6): 1034–1038. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.07.020.
[14]	HANSEN O R, GAVELLI F, ICHARD M, et al. Validation of FLACS against experimental data sets from the model evaluation database for LNG vapor dispersion [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2010, 23(6): 857–877. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.08.005.
[15]	SCHLEDER A M, MARTINS M R. Experimental data and CFD performance for CO₂ cloud dispersion analysis [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 43: 688–699. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.03.027.
[16]	FIATES J, SANTOS R R C, NETO F F, et al. An alternative CFD tool for gas dispersion modelling of heavy gas [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 44: 583–593. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.08.002.
[17]	WANG Q, SUN Y, LI X, et al. Process of natural gas explosion in linked vessels with three structures obtained using numerical simulation [J]. Processes, 2020, 8(1): 52. DOI: 10.3390/pr8010052.
[18]	文虎, 高慧慧, 王秋红, 等. 泄爆口强度对管内天然气爆炸流场的影响仿真 [J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(8): 126–136. DOI: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2019.08.016. WEN H, GAO H H, WANG Q H, et al. A simulation study on the influence of vent port strength on the natural gas explosion flow field in line pipes [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(8): 126–136. DOI: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2019.08.016.
[19]	LI J D, MA G W, ABDEL-JAWAD M, et al. Gas dispersion risk analysis of safety gap effect on the innovating FLNG vessel with a cylindrical platform [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 40: 304–316. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.01.005.
[20]	LI J, MA G, HAO H, et al. Gas explosion analysis of safety gap effect on the innovating FLNG vessel with a cylindrical platform [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 44: 263–274. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.09.019.
[21]	LI J, MA G, HAO H, et al. Optimal blast wall layout design to mitigate gas dispersion and explosion on a cylindrical FLNG platform [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2017, 49: 481–492. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.05.025.
[22]	HUANG Y, MA G, LI J. Multi-level explosion risk analysis (MLERA) for accidental gas explosion events in super-large FLNG facilities [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2017, 45: 242–254. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2016.11.004.
[23]	王志寰, 李成兵, 周宁. 大型LNG接收站泄漏事故灾害效应分析与预测 [J]. 天然气工业, 2019, 39(5): 145–153. DOI: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2019.05.018. WANG Z H, LI C B, ZHOU N. Analysis and prediction on the disaster effect of leakage accidents at large LNG receiving stations [J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39(5): 145–153. DOI: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2019.05.018.
[24]	BJEKETVEDT D, BAKKE J R, Van WINGERDEN K. Gas explosion handbook [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1997, 52(1): 1–150. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3894(97)81620-2.
[25]	杨国刚, 丁信伟, 毕明树, 等. 燃料浓度对可燃气云爆炸影响的实验研究与数值模拟 [J]. 石油学报(石油加工), 2004, 20(5): 53–58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2004.05.010. YANG G G, DING X W, BI M S, et al. Experimental and simulation study of the effect of fuel concentration on flammable vapor cloud explosion [J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 2004, 20(5): 53–58. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2004.05.010.
[26]	ZHANG S H, ZHANG Q. Influence of geometrical shapes on unconfined vapor cloud explosion [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2018, 52: 29–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.01.004.
[27]	HANSEN O R, GAVELLI F, DAVIS S G, et al. Equivalent cloud methods used for explosion risk and consequence studies [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(3): 511–527. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2012.07.006.
[28]	李炜, 槐文信. 浮力射流的理论及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1997.
[29]	ATKINSON G, COWPE E, HALLIDAY J, et al. A review of very large vapour cloud explosions: cloud formation and explosion severity [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2017, 48: 367–375. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.03.021.
[30]	LV D, TAN W, LIU L Y, et al. Research on maximum explosion overpressure in LNG storage tank areas [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2017, 49: 162–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.06.010.
[31]	MA G W, LI J D, ABDEL-JAWAD M. Accuracy improvement in evaluation of gas explosion overpressures in congestions with safety gaps [J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2014, 32: 358–366. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.10.007.

Relative Articles

[1]	ZHAO Jiangping, ZHANG Shuqi, ZHONG Xingrun, YU Kainan. Explosion characteristics of additive manufacturing aluminum and aluminum-silicon alloy powders[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2024-0093
[2]	GUO Hongzhan, ZHANG Yan, WANG Xiaorong. Explosion pressure characteristics of hydrogen-methane-ethanol mixtures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2023, 43(12): 125403. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2023-0224
[3]	CHENG Fangming, NAN Fan, XIAO Yang, LUO Zhenmin, NIU Qiaoxia. Experimental study on the suppression of methane-air explosion by CF₃I and CO₂[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2022, 42(6): 065402. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2021-0386
[4]	YE Zhiwei, CHEN Ming, LI Tong, LU Wenbo, YAN Peng. A calculation method of the peak pressure on borehole wall for low decoupling coefficient charge blasting[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2021, 41(6): 064901. doi: 10.11883/bzcyj-2020-0185
[5]	JIA Hailin, XIANG Haijun, LI Dihui, ZHAI Rupeng. Suppression of explosion in pipelines with different blocking ratios by ultrafine water mist containing sodium chloride[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(4): 042201. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0268
[6]	LI Xiaobin, ZHANG Ruijie, CUI Liwei, ZHANG Qingli. Coupling analysis of explosion pressure and free radical change during methane explosion inhibited by urea[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2020, 40(3): 032101. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0090
[7]	YU Minggao, WEI Beibei, ZHENG Kai. Effect of inert gas addition on syngas explosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2019, 39(6): 065401. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2018-0131
[8]	REN Shaoyun. The leakage, low temperature diffusion and explosion of liquefied natural gas in open space[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(4): 891-897. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0323
[9]	WEN Hu, YANG Yufeng, WANG Qiuhong, REN Xugang. Experimental study on micron-sized aluminum dust explosion in a rectangular pipe[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2018, 38(5): 993-998. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2016-0003
[10]	Sun Shaochen, Bi Mingshu, Ding Chunhui, Hu Xiyu, Liu Gang, Feng Yu. Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of flame propagation and quenching process in the in-line crimped-ribbon flame arrester[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(2): 353-364. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)02-0353-12
[11]	Deng Jun, Ren Xugang, Wang Qiuhong, Yang Yufeng. Explosion characteristics of zirconium dust cloud[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2017, 37(3): 496-501. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2017)03-0496-06
[12]	Gao Na, Zhang Yansong, Hu Yiting. Experimental study on gas explosion hazard under different temperatures and pressures[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2016, 36(2): 218-223. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2016)02-0218-06
[13]	Luo Zhen-min, Wang Tao, Cheng Fang-ming, Song Yu, Wu Kang. Experimental and numerical studies on the suppression of methane explosion using CO₂ in a mini vessel[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(3): 393-400. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455-(2015)03-0393-08
[14]	Li Run-zhi, Si Rong-jun. Simulation study of flow field characteristics of gas explosion in low temperature environment[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2015, 35(6): 901-906. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2015)06-0901-06
[15]	Li Run-zhi, Huang Zi-chao, Si Rong-jun. Influence of environmental temperature on gas explosion pressure and its rise rate[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2013, 33(4): 415-419. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2013)04-0415-05
[16]	AI Zhi-jiu, WU Guang-wu, WANG Qi-hua, LEI Wen-zhang, CHEN Gao-song. Three-dimensionalnumericalsimulationofgascloudexplosion inducedbywellblowout[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(1): 96-100. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)01-0096-05
[17]	LI Run-zhi. Numericalsimulationofcoaldustexplosioninducedbygasexplosion[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2010, 30(5): 529-534. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2010)05-0529-06
[18]	JIN Ri-ya, HU Shuang-qi, BO Tao, ZHANG Ying-hao, YUAN Hong-su. Relation between explosion pressure and volume fraction of ClO2 gas[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2009, 29(3): 333-336. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2009)03-0333-04
[19]	LI Ping, DING Jue, WENG Pei-fen. A numerical simulation on liquid-gas two phase leakage dispersion by using two particle turbulent models[J]. Explosion And Shock Waves, 2005, 25(6): 541-546. doi: 10.11883/1001-1455(2005)06-0541-06

Supplements(0)

Cited By

Cited by

Periodical cited type(9)

1.	杨鹏，刁旭，高康，窦站. 危险化学品运输车辆停车场火灾爆炸事故分析. 化工安全与环境. 2025(02): 18-23+29 .
2.	周楠，程桂敏，潘炎辉，李红宇，谢永迅，张金鹏. 民居内燃气泄漏爆炸特性及其数值仿真研究进展. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2023(02): 159-166 .
3.	张智琛，朱云峰，成卫戍，马守涛，姜杰，孙冰，周子辰，徐伟. 高压聚乙烯失控分解研究进展：反应机理、引发体系与模型. 化工进展. 2023(08): 3979-3989 .
4.	王有智，吴明，杜金，宫克. 基于FLACS的食堂天然气泄漏爆炸事故后果模拟. 辽宁石油化工大学学报. 2022(01): 35-40 .
5.	李佳航，杨国梁，多英全，吴宗之. 基于FLACS的海上钻探平台井喷爆炸事故后果模拟分析. 中国安全生产科学技术. 2022(06): 155-161 .
6.	杨肇琰，申莹，杨中，杨立辉. 液态乙烷子母罐工程设计要点. 新疆石油天然气. 2022(03): 92-96 .
7.	高江波，张展，姚爽. 化工企业安全评价方法研究综述. 化学工业. 2021(03): 91-96 .
8.	王秋红，王力文，蒋军成，张明广，李鑫. 城镇地埋天然气管道泄漏诱发气云爆炸仿真. 中国安全科学学报. 2021(09): 75-82 .
9.	芦烨，丁宇奇，王学勇，赵砚锋，卢宏，谢清，叶碧涛. 考虑温压载荷耦合作用的储罐内爆破坏与辐射区域. 化工机械. 2021(06): 839-846+867 .